Agreed. Great idea.SharonSharon ReillyOn Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 5:10 PM Paul Jenkins, <Paul.Jenkins@umanitoba.ca> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi Jim,
Myer Siemiatycki is Professor of Politics at Ryerson University, where he served as past Founding Director of the interdisciplinary MA Program in Immigration & Settlement.
Best,
Paul
Paul Jenkins, PhD
Instructor, Department of History, &
Program Developer/Coordinator & Assistant to the DirectorInstitute for the Humanities,
University of Manitoba
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Mochoruk, James <james.mochoruk@email.und.edu>
Sent: 11 April 2018 16:52:31
To: 1919 conference organizing committee
Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to ProposalsI vote yes to both. (also can you send me more detailed info on both Adrie and Siemiatycki at Ryerson for potential budgeting)
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Rhonda Hinther
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:39 PM
To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca>
Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Yes to both, I vote.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Julie Guard <Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca> wrote:Yes to a young workers panel. I agree the Adrie that it’s important – vital, in fact. Yes to accepting late proposals.
julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19 PM
To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca
Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor
Professor
Department of History
Brandon University
270 18th Street
Brandon, MB R7A 6A9
Canada
Office: 204 727 9664
Cell: 204 720 2117
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________
1919-Conference mailing list
1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca
http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list
1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca
http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________
1919-Conference mailing list
1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca
http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference