- AT-Network - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

PBIC News: Free Ped/Bike Lessons for Course Instructors
by Beth McKechnie 26 Aug '13

26 Aug '13

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: PBIC News <PBIC_News(a)mail.vresp.com> Date: Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:44 AM Subject: PBIC News: Free Ped/Bike Lessons for Course Instructors To: beth(a)greenactioncentre.ca <http://cts.vresp.com/fbl?33017d6d02/a153a5784b/http%3A%2F%2Fhosted-p0.vresp…> <http://cts.vresp.com/ts?33017d6d02/a153a5784b/http%3A%2F%2Fapi.addthis.com%…> <http://cts.vresp.com/ls?33017d6d02/a153a5784b/http%3A%2F%2Fapi.addthis.com%…> ** [image: PBIC News Brief -- News from the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center] *August 26, 2013* *New ped/bike planning and design lessons available for course instructors** * CHAPEL HILL, NC — The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center is pleased to announce the release of new bicycle and pedestrian planning teaching modules for undergraduate students. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Short Series is designed to augment undergraduate courses in basic civil engineering and/or transportation planning. The series consists of three lessons covering Planning for Pedestrians and Bicycles, Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Design, and Pedestrian and Bicycle Data and Performance. The modules are ideally suited to be integrated into an existing course, such as the first or introductory course in transportation engineering. Each of the educational modules contains presentation slides for a 50-minute lecture, speaker notes for instructors, references, and recommended additional readings. The program also includes one supplemental assignment. The modules can be used individually or sequentially. "Interest in bicycling and walking is growing nationally. Introducing undergraduate students to pedestrian and bicycle planning and design basics will create more well-rounded transportation professionals capable of addressing the complex transportation challenges of the future,” said Carl Sundstrom, PBIC staff member and co-author of the new curriculum. The teaching modules were developed, pilot tested and evaluated by an interdisciplinary team from the UNC-Chapel Hill Department of City and Regional Planning, the UNC Highway Safety Research Center (which houses the PBIC), and Auburn University’s Department of Civil Engineering. The effort was funded by the Southeastern Transportation Research, Innovation, Development and Education Center and the PBIC. This is a first of its kind supplemental curricula designed to fit within existing university courses. PBIC currently offers several semester-long courses for graduate and undergraduate students studying civil engineering and planning. All PBIC course materials can be found online at http://www.walkinginfo.org/training/university-courses/Short-Series.cfm<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?UNCHighwaySafetyRese/33017d6d02/a153a5784b/afcecaa6…>. Access to the instructional materials is limited to instructors. ------------------------------ Since its inception in 1999, PBIC's mission has been to improve the quality of life in communities through the increase of safe walking and bicycling as a viable means of transportation and physical activity. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center is maintained by the University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center with funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. ------------------------------ *Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center* 730 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Campus Box 3430 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3430 Phone: 1.888.823.3977 Fax: 919.962.8710 www.walkinginfo.org<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?UNCHighwaySafetyRese/33017d6d02/a153a5784b/3d5d26fe…> www.bicyclinginfo.org<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?UNCHighwaySafetyRese/33017d6d02/a153a5784b/55c6c716…> ------------------------------ Click to view this email in a browser<http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/871151/33017d6d02/1497217639/a153a5784b/> If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe <http://cts.vresp.com/u?33017d6d02/a153a5784b/mlpftw> ------------------------------ Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center 730 MLK, Jr. Blvd. CB 3430 Chapel Hill, NC 27599 US Read <http://www.verticalresponse.com/content/pm_policy.html> the VerticalResponse marketing policy. [image: Non-Profits Email Free with VerticalResponse!] <http://www.verticalresponse.com/landing/ef/?np/33017d6d02&utm_campaign=foot…>

1 0

Oregon: Crater Lake National Park Announces Inaugural Vehicle-Free Weekend
by Beth McKechnie 21 Aug '13

21 Aug '13

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Terry Zdan <tjzdan50(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:43:10 -0500 Travel Oregon**** [image: Travel Oregon Breaking News]**** **** **** ** ** *August 20, 2013***** ** ** *Crater Lake National Park Announces Inaugural * *Vehicle-Free Weekend on September 21-22* Crater Lake National Park Superintendent Craig Ackerman announced today the inaugural Vehicle-Free Weekend at Crater Lake to be held this year Sept. 21-22. The park plans to preserve every third weekend in September as an annual opportunity to highlight non-motorized use of the park. **** “In June, Crater Lake National Park, Travel Oregon and Cycle Oregon collaborated to open Crater Lake’s East Rim Drive to non-motorized traffic for a first-time trial,” said Ackerman. “After an outpouring of positive feedback from the many people who participated in this rare opportunity, we decided to make it an annual occurrence.” **** Whether hiking, biking, walking or running, visitors will have the opportunity to enjoy stunning views of Crater Lake, the deepest lake in the United States, from various points around the rim with no vehicle traffic. **** "Crater Lake and scenic cycling opportunities are state treasures that Oregon proudly claims,” said Todd Davidson, CEO of Travel Oregon. “Creating world-class recreation opportunities within Oregon’s unique landscapes is what we do best. I commend Craig and his team for giving Oregonians and visitors yet another opportunity to experience Crater Lake in such a remarkable way.” **** Under the plan, East Rim Drive will be open to non-motorized vehicles only (except for administrative and emergency vehicles) from North Junction around the East Rim of Crater Lake all the way to the intersection at Crater Lake National Park Headquarters and the Steel Visitors Center. Hwy 62 through the south end of the park, West Rim Drive and the North Entrance Road will be open to vehicles. Regular parking areas will be open, but generally fill up quickly. Normal park entrance fees apply. **** Visit the National Park Service’s website<http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/pfsudb>for details on parking, entrance fees and Crater Lake resources. **** *Photo credit: RideCyclingTours.com***** *Upcoming Events* *September 8, 2013* Bounty of the County <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/l0tudb>**** *September 12-15, 2013 * Japan Association of Travel Agents (JATA)<http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/1suudb> <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/hlvudb> *September 19-22, 2013* Feast Portland <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/xdwudb>**** *September 30, 2013* Travel Oregon 101 <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/d6wudb> **** *October 1, 2013* Oregon <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/9qyudb>Tourism Commission Meeting<http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/pjzudb> **** *October 2, 2013 * Travel Oregon 101 <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/5b0udb> <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/1w1udb> *October 2-4, 2013 * Oregon Main Street Conference <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/hp2udb> *Oct. 8, 2013-Jan. 28, 2014* Wild Rivers Coast <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/xh3udb> <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/da4udb>Rural Tourism Studio<http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/t24udb> **** ** ** *Important Deadlines* *August 30, 2013* Deadline to submit OTPF Project Beneficiary Form<http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/9u5udb>to Jeremys(a)SustainableTravel.org **** *October 7, 2013* Register for October <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/pn6udb> <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/5f7udb>Wild Rivers Coast <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/l87udb> <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/108udb>Rural Tourism Studio<http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/ht9udb> **** ** ** *Resources* Industry.TravelOregon.com<http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/xlavdb> **** Oregon Travel Barometer <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/debvdb>**** ** ** *Contact Us <Industry(a)TravelOregon.com?subject=null>* ** ** *TravelOregon.com <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/t6bvdb>* ** ** *Sign up for our Consumer eNewsletters* Subscribe to our General, Culinary and Outdoors eNewsletters <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/prdvdb> **** **** **** **** *Share this email with a friend <http://e2.ma/share/outbound/e/p3uod/l87a2c> * The Oregon Tourism Commission aims to improve Oregonians' quality of life by strengthening economic impacts of the state's $9.2 billion tourism industry. Industry.TravelOregon.com <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/5jevdb> **** **** Become a fan <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/lcfvdb>**** <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/14fvdb>**** Follow us <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/hxgvdb>**** <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/xphvdb>**** Be LinkedIn <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/diivdb>**** <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/tajvdb>**** **** If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online<http://e2.ma/message/p3uod/l87a2c>. **** *Share this:* <http://e2.ma/share/outbound/e/p3uod/l87a2c><http://e2.ma/share/outbound/t/p3uod/l87a2c><http://e2.ma/share/outbound/f/p3uod/l87a2c><http://e2.ma/share/outbound/l/p3uod/l87a2c> **** powered by**** [image: emma] <http://e2.ma/click/p3uod/l87a2c/92jvdb>**** **** -- Terry Zdan 126 Duncan Norrie Drive Wpg MB R3P 2J9 CANADA tjzdan50(a)gmail.com <tjzdan(a)gmasil.com>

1 0

Briefing on the British Government's Ambition for Cycling
by Beth McKechnie 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Terry Zdan <tjzdan50(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:34:51 -0500 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/2… long live the queen -- Terry Zdan 126 Duncan Norrie Drive Wpg MB R3P 2J9 CANADA tjzdan50(a)gmail.com <tjzdan(a)gmasil.com>

1 0

Thunder Bay: Stats show bike lanes make streets safer, city says
by Beth McKechnie 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

Stats show bike lanes make streets safer, city says Police collision reports show decreases in crashes every time a bike lane is put in, city says CBC News | Posted: Aug 15, 2013 3:46 PM ET http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/thunder-bay/story/2013/08/15/tby-thunder-bay-… The man in charge of planning bicycle lanes in Thunder Bay says they've resulted in a big drop in cycling collisions. The city’s active transportation coordinator, Adam Krupper, said studies prove the value of bike lanes in Thunder Bay. “The city of Thunder Bay has been using police collision reports to measure changes in collisions before and after bike lanes have been implemented,” he said. ** “What engineering has found is that there has been a 70 per cent decrease in collisions every time a bike lane is put in. These are really important numbers to keep in mind in terms of [questions like] 'Do bike lanes make the roads safer?' Every time a bike lane is put in the road becomes safer." 'A real surprise' Krupper said there's also been a decrease in motorist collisions on streets where bike lanes are installed. The same study found a 22 per cent drop in car accidents. "That's something that was a real surprise to us,” Krupper said. “Engineering didn't expect to see changes in motor vehicle collisions. But it's a very nice surprise to see there's actually been a decrease." Krupper said the decrease is likely because the more narrow car lane makes motorists more cautious. “They're paying a bit more attention,” he said. “We've found that traffic volumes haven't changed when a bike lane is put in. The same number of people are driving, but we believe that those people who are driving are being more cautious." This week the city is painting new lane markings and putting up signs for the newest additions to the network. The streets will include Adelaide, Arundel, High, Keith and Theresa, as well as Leslie Avenue. Beverly Street will be next, after reconstruction of the road has been completed.

1 0

WFP: Bike-boom backlash - European cities getting the gears over too many cyclists (Aug.17'13)
by Beth McKechnie 18 Aug '13

18 Aug '13

[Note: This article from Der Spiegel was published on Saturday, Aug. 17, 2013, in the Winnipeg Free Press but is not yet available on their website. Here it is from the original source -- the content appears the same though unfortunately the final two paragraphs were dropped in the Free Press presumably for space. The Der Spiegel headline was also more positive, "Bike boom: Popularity of Cycling Leads to Overcrowding". Ah, for such problems!] Too Many Bikes? Challenges in Europe's Cycling Boom By Holger Dambeck <http://www.spiegel.de/extra/0,1518,632103,00.html> http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/bike-boom-popularity-of-cycli… More bicycles were supposed to make Europe's cities more livable. Instead, the popularity of two-wheeled travel is causing problems in some cities in Holland and Denmark, where traffic jams and parking shortages are common. Still, planners remain optimistic.* * The bike path is completely full -- in pairs or three abreast the cyclists roll past the stoplight at a snail's pace. They pass by biker-to-biker for a good 80 seconds before the gaps between them finally start to widen. The scene at a Copenhagen intersection is captured in a YouTube video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYajXN4pPHI>, which shows what can happen when a third of a city's population travels every day by bike. Urban planners in Denmark and Holland are well acquainted with problems like these. Cycling has been heavily promoted, and more and more people are taking to the pedal -- but eventually cycling paths, bike racks and other parking areas have begun to run out of space. The bike boom -- long seen as the universal solution to roads jammed with parked cars, dead inner cities and other urban maladies like noise, smog and lack of exercise -- threatens to choke on its own success. Take the example of Groningen, a city in the northern Netherlands. Out of a population of just under 200,000, there are 375,000 bicycles, and 50 percent of all trips are made by bike. "We are very proud of our high share of bicycles, but the success has also caused problems," Jaap Valkema, the city's bicycle commissioner, recently said in a panel discussion at the Velo-City urban cycling conference in Vienna. One must keep in mind, cautioned Valkema, that public opinion can always flip. "We have to take action," he said. *Groningen* * Wants 65 Percent Bike Traffic* Urban planners in Groningen flipped the switch some 35 years ago. That's when they cut off all automotive traffic through the city center. Cycling became the most flexible and popular means of transport. But even if a bike takes up less space than a car, it became difficult to find space to cycle in Groningen's center. To get the chaotic bike parking situation under control, the city has laid out red carpets where bike parking is not permitted. Parking areas are then demarcated in turn. Ten years ago, there were 3,000 bicycles parked in front of the main train station," said Valkema. Today there are 10,000, he added, primarily because of the rising number of students in Groningen. Soon that number could be as high as 15,000 or 17,000. A parking garage has been built at the station to accommodate this flood of bikes. "It may be that we have to start charging for parking," said Valkema, "at least for more than a day." The city wants to increase the share of cycling traffic -- the so-called Modal Split -- to 65 percent by 2030. To achieve this, the city has planned a new parking garage with spaces for 1,200 bikes. In addition, traffic planners want to route car and bike transportation more consistently. Instead of broadening bike paths, they will soon reclassify entire streets as cycling roads. *Cycling Infrastructure Pays Out* Copenhagen is grappling with similar problems. The most heavily frequented bike paths headed to the city center are, at the most, 3-4 meters (10-13 feet) wide. As long as the light is green, a steady stream of cyclists flows by at around 20 kilometers per hour (12 mph). But at some point the light turns red -- and then patience is called for. "Sometimes the bike path is so full that I need two, three traffic light phases before I'm able to cross the intersection," says Niels Torslov, the Danish capital's chief traffic planner. This year alone, the city has invested €22 million ($30 million) to adapt and expand the current infrastructure. "We are focussing on the areas of the cycling network where there are often traffic jams and that are unsafe," says Ayfer Baykal, Copenhagen's deputy mayor for environmental issues and technology. She considers those millions a good investment. "Of course cycling infrastructure costs money, but it is a very effective and affordable way to improve mobility in Copenhagen," she adds. The bicycle boom is causing problems in the German capital<http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-battle-for-germany-s-roads-…>, as well. "There is a lack of space on the roads," says Burkhard Horn, a Berlin traffic planner. "The bike paths are too narrow. Sometimes 30, 40 people will be waiting at a traffic light." There have also been conflicts between fast and slow cyclists, because many bike paths -- especially older ones -- don't offer space for overtaking other bikers. *Anger on the Sidewalk* Horn also worries about increasing conflicts with pedestrians. These also go back to poor planning. Years ago, bike paths were often built into sidewalks -- inevitably bringing pedestrians and cyclists into uncomfortably close vicinity. And on some streets without bike paths, some cyclists prefer riding on the sidewalk rather than the street, because they feel safer there or because the pavement is smoother to ride on. In the bicycle metropolis of Copenhagen, cycling on the sidewalk is, incidentally, absolutely taboo. *[As noted above, these final two paragraphs were not included in the WFP.]* In Berlin, the problem is slowly being resolved: The city is adding cycle lanes to existing road surfaces. But because money is scarce, there won't be a physical separation, such as a curb, as is customary in Denmark and Holland. The price for this is that cars continue to misuse bike lines as parking spaces. But where this journey is headed is well known to Horn, the traffic planner: "We need to reallocate space for bicycles. That is inevitable. The space will be taken from cars."

1 0

WFP column: Vancouver cycles, Winnipeg recycles (Aug.3'13)
by Beth McKechnie 18 Aug '13

18 Aug '13

Vancouver cycles, Winnipeg recycles By: Catherine Mitchell <catherine.mitchell(a)freepress.mb.ca> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/columnists/vancouver-cycles-winnip… The acrimony in Vancouver over the development of a new cycling route shows just how much people hate change. Not in Vancouver, in Winnipeg. Vancouverites have just weathered a blistering debate about the value of encouraging commuters to get out of their cars and onto bicycles. The redevelopment of Point Grey Road, from Jericho Park to Hadden Park at the Burrard St. Bridge, will construct separated bike lanes, but also dump cars entirely off a one-kilometre stretch of the route. If you've driven in rush hour in that city, you understand the hard feelings. Closing that one-kilometre chunk of Point Grey will push 10,000 motorists onto other routes. Nevertheless, the project passed city council 7-2 last week. I say good on them. No, inertia is Winnipeg's problem. Compare Vancouver's bold plans to what has happened here, what unfolded in 2010 when city council painted miserly bike lanes along residential roads and plopped in some sorry excuses for traffic circles. The customary high-pitched whine turned into all-out revolt. Lawsuits, even. Living on Grosvenor Avenue, I can tell you the bitterness festers -- I hear the honking horns, and chronic complaints and witness a stubborn refusal to heed the rules of the roundabouts, which remain eyesores on the leafy street. When was the landscaping supposed to be done? Little wonder, then, city council got away with pulling the fast one on the active-transportation strategy -- the $400,000 for a study that was supposed to devise a plan to pull together all the fractured pieces of various bike routes, lanes, paths, trails and boulevards: quietly cancelled by public works. Coun. Jenny Gerbasi stumbled onto the public works decision by chance. Mayor Sam's can-do campaign that got him first elected in 2004 made some of us feel he would bring the spirit that built a ballpark to the grinding gears of a city bureaucracy, pave the potholes and bring Winnipeg into the 21st century for urban design. Meanwhile, Winnipeg's 3.6-kilometre rapid-transit splurge remains a stub of an idea to move bus riders speedily through congested streets. And the $20-million shot in the arm 2011's expansion gave to the active-transportation plan did not, as was hoped, spark real progress toward a safe, dedicated cycling network. I know cyclists who still ride on sidewalks, even where the city has reserved a metre or so of curbside space for them. Painting the blacktop with white bicycle graphics that rapidly wash out doesn't engender a load more goodwill from motorists. The difference, I think, is culture. The automobile has reigned supreme for so long in this city, and too few councillors are up to the heat that will come in challenging inertia. The equivalent here of Vancouver's plan for Grey Point Road would turn one side of Wellington Crescent exclusively over to bicycles, squeezing two-way vehicular traffic to the other side of the boulevard. Imagine the congestion that would erupt on Academy, or Corydon. That would elicit howls of indignation from many that such a plan favoured the well-heeled residents of the crescent and a small percentage of commuters at the expense of ordinary shmucks just trying to get to the office. (That's what they said in Vancouver, too). Maybe a few of those motorists would leave the keys at home, though. A dedicated road is a safer, more efficient ride, and security is pivotal to convincing people to commute by bike. I biked to work once. I can still feel the hair on the back of my neck rising as I picked my way along on Arlington, north of Portage, and up McPhillips. Others with greater dedication to clean living do it, daily (well, OK, maybe not every day of the year). But they are part of a small, tenacious group of warriors. That hardy club isn't going to grow much, I think, until we link a series of routes where bikes are separated from cars, which is probably what the active-transportation strategy would have advised. There are a lot of reasons to envy Vancouverites, but rush-hour traffic isn't one of them. It's congested. You can idle in frustration for a long time, burning gas that costs $1.50 a litre. That, too, is part of the strategy. catherine.mitchell(a)freepress.mb.ca *Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 3, 2013 A15*

1 0

Edmonton using unique method to promote bicycle safety
by Dave Elmore 16 Aug '13

16 Aug '13

In an effort to make Edmonton more bike-friendly, the City is getting creative. As part of an education campaign called "Let's Get There Together," three new videos have been unveiled, starring mini Lego figurines. The short videos cover common issues that may arise when cyclists and motorists share the road. Check out this link: http://globalnews.ca/news/783642/city-using-unique-method-to-promote-bicycle -safety-on-edmonton-roads/ Thanks Dave o _ ( \ _ (X)\ /(X)

1 0

Risks of cycling, walking and driving put in context
by Beth McKechnie 16 Aug '13

16 Aug '13

At the risk of overloading everyone on a sunny Friday afternoon (!), I also found this Vancouver Sun piece by Kay Teschke -- lead research investigator on the BICE study<http://cyclingincities.spph.ubc.ca/injuries/the-bice-study/>-- a real eye-opener. happy weekend, Beth * * * * * Risks of cycling, walking and driving put in context Opinion: Constructive discussion needed By Kay Teschke and John Carsley, Special to The Vancouver Sun | July 8, 2013 http://www.vancouversun.com/opinion/op-ed/Risks+cycling+walking+driving+con… We read with interest The Vancouver Sun article “It may be time to start talking about licensing bikes” and the subsequent letters to the editor. We agree that an open and constructive discussion of cycling issues is needed. We are writing to provide a more complete public health context, since there may be misconceptions. We address three issues related to modes of transport: the burden (or number) of injuries; the risk (or rate) of injuries; and other potential risks and benefits of various modes. The burden of deaths and head injuries The editorial suggests that “cycling remains the biggest cause of traumatic brain injury for all other forms of recreational activity among young people.” By this, we presume the authors meant the single most important recreational cause of traumatic head injuries. In Canada, cycling accounts for 10 per cent of head injury hospitalizations in kids. Of course, this includes mountain biking, the most risky cycling activity. We think that cycling as discussed in the article is better compared with other modes of transportation. The most recent B.C. Traffic Accident Reports (2005 to 2007) indicate that, on average each year, there were 31 children (up to age 19) who had head injuries when cycling, 60 when walking, and 703 when in a car, SUV, van or truck. Unfortunately, this data only include crashes with motor vehicles, so it does miss some cycling and walking injuries. Deaths are often considered a better comparison measure, since they almost always involve crashes with motor vehicles, are reliably recorded, and are the most devastating type of injury. So how do deaths compare between modes? British Columbia Motor Vehicle Branch data for the same years indicate there were 10 deaths a year on average (all age groups) when cycling, 70 when walking, and 300 when driving. Thus, bicycling had the lowest “burden” of deaths and head injuries of the three transportation modes. The numbers of deaths and head injuries indicate that all modes of transportation deserve public health attention. Death rates shows cyclists, pedestrians more vulnerable The burden of death and injury reported above does not tell us whether one mode of transportation is safer or riskier than another. For example, more trips are taken by car and more distance travelled. So when deciding what mode of transportation to use, it is important to consider the death rate, not just the raw numbers. A recent analysis compared the fatality rate by mode of travel in B.C. There were 14 deaths per 100 million trips for bicycling, 15 for walking and 10 for driving – remarkably similar. Per 100 million kilometres travelled, there were three deaths for bicycling, seven for walking and one for driving. Using distance rather than trips shows that cyclists and pedestrians are more vulnerable road users. Are these risks high? One way to think about this is the number of trips for one death to happen: one car occupant dies every 10 million trips and one pedestrian or cyclist dies every seven million trips. Other risks and benefitsof transportation modes In addition to injuries, transportation contributes in other ways to the risk of death. These are also vital to consider when choosing a mode of transportation. Motor vehicle travel increases time spent sitting and produces air pollution, and these are associated with increased mortality from chronic diseases. Both walking and bicycling are active modes of travel. The physical activity they entail reduces the risk of developing many chronic diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, certain cancers, and dementia. Many studies have compared these benefits to the injury risks. All have found that the benefits greatly outweigh the risks. The benefits of walking and cycling (lower risk of death from chronic diseases) are 10 to 100 times higher than the risk of death from injuries. This wonderful health benefit of active modes of travel is the reason public health experts around the world and in B.C. want to make it easy for as many people as possible to choose walking or cycling for at least some of their daily trips. A multi-faceted approach modelled on countries that have achieved higher rates of active travel would include, first and foremost, reduced vehicular speed (to lower injuries for all travel modes), protected bicycling infrastructure that makes cycling feel as comfortable as walking on a sidewalk, and education programs in schools to teach cycling and road skills at an early age. An emphasis on encouragement, rather than punishment, seems most appropriate for travel modes that have such large net health benefits. *Dr. Kay Teschke is a professor of the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia; Dr. John Carsley is the medical health officer for Vancouver Coastal Health Authority.* © Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

1 0

What if bike comfort is more important than bike safety?
by Beth McKechnie 16 Aug '13

16 Aug '13

Thanks, Erik, very interesting and apropos to a study I was looking at this morning comparing route safety to route preferences. UBC's BICE study<http://cyclingincities.spph.ubc.ca/injuries/the-bice-study/>by Kay Teschke, Meghan Winters and Mike Brauer "examined the association between *bicyclists’ injuries and the cycling environment *(e.g., route types, intersection types)" in Toronto and Vancouver, and then compared the results with those of an earlier study<http://cyclingincities.spph.ubc.ca/opinion-survey/>of route types that motivate and deter cycling. Here's a snippet of the results: "We found that route infrastructure does affect the risk of cycling injuries. The following features were the *safest*: - cycle tracks (also known as “separated” or “protected” bike lanes) alongside major streets - residential street bike routes with traffic diversion - bike lanes on major streets where there were no parked cars - off-street bike paths - intersections with motor vehicle speeds below 30 km/h - residential street intersections The following infrastructure features had *increased risk*: - streetcar or train tracks - downhill grades - construction - sharrows (shared car / bike lanes) - traffic circles at residential street intersections - arriving at an intersection in the direction opposite to traffic *are safe routes preferred routes?* In our earlier study <http://cyclingincities.spph.ubc.ca/opinion-survey/>of route types that motivate and deter cycling, we found that people preferred to ride on bike-only paths, multi-use paths, residential street bike routes, and cycle tracks. They preferred NOT to ride on major streets. The graph below compares our injury study results on route safety to the results on route preferences. Preferences and safety largely agree. Major streets are less safe and not preferred. Bike-specific routes are safer and preferred. The main disagreement was that multi-use paths are preferred, but were not particularly safe. They could be made safer by making them straighter so sight lines are better and by removing obstacles like bollards." cheers, Beth On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Erik Dickson <edickson(a)scatliff.ca> wrote: > A very interesting article from this weeks’ Green Lane Project News ( > http://greenlaneproject.org/blog/view/what-if-bike-comfort-is-more-importan…). > For anyone who has ever debated “vehicular cycling” there are several good > points regarding whether the debate over what is safer is really the most > important debate or if we should instead being asking ourselves what is > more comfortable and likely to attract new riders. An interesting further > discussion may be should we always seek the most efficient routes for bike > infrastructure even though longer, parallel routes may have the potential > to be more comfortable. - Erik > > > *What if bike comfort is more important than bike safety?* *By Michael > Andersen, Green Lane Project staff writer* *August 14, 2013* > > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/bikeportland/8884323350/> > > When I'm standing near the edge of a high ledge or cliff, I know, > rationally, that I'm unlikely to fall. I've spent most of my life without > spontaneously tumbling sideways, and standing on the edge of a cliff > doesn't change that. > > I know, statistically speaking, that I am almost completely safe. > > But that doesn't mean I like to stand near the edge of a cliff. > > When I'm in the front seat of a roller coaster, I know, rationally, that > my body is extremely safe. Tens of thousands of thrill-seekers have raised > their hands in the air without being harmed. > > But that doesn't stop me from being scared of raising my hands in the air > in the front seat of a roller coaster. > > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/rk_photos/9331712551/> > > When I'm riding my bike along a five-lane arterial road, I know, > rationally, that the professional truck driver next to me is statistically > unlikely to suddenly swerve to his right, crushing and killing me. > > But that doesn't mean I like to bike on a street like this: > > Last week, I interviewed<http://greenlaneproject.org/blog/view/at-last-feds-move-toward-a-green-ligh…>a man whose main ideas have been rejected by mainstream bike advocates in > the United States: John Forester, founder of the "vehicular cycling" > concept. Because cars and bikes rarely collide when they can see each > other, Forester and his allies argue, people should ride bicycles where > they are most visible: right down the middle of standard traffic lanes. > Protected bike lanes modeled on those in Northern Europe, they argue, move > people on bikes to the side of the roadway where they're harder for people > in cars to see. > > There's something to this argument. If there weren't, it wouldn't have > been nearly so successful in the 1970s and 1980s. To Forester and his > successors, such as Bicycle Quarterly's Jan Heine, peoples' desire to use > protected bike lanes is irrational and therefore unjustifiable<http://janheine.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/separated-cycle-paths-a-summary/> > . > > "Most Americans suffer from bicyclist inferiority complex," Forester told > me. "Most of the things that they like appeal to their phobias." > > There's a standard response to Forester, Heine and others who make this > case against protected bike lanes: that although no intersection is perfect > and a given protected lane might slightly increase the short-term risk of > collision at a given intersection, a city that offers a robust network of > protected lanes will actually become safer in the long run, because more > people will ride bikes<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_in_numbers#Examples_of_substantial_incr…> > . > > This is a pretty strong argument. > > But is it the best one? > > What if Forester, Heine and others are using the wrong metric to measure > the success of a bike lane? What if "safety," as calculated by government > statisticians who sit far away from speeding semi trailers, isn't actually > a bike lane's most precious characteristic? > > What if bike designers, instead of arguing about safety – an argument > that, to be clear, I think protected bike lanes would win – decided that*the most important measure of a good bikeway is whether people tend to like > it?* > > I'm not arguing that safety is unimportant. Obviously nonprofessionals are > imperfect judges of whether a particular lane or intersection is safe, and > cities must work carefully to design good, safe intersections with few > bike-car conflicts. > > But when professionals make safety their only absolute value, they presume > that physical safety is the most important value in people's lives. And > that assumption is demonstrably false. Of course people want safety. But > they want other things, too. > > *A restaurant doesn't measure its success by the percentage of people who > dine there without getting sick.* It measures success by the number of > people who come in the door, how much they pay and how often they return. A > public transit line isn't funded by the federal government based on its > anticipated vehicle failure rate. It's funded based on the number of people > who are expected to use it. > > And as for bike infrastructure, here's the thing: as one study<http://otrec.us/project/33>after another > <http://otrec.us/project/33>has found, people go out of their way to use > bike lanes, especially protected bike lanes<http://dc.streetsblog.org/2013/08/07/study-cyclists-gravitate-toward-street…> > . > > *Bluebonnet Lane in Austin.* > > Surprise! It turns out that, rationally or not, people dislike biking on a > street that constantly reminds them of their own possible demise. > > Even if, rationally, they know they're almost completely safe. > > Here's what a more human-centric way of thinking about bike design would > involve: > > - In every city, making the number of anticipated users the primary > metric for designing a desired bike project. > - In every city, actually taking efforts to measure the usage of > important bike projects. > - Using the phrase "safety and comfort" as a pair of core values in > street design, but not as a pair of synonyms. > > This line of thinking is why, at the Green Lane Project, we use the phrase > "low-stress" to describe the bike networks we value most. We don't talk > about building "safer bike lanes," though ultimately a network of good ones > is safer. > > We simply talk about building "better bike lanes." > > People aren't robots, and they don't change their behavior based on > mathematics. They change their behavior based on feelings. Until bike > advocates and street designers alike understand this, bikes will never > successfully belong. > > *Green lane idea of the day: **Street designers should consider making > short-term safety a baseline requirement of better bike facilities, but not > the sole measure of bike projects' value.** * > > *Cycle track photo from Copenhagen by J.Maus/BikePortland; used with > permission. Cliff photo by Adam Baker. Roller coaster photo by raghavvidya. > * > > Regards, > Erik Dickson > > Suite 1120 – 201 Portage Avenue > > Winnipeg, MB R3B 3K6 > > ph: (204) 927-3444 ext. 242 > fax: (204) 927-3443 > web: www.scatliff.ca > > blog: http://scatliff.tumblr.com > > Please consider our environment before printing this message. > > > > _______________________________________________ > AT-Network mailing list > AT-Network(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/at-network > >

1 0

What if bike comfort is more important than bike safety?
by Erik Dickson 16 Aug '13

16 Aug '13

A very interesting article from this weeks' Green Lane Project News (http://greenlaneproject.org/blog/view/what-if-bike-comfort-is-more-importan t-than-bike-safety). For anyone who has ever debated "vehicular cycling" there are several good points regarding whether the debate over what is safer is really the most important debate or if we should instead being asking ourselves what is more comfortable and likely to attract new riders. An interesting further discussion may be should we always seek the most efficient routes for bike infrastructure even though longer, parallel routes may have the potential to be more comfortable. - Erik What if bike comfort is more important than bike safety? By Michael Andersen, Green Lane Project staff writer August 14, 2013 <http://www.flickr.com/photos/bikeportland/8884323350/> When I'm standing near the edge of a high ledge or cliff, I know, rationally, that I'm unlikely to fall. I've spent most of my life without spontaneously tumbling sideways, and standing on the edge of a cliff doesn't change that. I know, statistically speaking, that I am almost completely safe. But that doesn't mean I like to stand near the edge of a cliff. When I'm in the front seat of a roller coaster, I know, rationally, that my body is extremely safe. Tens of thousands of thrill-seekers have raised their hands in the air without being harmed. But that doesn't stop me from being scared of raising my hands in the air in the front seat of a roller coaster. <http://www.flickr.com/photos/rk_photos/9331712551/> When I'm riding my bike along a five-lane arterial road, I know, rationally, that the professional truck driver next to me is statistically unlikely to suddenly swerve to his right, crushing and killing me. But that doesn't mean I like to bike on a street like this: Last week, I interviewed <http://greenlaneproject.org/blog/view/at-last-feds-move-toward-a-green-ligh t-for-separated-bike-lanes> a man whose main ideas have been rejected by mainstream bike advocates in the United States: John Forester, founder of the "vehicular cycling" concept. Because cars and bikes rarely collide when they can see each other, Forester and his allies argue, people should ride bicycles where they are most visible: right down the middle of standard traffic lanes. Protected bike lanes modeled on those in Northern Europe, they argue, move people on bikes to the side of the roadway where they're harder for people in cars to see. There's something to this argument. If there weren't, it wouldn't have been nearly so successful in the 1970s and 1980s. To Forester and his successors, such as Bicycle Quarterly's Jan Heine, peoples' <http://janheine.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/separated-cycle-paths-a-summary/> desire to use protected bike lanes is irrational and therefore unjustifiable. "Most Americans suffer from bicyclist inferiority complex," Forester told me. "Most of the things that they like appeal to their phobias." There's a standard response to Forester, Heine and others who make this case against protected bike lanes: that although no intersection is perfect and a given protected lane might slightly increase the short-term risk of collision at a given intersection, a city that offers a robust network of protected lanes will actually become <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_in_numbers#Examples_of_substantial_incr eases_in_cycling_associated_with_reduction_in_danger> safer in the long run, because more people will ride bikes. This is a pretty strong argument. But is it the best one? What if Forester, Heine and others are using the wrong metric to measure the success of a bike lane? What if "safety," as calculated by government statisticians who sit far away from speeding semi trailers, isn't actually a bike lane's most precious characteristic? What if bike designers, instead of arguing about safety - an argument that, to be clear, I think protected bike lanes would win - decided that the most important measure of a good bikeway is whether people tend to like it? I'm not arguing that safety is unimportant. Obviously nonprofessionals are imperfect judges of whether a particular lane or intersection is safe, and cities must work carefully to design good, safe intersections with few bike-car conflicts. But when professionals make safety their only absolute value, they presume that physical safety is the most important value in people's lives. And that assumption is demonstrably false. Of course people want safety. But they want other things, too. A restaurant doesn't measure its success by the percentage of people who dine there without getting sick. It measures success by the number of people who come in the door, how much they pay and how often they return. A public transit line isn't funded by the federal government based on its anticipated vehicle failure rate. It's funded based on the number of people who are expected to use it. And as for bike infrastructure, here's the thing: as one study <http://otrec.us/project/33> after another <http://otrec.us/project/33> has found, people <http://dc.streetsblog.org/2013/08/07/study-cyclists-gravitate-toward-street s-with-protected-bike-lanes/> go out of their way to use bike lanes, especially protected bike lanes. Bluebonnet Lane in Austin. Surprise! It turns out that, rationally or not, people dislike biking on a street that constantly reminds them of their own possible demise. Even if, rationally, they know they're almost completely safe. Here's what a more human-centric way of thinking about bike design would involve: * In every city, making the number of anticipated users the primary metric for designing a desired bike project. * In every city, actually taking efforts to measure the usage of important bike projects. * Using the phrase "safety and comfort" as a pair of core values in street design, but not as a pair of synonyms. This line of thinking is why, at the Green Lane Project, we use the phrase "low-stress" to describe the bike networks we value most. We don't talk about building "safer bike lanes," though ultimately a network of good ones is safer. We simply talk about building "better bike lanes." People aren't robots, and they don't change their behavior based on mathematics. They change their behavior based on feelings. Until bike advocates and street designers alike understand this, bikes will never successfully belong. Green lane idea of the day: Street designers should consider making short-term safety a baseline requirement of better bike facilities, but not the sole measure of bike projects' value. Cycle track photo from Copenhagen by J.Maus/BikePortland; used with permission. Cliff photo by Adam Baker. Roller coaster photo by raghavvidya. Regards, Erik Dickson Suite 1120 - 201 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, MB R3B 3K6 ph: (204) 927-3444 ext. 242 fax: (204) 927-3443 web: www.scatliff.ca blog: http://scatliff.tumblr.com Please consider our environment before printing this message.

1 0