Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba.

Setting lower limits for e-bikes just makes sense

https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/editorials/2025/01/09/setting-lowe...

THERE are some public-policy proposals that are so grounded in common sense that one wonders why they’re even up for discussion.

The current conversation regarding speed limits for motorized bicycles and scooters on Winnipeg’s active transportation network is one such circumstance. For the safety of all who walk, jog, run or ride on these protected pathways, it’s an initiative that should be rolled out with all due haste.

A City of Winnipeg spokesperson stated last week the public service is currently researching how other jurisdictions have dealt with the issue of motorized conveyances on active transportation routes, and how Winnipeg might effectively enforce whatever speed limits are eventually imposed.

Such investigation is a necessary element of creating and implementing a policy to ensure active transportation routes remain safe. But it shouldn’t require a deep dive into research or a lengthy debate to reach the conclusion that danger is created by the introduction of power-assisted machines onto pathways whose sole reason for being is to safely separate cyclists and pedestrians from interactions with motor vehicles travelling at much higher speeds.

The growing popularity of e-bikes and electric scooters has created a new subclass of transportation that is, to invoke an ancient metaphor, neither fish nor fowl. Not engineered, in terms of size or structure, to compete for space among cars and trucks on roadways, these power-assisted conveyances are still capable of travelling at top speeds ranging from 30 to 50 km/h — a rate at which collision with anything, including a pedestrian or conventional cyclist, could have catastrophic results.

Think of it this way: the low end of the e-bike/ scooter maximum-speed scale (30 km/h) equates to the reduced-speed limit imposed on motor vehicles traveling along school-zone streets which students or other pedestrians might have occasion to cross. It’s more than reasonable for those who utilize the city’s slowly growing active-transportation network to argue they don’t want anything travelling at that speed, or faster, whizzing past them from any direction.

Manitoba law already caps the maximum speed, in general terms, of e-bikes and scooters at 32 km/h, but common sense dictates that their rate of travel on pedestrian/bike paths must be considerably slower in order to promote their safe co-existence with walkers and pedal-powered riders.

Calgary has imposed a speed limit of 20 km/h for all conveyances, power-assisted or not, on its active-transportation routes, while Quebec has created a provincial regulation that makes it illegal for power-assisted vehicles that are not licensed and do not bear a federal safety certification mark to travel on public roadways, including bike lanes.

Arriving at an acceptable standard for Winnipeg’s active transportation network — quickly, one hopes — is only the first step. The second — and decidedly more challenging — element will be enforcing whatever limit is put in place. Simply put, it’s difficult to imagine how this cash strapped city will find the resources and personnel required to patrol the pathways and enforce the limits.

Safety in the active-transportation realm might depend largely on the willingness of reasonable power-assisted riders to abide by posted speed limits.

This much is certain, however: the growing popularity of e-bikes and other power-assisted conveyances will inevitably steer more of them onto Winnipeg’s active-transportation network; as this city seeks to catch up with others that have been more aggressive in encouraging their citizens to embrace active transportation, it’s incumbent on city hall to create the best possible opportunity for all who travel its protected pathways to safely and peacefully coexist.