WHEN it comes to moving around our cities, Canadians live in a world of rules — green lights, yellow lights, red lights, speed limits, crosswalks, countdowns, no parking, no stopping, no riding on the sidewalk.

All these rules are intended to order pedestrians, drivers and cyclists into individual corridors where each can move with blind obedience to lights and signs. They are designed to keep vehicles moving quickly, and naturally prioritize traffic flow for the largest, fastest and most dangerous road users.

Sometimes a street has a different purpose, a different story to tell. Some streets are more importantly a great place than a great connector. To be this, they must be designed first as somewhere to linger, not to move quickly through.

A street can be the social and economic heart of its community. Those with a strong sense of place can entice people to the sidewalks and public spaces, key to making urban neighbourhoods attractive places to live, work, shop and socialize. But when vehicle speed is prioritized, these streets feel less safe and become less attractive to sit near, live on or walk along. And as they attract fewer people, the businesses falter, the appeal to new residents decreases and the neighbourhood begins to decline.

About 30 years ago, a Dutch traffic engineer named Hans Monderman looked at the design of low-traffic streets and considered ways to prioritize all users equally, to make streets safe, vibrant and attractive places for people. His radical solution was to get rid of the rules completely, calling the idea a “shared street.”

Imagine sitting on a bench, enjoying a coffee, and the street in front of you looks more like a public plaza than a road. There are no curbs, and no sidewalks. Spaces are defined with trees, planters, benches and outdoor cafés. The paving pattern on the road surface appears as a single, beautiful piece of public art where parents pushing strollers, people riding bikes and even drivers in slow-moving cars mix seamlessly in a choreographed kaleidoscope of movement.

It sounds like a utopian fantasy that would in reality lead to carnage in the streets, like a scene from a Mad Max movie, but shared streets exist around the world. They are counterintuitive and initially almost always met with skepticism, but they often work.

In the absence of signage, lights and defined areas for each road user, people rely on social interaction to define their space. Instead of robotically following traffic signals, the natural uncertainty of the environment causes drivers to instinctively slow down (typically to 10 km/h) and become more engaged with other road users.

People stop looking at signs and begin looking at each other. A pedestrian makes eye contact with a driver — a nod to go ahead, a wave, and they each proceed. When done successfully, the street becomes a place where everyone is equal, creating a safe and welcoming environment that can transform the character of an entire neighbourhood.

Now imagine you are watching this scene in Winnipeg’s Exchange District. Coun. Vivian Santos is hoping this will become reality, recently bringing forward a motion which proposes a pilot project for a shared-streets concept on Bannatyne Avenue and Albert and Arthur streets, adjacent to Old Market Square. The motion was approved to proceed by a public works committee.

The idea came out of recent debate about the challenges of incorporating loading zones that are being displaced by bike lanes required to protect cyclists from higher-speed vehicle traffic. The shared-streets concept maintains vehicle access, allowing loading to occur for local businesses, and eliminates the need for bike lanes because of the inherent safety of reduced traffic speeds.

The proposal has these pragmatic roots, but it represents a much greater opportunity to introduce a new level of vibrancy to the Exchange District, helping to make it the destination and livable neighbourhood that it has the potential to be.

Cities across the world are embracing the idea of shared streets. Most began with similar pilot projects to familiarize people with the idea, and the concept is almost always embraced and expanded. Montreal has now implemented more than seven kilometres of shared and pedestrian streets, and offers financial grants to neighbourhoods wanting to create them across the city.

Halifax recently transformed two major downtown routes into shared streets, with great success, creating more people-focused spaces that support the vitality of downtown.

The notoriously car-centric city of Auckland, New Zealand, has used the shared-streets idea to transform its city centre into a vibrant, pedestrian- focused neighbourhood. A program was developed in 2011 to implement the strategy, and today seven downtown streets are shared space. The results have been overwhelmingly successful, increasing pedestrian volumes by 54 per cent and consumer spending by 47 per cent, and three-quarters of all property owners claim it has added value to their businesses.

The number of vehicles has fallen by 25 per cent, far fewer collisions have occurred and about 80 per cent of people surveyed say they feel safer in the area.

Winnipeggers are traditionally resistant to change, but the proposal to implement a shared streets pilot project in the Exchange District is an exciting opportunity to look at how we move through our city in a new way. Back-in diagonal parking was introduced a few years ago, to high levels of public skepticism, but after a pilot program, it has become a successful norm.

The physical character of the Exchange is similar to popular shared-street precedents in other cities, and represents an opportunity to create a new type of public space that makes streets safer while supporting businesses and residents. It is a progressive step forward in the goal of redefining our downtown as a vibrant and prosperous place for people.

Brent Bellamy is creative director at Number Ten Architectural Group.