Dear Jan and all Listers,
I am sorry for not providing detailed information earlier.
Well, I am using EpiData 3.1, and extract of the check file is provided at the end.
I wished to do data validation using the Double Entry Verification mode, but when I used an automatically generated unique identifier for the records using three fields(district,school and student) it could not prompt for correction even when there was discordance.
The key-field I selected *to prepare for double entry verification* was '* UNIQUE*'. However, when I selected key-field as '*STUDENT*' there was prompting for discordance. And yet student number alone may not uniquely identify records in the data set.
What is the solution?
DISTRICT COMMENT LEGAL USE label_district MUSTENTER REPEAT TYPE COMMENT END
SCHOOL MUSTENTER REPEAT END
SCHNAME MUSTENTER REPEAT END
STUDENT RANGE 1 100 MUSTENTER AFTER ENTRY UNIQUE=DISTRICT+"-"+SCHOOL+"-"+STUDENT END END
UNIQUE KEY UNIQUE NOENTER TYPE STATUSBAR "DIST-SCH-STD=" GREEN END
GENDER LEGAL 1 2 END COMMENT LEGAL USE label_gender SHOW MUSTENTER TYPE COMMENT END
AGE RANGE 10 50 MUSTENTER END
M1 LEGAL 0 1 END MUSTENTER END
M2 LEGAL 0 1 END MUSTENTER END
Kizito.
On 19 September 2013 20:00, epidata-list-request@lists.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Send EpiData-list mailing list submissions to epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to epidata-list-request@lists.umanitoba.ca
You can reach the person managing the list at epidata-list-owner@lists.umanitoba.ca
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of EpiData-list digest..."
EpiData-list mailing list ___________________________________
Today's Topics:
- Re: Automatic Unique Identifier and Double Entry Verification Mode (epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca)
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:11:54 +0200 From: epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [EpiData-list] Automatic Unique Identifier and Double Entry Verification Mode To: epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca Message-ID: 5239ECEA.1050109@tbrieder.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Dear Kizito:
It is a good rule to provide complete information before requesting assistance. Your message is non-informative about the software
Does your question concern:
- EpiData Entry 3.1?
- EpiData Manager, and if so which version?
- If you use EpiData Entry 3.1, could you show the part of the check
file that controls the field?
Without this information, one cannot answer.
Hans
On 18-Sep-13 11:19, epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Dear Listers,
sorry I am asking this again, since I received no help yet.
I wanted to do data validation using the Double Entry Verification mode, but when I used an automatically generated unique identifier for the records using three field it could not prompt for correction even when there was discordance.
What is the solution?
Kizito
-- Hans L Rieder, MD, MPH Jetzikofenstr 12 3038 Kirchlindach Switzerland
Tel: +41 31 829 4577 Mob: +41 79 321 9122 Web: http://www.tbrieder.org
EpiData-list@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list
End of EpiData-list Digest, Vol 119, Issue 12