Hi AT folks
 
I must share this news with you - can barely type it out!
Pass this on to your members / friends / anyone interested in AT. 
 
 
Tonight I attended the CAA election forum on infrastructure, consumer and safety issues at the Free Press News Cafe.  (photo attached)
http://www.caamanitoba.com/eblasts/elections2011/2011.09.02-PGA-0018_ElectionEblast.html
- Dan Lett Free Press columnist moderated.
- A lot of heavy weights were there asking questions - CAA President, MPI Insurance, AMM President, and others.
- Jeremy Hull from Bike to the Future also attended and asked a question on education / road safety.
 
As a CAA member and WTA representative - I was able to ask a question of the three candidates - Goertzen, Mackintosh and Stewart. 
Fortunately Mackintosh - through previous questions from the audience - spoke multiple times of  how the NDP were 4 years into an unprecedented $4B roadways investment and how CentrePort investment was going to be the 'jewel' of Canada from a transportation perspective - thus setting the stage for my question/s.
 
I spoke as a 'vulnerable road user' (explaining the MPI term), articulating that we too pay taxes to use roads - spoke of current situation:
- as these billions of roadways money were being spend - the complete lack of an AT policy meant there was no lens of active transportation being use to consider AT opportunities
- not one single person in gov't solely dedicated to AT
- simply no mechanism to gather public input on AT issues
 
Then highlighted the Greater Strides report with 25 recommendations  - a PLAN - which was released in a ditch in Southdale this June - and 500 printed copies were sitting in a closet in gov't offices and were not being distributed for purely political reasons (and gave them each a copy) -  and asked the QUESTION:
 
Within one year of becoming elected - would your government commit to:
  1. developing a Provincial active transportation policy
  2. dedicate full time resources to oversee implementation of policy, education and AT planning
  3. ensure formation of an avenue to gather public input / advice?
I did not highlight these are the three actions that are resulting in the City being so successful in moving AT forward - there is always a friction between the two levels of gov't.
 
Each one of them, said yes
- and as the first one started to ramble an answer ( I believe it was Mackintosh)
I interrupted  - articulating the question to get a black and white answer vs jargon -
Dan Lett jumped in,  drilled them a bit more on it -  and YES - they all clearly said these were significant points in light of the increase in public's engagement of active transportation AND they would commit to these actions.
 
POST FORUM
I went up to each one of them to AGAIN confirm - and yes -
Goertsen said it was in the PC health announcement from today - and exact details would be forthcoming soon
Mackintosh said yes - for sure - but wasn't sure how the public input aspect would look exactly
I thanked Stewart for being involved in tonight's event. 
 
 
VALUE OF AN ELECTION PROMISE:
In last Provincial election - NDP promised WTA $1.8 M
They delivered on every single penny (albeit with some heavy handed hounding)  -
WTA used the promise to leverage an additional $5M in trail funding from Feds / City and private for trails and trailheads. 
 
 
VALUE OF AN ELECTION PROMISE    . . .  x THREE:
can it get any better ?  the odds seem very good.  
 
 
Am now hoping we have a more 'official' AT announcement from each party - I expect it will occur.
If I can get recording in an an MPwhatever format - I will pass it on also. 
 
this is almost surreal.
Janice Lukes