SV: [EpiData-list] Parallels, Windows and Epidata Entry 3.1

epidata-list at epidata-list at
Thu Apr 4 07:09:59 CDT 2013

The advantage of Wineskin is that you can put Epidata and Analysis into the same place, so that epidata files are all in the one virtrual C: drive. I found that running epidata was simpler with Wineskin, once it was set up. But with either one, you can keep your data files wherever you want.


On 2013-04-04, at 2:32 AM, epidata-list at wrote:

> Dear Jamie, 
> thanks so much! I have read the wiki, and I wonder: It looks like Winebottler is a lot easier to handle than Wineskin - is there a downside to Winebottler compared to Wineskin? What is the difference?
> Sincerely
> Stine

More information about the EpiData-list mailing list