In case you missed this in the Free Press:
Cyclists and pedestrians are on the same side https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2022/09/16/cyclists-and-p...
MY granddad had a saying: “It’s better to negotiate from a place of strength than a place of weakness.”
I’ve been reflecting on this maxim as the clock ticks steadily toward 2030 — the year by which Winnipeg’s unanimously-approved-by-council Climate Action Plan says we must have significantly reduced the number of trips taken in motor vehicles.
With each year, it seems more unlikely — maybe downright impossible — that we’ll meet the target of reducing personal-vehicle use from 81 per cent to 50 per cent of all trips.
Private vehicle traffic makes up the lion’s share of Winnipeg’s transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions. To reduce those GHGs, the plan relies almost entirely on people switching to active transportation modes. Despite that ambitious goal, little is being done to make walking and biking safer or more pleasant.
For many Winnipeggers, active transportation is not seen as a viable alternative to driving, even for short trips that could easily be done on foot or by bike, at least sometimes. Many of us don’t live within easy walking or biking distance of our daily needs, but for those who do, why aren’t we leaving our cars at home more often? The answer lies in what we’ve done — or haven’t done – to make that choice more viable.
There’s a long-standing, ongoing back-and-forth in this newspaper’s letters to the editor, with concerns focused on cyclists riding on the sidewalk or at top speed on shared paths, or pedestrians blithely walking three abreast, oblivious to bells and other users because they’re on their phone or wearing earbuds.
Some writers plead for mutual respect and common sense, while others insist a full regime of bicycle licensing, registration, insurance and enforcement is necessary.
It’s tempting to think we simply need to correct specific, individual behaviours. But in reality, these conflicts are a direct result of insufficient space for people travelling outside of vehicles. (And if we think shared paths are bad now, just wait until e-scooters and e-bikes really take off — and that day is coming, sooner than we think.)
That’s the actual problem, not “aggressive cyclists” or “oblivious pedestrians.” It’s a transportation system in which motor vehicle traffic takes up so much space that all other users are left fighting for scraps. It’s a system that pits folks who are walking and biking (and costing the city and the planet the least) against each other.
And it’s the same system in which drivers insist our arterials – major roads, usually with four or more lanes – need more lanes and the inner ring road must be completed, despite decades of evidence that adding more capacity to roads just means more people will use them. The rule of induced demand means we can’t build our way out of congestion.
Evidence also shows when cities build safe, quality infrastructure for biking and walking, people choose those modes more often. Lucky for us, many parts of the city have excellent potential to evolve into “15-minute neighbourhoods.” But that won’t happen if we aren’t willing to reconfigure our arterials.
In Winnipeg, nothing is more sacrosanct than traffic flow on an arterial. To date, any changes that might impact traffic flow or parking have been off the table. That’s why you won’t find protected bike lanes on Osborne Street, on Henderson Highway, on St. Mary’s Road or any other arterials; instead, you’ll find a mishmash of side street “bike routes” — if you’re lucky.
A complete bike network that allows folks to move between all parts of the city is essential. But if we want people to start using active transportation for their everyday needs, it’s also essential to provide safe infrastructure on arterials, because that’s where most destinations — stores, services, restaurants, libraries, pools, etc. — are.
There is more than enough road space in the city to provide abundant routes for public transit, active transportation, commercial and private vehicular traffic. Every time we repair or reconstruct a roadway, we need to incorporate protected bike lanes and better sidewalks as a matter of course (even if it means taking that space from cars) — especially on those destination-rich arterials. If we want to convert trips from car to foot or bike, the space allocated to each mode must reflect that goal.
The longer we wait to adapt to the new reality our planet demands, the longer we allow car-oriented spending to decimate our city coffers, the longer we wait to give people safe and pleasant infrastructure to do at least some of their trips without driving, the harder and more abrupt the transition will be.
There’s another saying: the best time to plant a tree is 40 years ago; the next best time is today. With each passing month and year, we have less time to forge a better transportation system that makes Winnipeg a more livable city while meeting our climate action goals.
We will never have more time to start adapting than we do right now. It’s time to negotiate from a place of strength.
*Emma Durand-Wood is a parent of three young children living in Elmwood.*