WFP: SUNDAY BIKE ROUTES START NEXT MONTH
Motorists will soon be slowing down on 15 city streets starting next month
for the summer and fall.
The city announced Friday that during the first three weeks of May it will
be putting signage up reminding motorists to slow down to 30 km/h 24 hours
per day, seven days a week, on the streets until Oct. 31.
The streets include Wellington Crescent, from the Maryland Bridge to
Academy Road, Lyndale Drive from Cromwell to Gauvin streets, and Scotia
Street from Armstrong to Anderson avenues.
CBC:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/winnipeg-open-streets-bike-route-1.…
CoW press release:
https://winnipeg.ca/cao/media/news/nr_2022/nr_20220429.stm#4
EVs not a ‘silver bullet’ solution
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/evs-not-a-silver-bullet-…
AS governments across the world struggle to meet quickly approaching
climate change targets, electric vehicles have begun to find their way into
the spotlight. The “Build Back Better” plan in the U.S. and Canada’s 2022
federal budget both focus efforts to decarbonize the transportation sector
on incentivizing “zero emission vehicles” (ZEVs).
Transportation is Canada’s second largest source of GHG emissions,
responsible for 25 per cent of the country’s total. In cities such as
Winnipeg, vehicle tailpipes are the source of half of all emissions.
It is also clear, however, that electric vehicles are not an “easy button”
solution to climate change. A 2,000-kilogram machine transporting an
80-kilogram human cargo for almost every trip made outside of the home is
not a sustainable solution, regardless of the machine’s power plant.
There are many studies that try to quantify ZEVs’ emissions, and the
consistent conclusion is that no car is truly a zero-emission vehicle. For
a more complete picture, the current focus on tailpipe emissions must be
broadened to include the carbon footprint of all facets of a vehicle’s life
cycle.
When factoring in the manufacturing emissions created during raw-materials
extraction, production and shipping, as well as emissions from the
electrical grid during its use, it has been found that an electric vehicle
has about half the overall carbon footprint of a gasoline vehicle.
This is an important reduction that will only improve over time, but
threatening to counteract these gains is the fact that every 20 years there
are 50 per cent more vehicles on Canadian roads. They are also getting
larger, which increases manufacturing emissions, battery sizes and energy
use.
Over the last two decades, the share of trucks and SUVs has grown from 30
per cent to 80 per cent.
In our ever-shortening climate-crisis timeline, market absorption also
creates a challenge for ZEVs. A new study done at Polytechnique Montréal
found that to meet that city’s 2030 emissions reduction targets, more than
60 per cent of vehicles on the road will need to be ZEVs.
Many projections show that even with federal incentives, by 2030 only 11
per cent of vehicles will be electric, with 60 per cent likely not being
reached until 2050.
Extensive vehicle electrification is important, but it will only get us
part way to our transportation emissions targets. A complete solution will
require serious investment in strategies that fundamentally reduce the
amount we drive.
Key to this will be investing heavily in alternate forms of transportation,
including public transit, to provide convenient mobility alternatives. The
focus has been on electrification, but for that to be an effective climate
policy, priority should be given to investments that increase ridership.
Electrification of public transit creates headlines, but the environmental
benefits of public transit are actually realized when more people get out
of their cars and onto a bus. If we made public transit sufficiently
attractive to reduce emissions from private vehicles by only two per cent,
it would have the same environmental impact as electrifying every transit
vehicle in Canada.
More effective policy would fast-track rapid transit
construction, significantly increase service frequency and reliability, and
provide strong connectivity to make transit effective for everyday use.
Most Canadian cities developed around a pervasive streetcar system that was
its primary mode of motorized transportation. We can take inspiration from
our past and re-establish a public transit system that is no longer an
afterthought, but instead is a well-integrated and desirable mobility
option for everyone.
Creating an effective system of alternative mobility, including public
transit, walking or biking, is more complex than simply buying more buses
or building bike lanes. Land-use policies must carefully dovetail with
transportation planning to realize success.
We can again learn from our past, when streetcar neighbourhoods were built
with higher densities and grid pattern streets that provided walkable
access to shops and public transit. When new neighbourhoods were built, the
street grids and transit routes were simply extended, instead of the
disconnected subdivisions and commercial power centres we build today that
make cars the only viable transportation option.
On average, Canadians drive 25 per cent farther each day than they did 20
years ago. By limiting suburban sprawl on the periphery of the city and
implementing policies that promote infill development, such as higher
allowable densities and reduced parking requirements, more compact and
walkable neighbourhoods will result.
This will allow more people to live closer to their daily services and
amenities, making walking, busing and biking more viable options. Zoning
and land-use policies can also emphasize the development of “complete
streets” that reallocate vehicle space to alternate transportation such as
bike lanes, priority transit lanes and wider sidewalks. These streets can
be higher density with walkable access to employment, commerce and
recreation.
Electric vehicles are an important part of our climate change policy, but
they are not a silver bullet. They must dovetail with effective government
policies and budgets that promote greater use of public transportation and
alternative modes of travel. Our challenge is great, and the time is now to
make impactful changes for our future.
*Brent Bellamy is senior design architect for Number Ten Architectural
Group.*
Winnipeg’s active transportation network needs all the help it can get. As
such, a proposal to continue the city’s "open streets" program through this
summer, and beyond, is a welcome development.
The plan — renamed the "enhanced summer bike route program" after the city
realized encouraging pedestrians to mingle with vehicles on roadways was in
contravention of the Highway Traffic Act — has been tweaked for 2022 and is
awaiting council approval.
Changes include dropping weekday speed limits to 30 km/h and limiting
wholesale street closures to weekends and holidays on many routes.
Residents along Wellington Avenue who opposed the street’s closure last
year will be pleased to see the thoroughfare has been excluded from the
program for the upcoming season. City planners concurred that a protected
bike lane through the neighbourhood would be more useful.
The seasonal transportation mode shift along residential roads has been
celebrated (and enjoyed) by many, and the program is a rare example of the
city prioritizing cyclists over drivers. At least some of the time.
Safe cycling routes are the first step to encouraging more people to hop on
a bike — and Winnipeg needs a lot more people to hop on bikes if it wants
to meet the objectives outlined in the city’s OurWinnipeg 2045 planning
document.
The aspirational plan pushes for a sustainable transportation system that
relies less on personal vehicles and more on low-carbon public and active
transportation. Within the document, cycling is promoted as a
cost-effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve community
health.
Unfortunately, it’s a choice that, at the moment, presents more barriers
than benefits locally.
The summer bike routes are great for recreational users, since they allow
cyclists to enjoy scenic areas of the city without having to duck and dodge
vehicle traffic. However, many of the 14 routes proposed are mere islands
of safety. Few connect directly with established bike paths and, unless you
live in the neighbourhood, most require traversing busy main roads to gain
access.
Churchill Drive, for example, offers pleasant views of the Red River, but
visiting cyclists have to deal with bridges, train tracks, under- and
over-passes before they can catch a glimpse.
Cycling advocates have long called on officials to create a connected
network of bike lanes that allows people to move through all areas of the
city safely and with ease. Yet for many Winnipeggers, cycling still isn’t a
viable way to get to work, go grocery shopping or pick the kids up from
school. The system is too fractured, and most commutes, depending on where
you live, require riders to mix with cars or pedestrians for at least part
of the journey.
Progress has been made in recent years, with protected paths cropping up
throughout the city, but Winnipeg has a long way to go before it can claim
to be bicycle-friendly — or even bicycle-tolerant.
Recreational biking can be a gateway to commuter cycling. The enhanced
summer bike route program was born out of the pandemic, but has proven it
has permanent appeal. Based on uptake (many routes saw hundreds of cyclists
daily), it also has the potential to get more people thinking about their
bikes as an everyday mode of transportation.
It’s clear Winnipeggers want to cycle. It’s up to the city to create a
clear path forward.
Time to get people back on the bus
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/time-to-get-people-back-…
AS reported in the Free Press (“Advertising campaign aims to attract riders
back to Transit,” March 22), Winnipeg Transit has started advertising to
bring riders back. Renewing interest in public transit is an important
first step, both locally and nationally. However, much more must be done to
truly resurrect transit across Canada.
As part of a study funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research
Council (SSHRC) and Infrastructure Canada, we investigated impacts of the
COVID-19 pandemic on public transit and active transportation in Canadian
municipalities.
Prior to COVID-19, as seen in the 2011 and 2016 census results, Winnipeg
had been doing rather well in terms of transit ridership. But then the
pandemic arrived in March 2020, causing a near-total collapse in monthly
transit ridership and fare revenues both locally and across Canada.
The number of transit passenger trips fell from 161 million in February
2020 to 26 million in April, after the onset of the pandemic. Monthly
ridership has since been inching upward, but only to about half of
pre-pandemic levels.
We identified several reasons for the collapse. First, there were the
shifts to remote work or telecommuting, and to online education, especially
in post-secondary education. These shifts account for a fair amount of the
decline in demand. Second, social-distancing requirements had the effect of
reducing transit capacity, i.e. number of seats available.
Third, and perhaps most problematic, people were afraid to enter enclosed
spaces, including buses and train cars. Countering the fear will require
measures to increase safety, as well as promotional campaigns to rebuild
public confidence.
Public transit has important implications for Canada, in terms of improving
environmental performance and social equity. Thus, there is an urgent need
to rethink and redirect public policies related to public transit,
particularly at the federal level.
The government of Canada has invested heavily in shifting transit to
zero-emission buses (ZEB), to the tune of $2.75 billion over five years.
The purpose behind this large investment is achieving substantial
reductions in emissions. While Canada could reach its 5,000 ZEB target by
2025, for the money to be well spent, people need to be riding these buses.
The federal government has also announced some funding to help
municipalities cover transit losses. However, these funds are more limited
($750 million in total), and have more strings attached.
Modal shift remains the main mechanism for emission reductions by transit —
in other words, getting folks out of cars and onto buses. Compared to a
similar number of people operating private vehicles, a conventional diesel
bus can reduce emissions by approximately 50 per cent. A ZEB can reduce
emissions 100 per cent, but is more than twice as expensive to purchase.
Thus, for a given capital budget, a transit agency can achieve the same
reductions by buying either one ZEB or two conventional buses. The
conventional option also better addresses social equity, since lower-income
people depend more on the availability of public transit. Further, on a
fuel cost per passenger/kilometre basis, diesel buses are about half as
sensitive to fuel price increases as private vehicles. We recommend that
public transit be exempted from the federal carbon tax. While
municipalities have received some collected fuel taxes back from the
government of Canada, all still must pay carbon tax. Winnipeg Transit is
now paying close to $2.5 million annually. Transit agencies can either
absorb the added cost or pass it on to riders. Carbon tax on transit makes
little sense if the goal is to increase ridership.
Turning to active transportation, cycling has seen a surge of interest and
activity, primarily driven by recreational pursuits, rather than commuting
to work or school. But overall, active transportation has been slowly but
steadily declining in Canada, led by less walking.
One emerging trend is multi-modal trips combining transit and cycling. This
is something Winnipeg Transit has embraced, with bike racks on buses and
lockers at transit stations. This combination addresses the distance
limitation associated with cycling, and active transportation in general.
Of course, it also depends on the availability of effective transit
infrastructure and service.
The pandemic hit public transit hard. It has also had negative ripple
effects on lower-income communities and active transportation. Restoring
public transit ridership should be a clear policy priority. Practical
policy changes at all levels are needed to make it happen.
*Paul D. Larson is a professor of supply chain management and Robert
Parsons is a sessional instructor at the I.H. Asper School of Business,
University of Manitoba. Larson was applicant and principal investigator and
Parsons was co-applicant for the recent Knowledge Synthesis Grant
investigation entitled “Public Transit and Active Transportation: Activity,
Structural and Energy Efficiency Effects on Mobility and the Environment.”*
Marion Street makeover project proposal ‘big jump forward’
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/input-sought-on-marion-street-makeo…
AFTER being T-boned twice, Kristen Marino believes Marion Street needs a
major makeover.
“In my opinion, (Marion) is extremely poorly planned,” said the Transcona
resident who drives on Marion each day. “I think infrastructure hasn’t kept
up with the amount of traffic that uses it every day.”
The 40-year-old bank employee said she was T-boned twice near the
Lagimodiere Boulevard intersection: once in 2020, and again in 2021.
Both times, Marino had been driving home to Transcona, travelling eastbound
on Marion in the inside lane, when a truck collided with her vehicle while
exiting the Maple Leaf Consumer Foods parking lot.
“There’s just so much congestion in that intersection and cars trying to
turn in and out. Someone is going to get killed one day,” Marino said.
The City of Winnipeg is asking the public for input on how to improve
Marion Street and a series of area intersections.
The second phase of the Moving on Marion Street project, which aims to
address weak spots in the corridor’s vehicle, cycling, and pedestrian
infrastructure, is underway.
The project’s scope includes sections of Marion Street from St. Mary’s Road
to Lagimodere Boulevard and Lagimodiere from Marion to Dugald Road. There
are also proposed changes to the Panet-Dawson intersection, and Youville
Road between Marion and Goulet.
In one iteration of the plan, the easternmost approach of the Maple Leaf
Consumer Foods parking lot would be closed. Marino said she’s seen numerous
near-accidents at the entrance and describes it as a “dangerous” spot.
The project proposes changes to bike infrastructure along the Marion-Goulet
couplet near the Norwood Bridge — an area where Marino said she has
witnessed narrow misses between pedestrians and cyclists opting to use the
sidewalk instead of the road.
Mark Cohoe, executive director of Bike Winnipeg, said adding bike lanes
that stem from the south end of the bridge would create “important
connections” in the city’s cycling network.
“Coming off the Norwood bridge, right now it’s just dead ends,” Cohoe said.
“This would be a big jump forward.”
He added Moving on Marion Street’s proposed improvements to bike routes
complement Our Winnipeg 2045, the city’s 25-year development plan.
“When you think about the price of gas going up the way it is, and what
we’re hearing on climate and the need to drive down our emissions by 2030,
this is something that helps us along the way,” Cohoe said.
The project was born out of the failed $566-million Marion-Archibald
underpass and road-widening project, Coun. Matt Allard (St. Boniface) said.
The first phase of Moving on Marion Street kicked off in 2019. The
project’s final design phase is expected to wrap later this year.
“We rebooted the Marion Street design study to look at bettering the road
for all road users, and we wanted an affordable option,” Allard said. “It’s
a matter of finding the money in a future budget to get it funded.”
The design plan for Lagimodiere from Marion to Dugald highlights property
along the west side of the route that would need to be absorbed to make way
for a new vehicle lane — a property that currently contains homes.
“I’m not convinced yet that those are going to be required as part of the
project,” Allard said. “I raised my concerns with the public service and
expect to be talking about that some more.”
The public consultation for the west segment of the project area will take
place April 19, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. The city is taking feedback for
the east segment the following day (also 6:30-8:30 p.m.). Registrations can
be made through the Engage Winnipeg website.
An online project survey is available through Engage Winnipeg until April
28.
fpcity(a)freepress.mb.ca
BIKE ROUTE PROPOSAL
SPEEDS AHEAD
A new proposal to create enhanced summer bike routes this year, which would
reduce speed limits from 50 km/h to 30 km/h on the selected streets, is
pedalling forward.
Council’s public works committee voted in favour of the 2022 version of
“open streets” on Wednesday, which aims to create easier access for
cyclists.
If council gives the program final approval, it will be the latest version
of “open streets,” which began in 2020 to offer more room for pedestrians
and cyclists on select roads. In 2021, the city learned that inviting
pedestrians to use the routes broke traffic laws, so it began promoting
them solely to cyclists instead.
The public works committee is calling to create additional enhanced bike
routes on Ruby Street (from Wolseley Avenue to Portage Avenue) and Banning
Street (from Portage Avenue to Notre Dame Avenue). It also directed city
staff to install a bike lane with poly-posts along Wellington Avenue while
the program is underway.
CROSSWALK LIGHTS BACK IN SPOTLIGHT
A second attempt to ensure eye-level flashers are installed at all lighted
pedestrian crosswalks has been raised at city hall, accompanied by a call
to fund many additional traffic-safety enhancements.
On Wednesday, council’s public works committee approved a motion to seek
$7.9 million from the local and regional street renewal reserve to cover
all projects the city believes are needed to improve safety but has yet to find
a way to fund.
At crosswalks, that would ensure 158 lower mounted safety lights are
installed as soon as possible, at a cost of about $1.6 million.
Coun. Matt Allard first called for the street renewal reserve, which is
funded by annual tax hikes, as one option to pay for the flashing lights
alone last month. That followed a recent Free Press series that noted the
city has been lobbied to add more of the lights, which a traffic-safety
activist believes are more visible to drivers close to the crosswalks than
currently installed overhead lights.
But the matter was referred back to the public works committee over
concerns it lacked a clear funding source. While using the street-renewal
funds for a new purpose would require a two-thirds council vote, Allard
believes road-safety projects should be considered part of street renewal.
“I don’t have an actual determination suggesting… that the
road-renewal reserve can’t be used to fix our roads (for safety). Signals
and intersection upgrades, these are all in my opinion, part of roads,” he
said.
The investment would require a council vote.