[EpiData-list] Access violation when comparing duplicate files
EpiData development and support
epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca
Thu Jul 9 03:28:24 CDT 2015
Thank you for your reply
1. I use version 18.104.22.168 for Mac
Program Version: 22.214.171.124 r1156
Core version: 126.96.36.199 r1161
FPC Version: 2.6.4
2. Both dataforms have the same identical 10 sections. I have created 1 dataform with 10 sections and let 2 people insert data parallel.
3. I haven’t defined any key, but I have defined an ID as a variable for each subject. However, it is not used for coupling the two files.
This is what I did:
Document -> Compare duplicate files -> (the new window pops up) -> Click on “Compare” -> Click on “Add files” -> select those 2 files -> select the sections I would like to compare
Thank you so much.
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 12:20:51 +0200
> From: EpiData development and support
> <epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca>
> To: EpiData development and support <epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca>
> Subject: Re: [EpiData-list] Access violation when comparing duplicate
> Message-ID: <88C2E6EF-3317-4256-81A5-212A9B9228BF at epidata.dk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Please inform us of:
> 1 the version of manager You are using.
> 2 are you working with sections on one dataform or a related system with fields and sections on all dataforms
> 3 have you defined a key, and if so is that used for coupling of the two project files?
> You get the version from the help menu "copy version "
> /Jens Lauritsen, Epidata association.
> On 8. jul. 2015 12.09.45 CEST, EpiData development and support <epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I am trying to compare the duplicate files. I did it for each section.
>> In some sections with small number of fields and just integer, the
>> comparison goes well. But in other sections with larger number of
>> fields, the program always shows the message ?Access violation? and ask
>> whether I will ignore it and continue and kill the program.
>> I always choose to ignore and the program seems to work on something.
>> But nothing has really happened.
>> Should I just wait, because the program is still working? Or should I
>> fix something in the entries?
>> I would be very grateful if someone could suggest me what to do.
>> Kind regards,
>> EpiData-list mailing list
>> EpiData-list at lists.umanitoba.ca
> EpiData-list at lists.umanitoba.ca
> End of EpiData-list Digest, Vol 140, Issue 4
More information about the EpiData-list