[EpiData-list] EPIDATA really appropriate??

epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca
Mon Sep 25 02:46:59 CDT 2006


Hi;
EpiData does just what EpiInfo 6 was doing, more easily (Windows interface), and with extended check capabilities.
It does include an export-to-stata function, that (as far as I used it, which is pretty much) works fine.
As far as I'm concerned (and given the constraints of dealing with field persons who are not computer specialists -I did the same as you with MSF for a long time-), the answer to your question is 'Yes'!
Best regards,
		
	______________________________________________ 
	Gilles DELMAS 
	Epidémiologiste
	Institut de Veille Sanitaire 
	Dept. Maladies Infectieuses, 
	Unité infections entériques, alimentaires et zoonoses 
	12 rue du Val d'Osne 94415 Saint-Maurice cedex - France 
	+ 33 1 41 79 67 27 
	g.delmas at invs.sante.fr 
	______________________________________________ 



-----Message d'origine-----
De : epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca] 
Envoyé : samedi 23 septembre 2006 15:38
À : epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca
Objet : [EpiData-list] EPIDATA really appropriate??

QUESTION: I may be addressing a biased audiance, but Id like some reassurance that EpiData is the best way to go for capturing questionnaire data, which will then be transferred to STATA. I had started an EpiInfo database but then realized that it does not support double data entry...or at least not very easily. 
 
Thanks!!
 
Todd
 
Technical Public Health Advisor, Epidemiologist

Technical Support Unit (STAO)
Médecins du Monde
62 rue Marcadet Paris-75018
Tel.: +33 (0)1 44 92 14 79
Fax: +33 (0)1 44 92 99 92
E-mail: todd.swarthout at medecinsdumonde.net
 



More information about the EpiData-list mailing list