BREAKING THE CYCLE
Bike theft is far from a uniquely Winnipeg problem, but other Canadian
cities are having
more success reducing numbers and reuniting owners with their wheels
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/2023/05/05/breaking-the-cycle-4
JEN Sjodin never expected to be sending her 13-year-old son pedalling down
a criminal path.
But the Winnipeg mom was out of luck when it came to retrieving his $400
bike with the help of city police, so she and her husband took matters into
their own hands, and their son Dawson’s legs.
He’d saved for months to buy the grey and neon-green Giant Talon last fall.
Not long after getting his new wheels, he rode to the Walmart on Taylor
Avenue and locked his bike to the rack near the front doors. He was in and
out of the store in about 15 minutes, and found his cable lock cut. The
bike was gone.
Sjodin filed a police report with the Winnipeg Police Service, posted a
notice on Facebook and scoured online classified ads in hopes of finding
the bike. Six days later, Dawson spotted it on Kijiji.
“We called the police non-emergency line and talked with someone after
hours,” she says. “They suggested to call back the next day, provide any
updates to the police report and the police would check it out.”
The next day was going to be too late. Instead, Sjodin, her husband and two
brothers concocted a plan to steal the bike back. She messaged the seller
and posed as an interested customer. When they met up, Dawson took the bike
for a test ride and pedalled directly to his uncle’s house.
Dawson got his bike back, but the experience left him shaken.
“For my son, it has made him much more afraid to lock up his bike,” Sjodin
says. “He doesn’t think it’s safe to lock it up anywhere.”
❏❏❏
The experience is one thousands of Winnipeg cyclists — from young kids to
seniors — are all too familiar with, some repeatedly.
Police say 1,665 bikes were reported stolen across the city in 2022. The
real number, however, is likely many times higher; multiple studies suggest
“small” property crimes often go unreported. Many victims won’t bother to
involve police because of the time involved and minuscule odds of getting
their stuff back.
And although the city launched an online bike registry in 2018, it has
proven mostly ineffective at reuniting owners and their rides —
particularly when compared to measures implemented in other Canadian cities
— say cycling advocates, bike-shop owners and even police.
About 400 cycles are recovered in Winnipeg annually, but less than 10 per
cent of them make their way home. In 2022, 386 bikes were recovered, and 15
were returned to their owners, according to the city’s community services
department. In Edmonton, 23 per cent of recovered bikes are returned to
their owners.
More than 17,000 bikes are registered in the Winnipeg system, which
combined existing paper registrations from 1995 with web records. Of that
number, more than 7,500 went on the registry between 2018 and 2021.
❏❏❏
Tom Babin, a Calgary author, active-transportation advocate and “cyclist in
chief” at online magazine Shifter, says bike theft breaks trust in
communities, creates economic difficulties and fuels other crimes.
“There isn’t a lot of trust between citizens and police when it comes to
bike theft. There’s an assumption everywhere that the cops will do nothing
about it, and they’re probably right. The police are busy,” he says.
When filing police reports and registering bikes fail to show results,
people such as Sjodin may take drastic measures when they see systems not
working.
“Can you imagine celebrating other crimes for stealing something back?
Stealing your bike back might be good at the moment, but for society, it’s
a terrible way of approaching it,” Babin says.
Police say they understand that people may turn to vigilantism when they
feel the police aren’t helping in their time of need.
“I don’t blame people for doing that. Of course, we can’t recommend that
people take matters into their own hands. But I understand the
frustration,” says WPS Sgt. Yvan LeTourneau.
Winnipeg cyclists can pay $7.35 and input their bike’s serial number, make,
model, year, value and three images to add a bike to the city’s online
registry. Any recovered bikes are taken to a city bike-storage facility and
cross-referenced with the registry to try finding their rightful owners.
A nondescript warehouse in a Winnipeg industrial district houses hundreds
of bikes, likely bound for auction or the scrap pile. The city’s 2023
auction of recovered bikes ended Wednesday. Associated Auto Auctions, which
conducted the weeklong online sale, had 428 bikes listed, an 11 per cent
increase from 2022. All 428 were sold, the proceeds of which go into the
city community services department’s coffers.
Winnipeg has a single bike-recovery officer who is responsible for the
warehouse, recovering reported bikes, communicating with the police,
providing promotional materials and returning bikes back to owners.
Bike Winnipeg executive director Mark Cohoe says only three per cent of 300
cyclists surveyed found the online registry useful for recovering their
property.
❏❏❏
Before he retired last spring, Rob Brunt worked as the Vancouver Police
Department’s first-ever bike detective.
He says in 2015, about one per cent of the 3,000 stolen bikes reported to
the police were getting back to their owners. That year, he reached out to
other cities and developed a partnership with Project 529, an online bike
registration system.
“This system allows anybody to search the stolen database. The cops can use
it, the bike stores can use it and the community can use it,” he says.
In the first year after Vancouver joined Project 529, police saw a 30 per
cent decline in reported bike thefts, along with improvements in recovery
efforts. That number is now a staggering 60 per cent, compared to the
number of thefts in 2015.
It’s free for bike owners to register their rides with Project 529, and the
international database is available to anyone, not just law-enforcement
agencies.
Const. Kenny McKinnon of the Edmonton Police Service wanted to address
Edmonton’s bike-theft crisis in a similar way.
“For The EPS, bike recovery was abysmal,” he says. “When we worked in the
downtown core, frequently we would stop people on bikes, and it was well
known that they were known bike thieves. But being able to prove that the
bike was stolen was the most difficult thing that we ran into.”
McKinnon says it was important to partner with the community. Since 2019,
all 18 bike shops in Edmonton offer point-of-sale registration for every
sale, free of charge. EPS says more than 100,000 Edmonton bikes are
registered through the Bike Index.
When the system was first implemented, 1,200 bikes were sent to auction or
destroyed annually. In 2021, that number fell to 774.
Winnipeg’s online registry was developed by ePly, a company focused on
event registration. The city is ePly’s first and only client for
bike-registration purposes.
LeTourneau has unsuccessfully pitched Project 529 and the Bike Index to the
city.
“(ePly) was never on our radar as a solution,” he says. “Why are we
creating something that’s already been created elsewhere?”
❏❏❏
In April 2019, the community services department launched Bicycle Registry
at the Time of Purchase Project, a stakeholder engagement survey. Of the 21
surveyed bike retailers who participated, 15 supported point-of-sale
registration.
Tim Woodcock, owner of Woodcock Cycle Works, says the city approached him
and other shops to register bikes at the point of sale. Through the shop’s
own database, Woodcock keeps a record of serial numbers for every sale.
“It’s not that much extra work for us. I said to (the city) that I’m on
board, and then we never heard anything back,” he says. “I don’t view
selling a person a bike because their bike was stolen as a sale. If people
get multiple bikes stolen, we lose them as cyclists.”
City spokesperson Adam Campbell says the city annually provides shops with
promotional materials for registration that can be included in paperwork
when someone buys a bike.
“During a consultation with stakeholders conducted in 2019, we found that
not all bike shops or larger retailers support or have the resources to do
a point-of-sale bike registration,” Campbell says.
WPS Sgt. Todd Martens says the registration system needs to change.
“If the system isn’t working to the best of its capability and you have
evidence to prove it, let’s pivot,” he says.
fpcity(a)freepress.mb.ca
Walking it back
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/editorials/2023/05/02/walking-it-…
PORTAGE and Main has long been considered Winnipeg’s most famous
intersection. Infamous may be more appropriate.
Since 1979, Portage and Main — the confluence of this city’s two main
non-river arteries — has been closed to pedestrians. Crossing at the
intersection involves navigating a confusing underground concourse
populated by businesses that close at 6 p.m., and is accessed by poorly
maintained, poorly lit stairwells. Traversing Portage and Main is an
accessibility nightmare for those with disabilities, and a baffling ordeal
for tourists and newcomers to the city.
The word iconic gets bandied about a lot when describing Portage and Main.
What, exactly, is “iconic” about crumbling concrete barricades? The
intersection is a reliable source of debate and, once, a go-nowhere
plebiscite. And that’s about it.
But now, the city is being presented with a rare opportunity to reimagine
our most infamous intersection into something that could, perhaps, be
worthy of the “iconic” designation. The current barricades need to come
down, owing to necessary repairs above and below ground, and the city is
soliciting public feedback on potential replacements, including a circular
“sky garden” that would allow pedestrians to move across the intersection —
suspended six storeys above traffic. Other ideas at street level include
lookout towers, lighting poles, canopies, and “monumental public art.”
Maybe we should revisit former mayor Susan Thompson’s
laser-pyramid-and-hot-tubs idea while we’re at it.
Most of these ideas do not involve improved street-level pedestrian access.
Making Portage and Main more attractive to residents and visitors alike is
a fine goal, but it shouldn’t be the only goal. What if — and hear us out —
people could just cross the street? What if Portage and Main was accessible
to everyone, every day, in their daily lives?
While a balance can certainly be struck between the practical and the
beautiful, what we’re talking about, at the end of the day, is an
intersection. Perhaps we should improve its function before we talk about
its form.
The thing that makes cities feel alive is vibrancy at street level, the
feeling of being part of a larger, kinetic energy that comes from being
around a crush of other people — which is why pedestrian-only corridors and
squares in other, larger cities tend to be popular tourist attractions. We
can’t erect a concrete fortress around our supposedly iconic intersection
and then turn around and wonder why our downtown practically has
tumbleweeds rolling across it after 6 p.m. Vibrant city centres need people
in them. Not just cars.
A pedestrian scramble-style crossing — in which vehicles are stopped in all
directions and pedestrians can move any way, including diagonally, to get
where they need to go more quickly and efficiently — could be a potential
solution for Portage and Main. Arguably the most famous scramble crossing
in the world is Shibuya Crossing, which, in addition to being functional,
is actually worthy of the designation “iconic.” Many cities have them.
Oxford Circus in London features a pedestrian scramble; so does Yonge and
Dundas in Toronto. Vancouver is looking at installing them as well.
When they are navigated properly, scramble crossings — despite their
moniker — are safer for pedestrians, according to City of Winnipeg
engineers who started looking at them as part of a road safety strategy
back in 2019.
Re-erecting the barricades at Portage and Main — even prettier, more
Instagrammable versions — only cements our image as a pedestrian- hostile,
car-centric city. Sky gardens, discs, towers, orbs… it doesn’t really
matter what you call them. A barricade by any other name is still a
barricade.
*Coun. Browaty? Meet Joe Downtown; he rides a bike, doesn’t like coffee and
— surprise! — he’s a Winnipegger, too*
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/2023/05/01/coun-browaty-meet-joe-do…
WINNIPEG, we have a Jeff Browaty problem. In this city’s ongoing efforts to
build a better, more progressive and more sustainable city — for those of
us here now and future generations — the veteran North Kildonan councillor
has emerged as a major impediment.
Now, let me say that I respect the fact that Browaty puts his name on a
ballot every four years and — if election results are any indication — has
done an excellent job of representing his ward. His current position as
chair of the finance committee of council proves he has the respect of at
least some of his fellow councillors.
However, I cannot be alone in squirming any time Browaty ventures out of
his suburban enclave to engage on citywide issues.
That was certainly my reaction when he almost single-handedly triggered the
2018 plebiscite on reopening Portage and Main. Browaty weighed into an
issue that didn’t really affect his constituents, screwed over the people
who live and own businesses downtown and then scurried back to the ’burbs.
If that were his only crime against progress, it would be tolerable. But
he’s at it again, this time at the April 26 meeting of the East
Kildonan-Transcona community committee.
One of the delegates at that meeting was Marianne Cerilli, founder of the
Transportation and Land Use Coalition, an advocacy group that supports
progressive and sustainable urban planning. The TLUC is well-informed,
well-supported and regularly makes a valuable contribution to discussions
on the future of the city.
Cerilli told the committee the city’s plan to spend $1 billion widening
Kenaston Boulevard and extending Chief Peguis Trail — projects that Browaty
passionately supports — are inconsistent with the principles expressed in
the city’s proposed strategic priorities action plan.
Cerilli is hardly the first person to make this observation, and she is not
wrong in her assessment. At a time when the city is struggling to maintain
existing infrastructure, and the world is trying to slow climate change,
spending a billion dollars on bigger, longer roads is harmful.
Perhaps it was because Cerilli is a former NDP MLA, and Browaty is a
true-blue Tory. Perhaps it’s Cerilli’s contempt for suburban sprawl, for
which Browaty is Winnipeg’s self-proclaimed poster boy. Whatever the
reason, Browaty launched into a rant about how advocates such as Cerilli
“do not represent most Winnipeggers.”
Who, you may ask, are “most Winnipeggers?”
They are, according to the councillor, the people who “want their street
lights timed well so they can get to work as fast as possible. They want to
drive their SUVs through the Tim Hortons drive-thru to get their coffee on
the way to hockey practice.”
Browaty then proclaimed that delegations at committee are “not relevant”
and “not representative of Joe Lunchbox Winnipeg who work all day long, who
pay taxes, to provide for their families and make a life for themselves.”
Browaty is hardly the first politician to play the Joe Lunchbox card or to
disparage lobby groups. Former NDP premier Gary Doer regularly referenced
the perspective he gained at his daughter’s soccer games, and called lobby
groups “one-trick ponies.” But there’s no evidence he ever insulted any of
them face to face.
There’s a ton of offensive stuff to unpack here.
First and foremost, it’s not Browaty’s job to disparage the people who go
before committee or council to express their concerns. Or to label them as
representative or unrepresentative. He is an elected official and part of
the job is listening to citizens, particularly those of the informed
variety, such as Cerilli.
More important, however, it is very hard not to gag over Browaty’s absurd
description of a typical Winnipegger.
No doubt some people living in his ward fit the image of a Tim Hortons-
clutching, SUV-driving hockey mom or dad complaining about the timing of
traffic lights. But surely Browaty has travelled outside his ward enough to
realize the city is so much more than that.
Let’s remember that Browaty represents about 45,000 people out a community
of more than 750,000 people that has become infinitely
more diverse and multicultural in the last 20 years. Even in his own ward,
you can bet more people do not own a car or truck, or drive smaller
vehicles, than those who pilot SUVs.
And perhaps most important, there are a lot of people in this city who
“work all day long, who pay taxes to provide for their families and make a
life for themselves” who also want to see the city take a more progressive
approach to urban planning. Some of them might even agree that extending
Chief Peguis Trail is not warranted.
Perhaps Browaty has been stuck in his SUV in the drive-thru too long to
notice how much the city has evolved. Or, he simply hasn’t learned how to
make friends outside his peer group in North Kildonan.
Either way, it’s time for Browaty to start showing some respect to the
people who take the time to engage with him and broaden his understanding
of what it really means to be a Winnipegger. Or, alternatively, find
another line of work.
Heck, maybe he could ask Joe Lunchbox where he works and try to get a job
there.
dan.lett(a)winnipegfreepress.com
River Heights group pushes city for changes after vehicle volumes spike on
residential street
Seeking calm amid traffic chaos
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/2023/05/01/seeking-calm-amid-the-tr…
WINNIPEGGER Tim Fennell counted more than 4,200 vehicles driving past his
Cambridge Street home in just 24 hours last month.
While calling for traffic calming measures, he said an average of 175
vehicles per hour on a “narrow” residential street is far beyond what should
be considered safe.
“I believe that the City of Winnipeg has engineered a dangerous situation
by continuing to direct more and more traffic on a street that they know
was never designed to handle the volume,” he told the Free Press on Monday.
Fennell, a founding member of a residents group called Calm Cambridge, has
raised concerns with city hall and council members about a spike in
vehicles using the street between Corydon and Academy avenues in River
Heights.
He said drivers treat it as a shortcut during construction projects on
Harrow and Stafford streets.
“We’d like to see some action taken to calm the traffic, at least slow the
traffic down,” said Fennell.
City spokesman Ken Allen said staff are aware of “renewed interest” in
calming measures due, in part, to construction leading to more traffic on
Cambridge.
“We are currently investigating the situation to determine potential
options to address traffic concerns,” he wrote in an email.
Coun. Janice Lukes, chairwoman of the public works committee, said traffic
volumes are a concern on several streets near the River Heights/
Crescentwood boundary.
She hopes staff, who receive many requests, will be able to conduct a
community traffic calming study.
Lukes said a community plan would be more effective than individual
changes. “When
you change something on one street, it’s a domino effect on other streets,”
said the councillor for Waverley West. “Traffic is like water. It’s just
going to go somewhere else.”
Lukes acknowledged there has been an “incredible” amount of traffic on
Cambridge due to road work.
She said traffic calming measures are a priority for city staff.
Coun. John Orlikow (River Heights-Fort Garry) said he is working with city
employees to address the issues raised by residents.
Fennell has been conducting his own traffic counts on Cambridge, north of
Corydon. He uses a motion sensor and digital camera.
He counted 4,214 vehicles when he went through all the images taken April
26. Much of the traffic was recorded during the morning and afternoon
commutes. Fennell said the section of Cambridge between Corydon and
Academy shouldn’t be handling so many vehicles in a single day because it
is narrower than the stretch south of Corydon.
He believes thousands more vehicles per day were using the street to avoid
congestion around nearby construction projects last summer.
“That’s when we started pushing and saying something has to be done,” said
Fennell.
In addition to a long-term solution, his group asked for temporary traffic
calming measures in a bid to improve safety and livability.
Fennell is concerned about the safety of his two children and others who
live on or use the street.
“We help them cross the street because there are too many cars and they’re
going too fast,” he said of his kids.
The speed limit outside his home is 50 km/h.
When he watches vehicles pass by, most drivers appear to be travelling at
or just below the limit.
Fennell is in favour of reducing speed limits on residential streets to 30
km/h.
In March, the city lowered speed limits to 30 or 40 km/h on four streets in
residential areas as part of a pilot project.
The city will look at whether drivers slow down and whether the change
affects livability and quality of life.
In his neighbourhood, Fennell wants the city to consider making physical
changes to roadways or turning some into one-way streets.
Speed humps were previously installed on Cambridge between Academy and
Kingsway.
Ian Walker, chair of Safe Speeds Winnipeg, said he observed a lot of
traffic when he visited Cambridge on a recent Friday afternoon.
“It was like it was being used as a collector or arterial street,” he said.
Safe Speeds Winnipeg has lobbied the city to reduce speed limits to 30 km/h
in residential areas in a bid to reduce the risk of fatal or serious injury
collisions.
The group believes the change would help neighbourhoods thrive and
encourage residents to be more active.
chris.kitching(a)freepress.mb.ca Twitter: @chriskitching
CALMING TRAFFIC BY DESIGN
THE City of Winnipeg will study ways to calm traffic through design.
Council has approved a motion to order a city staff report on methods to
add traffic-calming design elements whenever a street is selected for
reconstruction.
The potential changes could include narrowing roads, adding speed tables
(sections of raised road) and/or installing curb extensions to create more
space for pedestrians.
A report on the matter is expected back in about eight months.
*Councillor pushes for Portage, Main plebiscite*
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2023/04/28/councillor-pushes…
IF the city wants to reopen Portage Avenue and Main Street to pedestrians
in the future, all Winnipeggers should get another vote on the idea first,
according to one city councillor.
Coun. Russ Wyatt will push for a policy that requires a plebiscite prior to
opening the city’s most famous intersection to foot traffic and for council
to follow the results.
Wyatt said he will raise a motion to that effect at the May council
meeting, primarily over road safety concerns.
“When you open this intersection to pedestrians, you can expect injuries
and fatalities and that’s my biggest concern. I want the citizens of
Winnipeg to have a right to weigh in on this issue as they did before. And
that will be council policy before any decision,” he said. Plebiscites are
typically considered non-binding votes, which is why Wyatt wants the policy
to commit city council to respect the results.
In 2018, 65 per cent of Winnipeggers who participated voted “no” to
reopening the intersection to pedestrians; council has not taken action to
permanently reopen it since.
Wyatt said he is concerned there may be a new appetite to restore
pedestrian access.
Debate has raged on for years about allowing pedestrians to cross the
street at the surface level of the intersection, something they haven’t
been able to do since 1979. Supporters argue pedestrian access would help
connect and revitalize downtown, while opponents argue it would snarl
traffic and pose safety concerns.
The matter was thrust into the spotlight again this week as the city began
seeking public feedback on options to enhance the intersection.
An online survey and open houses will seek input on a wide variety of
ideas, including a sixth-floor-level “sky garden” circular walkway,
“monumental” public art, a set of four lookout towers and multi-media
lighting poles, along with simpler upgrades that would add trees and/or
enhance paving.
None of the options would give pedestrians permanent access to cross the
street at ground level.
While those ideas from a city consultant don’t include cost estimates,
Wyatt said he is also concerned about the potential price tag.
“I don’t see why the ratepayers of Winnipeg should be subsidizing fancy
lights and whatnot that could cost millions. I think there’s higher
priorities in our city,” he said.
Others argue a policy that guarantees voters a say in the matter wouldn’t
make sense.
“I think that’s preposterous. I think it’s an abrogation of their duties as
elected councillors. We don’t have a plebiscite over the Chief Peguis
(Trail) extension. We didn’t have a plebiscite over (building) Bridgwater.
It’s just ridiculous,” said Adam Dooley, a spokesperson for the Vote Open
campaign in 2018.
The city council process already allows the public to provide input on
council and committee decisions through a delegation process, he said.
A Winnipeg-wide vote would also prevent the city from focusing on feedback
from the intersection’s immediate neighbours, Dooley said.
“I think if this were a regular public works project, then the residents in
the area would have a larger say than what they are having because they
overwhelmingly want this to happen: pedestrian access at Portage and Main.
And they’re being told they can’t have that because of votes from, mostly,
the suburbs.”
Coun. Sherri Rollins said she doesn’t support the use of more plebiscites,
stressing elected officials shouldn’t shirk their duty to make informed
decisions on voters’ behalf.
“A simple yes/no (public) vote is just artificially narrow, so I’m not a
fan of plebiscites in general. I really feel that they are anti-democratic.
They don’t underline or emphasize the accountability that most of us
believe is part of being in elected office,” said Rollins.
In a brief written statement, Mayor Scott Gillingham said he won’t support
Wyatt’s motion.
“I don’t think the city needs another plebiscite on Portage and Main.”
joyanne.pursaga(a)freepress.mb.ca Twitter: @joyanne_pursaga
*Special-interest groups don’t represent most Winnipeggers, says Coun. Jeff
Browaty*
*Advocates’ relevance questioned*
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2023/04/28/special-interest-…
CITY council’s most senior member has caused outrage after telling members
of special interest groups their views are out of step with what most
Winnipeggers want.
“I appreciate your advocacy, but I don’t think a lot of these opinions are
relevant,” North Kildonan Coun. Jeff Browaty, who was first elected in 2006
and is currently finance committee chairman, told Marianne Cerilli, a
former MLA and mayoral candidate, after she made a presentation to
councillors.
“I appreciate everybody who comes to city hall, and takes time out of their
day to make presentations — people are very passionate,” Browaty said
during the East Kildonan-Transcona community committee Wednesday.
“(But) the people who present here really do not represent most
Winnipeggers, in my opinion. Each one of us on council represent 45,000-ish
people. They’re not looking to blow things up. They don’t have time to come
and make presentations all day. They want their street lights timed so they
can get to and from work as fast as possible. Or drive their SUVs through
Tim Hortons drive-thru to get their coffee on their way to hockey practice.
“The consultation we get is not as relevant as the consultation we get as
elected officials going door to door every four years to talk to people…
it’s not at all as representative of Joe Lunchbox Winnipegger, the people
who pay taxes and work all day long to provide for their families, to make
a life for themselves.”
On Friday, Browaty made an attempt to explain his comments, saying he knew
Cerilli had been a politician, so she would have a “thicker skin because of
the business we’re in.”
But there was little in the way of contrition.
“I’m not sending her an apology card today, but all Winnipeggers have the
right to have their views and ideas heard. I still do maintain that some of
the delegations we hear on budgets are from special interest groups and
aren’t representative of the majority of Winnipeg,” he said. “Just because
you’ve come to council, your opinions aren’t more important than residents
submitting letters to the editor, calling in to talk-radio shows, posting
in online community forums or talking directly to elected officials.”
Mayor Scott Gillingham said he wasn’t at the meeting, and he doesn’t know
everything that was said, so any questions about it should be directed to
Browaty.
But Gillingham said all councillors work hard to have a good sense of the
views of the people they are representing.
“We do have an open process at the City of Winnipeg. I appreciate the
knowledge and passion that delegations bring to their presentations, and I
have learned a lot from this process, but Coun. Browaty is correct that
delegations are just one tool that council uses to make its decisions,” he
said.
“From what I saw (on a social media posting) I didn’t see anything that
concerned me, as far as decorum.”
Cerilli, a founder of the Transportation and Land Use Coalition, said
Browaty’s comments were offensive.
“This is not about personal opinion. This is about research and evidence. I
was telling (councillors) the city has policy on this and for the city to
follow the policy. I think he needs to be more concerned about his conduct
with a city committee about following public policy. His ideas about urban
development are from the 1950s. That’s where he is,” she said.
“I don’t care if he apologizes or not.” Marc Cohoe of advocacy group Bike
Winnipeg has been making presentations to councillors since the days when
cyclists asking for bike paths were considered members of a fringe group.
The city now spends millions of budget dollars to build, maintain and clear
them.
“I was shocked to hear him. I’ve heard presentations that have changed my
mind on things and I’m sure others have, too,” Cohoe said.
“It’s important in the democratic process for people to listen. I know this
is not the whole process, but we bring in expertise and ideas which are
valuable to the city. If you sit and dismiss that public-engagement
process, what are you telling people?”
Longtime Point Douglas advocate and social activist Sel Burrows said he is
likely considered “a special interest delegation” by councillors.
“It is important for politicians to hear from others,” Burrows said.
“Delegations showing up at city council is part of gradually changing
councillors’ thoughts on issues. It is particularly important for suburban
councillors, who aren’t aware of inner-city issues where most of the
homelessness and crime happens.”
Mel Marginet, co-chair of the Transportation and Land Use Coalition, said
she believes Browaty’s comments are so serious the mayor should remove him
as finance chair.
“His comments were deeply shocking. It was deeply insulting to his
residents and the city as a whole. He should be pulled from the committee,”
Marginet said.
Coun. Matt Allard said he not only has no problem with delegations, he
welcomes appearances from more of them.
“I believe that it is important to encourage and welcome delegations from
the public and any organization that has an interest in making the city
better and wants to share their ideas about it,” Allard said.
— With files from Joyanne Pursaga
kevin.rollason(a)freepress.mb.ca
Portage and Main has to be people-friendly
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2023/05/01/portage-and-m…
Is it too soon? Can we talk about Portage and Main again? It’s been almost
five years. The vote was clear, but 2018 feels like a different lifetime,
doesn’t it? We’ve been through a lot since then, and a lot has changed.
The pandemic was devastating for downtown, and its legacy is lasting.
Significantly fewer people are now coming downtown to work. Office
buildings are sitting empty. Shops, restaurants, and the last movie
theatres have closed. Tax incentive programs that were eagerly snapped up
by developers in the past, now sit unsubscribed as they shy away from new
residential construction in the city centre. As the social, cultural, and
economic heart of our city, downtown needs as much help as it can get right
now, because no city flourishes without a prosperous and healthy core.
Another thing that has changed is we now know what’s going to happen at the
city’s storied intersection. The waterproofing membrane that protects the
underground concourse at Portage and Main needs to be replaced and the
barricades we so passionately fought over are coming down as part of a
multi-million-dollar construction project.
If we are removing the barricades, what should we put back? A design team
was hired to answer that question, and their proposals were recently
unveiled for public feedback. The goals for the design are to improve
accessibility, increase safety, enhance the pedestrian experience, and
attract people back to the intersection, restoring it to a vital public
space and needed a catalyst to help bring downtown back to life. Of course,
they must do this while maintaining the pedestrian blockades that prevent
people from using the intersection if they are not driving in a vehicle.
The designers face the daunting task of trying to attract people while at
the same time actively repelling them.
Attempting to overcome this dichotomy, the proposals made are dramatic, a
ring of sky gardens floating six storeys in the air, lookout towers on each
corner, or monumental public art that we can drive under. The scale and
grandeur of the proposals are striking and demonstrate just how important
Portage and Main is in our collective psyche.
Portage and Main is not just an intersection. It’s where we come together
in celebration, in protest and in mourning. It has always been seen as the
heart of the city, even when hidden behind concrete walls. There is
significant irony in the fact that we believe Portage and Main is important
enough to invest in a big idea that brings it back to life, but we voted so
clearly to say we are not willing to spend a few seconds longer in our cars
to accomplish this goal organically, and at low cost.
The designs presented are beautiful, and would be exciting additions to our
city, but without allowing functional day-to-day use of the intersection by
pedestrians, creating attractions to draw people is unlikely to find
success.
The fact that attractions are felt to be necessary to overcome the impacts
of our choice to value driving faster over quality of place, accessibility,
and economic vibrancy, means they would stand as monuments to our city’s
unwavering dedication to the vehicle, even more than the concrete walls are
today.
These grand gestures would be the embodiment of the gymnastics our city is
willing to put itself through to avoid the easy solution, and ensure it
remains subservient to vehicles above all else, even in our downtown.
Despite the difficult times downtown Winnipeg is going through, Portage and
Main is seeing some important sidewalk-level growth. Restaurants like
Earls, OEB, 529 Uptown, and Hy’s are opening or expanding, a Goodlife gym
has been built, 300 Main and soon 138 Portage East will bring 550 new
residential homes to the area, and the MMF is transforming the Bank of
Montreal into an important heritage centre.
These developments, and the more than 10,000 people working within a block
of the intersection, provide more than enough pedestrian gravity to create
a vibrant public space simply by inviting people to freely cross the
street, restoring Portage and Main to the powerful neighbourhood connector
it once was. Despite the post-pandemic need for downtown to be given every
opportunity to find new life, it is unlikely we will seize the simple
solution, and settle for prettier barricades that can be enjoyed from our
cars as we drive past.
Thankfully, the distant future of Portage and Main has been cast and it
will be as a vibrant public space and downtown focal point. Paired with the
redevelopment of Union Station, the Transportation Master Plan envisions a
major downtown rapid transit station at Portage and Main, anticipated to
serve more than 50,000 people every day. It seems impossible to imagine a
major transit hub without reintroducing pedestrians.
Portage and Main is really just an intersection. Its traffic volumes,
weather, width and whatever else has created its mythological status, isn’t
wildly different from Main and Broadway, Portage and Colony, Kenaston and
Sterling Lyon, or many large intersections across the world with pedestrian
crossings.
Until we treat it like it is a normal intersection, it won’t matter how
many floating doughnut gardens or elevators to the sky we build. Portage
and Main will never successfully attract people if it is simultaneously
designed to repel them.
*Brent Bellamy is senior design architect for Number Ten Architectural
Group.*