Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I'm going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn's proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won't contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers' Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers' Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D1CCA7.E31D2D80]
Yes to a young workers panel. I agree the Adrie that it's important - vital, in fact. Yes to accepting late proposals. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19 PM To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I'm going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn's proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won't contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers' Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers' Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D1CCA7.E31D2D80]
Yes to both, I vote.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Julie Guard <Julie.Guard@umanitoba.camailto:Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
Yes to a young workers panel. I agree the Adrie that it’s important – vital, in fact. Yes to accepting late proposals. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19 PM To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
I vote yes to both. (also can you send me more detailed info on both Adrie and Siemiatycki at Ryerson for potential budgeting)
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Rhonda Hinther Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:39 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Yes to both, I vote. RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Julie Guard <Julie.Guard@umanitoba.camailto:Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca> wrote: Yes to a young workers panel. I agree the Adrie that it's important - vital, in fact. Yes to accepting late proposals. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19 PM To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I'm going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn's proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won't contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers' Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers' Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
Hi Jim,
Myer Siemiatycki is Professor of Politics at Ryerson University, where he served as past Founding Director of the interdisciplinary MA Program in Immigration & Settlement.
Best,
Paul
Paul Jenkins, PhD Instructor, Department of History, & Program Developer/Coordinator & Assistant to the Director Institute for the Humanities, University of Manitoba ________________________________ From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca on behalf of Mochoruk, James james.mochoruk@email.und.edu Sent: 11 April 2018 16:52:31 To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
I vote yes to both. (also can you send me more detailed info on both Adrie and Siemiatycki at Ryerson for potential budgeting)
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Rhonda Hinther Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:39 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Yes to both, I vote. RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Julie Guard <Julie.Guard@umanitoba.camailto:Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca> wrote: Yes to a young workers panel. I agree the Adrie that it’s important – vital, in fact. Yes to accepting late proposals. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19 PM To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
Agreed. Great idea. Sharon
Sharon Reilly
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 5:10 PM Paul Jenkins, Paul.Jenkins@umanitoba.ca wrote:
Hi Jim,
Myer Siemiatycki is Professor of Politics at Ryerson University, where he served as past Founding Director of the interdisciplinary MA Program in Immigration & Settlement.
Best,
Paul
Paul Jenkins, PhD Instructor, Department of History, & Program Developer/Coordinator & Assistant to the Director Institute for the Humanities, University of Manitoba
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca < 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca> on behalf of Mochoruk, James < james.mochoruk@email.und.edu> *Sent:* 11 April 2018 16:52:31 *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
I vote yes to both. (also can you send me more detailed info on both Adrie and Siemiatycki at Ryerson for potential budgeting)
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *Rhonda Hinther *Sent:* Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:39 PM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee < 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Yes to both, I vote.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Julie Guard Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca wrote:
Yes to a young workers panel. I agree the Adrie that it’s important – vital, in fact. Yes to accepting late proposals.
julie
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [ mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *James Naylor *Sent:* Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19 PM *To:* 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca *Subject:* [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., *The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925*. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
*James Naylor*
Professor
Department of History
Brandon University
270 18th Street
Brandon, MB R7A 6A9
Canada
Office: 204 727 9664
Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca
people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
Yes and yes!
KL 204.899.8687
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 5:24 PM, Sharon Reilly reillysharonmarie@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. Great idea. Sharon
Sharon Reilly
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 5:10 PM Paul Jenkins, Paul.Jenkins@umanitoba.ca wrote: Hi Jim,
Myer Siemiatycki is Professor of Politics at Ryerson University, where he served as past Founding Director of the interdisciplinary MA Program in Immigration & Settlement. Best,
Paul
Paul Jenkins, PhD Instructor, Department of History, & Program Developer/Coordinator & Assistant to the Director Institute for the Humanities, University of Manitoba
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca on behalf of Mochoruk, James james.mochoruk@email.und.edu Sent: 11 April 2018 16:52:31 To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
I vote yes to both. (also can you send me more detailed info on both Adrie and Siemiatycki at Ryerson for potential budgeting)
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Rhonda Hinther Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:39 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Yes to both, I vote.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Julie Guard Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca wrote:
Yes to a young workers panel. I agree the Adrie that it’s important – vital, in fact. Yes to accepting late proposals.
julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19 PM To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor
Professor
Department of History
Brandon University
270 18th Street
Brandon, MB R7A 6A9
Canada
Office: 204 727 9664
Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca
people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
I too am in agreement with both suggestions, with thanks.
Paul
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. From: Mochoruk, James Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:07 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee Reply To: 1919 conference organizing committee Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
I vote yes to both. (also can you send me more detailed info on both Adrie and Siemiatycki at Ryerson for potential budgeting)
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Rhonda Hinther Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:39 PM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Yes to both, I vote. RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Julie Guard <Julie.Guard@umanitoba.camailto:Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca> wrote: Yes to a young workers panel. I agree the Adrie that it’s important – vital, in fact. Yes to accepting late proposals. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of James Naylor Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19 PM To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
Agreed to both.
Dr. Jeffery Taylor Dean of Arts Professor of History 310 Fletcher Argue Building University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V5
(p) 204-474-9271 (f) 204-474-7590
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments to it are intended for the addressee only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender if you have received this email by mistake, and please delete it and the attachments (and all copies) in a secure manner.
On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:19 PM, James Naylor <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> wrote:
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
yes and yes
Victor D
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Naylor" Naylor@BrandonU.CA To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925 . He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor
Professor
Department of History
Brandon University
270 18th Street
Brandon, MB R7A 6A9
Canada
Office: 204 727 9664
Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca
people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
Sounds good to me as well. Janis
On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:51 PM, "vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net" <vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net> wrote:
yes and yes
Victor D
________________________________ From: "James Naylor" <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D1CCA7.E31D2D80]
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
Victor Dobchuk
204 781 7861 Mobile _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
I also wanted to confirm that we have someone on the round tables able to speak to issues people with disabilities face. I know this was raised in past meetings - can we confirm this is the case (need to know for SSHRC & bc it’s an important issue to address in our context)? If no, then I have a name that might work.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
Sounds good to me as well. Janis
On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:51 PM, "vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net" <vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net> wrote:
yes and yes
Victor D
________________________________ From: "James Naylor" <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D1CCA7.E31D2D80]
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
Victor Dobchuk
204 781 7861 Mobile _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
I don’t think we do. Who are you thinking of? Jim
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:22 PM, Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> wrote:
I also wanted to confirm that we have someone on the round tables able to speak to issues people with disabilities face. I know this was raised in past meetings - can we confirm this is the case (need to know for SSHRC & bc it’s an important issue to address in our context)? If no, then I have a name that might work.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
Sounds good to me as well. Janis
On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:51 PM, "vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net" <vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net> wrote:
yes and yes
Victor D
________________________________ From: "James Naylor" <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
Victor Dobchuk
204 781 7861 Mobile _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference <image001.png>_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D3620B.5A4D3D10]
John Rae was suggested to me. His email is thepenguin@rogers.commailto:thepenguin@rogers.com.
Here’s some biographical info: http://www.innoversity.com/roadmap/speakers/john-rae/
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:28 PM, James Naylor <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> wrote:
I don’t think we do. Who are you thinking of? Jim
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:22 PM, Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> wrote:
I also wanted to confirm that we have someone on the round tables able to speak to issues people with disabilities face. I know this was raised in past meetings - can we confirm this is the case (need to know for SSHRC & bc it’s an important issue to address in our context)? If no, then I have a name that might work.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
Sounds good to me as well. Janis
On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:51 PM, "vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net" <vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net> wrote:
yes and yes
Victor D
________________________________ From: "James Naylor" <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
Victor Dobchuk
204 781 7861 Mobile _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference <image001.png>_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/http://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D3620B.5A4D3D10]
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
Should I extend a round table invite to John Rae, then? For the second round table? Let me know and I’ll send in the AM as directed. I think it’s a very, very good idea.
Krishna 204.899.8687
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 10:40 PM, Rhonda Hinther HintherR@BrandonU.CA wrote:
John Rae was suggested to me. His email is thepenguin@rogers.com.
Here’s some biographical info: http://www.innoversity.com/roadmap/speakers/john-rae/
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:28 PM, James Naylor Naylor@BrandonU.CA wrote:
I don’t think we do. Who are you thinking of? Jim
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:22 PM, Rhonda Hinther HintherR@BrandonU.CA wrote:
I also wanted to confirm that we have someone on the round tables able to speak to issues people with disabilities face. I know this was raised in past meetings - can we confirm this is the case (need to know for SSHRC & bc it’s an important issue to address in our context)? If no, then I have a name that might work.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Janis Thiessen ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca wrote:
Sounds good to me as well. Janis
On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:51 PM, "vdobchuk@mymts.net" vdobchuk@mymts.net wrote:
yes and yes
Victor D
From: "James Naylor" Naylor@BrandonU.CA To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
Victor Dobchuk
204 781 7861 Mobile _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
<image001.png>_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
It would be good if we knew something about Mr. Rae, just to be consistent. We did that for others on the panels. I do trust Rhonda’s judgement but I guess I have become a bit of a rule freak and I’d prefer that we proceed, as much as possible, in a consistent manner. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Krishna Lalbiharie Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:03 AM To: 1919 conference organizing committee 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Should I extend a round table invite to John Rae, then? For the second round table? Let me know and I’ll send in the AM as directed. I think it’s a very, very good idea.
Krishna 204.899.8687 Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 10:40 PM, Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> wrote: John Rae was suggested to me. His email is thepenguin@rogers.commailto:thepenguin@rogers.com.
Here’s some biographical info: http://www.innoversity.com/roadmap/speakers/john-rae/
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:28 PM, James Naylor <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> wrote: I don’t think we do. Who are you thinking of? Jim
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:22 PM, Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> wrote:
I also wanted to confirm that we have someone on the round tables able to speak to issues people with disabilities face. I know this was raised in past meetings - can we confirm this is the case (need to know for SSHRC & bc it’s an important issue to address in our context)? If no, then I have a name that might work.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote: Sounds good to me as well. Janis
On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:51 PM, "vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net" <vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net> wrote: yes and yes
Victor D
________________________________ From: "James Naylor" <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
Victor Dobchuk
204 781 7861 Mobile _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference <image001.png>_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/http://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D3D237.6174B8B0]
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
I share Julie’s concern. While I’m not necessarily at all opposed to the idea, we took a lot of time to discuss and balance the roundtables both on the committee as a whole and in the subcommittee that narrowed down the list. It was also a time when concerns about individuals were raised. Discussions such as this was one of the reasons that I’ve tended to support us meeting face to face to think of issues that might arise. This may be straight forward and we will all agree, and we might be able to do this on the listserv. But, the only reason we are rushing it is the SSHRC, and I’m not convinced how much difference it would make.
Jimn
On Apr 12, 2018, at 8:22 AM, Julie Guard <Julie.Guard@umanitoba.camailto:Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
It would be good if we knew something about Mr. Rae, just to be consistent. We did that for others on the panels. I do trust Rhonda’s judgement but I guess I have become a bit of a rule freak and I’d prefer that we proceed, as much as possible, in a consistent manner. julie
From: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto:1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] On Behalf Of Krishna Lalbiharie Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:03 AM To: 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca> Subject: Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Should I extend a round table invite to John Rae, then? For the second round table? Let me know and I’ll send in the AM as directed. I think it’s a very, very good idea.
Krishna 204.899.8687 Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 10:40 PM, Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> wrote: John Rae was suggested to me. His email is thepenguin@rogers.commailto:thepenguin@rogers.com.
Here’s some biographical info: http://www.innoversity.com/roadmap/speakers/john-rae/
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:28 PM, James Naylor <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> wrote: I don’t think we do. Who are you thinking of? Jim
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:22 PM, Rhonda Hinther <HintherR@BrandonU.CAmailto:HintherR@BrandonU.CA> wrote:
I also wanted to confirm that we have someone on the round tables able to speak to issues people with disabilities face. I know this was raised in past meetings - can we confirm this is the case (need to know for SSHRC & bc it’s an important issue to address in our context)? If no, then I have a name that might work.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Janis Thiessen <ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.camailto:ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote: Sounds good to me as well. Janis
On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:51 PM, "vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net" <vdobchuk@mymts.netmailto:vdobchuk@mymts.net> wrote: yes and yes
Victor D
________________________________ From: "James Naylor" <Naylor@BrandonU.CAmailto:Naylor@BrandonU.CA> To: 1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM Subject: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/https://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
Victor Dobchuk
204 781 7861 Mobile _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference <image001.png>_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/http://people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference _______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.camailto:1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.camailto:Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
[cid:image001.png@01D3620B.5A4D3D10]
I super agree, Julie!
Earlier in this exchange, Rhonda provided the following URL, which contains some biographical info re: John Rae:
http://www.innoversity.com/roadmap/speakers/john-rae/
I'm not sure how pressing things are re: SSHRC grant app name inclusion, but if there's a couple of days left -- and folks approve -- I will happily pursue Rae! And continue to email and call Jerry Woods (who I suspect is out of town at present).
Lemme know!
KL 204.899.8687
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Julie Guard Julie.Guard@umanitoba.ca wrote:
It would be good if we knew something about Mr. Rae, just to be consistent. We did that for others on the panels. I do trust Rhonda’s judgement but I guess I have become a bit of a rule freak and I’d prefer that we proceed, as much as possible, in a consistent manner.
julie
*From:* 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca [mailto: 1919-conference-bounces@lists.umanitoba.ca] *On Behalf Of *Krishna Lalbiharie *Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:03 AM *To:* 1919 conference organizing committee <1919-conference@lists. umanitoba.ca> *Subject:* Re: [1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Should I extend a round table invite to John Rae, then? For the second round table? Let me know and I’ll send in the AM as directed. I think it’s a very, very good idea.
Krishna
204.899.8687
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 10:40 PM, Rhonda Hinther HintherR@BrandonU.CA wrote:
John Rae was suggested to me. His email is thepenguin@rogers.com.
Here’s some biographical info: http://www.innoversity. com/roadmap/speakers/john-rae/
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:28 PM, James Naylor Naylor@BrandonU.CA wrote:
I don’t think we do. Who are you thinking of?
Jim
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:22 PM, Rhonda Hinther HintherR@BrandonU.CA wrote:
I also wanted to confirm that we have someone on the round tables able to speak to issues people with disabilities face. I know this was raised in past meetings - can we confirm this is the case (need to know for SSHRC & bc it’s an important issue to address in our context)? If no, then I have a name that might work.
RLH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2018, at 9:08 PM, Janis Thiessen ja.thiessen@uwinnipeg.ca wrote:
Sounds good to me as well.
Janis
On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:51 PM, "vdobchuk@mymts.net" vdobchuk@mymts.net wrote:
yes and yes
Victor D
*From: *"James Naylor" Naylor@BrandonU.CA *To: *1919-conference@lists.umanitoba.ca *Sent: *Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:19:15 PM *Subject: *[1919-Conference] Responses to Proposals
Hi all,
I’m going to contact those who made proposals and tell them, for the most part, that they have been accepted and we will get back to them closer to the time of the conference with the schedule and any other guidelines.
For those who were not there, we returned to the issue late in the meeting. There were 3 proposals that we were debating: Mancini, Fairbairn, and Bako. We decided to find a place for Mancini in one of the other panels, and to reject Fairbairn’s proposal. On Bako, we decided that I would contact him and suggest that he play some other role in the conference. Shortly afterwards, I was talking to my daughter Adrie, who some of you know (she works for Workers United in Toronto) who had just returned from the Labor Notes conference in Chicago. She was quite keen that we have a session on young workers and said that she would be willing to participate and/or to find someone. I think she has a point that we do want to have something addressing young workers as it would be attractive to the MFL Young Members Assembly. I won’t contact Bako immediately, but let me know what you think about constructing a session addressing young workers.
Also, after the deadline I was contacted by Myer Siemiatycki at Ryerson, who missed the deadline and wanted to see if he could still apply. He was a contributor to Craig Heron, ed., *The Workers’ Revolt in Canada, 1917-1925*. He is interested in presenting on the Mathers’ Commission that was investigating industrial relations in 1919. I said that I would ask the committee if we would accept a proposal from him.
Jim
*James Naylor*
Professor
Department of History
Brandon University
270 18th Street
Brandon, MB R7A 6A9
Canada
Office: 204 727 9664
Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca
people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
<image001.png>
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
--
Victor Dobchuk
204 781 7861 Mobile
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
<image001.png>_______________________________________________ 1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
James Naylor Professor Department of History Brandon University 270 18th Street Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 Canada
Office: 204 727 9664 Cell: 204 720 2117
Naylor@BrandonU.ca people.brandonu.ca/naylorj/
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
1919-Conference mailing list 1919-Conference@lists.umanitoba.ca http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/1919-conference
participants (11)
-
James Naylor -
Janis Thiessen -
Jeff Taylor -
Julie Guard -
Krishna Lalbiharie -
Mochoruk, James -
Paul Jenkins -
Paul Moist -
Rhonda Hinther -
Sharon Reilly -
vdobchuk＠mymts.net