Dear Clinical Colleagues:
I am writing to gently nudge the May 2nd deadline for the John R. Walker Research Award and the Marion & Morgan Wright Clinical Award. Please encourage your students to apply for the research award, and please consider nominating a student for the clinical award.
I am wondering if there are any volunteers to review applications for the John R. Walker Research Award. So far, we have received 1 application, but there is lots of time, it is only April 30th 🙂.
In past years, we have had 2 faculty members review each application and score according to the attached framework.
Last year, during our deliberation meeting for the Walker Award, we decided that a more open approach, and one focused on the quality of the paper submitted, would be more fruitful and appropriate given the range of methodologies that students are applying in their work.
As such, I wonder about using the following for the 2025 evaluation:
(a) scientific achievement (first authorship on a peer reviewed journal article, book chapter, or conference presentation) in the previous calendar year (2024) /5 (b) original/innovative/significant to the field of clinical psychology /5 (c) scientifically rigorous in terms of its design and analysis /5 (d) quality of writing /5 (e) evidence of scholarly achievement (a minimum GPA of 3.5) /5
Comments: (space to document considerations regarding the submission)
Total /25
Please let me know what you think of the revised framework for evaluation presented above, as well as your interest in volunteering to evaluate.
Thank you for considering, and all the best,
Kristin
Kristin Reynolds, Ph.D., C. Psych.
Pronouns: She/Her
Associate Professor and Director of Clinical Training, Department of Psychology
Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry
Research Affiliate, Centre on Aging
Scientist, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Director, Health Information Exchange Lab: https://healthinfoexchangelab.ca/
P516 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Email: Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca
Phone: (204) 474-8260
The University of Manitoba campuses are located on original lands of Anishinaabeg, Ininewuk, Anisininewuk, Dakota Oyate and Denesuline, and on the National Homeland of the Red River Métis.
We respect the Treaties that were made on these territories, we acknowledge the harms and mistakes of the past, and we dedicate ourselves to move forward in partnership with Indigenous communities in a spirit of Reconciliation and collaboration.
Hi Kristin et al.,
I’m confused/fuzzy on the nomination process for the Wright Award. I know that students are eligible for this after they’ve completed their 4th practicum. But given that these are senior students shouldn’t the nominations come from external practicum supervisors?
Re the Walker award, I’m happy to review papers and I agree that a new evaluation approach is needed. The criteria you outlined below look great, although the problem with the rating out of 5 is that there is normally very little variance with scores typically ranging from 4-5. One solution to this would be to use a rating scale with meaningful rating points, such as this SSHRC system:
[cid:image001.png@01DBB9BB.1B6E06A0]
Another option, that I think we should consider because it’s the easiest logistically, would be to have a subset of us (or all faculty members in our area?) read and rank order all of the papers based on the criteria you’ve outlined, with the award going to the student with the lowest averaged rank. We normally only have a handful of papers, so this shouldn’t take long to do.
Take care,
Corey
From: Kristin Reynolds Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2025 at 8:00 AM To: arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [Arts-Psych-Clinical-Academics] Clinical Awards Dear Clinical Colleagues:
I am writing to gently nudge the May 2nd deadline for the John R. Walker Research Award and the Marion & Morgan Wright Clinical Award. Please encourage your students to apply for the research award, and please consider nominating a student for the clinical award.
I am wondering if there are any volunteers to review applications for the John R. Walker Research Award. So far, we have received 1 application, but there is lots of time, it is only April 30th 🙂.
In past years, we have had 2 faculty members review each application and score according to the attached framework.
Last year, during our deliberation meeting for the Walker Award, we decided that a more open approach, and one focused on the quality of the paper submitted, would be more fruitful and appropriate given the range of methodologies that students are applying in their work.
As such, I wonder about using the following for the 2025 evaluation:
(a) scientific achievement (first authorship on a peer reviewed journal article, book chapter, or conference presentation) in the previous calendar year (2024) /5 (b) original/innovative/significant to the field of clinical psychology /5 (c) scientifically rigorous in terms of its design and analysis /5 (d) quality of writing /5 (e) evidence of scholarly achievement (a minimum GPA of 3.5) /5
Comments: (space to document considerations regarding the submission)
Total /25
Please let me know what you think of the revised framework for evaluation presented above, as well as your interest in volunteering to evaluate.
Thank you for considering, and all the best,
Kristin
Kristin Reynolds, Ph.D., C. Psych.
Pronouns: She/Her
Associate Professor and Director of Clinical Training, Department of Psychology
Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry
Research Affiliate, Centre on Aging
Scientist, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Director, Health Information Exchange Lab: https://healthinfoexchangelab.ca/
P516 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Email: Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca
Phone: (204) 474-8260
The University of Manitoba campuses are located on original lands of Anishinaabeg, Ininewuk, Anisininewuk, Dakota Oyate and Denesuline, and on the National Homeland of the Red River Métis.
We respect the Treaties that were made on these territories, we acknowledge the harms and mistakes of the past, and we dedicate ourselves to move forward in partnership with Indigenous communities in a spirit of Reconciliation and collaboration.
FYI, students eligible for the Wright award have been identified, but I need to prepare the email about who there are. And instructions about how to nominate.
Harold R. Wallbridge, Ph.D., C.Psych.
Director, Psychological Service Centre,
Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba
161 Dafoe Building, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2
Tel 204-474-9069
Fax 204-474-6297
________________________________ From: Corey Mackenzie Corey.Mackenzie@umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2025 10:38 AM To: Kristin Reynolds Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca; arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [Arts-Psych-Clinical-Academics] Re: Clinical Awards
Hi Kristin et al.,
I’m confused/fuzzy on the nomination process for the Wright Award. I know that students are eligible for this after they’ve completed their 4th practicum. But given that these are senior students shouldn’t the nominations come from external practicum supervisors?
Re the Walker award, I’m happy to review papers and I agree that a new evaluation approach is needed. The criteria you outlined below look great, although the problem with the rating out of 5 is that there is normally very little variance with scores typically ranging from 4-5. One solution to this would be to use a rating scale with meaningful rating points, such as this SSHRC system:
[cid:image001.png@01DBB9BB.1B6E06A0]
Another option, that I think we should consider because it’s the easiest logistically, would be to have a subset of us (or all faculty members in our area?) read and rank order all of the papers based on the criteria you’ve outlined, with the award going to the student with the lowest averaged rank. We normally only have a handful of papers, so this shouldn’t take long to do.
Take care,
Corey
From: Kristin Reynolds Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2025 at 8:00 AM To: arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [Arts-Psych-Clinical-Academics] Clinical Awards
Dear Clinical Colleagues:
I am writing to gently nudge the May 2nd deadline for the John R. Walker Research Award and the Marion & Morgan Wright Clinical Award. Please encourage your students to apply for the research award, and please consider nominating a student for the clinical award.
I am wondering if there are any volunteers to review applications for the John R. Walker Research Award. So far, we have received 1 application, but there is lots of time, it is only April 30th 🙂.
In past years, we have had 2 faculty members review each application and score according to the attached framework.
Last year, during our deliberation meeting for the Walker Award, we decided that a more open approach, and one focused on the quality of the paper submitted, would be more fruitful and appropriate given the range of methodologies that students are applying in their work.
As such, I wonder about using the following for the 2025 evaluation:
(a) scientific achievement (first authorship on a peer reviewed journal article, book chapter, or conference presentation) in the previous calendar year (2024) /5
(b) original/innovative/significant to the field of clinical psychology /5
(c) scientifically rigorous in terms of its design and analysis /5
(d) quality of writing /5
(e) evidence of scholarly achievement (a minimum GPA of 3.5) /5
Comments: (space to document considerations regarding the submission)
Total /25
Please let me know what you think of the revised framework for evaluation presented above, as well as your interest in volunteering to evaluate.
Thank you for considering, and all the best,
Kristin
Kristin Reynolds, Ph.D., C. Psych.
Pronouns: She/Her
Associate Professor and Director of Clinical Training, Department of Psychology
Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry
Research Affiliate, Centre on Aging
Scientist, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Director, Health Information Exchange Lab: https://healthinfoexchangelab.ca/
P516 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Email: Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca
Phone: (204) 474-8260
The University of Manitoba campuses are located on original lands of Anishinaabeg, Ininewuk, Anisininewuk, Dakota Oyate and Denesuline, and on the National Homeland of the Red River Métis.
We respect the Treaties that were made on these territories, we acknowledge the harms and mistakes of the past, and we dedicate ourselves to move forward in partnership with Indigenous communities in a spirit of Reconciliation and collaboration.
Thank you, Corey. Several of us supervise senior students in specialty practicum placements, and these students should be eligible. I believe Hal will send around additional information shortly.
I really like your suggestion regarding ranking the John R. Walker Award papers based on the criteria in the email below. Thank you for offering to review! Gabe has also offered, so we now have 3.
Any other volunteers!?
Kristin
Kristin Reynolds, Ph.D., C. Psych.
Pronouns: She/Her
Associate Professor and Director of Clinical Training, Department of Psychology
Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry
Research Affiliate, Centre on Aging
Scientist, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Director, Health Information Exchange Lab: https://healthinfoexchangelab.ca/
P516 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Email: Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca
Phone: (204) 474-8260
The University of Manitoba campuses are located on original lands of Anishinaabeg, Ininewuk, Anisininewuk, Dakota Oyate and Denesuline, and on the National Homeland of the Red River Métis.
We respect the Treaties that were made on these territories, we acknowledge the harms and mistakes of the past, and we dedicate ourselves to move forward in partnership with Indigenous communities in a spirit of Reconciliation and collaboration. ________________________________ From: Corey Mackenzie Corey.Mackenzie@umanitoba.ca Sent: April 30, 2025 10:38 AM To: Kristin Reynolds Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca; arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: Clinical Awards
Hi Kristin et al.,
I’m confused/fuzzy on the nomination process for the Wright Award. I know that students are eligible for this after they’ve completed their 4th practicum. But given that these are senior students shouldn’t the nominations come from external practicum supervisors?
Re the Walker award, I’m happy to review papers and I agree that a new evaluation approach is needed. The criteria you outlined below look great, although the problem with the rating out of 5 is that there is normally very little variance with scores typically ranging from 4-5. One solution to this would be to use a rating scale with meaningful rating points, such as this SSHRC system:
[cid:image001.png@01DBB9BB.1B6E06A0]
Another option, that I think we should consider because it’s the easiest logistically, would be to have a subset of us (or all faculty members in our area?) read and rank order all of the papers based on the criteria you’ve outlined, with the award going to the student with the lowest averaged rank. We normally only have a handful of papers, so this shouldn’t take long to do.
Take care,
Corey
From: Kristin Reynolds Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2025 at 8:00 AM To: arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca arts-psych-clinical-academics@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [Arts-Psych-Clinical-Academics] Clinical Awards
Dear Clinical Colleagues:
I am writing to gently nudge the May 2nd deadline for the John R. Walker Research Award and the Marion & Morgan Wright Clinical Award. Please encourage your students to apply for the research award, and please consider nominating a student for the clinical award.
I am wondering if there are any volunteers to review applications for the John R. Walker Research Award. So far, we have received 1 application, but there is lots of time, it is only April 30th 🙂.
In past years, we have had 2 faculty members review each application and score according to the attached framework.
Last year, during our deliberation meeting for the Walker Award, we decided that a more open approach, and one focused on the quality of the paper submitted, would be more fruitful and appropriate given the range of methodologies that students are applying in their work.
As such, I wonder about using the following for the 2025 evaluation:
(a) scientific achievement (first authorship on a peer reviewed journal article, book chapter, or conference presentation) in the previous calendar year (2024) /5
(b) original/innovative/significant to the field of clinical psychology /5
(c) scientifically rigorous in terms of its design and analysis /5
(d) quality of writing /5
(e) evidence of scholarly achievement (a minimum GPA of 3.5) /5
Comments: (space to document considerations regarding the submission)
Total /25
Please let me know what you think of the revised framework for evaluation presented above, as well as your interest in volunteering to evaluate.
Thank you for considering, and all the best,
Kristin
Kristin Reynolds, Ph.D., C. Psych.
Pronouns: She/Her
Associate Professor and Director of Clinical Training, Department of Psychology
Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry
Research Affiliate, Centre on Aging
Scientist, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Director, Health Information Exchange Lab: https://healthinfoexchangelab.ca/
P516 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Email: Kristin.Reynolds@umanitoba.ca
Phone: (204) 474-8260
The University of Manitoba campuses are located on original lands of Anishinaabeg, Ininewuk, Anisininewuk, Dakota Oyate and Denesuline, and on the National Homeland of the Red River Métis.
We respect the Treaties that were made on these territories, we acknowledge the harms and mistakes of the past, and we dedicate ourselves to move forward in partnership with Indigenous communities in a spirit of Reconciliation and collaboration.
participants (3)
-
Corey Mackenzie -
Harold Wallbridge -
Kristin Reynolds