Re: EpiData-list Digest, Vol 77, Issue 12
Dear Hans,
Thank you for asking; indeed the idno is key unique 1 in file.rec1 and key unique 2 in file.rec2 and file.rec 3.
I have tested the files using different computers (at least 3) they all work fine (sorry for not stating this in my previous request). However, the error occurs and continues to occur when I use my lap top (Vista) and yet this is my main tool to design the entire database.
Clearly, the error may not be associated with EpiData; but something to do with my laptop (with Vista, in particular). Are there any solutions or just ignore it?
Kind regards
Tieble
On 21 March 2010 17:00, epidata-list-request@lists.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Send EpiData-list mailing list submissions to epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to epidata-list-request@lists.umanitoba.ca
You can reach the person managing the list at epidata-list-owner@lists.umanitoba.ca
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of EpiData-list digest..."
EpiData-list mailing list ___________________________________
Today's Topics:
- Re: "Cannot apply opGT to missing operands" (epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca)
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:26:16 +0100 From: epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [EpiData-list] "Cannot apply opGT to missing operands" To: epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca Message-ID: 4BA52F68.6030302@tbrieder.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Dear Tieble:
Just to get it out of the way (apologies if it is too trivial a question): is your idno KEY UNIQUE in file1.rec and KEY in file2.rec? I am asking because I simulated it and get no error message.
Hans
On 20:59, epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Is there a possible solution to avoid the error message "Error in IF expression; Cannot apply opGT to missing operands" during data entry under the check commands below? NB: (values and labels 0=No; 1=Yes) for varsv1
varsv1 COMMENT LEGAL USE label_varsv1 MUSTENTER TYPE COMMENT AFTER ENTRY IF varsv1=1 THEN GOTO WRITE ENDIF IF varsv1=0 THEN RELATE idno file2.rec ENDIF END END I am not sure if this error message is related to a bug or typo. Your help would be very appreciated.
Tieble London, UK
-- Hans L Rieder, MD, MPH Jetzikofenstr 12 3038 Kirchlindach Switzerland
Tel: +41 31 829 4577 Mob: +41 79 321 9122 Web: http://www.tbrieder.org
EpiData-list@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list
End of EpiData-list Digest, Vol 77, Issue 12
Dear Tieble:
Apologies, if still persisting: idno must be "KEY UNIQUE" in file1.rec and "KEY" (not "KEY UNIQUE") in file2.rec. The reason being that it cannot usually be unique in file2.rec. It worked for me in all XP, Vista Win7. You can add (but do not need) "1" in both files, ie idno is "KEY UNIQUE 1" in file1.rec and "KEY 1" in file2.rec.
Regards,
Hans
On 20:59, epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Dear Hans,
Thank you for asking; indeed the idno is key unique 1 in file.rec1 and key unique 2 in file.rec2 and file.rec 3.
I have tested the files using different computers (at least 3) they all work fine (sorry for not stating this in my previous request). However, the error occurs and continues to occur when I use my lap top (Vista) and yet this is my main tool to design the entire database.
Clearly, the error may not be associated with EpiData; but something to do with my laptop (with Vista, in particular). Are there any solutions or just ignore it?
Kind regards
Tieble
participants (1)
-
epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca