- AT-Network - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

Grist: There's safety in numbers for cyclists
by Beth McKechnie 12 Oct '10

12 Oct '10

[Of course, reduced crash rates with increased numbers of cyclists would hold true here, too. You can find this article online at: http://www.grist.org/article/2010-10-11-theres-safety-in-numbers-for-cyclis…, Beth] How we roll There’s safety in numbers for cyclistsby Elly Blue In U.S. cities, there are a lot more people out bicycling than just a few years ago. You might reasonably think that the bicycle crash rate would skyrocket as more people, from wobbly new riders to the outright safety-averse, take to the streets on two wheels. It's a fine, common-sense assumption -- that happens to be wrong. Research has been steadily showing, actually, that the more people are out there riding bicycles, the safer bicycling becomes. As ridership goes up, crash rates stay flat. It's happening in Portland (see page 11 of this report<http://bikeportland.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/bikecount2009reportfinal…>[PDF]). It's happening in New York City<http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/05/safety-in-numbers-its-happening-in-ny…> . Much of the ridership increase is due to cities' investments in bicycle-specific infrastructure. But the efficacy of that infrastructure for safety is often questioned. And there's one theory -- based on a growing body of data -- that suggests that a few painted lines on the road, bike racks, and traffic lights form only part of the safety equation. And maybe a smaller part than we tend to assume. The phenomenon, dubbed "safety in numbers," was first identified in 2003, in an academic paper <http://www.cycle-helmets.com/safety_in_numbers2.pdf> by public health researcher Peter Jacobsen [PDF]. After being asked by officials in Pasadena, Calif., if their city "was a dangerous place to bicycle," Jacobsen began looking at crash data from various communities where bicycle ridership had fluctuated over time. What he found surprised him: The number of crashes involving bikes correlated with the number of riders in a community. As ridership fluctuated, so did the crash rate. More riders, fewer crashes; fewer riders, more crashes. This happened too abruptly, Jacobsen decided, to be caused by slow-moving factors like infrastructure development and cultural change. Bicycling becomes safer *when* the number of riders increases, he concluded, at least in part *because* the number of riders increases. The inverse happens, as well. One data set Jacobsen looked at covered 49 years of biking history in the United Kingdom. Those numbers showed that cycling became safer during the oil crisis of the 1970s, caused by the OPEC oil embargo. Once the crisis ended, both ridership and safety dropped. This all must sound terribly wonky. Actually, it's been revolutionary. The idea of Safety in Numbers has slowly built up steam in traffic safety circles since Jacobsen introduced it. Supporting data<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/09/080903112034.htm>continues to quietly (and sometimes dramatically<http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=46B9E06D-FC8E-9007…>) roll in from around the world, influencing mainly traffic engineers and planners who are trying to figure out how to improve bicycle safety. Bicycle safety is often seen in a sort of vacuum. Helmets tend to dominate the conversation, with visibility -- lights and bright clothing -- taking a close second. More sophisticated conversations get deep into infrastructure: Which is better, sharrows, bike lanes, or separated cycle tracks? We discuss educating cyclists in defensive riding techniques and the rules of the road. These are all good and important efforts. The problem is what's missing. Here's the core of Jacobsen's analysis, from the 2003 "Safety in Numbers" report: Whose behavior changes, the motorist's or that of the people walking and bicycling? It seems unlikely that people walking or bicycling obey traffic laws more or defer to motorists more in societies or time periods with greater walking and bicycling. Indeed it seems less likely. ... Adaptation in motorist behavior seems more plausible. So why might this be the case? When there is a serious bicycle crash, it almost always involves someone driving a car. There are any number of ways drivers become involved in these crashes, primarily involving speed, turning, and the myriad distractions that are common behind the wheel. But when there are a lot of bicyclists on the road, according to this theory, drivers take notice. They become more attentive, slow down, pass more cautiously, double-check their blind spots, expect the unexpected. They sense that the road has become a more complicated place, and adjust their behavior accordingly. As a result, the road becomes safer, presumably for everyone. Safety in numbers is an important idea that has shifted the way planners and engineers think about bicycle safety. But it won't be the final word. We will doubtless see this idea bandied back and forth for some time, especially as academic interest in bicycling and walking increases. As data improves we'll likely see a more complex relationship emerge among ridership, safety, infrastructure, laws, and culture. Whatever the variables, as Jacobsen told me in a requisitely wonky email, "The bigger SIN story is that those cities /countries that have encouraged bicycling have been rewarded with more trips by bike, and not just a non-linear increase in injuries, but a decrease in injuries." That's huge. Safety in numbers will prove over time, I suspect, to be the first major theory based on objective data that can break down the double standard we all pedal under. Jacobsen's research calls into question the foundation of a system in which the convenience of driving is exalted above the basic safety and mobility of people walking and bicycling.

1 0

ecoMOBILITY Webinar: Implementing Social Marketing
by Beth McKechnie 08 Oct '10

08 Oct '10

** Hello everyone: In case you are interested, the following FREE webinar on "Changing Transportation Behaviours: A Social Marketing Guide" takes place this coming Wednesday, October 13 from Noon-1pm CST. I'm hoping it will be of particular interest to Manitoba folks, as I will be presenting on the WinSmart Community-Based Travel Marketing pilot project that we ran in the Riverview/Lord Roberts/River Heights neighbourhoods from 2007-2009. That project resulted in increased numbers of trips made by cycling, walking and carpooling, and reduced numbers of trips made by driving alone for participating households. Hope you can join us (from the comfort of your own computer) next week. Details follow below -- please share with anyone else you think might be interested. cheers, Beth * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Transport Canada's ecoMOBILITY Program is pleased to invite you to a free bilingual webinar entitled "Implementing Social Marketing" to be held on Wednesday, October 13, 2010, from 1-2pm EST. This webinar will present "Changing Transportation Behaviours: A Social Marketing Planning Guide", a new guide designed to help TDM planners and other transportation practitioners implement effective social marketing campaigns. Please note that the presentation will not focus on the theory behind community-based social marketing (CBSM) but will rather address the practical application of CBSM. Following the presentation on the new guide, Beth McKechnie, Workplace TDM Coordinator from Resource Conservation Manitoba, will present the results from the social marketing aspects of Winnipeg's WinSmart Showcase, one of the projects funded by Transport Canada's Urban Transportation Showcase Program (UTSP). This project included a social marketing pilot, which was remarkably successful in bringing about modal shifts despite Winnipeg's harsh winter weather and entrenched car culture. Follow this link http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/tce to sign up for the webinar. Please feel free to forward this invitation to your colleagues. Best regards, The ecoMOBILITY team http://www.tc.gc.ca/ecomobility *************** Le programme écoMOBILITÉ de Transports Canada a le plaisir de vous inviter à un Webinaire (séminaire en ligne) gratuit et bilingue, intitulé «Mise en œuvre de marketing social» qui se tiendra le mercredi 13 Octobre 2010 de 13 à 14 h HNE. Ce webinaire présentera «Modification des habitudes de transport: guide de planification de marketing social», un nouveau guide conçu pour aider les planificateurs de la GDT et autres intervenants du milieu des transports à mettre en œuvre des campagnes efficaces de marketing social. Veuillez noter que la présentation ne sera pas axée sur la théorie du marketing social communautaire (MSC) mais plutôt sur l'application pratique du MSC. Suite à la présentation sur ce nouveau guide, Beth McKechnie, coordonnatrice de la GDT en milieu de travail chez «Resource Conservation Manitoba», présentera les résultats des aspects du marketing social de «WinSmart: la ville de Winnipeg», l'un des projets financés par le Programme de Démonstration en Transport Urbain (PDTU) de Transports Canada. Ce projet a inclu un projet pilote de marketing social, qui a été un succès remarquable dans la réalisation de transferts modaux, malgré les hivers peu cléments de Winnipeg et la culture bien établie d'usage des voitures. Suivez ce lien http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/tcf pour vous inscrire au webinaire. N'hésitez pas à transmettre cette invitation à vos collègues. Salutations, L'équipe écoMOBILITÉ http://www.tc.gc.ca/ecomobilite -- Beth McKechnie Workplace Commuter Options Green Action Centre 204.925.3772 www.greenactioncentre.ca Green Action Centre is a registered charity. Please consider making a donation. *Coming to the EcoCentre?* (3rd floor, 303 Portage at Donald, MEC bldg) Enter via the elevator just inside MEC's front doors Bike racks are located in front of the building

1 0

Reminder: Mayoral Candidates Forum on Downtown (Thurs Oct 7 5:30)
by Beth McKechnie 06 Oct '10

06 Oct '10

Hello everyone: Friendly reminder about tomorrow's mayoral candidates forum on downtown – an excellent opportunity to discuss the positives of (and need for) pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure in Winnipeg. cheers, Beth <http://login.greatbignews.com/agents/linkTrack.cfm?mid=060508015E&eid=50554…> RSVP on Facebook!<http://login.greatbignews.com/agents/linkTrack.cfm?mid=060508015E&eid=50554…>

1 0

Job Postings: Mechanical Director and Programming Director for the Winnipeg Repair Education and Cycling Hub (The WRENCH)
by Stephanie Fulford 30 Sep '10

30 Sep '10

Hello All, Please find attached 2 job postings for The WRENCH. The WRENCH is a newly established non-profit organization that has developed out of a partnership between individuals, community groups, and the City of Winnipeg. We envision a city where people of all ages, genders, ethnicities and economic backgrounds are empowered to build, maintain, and use bicycles. Our mission is to make bicycles and cycling accessible to the public by providing programming, education and resources for community members and organizations while supporting new and existing community bike shops. Application Deadline: Thursday, October 7th, 2010 -- *Stephanie Fulford* Green Action Centre 204.925.3774 www.greenactioncentre.ca Green Action Centre is a non-profit organization. Please consider making a donation.

1 0

Backpack with Turning Signals for Bikes
by Erik Dickson 30 Sep '10

30 Sep '10

Check out this interesting new backpack with LED lights to indicate left and right turns: http://66.196.80.202/babelfish/translate_url_content?.intl=fr&lp=fr_en&trurl =http%3a%2f%2fwww.fubiz.net%2f2010%2f09%2f29%2fseil-bag%2f#more-104802 Regards, Erik Dickson B.Sc. (Hons) Marr Consulting Services 8th Floor - 136 Market Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0P4 Phone: (204) 927-3456 ext. 242 Fax: (204) 927-3443 Please consider our environment before printing this message.

1 0

WFP: Causes of congestion (Sept.29'10)
by Beth McKechnie 29 Sep '10

29 Sep '10

Winnipeg Free Press Letters to the Editor: Have your say *Causes of congestion* Re: *Bragging rights gone* (Letters, Sept. 27). Tim Kwiatkowski's argument that diamond lanes and red-light cameras have caused increased commute times in Winnipeg is completely illogical. There are two real causes of this, in fact. One deals with drivers. There are more cars and trucks on the roadways than ever before (a high proportion of which are driver-only, i.e. without passengers), more impatient drivers who are cutting others off and getting into accidents, and drivers who are (still!) illegally operating a cellphone and adding to the accident rates. The other cause is city planning and outward migration. The uncontrolled and accelerating suburban sprawl (despite a low rate of population growth) without consideration for public transportation makes it next to impossible for people to take the bus, further clogging the roads with more cars and trucks. Kwiatkowski's argument is completely off-base. The reason driving times have increased is because of increased automobile traffic, not because of a few buses or cyclists. Stephen Berg Winnipeg * * * * * *Bragging rights gone* There was a time, not too long ago, when most Winnipeggers could brag about the pleasure of being able to get from any Point A to Point B in less than 20 minutes of driving. Those days are long since gone. Thanks to the advent of diamond lanes and red-light camera intersections, we now have much longer, smoggier and costly commutes to and from work. We can see the bottlenecked effect on our roadways daily. I could see putting up with the costly bumper-to-bumper traffic if the changes implemented were practical and cost-effective. But such is not the case. It doesn't make sense to force all road traffic into three-quarters of available traffic lanes during the busiest periods of the day, just to maintain a free lane for the occasional transit bus, bicycler or pedestrian on roller blades. I thought this is why we had restricted parking during rush hour. Furthermore, would it have been difficult to implement a yield to transit bus law to expedite the bus traffic? And we know that the red-light camera intersections are not influencing an over-all decline in traffic accidents. I feel that reasonable forethought was not given to these issues. I can say that the current administration has not secured my vote in the upcoming civic election. I know my pocketbook is hurting and our bragging rights are gone. Maybe it is time for change? TIM KWIATKOWSKI Winnipeg -- Beth McKechnie Workplace Commuter Options Green Action Centre 204.925.3772 www.greenactioncentre.ca Green Action Centre is a registered charity. Please consider making a donation. *Coming to the EcoCentre?* (3rd floor, 303 Portage at Donald, MEC bldg) Enter via the elevator just inside MEC's front doors Bike racks are located in front of MEC

1 0

WFP Editorial: Not so fast, Mr. Katz (Sept.29'10)
by Beth McKechnie 29 Sep '10

29 Sep '10

Winnipeg Free Press Editorial Not so fast, Mr. Katz Mayor Sam Katz, clearly hearing a backlash from neighbourhoods where streets are being torn up and redesigned for cyclists, tried distancing himself Monday from the city's "active transportation" plan -- an ambitious venture that this year saw 36 projects undertaken around Winnipeg. Not so fast, Mr. Mayor. Mr. Katz said he was never a part of and did not see the plans for the street redesigns. Further, he has concluded not nearly enough consultation happened before shovels went in the ground on the bike lanes, traffic circles and curb bump-outs. Mr. Katz's conclusions on consultation are inescapable -- inviting affected residents to come to a public information session does not substitute for good warning of the street alterations that happened as, or after, local projects went to community committees, where hearings and decisions on ward issues are made. As Mr. Katz concedes, some of the details discussed at initial information sessions varied substantially from the blueprints that rolled out in the neighbourhoods. And postcards or flyers announcing change, but sent to some residents in affected areas, do not constitute sufficient notice to communities. Councillors agree that the process was rushed to qualify the projects for the federal government's stimulus spending program, which ends in March. But Mr. Katz's explanation of how this one got past him is disingenuous -- he is the mayor, he advocated for this active transportation plan, and he voted for the $20 million (and the city's one-third share of it) as part of the capital budget. The plans are available on the city's website, right under his nose. Mr. Katz can sense a rising tide of anger -- and this is election time. On Monday, he said he would have a talk with the chief administrative officer (who has quit and has been replaced with an interim CAO) on halting active transportation projects not yet underway. Within hours, a plan for McDermot Avenue was cancelled. Assiniboine Avenue, which raised the ire of residents and business owners dismayed about the implementation of a one-way control for a block there, is essentially complete and cannot be changed, Mr. Katz said. The 11th-hour turnabout is an ominous message to send on active transportation. The mayor wishes to deflect blame to local councillors, who saw the details, and the administration, which executed the plans. But, as he admitted, the buck stops at his office. That the process saw redesigns pass with little notice to residents is a sign of poor communication. Residents rely on city council -- a body led by the mayor, a man who brags that he gets things done with an often fractious council by consensus -- for information about changing traffic patterns in their neighbourhoods. Mr. Katz cannot claim on one hand to be a master of consensus, a maestro of a disparate group of politicians, and on the other plead ignorance of what has been the city's largest active transportation project ever. And how can a mayor who has claimed credit for the building of more miles of bike trails than any other now back away from accounting for the biggest piece of active transportation rolled out to date? The unfortunate cock-up of what should have been vigorous, early community engagement in a movement to share streets with bicycles has instead pitted motorists and residents -- who lose traffic lanes and parking spaces -- against cyclists trying to find their way to work while staying fit. Mr. Katz has vowed that the next time such construction is contemplated the city will go "beyond above and beyond" what has been considered adequate in consultation. That's admirable. But Mr. Katz on Monday sounded very much like a mayor pulling the rug out from underneath an administration (effectively two civil servants in charge of the $20-million project) that was left to implement a plan written hastily in 36 parts, under the nose of an apparently distracted mayor. Mr. Katz needs to find why the plan's consultation and execution got muddled, and ensure active transportation does not again get bogged down in acrimony. -- Beth McKechnie Workplace Commuter Options Green Action Centre 204.925.3772 www.greenactioncentre.ca Green Action Centre is a registered charity. Please consider making a donation. *Coming to the EcoCentre?* (3rd floor, 303 Portage at Donald, MEC bldg) Enter via the elevator just inside MEC's front doors Bike racks are located in front of MEC

1 0

WFP: Bike-path work overkill: Bureaucrat concedes workload daunting for city, residents (Sept.29'10)
by Beth McKechnie 29 Sep '10

29 Sep '10

Winnipeg Free Press Bike-path work overkill: official Bureaucrat concedes workload daunting for city, residents By: Bartley Kives The official in charge of Winnipeg's $20.4-million active-transportation upgrade that has sparked criticism and controversy says he hopes the city won't attempt such an ambitious bike-and-pedestrian overhaul in a single year ever again. In an interview with the *Free Press*, public works project manager Bill Woroby suggested what Mayor Sam Katz and other senior officials have refused to concede over the past week -- that this year's 36-project upgrade was too ambitious to tackle over the course of one construction season. "Hopefully not," said Woroby when asked whether Winnipeg should ever repeat this year's attempt to add 102 kilometres of cycling routes to the city's existing 274-kilometre network. All three levels of government paid for the project, the largest commuter-cycling upgrade ever attempted in Winnipeg. "It's hard to deliver 30-odd projects in one year. Not only are there 30-odd projects, you're undertaking public consultation at the same time and introducing people to new facilities they're not used to," Woroby said. "This has certainly challenged the delivery. It has not given the public the opportunity to appreciate the facilities we have in place. Once people see the completed project, they will see it as a great addition to the city." Katz and other officials have repeatedly said the tight time frame for the ambitious slate of projects had nothing to do with a public-consultation process both he and mayoral challenger Judy Wasylycia-Leis have described as a failure. Federal infrastructure-funding rules require the projects to be finished before the end of March 2011, which effectively means all but three parts of the upgrade must be finished before the winter, when snowfall makes it impossible to lay concrete. One project, a $1-million bridge in Omand Park, was cancelled and replaced with $100,000 worth of path improvements. A second, the $250,000 Bannatyne-McDermot Bikeway, is in limbo to allow more dialogue with residents and businesses. A third, the Assiniboine Bikeway, is nearing completion despite a lawsuit six Broadway-Assiniboine businesses have launched. There's also opposition to projects along Berry Street, Grosvenor Avenue, Sherbrook Street and Harrow Street. As of Tuesday, 32 out of 34 green-lighted projects were either under construction or nearing completion, said Woroby. Construction on the final two will begin shortly. Woroby dismissed suggestions a round of cuts to the public service last year had any effect on the projects or their public consultation. "We did what was required, with the resources we had in hand," he said. The city employed seven consulting firms to engineer what were originally 36 projects, while two other firms were hired to co-ordinate the upgrade. The city asked private firms to conduct the public consultations last November, but cancelled the search four days before it closed. Former city communications manager Ed Shiller said he felt $125,000 was too much to spend on public relations consultants. He said the city did a good job engaging the public on its own early this year, beginning at Katz's state of the city address in January. "We produced fantastic literature, describing every single one of the projects then under consideration. Then we set up a whole series of public consultations," said Shiller, who left the city at the end of March. After his departure, private consulting firms took over the communications strategy as well as the public-consultation meetings. Woroby said the city responded to the advice it received at all of the meetings. But even active-transportation proponents say the public ignored these events. "I was at 99 per cent of those consultations and the turnout was minimal," said Janice Lukes, executive director of the Winnipeg Trails Association. "No one reads the notices, but when the bulldozers are on the street, then people perk up. It's too bad. I just hope someone has the balls to keep things moving forward." Others want more projects placed on hold. Ellice Cafe and Theatre manager Belinda Squance, for example, plans to meet with public works director Brad Sacher this week to convince the city to shelve the $228,000 Sherbrook/Maryland bike-lane project until parking issues in the West End are addressed. Squance said she supports cyclists but wishes the city actually studied where they go. Other cycling advocates complain the upgrade was a rush job. "A tight timeline for the project and the need to spend federal funds within this timeline no doubt was the issue in regards to actively engaging others," said Downtown BIZ director Stefano Grande. "Active transportation has to be part of the overall infrastructure strategy, not an afterthought (that involves) trying to fit a peg in a hole." Katz's campaign described the ongoing headaches as "growing pains." bartley.kives(a)freepress.mb.ca Cash for cycling routes Spending on active-transportation in Winnipeg over the past five years: 2006: $200,000 2007: $1.75 million 2008: $2.65 million 2009: $4.4 million 2010: $20.4 million (allocated) The 2010 active-transportation plan On Sept. 11, 2009, all three levels of government pledged to spend a combined $20.4 million on 36 active-transportation projects in Winnipeg. The cash was supposed to add 102 kilometres of cycling and walking routes to an existing 274-kilometre network. Here's what the project was supposed to build: New pathways dedicated for cyclists: 28 kilometres, for 15 separate projects. New separated bike lanes on city streets (the Assiniboine Bikeway): Two kilometres. New bike lanes on streets with "sharrows" (the Bannatyne-McDermot Bikeway): Eight kilometres. Other new cycling routes on city streets (18 separate projects): 64 kilometres. New bike-and-pedestrian bridge (Omand Park Bridge): One. Here's where the projects stand right now: Projects completed or nearing completion: Eight. Projects under construction: 24. Projects awaiting construction, with tenders awarded: Two. Projects on hold: One. The city has put the brakes on the $250,000 Bannatyne-McDermot Bikeway. Cancelled projects: One. Wolseley residents rejected plans for the $1-million Omand Park Bridge. It's been replaced by $100,000 worth of path upgrades in the park. *-- Sources: City of Winnipeg* -- Beth McKechnie Workplace Commuter Options Green Action Centre 204.925.3772 www.greenactioncentre.ca Green Action Centre is a registered charity. Please consider making a donation. *Coming to the EcoCentre?* (3rd floor, 303 Portage at Donald, MEC bldg) Enter via the elevator just inside MEC's front doors Bike racks are located in front of MEC

1 0

Downtown Mayoral Forum, Thurs, Oct 7, 5:30-7:30, Manitoba Hydro Place
by Beth McKechnie 28 Sep '10

28 Sep '10

Please find attached a poster for the upcoming Downtown Mayoral Forum taking place Thursday, October 7, 5:30-7:30 p.m. at Manitoba Hydro Place atrium (360 Portage Ave). -- Beth McKechnie Workplace Commuter Options Green Action Centre 204.925.3772 www.greenactioncentre.ca Green Action Centre is a registered charity. Please consider making a donation. *Coming to the EcoCentre?* (3rd floor, 303 Portage at Donald, MEC bldg) Enter via the elevator just inside MEC's front doors Bike racks are located in front of MEC

1 0

AT projects become political football
by Beth McKechnie 28 Sep '10

28 Sep '10

Unfortunately, it appears that the new AT infrastructure projects (which must be completed before the snow falls or the funding from the province and feds is lost) are being used as a political football with the upcoming election. An easy mark, perhaps. Please note that the Downtown Winnipeg BIZ is hosting a Mayoral Forum next Thursday, October 7, 5:30-7:30 pm at Manitoba Hydro Place. Richard Cloutier (CJOB) and Dan Lett (Winnipeg Free Press) will lead the candidates in a dynamic discussion about downtown issues, including bike lanes, rapid transit, etc. This should be an excellent opportunity for input and discussion.I will circulate a notice for the forum shortly. cheers, Beth -- Beth McKechnie Workplace Commuter Options Green Action Centre 204.925.3772 www.greenactioncentre.ca Green Action Centre is a registered charity. Please consider making a donation. __________________________________________________________________________ Bike-pedestrian project stalls Katz, Wasylycia-Leis call upgrade a public-consultation failure By: Bartley Kives The City of Winnipeg has put the brakes on another bike-and-pedestrian project as both of Winnipeg's leading mayoral candidates described the city's $20.4-million active-transportation upgrade as a public-consultation failure. On Monday afternoon, incumbent Mayor Sam Katz told reporters he wants to halt construction on the $250,000 Bannatyne-McDermot bikeway, one of 36 active-transportation projects the city planned to conduct this year with the help of federal and provincial infrastructure money. Hours later, the city placed the project on hold, citing the need to conduct more talks with residents and businesses along the route, which runs from Waterfront Drive to Sherbrook Street. "During projects such as this, sometimes dialogue with the community results in improvements to the project through design change," city spokesman Steve West said in a statement. "With regard to the McDermot Bikeway, we have concluded that more dialogue will be beneficial." The move comes as another blow to an active-transportation project all three levels of government have hailed as a long overdue upgrade to the city's network of bike-and-pedestrian corridors. The $20.4 million in spending represents nearly an eight-fold increase over the $2.6 million the city typically spends every year to build recreational and commuter cycling routes as well as other pathways. Several of the projects have angered residents and businesses, who claim the city failed to consult with them properly about the changes. A $1-million bridge planned for Omand Park was struck from the project list this spring. At the end of the summer, six Broadway-Assiniboine businesses sued the city over the $125,000 Assiniboine Bikeway. Work on the Assiniboine Avenue project continues, but the Bannatyne-McDermot project has now been shelved, leading Katz to criticize city staff about the project for the fourth time in six days. "This city does not have to go the extra mile. It has to go the extra 10 miles in consultation," Katz told reporters after a mayoral-candidate forum at the Fort Garry Hotel. "When anything like this happens in the future, you will see consultation above and beyond." Katz told reporters he did not personally vote in favour of the projects, which he said were approved by community committees. In fact, the mayor and 12 out of 15 councillors approved the active-transportation upgrade on Dec. 15, 2009, when council approved the 2010 capital budget. And the project details merely came before community committees as information. Only the capital budget provides authority for the spending. In a scrum with reporters, Katz accepted responsibility. "I am the mayor. No matter where you draw the line, the buck ends up at my table," he said. Mayoral challenger Judy Wasylycia-Leis said Katz should also halt the Assiniboine Bikeway if he's serious about public consultation. "It's a little late in the game, in an election period, saying he's going to halt construction," she told reporters. "He's acknowledging he made a strategic error in planning and consulting." After a round of public-service cuts at the management level in 2009, the city has two senior staffers working on the active-transportation upgrade. Private consultants were also hired to engage in public consultation. Katz has dismissed suggestions meagre resources are not to blame for the city's performance. He also said tight timelines associated with the federal funding for the active-transportation upgrade are to blame. The projects must be finished before the end of March to qualify for federal infrastructure money. All but three must be completed before the snow falls because they involve laying concrete. bartley.kives(a)freepress.mb.ca

1 0