4 Apr
2013
4 Apr
'13
7:09 a.m.
The advantage of Wineskin is that you can put Epidata and Analysis into the same place, so that epidata files are all in the one virtrual C: drive. I found that running epidata was simpler with Wineskin, once it was set up. But with either one, you can keep your data files wherever you want.
Jamie
On 2013-04-04, at 2:32 AM, epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Dear Jamie, thanks so much! I have read the wiki, and I wonder: It looks like Winebottler is a lot easier to handle than Wineskin - is there a downside to Winebottler compared to Wineskin? What is the difference?
Sincerely Stine