Greetings.

On 2026-09-01 14:45, Ori Amir wrote:
> Working on the diversity section. Do you believe it is best to use their
> suggested subsections? - in which case, we are weak on the third point,
> "diversifying participation" (which states: "providing mentoring,
> subsidies, coordinating with affinity groups, diversifying the selection
> of papers, and so
> on"). Or is it better to make it one long paragraph instead, like last
> time but extended?

Those aren't subsections in the template; they're just points that they
suggest we consider.  We don't need to address all of them, and don't
need to list them explicitly as in the template.  One or more unlabelled
paragraphs should be fine.  It's also fine if the paragraphs say nothing
about the "diversifying participation" point.

Regards,
Tristan

--
Dr. Tristan Miller, Assistant Professor
Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba
https://clam.cs.umanitoba.ca/ | Tel. +1 204 474 6792
_______________________________________________
CHum-organizers mailing list -- chum-organizers@lists.umanitoba.ca
To unsubscribe send an email to chum-organizers-leave@lists.umanitoba.ca