Interesting article about modelling of bike network flows using Winnipeg as a Case Study
Hi,
I stumbled across this paper while researching prioritization of bicycle network segments, and thought I'd pass it along. It's not like there are a lot of papers based on Winnipeg's bike network, so this piqued my interest. I'm really not sure what the connection to Winnipeg is, as there doesn't seem to even be a Canadian University attached to the paper, let alone a Winnipeg institution.
Considering Space Syntax in Bicycle Traffic Assignment with One or More User Classes file:///C:/Users/MCohoe/AppData/Local/Temp/sustainability-13-11078-v3.pdf
The paper discusses a model that was created to estimate bike flows in Winnipeg and compare different ways of estimating the route choice of people on bike. They use shortest path, what they term "route cognition", and Bicycle Level of Service as criteria to assign trips from an origin destination model.
I'm not sure how the origin-destination trip tables were attained; maybe through the WATS study, but maybe generated through Space Syntax methodology. The latter seems lilley as I gather that Space Syntax involves dividing the city into smaller zones that are understandable at a personal level. It seems similar to cycle zone analysis.
The "route cognition" criteria is new to me, but essentially seems to be related to how easy it is to understand a route. The more turns, the harder to understand, and the less attractive. It seems to come out of "Space Syntax", which is also new to me. I find it to be an interesting criteria.
For Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS), they seem to have calculated BLOS for every road segment and intersection based on methods from the Highway Traffic Manual (HTM).
Cheers, Mark Cohoe Executive Director Bike Winnipeg t: 204-894-6540 e: mark@bikewinnipeg.ca
Here’s a link to the paper if you have trouble accessing it. (PDF) Considering Space Syntax in Bicycle Traffic Assignment with One or More User Classes (researchgate.net)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355126398_Considering_Space_Syntax_in_Bicycle_Traffic_Assignment_with_One_or_More_User_Classes
For those curious, the company (INRO) that makes EMME transportation modelling software had access to information regarding Winnipeg’s network for several years, (I believe Winnipeg’s network is still used as a demo in EMME). The modelled network, plus data on bike use from Census data would allow the network to be studied as outlined in the paper.
David Patman P.Eng. (he/him) Manager - Transportation Public Works Transportation City of Winnipeg
T. 204-986-5895 M. 204-806-6471 E. dpatman@winnipeg.camailto:dpatman@winnipeg.ca
winnipeg.cahttps://winnipeg.ca/
From: at-network-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca at-network-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca On Behalf Of Mark Cohoe Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 12:17 PM To: AT network at-network@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [At-network] Interesting article about modelling of bike network flows using Winnipeg as a Case Study
** EXTERNAL EMAIL: USE CAUTION **
Hi,
I stumbled across this paper while researching prioritization of bicycle network segments, and thought I'd pass it along. It's not like there are a lot of papers based on Winnipeg's bike network, so this piqued my interest. I'm really not sure what the connection to Winnipeg is, as there doesn't seem to even be a Canadian University attached to the paper, let alone a Winnipeg institution.
Considering Space Syntax in Bicycle Traffic Assignment with One or More User Classesfile:///C:/Users/MCohoe/AppData/Local/Temp/sustainability-13-11078-v3.pdf
The paper discusses a model that was created to estimate bike flows in Winnipeg and compare different ways of estimating the route choice of people on bike. They use shortest path, what they term "route cognition", and Bicycle Level of Service as criteria to assign trips from an origin destination model.
I'm not sure how the origin-destination trip tables were attained; maybe through the WATS study, but maybe generated through Space Syntax methodology. The latter seems lilley as I gather that Space Syntax involves dividing the city into smaller zones that are understandable at a personal level. It seems similar to cycle zone analysis.
The "route cognition" criteria is new to me, but essentially seems to be related to how easy it is to understand a route. The more turns, the harder to understand, and the less attractive. It seems to come out of "Space Syntax", which is also new to me. I find it to be an interesting criteria.
For Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS), they seem to have calculated BLOS for every road segment and intersection based on methods from the Highway Traffic Manual (HTM).
Cheers, Mark Cohoe Executive Director Bike Winnipeg t: 204-894-6540 e: mark@bikewinnipeg.camailto:mark@bikewinnipeg.ca
Thanks David! That explains how Winnipeg managed to become a case study. You definitely don't see that too often.
Cheers, Mark
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:36 PM Patman, David DPatman@winnipeg.ca wrote:
Here’s a link to the paper if you have trouble accessing it.
(PDF) Considering Space Syntax in Bicycle Traffic Assignment with One or More User Classes (researchgate.net) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355126398_Considering_Space_Syntax_in_Bicycle_Traffic_Assignment_with_One_or_More_User_Classes
For those curious, the company (INRO) that makes EMME transportation modelling software had access to information regarding Winnipeg’s network for several years, (I believe Winnipeg’s network is still used as a demo in EMME). The modelled network, plus data on bike use from Census data would allow the network to be studied as outlined in the paper.
*David Patman P.Eng. (he/him)*
Manager - Transportation
*Public Works*
*Transportation*
City of Winnipeg
*T. *204-986-5895
*M. *204-806-6471
*E. *dpatman@winnipeg.ca
winnipeg.ca
*From:* at-network-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca < at-network-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> *On Behalf Of *Mark Cohoe *Sent:* Wednesday, December 29, 2021 12:17 PM *To:* AT network at-network@lists.umanitoba.ca *Subject:* [At-network] Interesting article about modelling of bike network flows using Winnipeg as a Case Study
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL: USE CAUTION ***
Hi,
I stumbled across this paper while researching prioritization of bicycle network segments, and thought I'd pass it along. It's not like there are a lot of papers based on Winnipeg's bike network, so this piqued my interest. I'm really not sure what the connection to Winnipeg is, as there doesn't seem to even be a Canadian University attached to the paper, let alone a Winnipeg institution.
Considering Space Syntax in Bicycle Traffic Assignment with One or More User Classes
The paper discusses a model that was created to estimate bike flows in Winnipeg and compare different ways of estimating the route choice of people on bike. They use shortest path, what they term "route cognition", and Bicycle Level of Service as criteria to assign trips from an origin destination model.
I'm not sure how the origin-destination trip tables were attained; maybe through the WATS study, but maybe generated through Space Syntax methodology. The latter seems lilley as I gather that Space Syntax involves dividing the city into smaller zones that are understandable at a personal level. It seems similar to cycle zone analysis.
The "route cognition" criteria is new to me, but essentially seems to be related to how easy it is to understand a route. The more turns, the harder to understand, and the less attractive. It seems to come out of "Space Syntax", which is also new to me. I find it to be an interesting criteria.
For Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS), they seem to have calculated BLOS for every road segment and intersection based on methods from the Highway Traffic Manual (HTM).
Cheers,
Mark Cohoe
Executive Director
Bike Winnipeg
t: 204-894-6540
e: mark@bikewinnipeg.ca
participants (2)
-
Mark Cohoe -
Patman, David