Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here's what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D1CCA7.E31D2D80]
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there's a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there's a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here's what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D1CCA7.E31D2D80]
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don't think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there's a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there's a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here's what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D1CCA7.E31D2D80]
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Jeff Taylor Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
I agree with David, too.
RLH
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca on behalf of Paul Moist pmoist@cupe.ca Reply-To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Date: Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:01 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Jeff Taylor Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
"the least bad of two bad options" -- YES.
________________________________ From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca on behalf of Rhonda Hinther HintherR@BrandonU.CA Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 5:06:59 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I agree with David, too.
RLH
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca on behalf of Paul Moist pmoist@cupe.ca Reply-To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Date: Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:01 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Jeff Taylor Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
Is there no way we could run this session over a lunch break? (So we can keep the Friday afternoon time slot for concurrent sessions and not have more conflicting sessions) Sharon
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:44 PM Janis Thiessen ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca wrote:
"the least bad of two bad options" -- YES.
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca < 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Rhonda Hinther HintherR@BrandonU.CA *Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2019 5:06:59 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I agree with David, too.
RLH
*From: *1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca on behalf of Paul Moist pmoist@cupe.ca *Reply-To: *1919 conference organizing committee < 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> *Date: *Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:01 PM *To: *1919 conference organizing committee < 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> *Subject: *Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------
From: Jeff Taylor Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca
Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: 1919 conference organizing committee < 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca>
Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts
Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options.
I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield
Coordinator, Labour Studies Program
Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building
183 Dafoe Road
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg
Manitoba
R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160
fax: 204-474-7869
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *Julie Guard *Sent:* January-21-19 4:54 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear.
Thanks,
julie
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Taylor *Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts
Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual
or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number
of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield
Coordinator, Labour Studies Program
Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building
183 Dafoe Road
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg
Manitoba
R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160
fax: 204-474-7869
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *Julie Guard *Sent:* January-21-19 1:54 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone:
There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program.
On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels.
On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct.
I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision.
julie
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *James Naylor *Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
*James Naylor*
Professor
Department of History
Brandon University
270 18th Street
Brandon, MB R7A 6A9
Canada
Office: 204 727 9664
Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca
people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
That sounds like a workable idea. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Sharon Reilly Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:35 AM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Is there no way we could run this session over a lunch break? (So we can keep the Friday afternoon time slot for concurrent sessions and not have more conflicting sessions) Sharon
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:44 PM Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
"the least bad of two bad options" -- YES.
________________________________ From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 5:06:59 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I agree with David, too.
RLH
From: <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Paul Moist <pmoist@cupe.camailto:pmoist@cupe.ca> Reply-To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Date: Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:01 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Jeff Taylor <Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.camailto:Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca> Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
-- ..........................................................................................
Sharon Reilly
48 Glen Avenue Winnipeg, MB R2M 1V5 tel: 204-255-4446 cell: 204-590-7051 reillysharonmarie@gmail.commailto:reillysharonmarie@gmail.com
On Jan 22, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Sharon Reilly <reillysharonmarie@gmail.commailto:reillysharonmarie@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there no way we could run this session over a lunch break? (So we can keep the Friday afternoon time slot for concurrent sessions and not have more conflicting sessions) Sharon
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:44 PM Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
"the least bad of two bad options" -- YES.
________________________________ From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 5:06:59 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I agree with David, too.
RLH
From: <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Paul Moist <pmoist@cupe.camailto:pmoist@cupe.ca> Reply-To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Date: Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:01 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Jeff Taylor <Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.camailto:Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca> Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
-- ..........................................................................................
Sharon Reilly
48 Glen Avenue Winnipeg, MB R2M 1V5 tel: 204-255-4446 cell: 204-590-7051 reillysharonmarie@gmail.commailto:reillysharonmarie@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D3620B.5A4D3D10]
I think doing it over the lunch break will just mean eliminating the lunch break for a very large number of people and mess up the sessions afterwards.
I actually have a different thought as I watch registrations come in. We have now at least one union registering as a group (they’ve now asked us to register 40 of them as a block), and as I’m writing the blurb about the conference for the MFL newsletter that goes to hundreds of locals, as well as receiving at least a few emails from out of town of people i didn’t know were coming, I’m beginning to wonder about our total numbers. The Panitch session, whatever we think of it, will also bring people to the conference. We might have a lot of registrations! Frankly, I don’t really know. But I’m beginning to think that we’re better off with a few more concurrent sessions rather than ones that are too large, or where people can't get seats.
This is not a bad problem to have, but I’m a bit relieved at the thought of dividing a large group into four, rather than into three, for most of the time slots.
I have no idea whether is is a real issue, since it's very early in the registration process.
Jim
On Jan 22, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Sharon Reilly <reillysharonmarie@gmail.commailto:reillysharonmarie@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there no way we could run this session over a lunch break? (So we can keep the Friday afternoon time slot for concurrent sessions and not have more conflicting sessions) Sharon
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:44 PM Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
"the least bad of two bad options" -- YES.
________________________________ From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 5:06:59 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I agree with David, too.
RLH
From: <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Paul Moist <pmoist@cupe.camailto:pmoist@cupe.ca> Reply-To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Date: Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:01 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Jeff Taylor <Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.camailto:Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca> Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
-- ..........................................................................................
Sharon Reilly
48 Glen Avenue Winnipeg, MB R2M 1V5 tel: 204-255-4446 cell: 204-590-7051 reillysharonmarie@gmail.commailto:reillysharonmarie@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D3620B.5A4D3D10]
I think Jim's point is a good one. So, yes. the Friday afternoon plenary does seem like our best option under the circumstances. I agree that Jeff would be an excellent choice to chair this session, if he is willing. Sharon
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:23 AM James Naylor Naylor@brandonu.ca wrote:
I think doing it over the lunch break will just mean eliminating the lunch break for a very large number of people and mess up the sessions afterwards.
I actually have a different thought as I watch registrations come in. We have now at least one union registering as a group (they’ve now asked us to register 40 of them as a block), and as I’m writing the blurb about the conference for the MFL newsletter that goes to hundreds of locals, as well as receiving at least a few emails from out of town of people i didn’t know were coming, I’m beginning to wonder about our total numbers. The Panitch session, whatever we think of it, will also bring people to the conference. We might have a lot of registrations! Frankly, I don’t really know. But I’m beginning to think that we’re better off with a few more concurrent sessions rather than ones that are too large, or where people can't get seats.
This is not a bad problem to have, but I’m a bit relieved at the thought of dividing a large group into four, rather than into three, for most of the time slots.
I have no idea whether is is a real issue, since it's very early in the registration process.
Jim
On Jan 22, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Sharon Reilly reillysharonmarie@gmail.com wrote:
Is there no way we could run this session over a lunch break? (So we can keep the Friday afternoon time slot for concurrent sessions and not have more conflicting sessions) Sharon
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:44 PM Janis Thiessen ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca wrote:
"the least bad of two bad options" -- YES.
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca < 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Rhonda Hinther < HintherR@BrandonU.CA> *Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2019 5:06:59 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I agree with David, too.
RLH
*From: *1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca on behalf of Paul Moist pmoist@cupe.ca *Reply-To: *1919 conference organizing committee < 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> *Date: *Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:01 PM *To: *1919 conference organizing committee < 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> *Subject: *Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------
From: Jeff Taylor Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca
Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: 1919 conference organizing committee < 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca>
Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts
Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options.
I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield
Coordinator, Labour Studies Program
Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building
183 Dafoe Road
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg
Manitoba
R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160
fax: 204-474-7869
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *Julie Guard *Sent:* January-21-19 4:54 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear.
Thanks,
julie
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Taylor *Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts
Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual
or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number
of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield
Coordinator, Labour Studies Program
Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building
183 Dafoe Road
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg
Manitoba
R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160
fax: 204-474-7869
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *Julie Guard *Sent:* January-21-19 1:54 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone:
There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program.
On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels.
On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct.
I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision.
julie
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *James Naylor *Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
*James Naylor*
Professor
Department of History
Brandon University
270 18th Street
Brandon, MB R7A 6A9
Canada
Office: 204 727 9664
Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca
people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
..........................................................................................
Sharon Reilly
48 Glen Avenue Winnipeg, MB R2M 1V5 tel: 204-255-4446 cell: 204-590-7051 reillysharonmarie@gmail.com
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
I haven’t shared my email conversation with Leo, but he has been very accommodating to our wishes, dropping three people entirely from the panel (in spite of a bit of push back from his group) and suggesting ways of making sure that panelists not only make short introductory remarks, but don’t speak too much during the session. I’ve pointed out that going overtime will affect our very important roundtable on union diversity and inclusiveness. I think they got the point. They have proposed Leo and/or Sam Gindin as chair. I’m going to argue that we should go with their suggestion. Not only are they people who should, logically, be part of the panel, they very much get our concerns. And I will use my role of conference committee chair to enforce that in the unlikely case that it becomes a problem. I very much believe that our initial concerns about time have been addressed. Not only that, Leo and Sam are both significant drawing cards to the conference and the session. If the session is going ahead, we want to make it as successful as possible.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D1CCA7.E31D2D80]
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca On Behalf Of Sharon Reilly Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:00 AM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I think Jim's point is a good one. So, yes. the Friday afternoon plenary does seem like our best option under the circumstances. I agree that Jeff would be an excellent choice to chair this session, if he is willing. Sharon
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:23 AM James Naylor <Naylor@brandonu.camailto:Naylor@brandonu.ca> wrote: I think doing it over the lunch break will just mean eliminating the lunch break for a very large number of people and mess up the sessions afterwards.
I actually have a different thought as I watch registrations come in. We have now at least one union registering as a group (they’ve now asked us to register 40 of them as a block), and as I’m writing the blurb about the conference for the MFL newsletter that goes to hundreds of locals, as well as receiving at least a few emails from out of town of people i didn’t know were coming, I’m beginning to wonder about our total numbers. The Panitch session, whatever we think of it, will also bring people to the conference. We might have a lot of registrations! Frankly, I don’t really know. But I’m beginning to think that we’re better off with a few more concurrent sessions rather than ones that are too large, or where people can't get seats.
This is not a bad problem to have, but I’m a bit relieved at the thought of dividing a large group into four, rather than into three, for most of the time slots.
I have no idea whether is is a real issue, since it's very early in the registration process.
Jim
On Jan 22, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Sharon Reilly <reillysharonmarie@gmail.commailto:reillysharonmarie@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there no way we could run this session over a lunch break? (So we can keep the Friday afternoon time slot for concurrent sessions and not have more conflicting sessions) Sharon
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:44 PM Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
"the least bad of two bad options" -- YES.
________________________________ From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 5:06:59 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I agree with David, too.
RLH
From: <1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Paul Moist <pmoist@cupe.camailto:pmoist@cupe.ca> Reply-To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Date: Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:01 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I too agree with David.
Paul
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Jeff Taylor <Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.camailto:Jeff.Taylor@umanitoba.ca> Date: 2019-01-21 4:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Again, I agree with David.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
For what it’s worth, I think having it as a stand-alone session is the least-bad of two bad options. I’m not happy that we’re in this position.
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 4:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
So, are you both arguing for leaving it as a stand-alone session? Just to be clear. Thanks, julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 4:50 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
I concur with David. Jeff
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Acting Director, School of Art Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:50 PM, David Camfield <David.Camfield@umanitoba.camailto:David.Camfield@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
I think scheduling that panel as a stand-alone event does give it special treatment that I don’t think the panel merits on intellectual or political grounds. However, I think doing so may well be the best choice for pragmatic reasons (it might draw a significant number of people away from panels scheduled simultaneously).
Cheers, David
David Camfield Coordinator, Labour Studies Program Associate Professor of Labour Studies & Sociology
116 Isbister Building 183 Dafoe Road University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2
phone: 204-474-6160 fax: 204-474-7869
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Julie Guard Sent: January-21-19 1:54 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
FYI, everyone: There has been some debate among the committee and our chair about whether to schedule the new panel, organized by Leo Panitch, in its one slot on the program. On the one hand, there’s a case that a panel of well-known and long-standing academics might attract so many of the participants that it would compete unfairly with adjacent panels. On the other, there’s a case that scheduling the panel as a stand-alone event privileges this one panel unfairly. It assumes that they will be of greater interest than other panels and deserve a special place on the program, an assumption that may not be correct. I, for one, would be interested in knowing what everyone else thinks about this decision. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:05 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: [1919-Conference] Proposal from Program Committee
Hello everyone,
Here’s what the program committee has come up with. I did communicate with Leo Panitch and his group. They are willing to reduce the size of their panel as we wish and, I think more importantly, recognize the time constraints generally since the issue is not simply the number and length of the opening remarks, but of ending it on time.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
-- ..........................................................................................
Sharon Reilly
48 Glen Avenue Winnipeg, MB R2M 1V5 tel: 204-255-4446 cell: 204-590-7051 reillysharonmarie@gmail.commailto:reillysharonmarie@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/http://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D4B243.31141660]
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
-- ..........................................................................................
Sharon Reilly
48 Glen Avenue Winnipeg, MB R2M 1V5 tel: 204-255-4446 cell: 204-590-7051 reillysharonmarie@gmail.commailto:reillysharonmarie@gmail.com
participants (8)
-
David Camfield -
James Naylor -
Janis Thiessen -
Jeff Taylor -
Julie Guard -
Paul Moist -
Rhonda Hinther -
Sharon Reilly