- AT-Network - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

AT webinar slides: Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs
by Beth McKechnie 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hi everyone, Thought others – beyond those who attended today's APBP webinar on Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs – might be interested in the attached slides and additional links and info. cheers, Beth -- *Beth McKechnie* | Workplace Commuter Options <http://greenactioncentre.ca/>Green Action Centre <http://www.greenactioncentre.ca/> <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> 3rd floor, 303 Portage Ave | (204) 925-3772 | Find us here <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> Green Action Centre is your non-profit hub for greener living. Support our work by becoming a member <http://greenactioncentre.ca/support/become-a-member/>. Donate at CanadaHelps.org <http://canadahelps.org/> <http://canadahelps.org/>

1 0

WFP Herald: Browaty stirs up emotions with "bike tunnel" ad (Mar.16'15)
by Beth McKechnie 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Browaty stirs up emotions with “bike tunnel” ad By: Sheldon Birnie http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/our-communities/herald/Browaty-stirs-up-em… Plans to include an active transportation link and emergency corridor beneath an elevated interchange at Highway 59 and the Perimeter Highway have come under fire from one Winnipeg city councillor. But Manitoba government and RM of East St. Paul officials say Browaty is being alarmist. Coun. Jeff Browaty (North Kildonan) took out a full page ad in last week’s issue of* The Herald* calling on premier Greg Selinger not to "waste $$$ on (a) bike tunnel." "Originally proposed as a simple active transportation bridge over the Perimeter Highway by the NDP during the 2011 provincial election," Browaty’s statement reads, "the revised proposal is calling for an elaborate tunnel, costing $10’s (sic) of millions of dollars and routing thousands of vehicles daily onto residential streets in North Kildonan and East St. Paul." "The money could be better spent," Browaty told* The Herald*, saying he believes upgrades to Lagimodiere Boulevard and Henderson Highway are more deserving of public investment. Lance Vigfusson, assistant deputy minister of Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation, and Shelley Hart, mayor of East St. Paul, both said Browaty made incorrect and misleading statements in his ad and subsequent press release. "For one, this is not a tunnel," Hart told *The Herald*. "It’s a level-grade crossing. The new cloverleaf (interchange) will be above it." Vigfusson explained that, in order to deliver on the 2011 promise of an active transportation connection "there were two options" when designing that link into plans for the upgraded interchange at the Perimeter and Highway 59. "One option was up and over the Perimeter," Vigfusson said. "The other was taking the Perimeter up and over, making the active transportation corridor as a through path, not a tunnel." After consulting with trucking industry representatives, the province determined that a bridge over the Perimeter which could accommodate large, oversize loads would be the more difficult of the two options. "We would have had to build with at least seven metres of clearance," he said. As a result, he explained, the overpass would have been "approximately nine metres above the ground," making it impractical for active transportation. Keeping the active transportation corridor at grade was the option selected. As a result of Browaty’s ad, some North Kildonan residents have expressed concern that the proposed transportation link will increase traffic in the residential area along Raleigh Street and Gateway Road south of the perimeter. "This’ll increase traffic flow," said Ross Campbell, who lives near the intersection of Gateway and Knowles Avenue. "Traffic will in turn create problems in residential areas. All in all, I do not believe the province or East St. Paul put any thought into it." Vigfusson stressed that the active transportation corridor will not create additional traffic headaches as it won’t be open to commuter traffic. It will be made wide enough to accommodate emergency vehicles, which would access it via a gated system. Vigfusson did say that, if the city of Winnipeg and the RM of East St. Paul decide to open the corridor to regular vehicle traffic in the future, the costs to upgrade would be minimized. "We designed this (interchange) to last for 75 years," he explained. "If ever East St. Paul and the city want to convert it down the line, it would cost a fraction of overall cost to do it now, rather than retrograde." Vigfusson said he believes Browaty’s estimate of thousands of vehicles "that number is highly exaggerated." "From where we’re standing, we applaud the province’s foresight," East St. Paul mayor Hart said. Longtime East St. Paul resident Gary Alderson agreed. "The option of going with a two-lane underpass is probably, if you look down the road, a good idea," Alderson told *The Herald*. "To me, this is good planning. Sure, it’ll cost residents here a few million bucks, and it’ll cost the province. But that’s inevitable if you’re going to do something like this." The province is now awaiting final proposals for the Highway 101/59 interchange as part of the competitive process. Vigfusson said a proposal should be selected by June and hopes to see construction begin at the end of summer. He expects the project to take three to four years to complete. "We have a lot of bridges and lanes to build," he said. "And a lot of dirt to move." *Facebook.com/TheHeraldWPGTwitter: @heraldWPG*

1 0

AT Webinar Reminder: Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs, Wed, Mar 18, 2-3:30, EcoCentre
by Beth McKechnie 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

*Friendly reminder about tomorrow's webinar...* Green Action Centre and Bike Winnipeg invite you to join us for a local viewing of the following APBP webinar: *Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs. * Interesting to see that the presenters include a couple of Canadians (from Ottawa and Montreal). The webinar viewing takes place in the EcoCentre boardroom (3rd floor, 303 Portage Ave) and will be followed by group discussion of local applications. RSVPs appreciated but not necessary. Hope to see you then! cheers, Beth ** * * * ** Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs *Wednesday, Mar. 18th, 2-3:30pm, EcoCentre <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> Boardroom* Key learning objectives: 1. Review state of the practice for bicycle and pedestrian data collection, with reference to NCHRP Report 797 2. Recognize the elements of effective bicycle and pedestrian counting programs 3. Understand the methodology and policy implications of Ottawa’s bicycle count program 4. Explore the Trail Modeling and Assessment Platform (T-MAP) *Description*: Consistent and standardized data collection techniques are the building blocks for establishing reliable performance measures to document usage, need, and return on investment in bicycle and pedestrian facilities. This 90-minute webinar provides practitioners with a comprehensive introduction to concepts, examples of current practice, and discussion of policy implications of data collection programs. The session agenda includes: - An overview of NCHRP Report 797: Guidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection and the state of the practice - A case study from the City of Ottawa that describes a methodology for measuring trends accurately over the long term and developing correction factors for short-term or seasonal influences - Guidelines for setting up a robust counting program, with reference to the 2013 FHWA Traffic Monitoring Guide; including techniques for estimating Annual Average Daily Bicyclists and Pedestrians (AADB / AADP) - An explanation of the Trail Modeling and Assessment Platform (T-MAP), the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy’s new tool to measure and model trail use for project prioritization and impact assessment. *Presenters*: - Tony Hull - Zlatko Krstlic, P. Eng., Transportation Planner, City of Ottawa - Tracy Hadden Loh, Ph.D., Director of Research, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy - Luis F. Miranda-Moren, Ph.D., Associate Professor, McGill University - Krista Nordback, Ph.D., P.E., Postdoctoral Research Associate, TREC, Portland State University

1 0

Metro Article: Perimeter Crossing
by Anders Swanson 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

http://metronews.ca/news/winnipeg/1312192/perimeter-tunnel-crossing-near-hi…

1 0

WFP L2E: Crossing for cyclists crucial (Mar14'15)
by Beth McKechnie 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

*Crossing for cyclists crucial* http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/letters-marc… Coun. Jeff Browaty's assertion that safety will be compromised by the construction of a through-pass on the Northeast Pioneers Greenway right-of-way turns reason on its head (Perimeter plan 'poorly conceived': Browaty, March 12). As a restricted-access roadway, the Perimeter Highway acts as a major barrier between regionally important recreational facilities such as the Gateway Recreation Centre, Bunn's Creek Trail, the Skylight Complex, Chief Peguis Trail pathways, Kilcona Park, the East St. Paul Recreation Complex and the Red River Floodway trail to Birds Hill Park. Without this much-needed crossing, people wanting to ride their bikes to these and other destinations on either side of the Perimeter would be forced to cross the Perimeter on Highway 59 through the planned interchange. They would be required to run a gauntlet of long, high-speed merge lanes serving up to 900 vehicles per hour. This is the approach Coun. Browaty favours, but it represents a very real safety concern that is completely unacceptable. Bike Winnipeg and our allies have been working so hard to see a safe, convenient crossing of the Perimeter Highway included in the interchange project. Mark Cohoe Executive director, Bike Winnipeg *** While Coun. Jeff Browaty's desire to protect his constituents is admirable, his assertions the province is moving forward without consultation on a plan that will funnel 30,000 cars onto the streets of north Winnipeg is simply incorrect. Consultations were held as part of the design/tender process and resulted in a plan to build a full cloverleaf interchange with an active-transportation corridor at ground level that will connect Winnipeg with Birds Hill Park. The raised Perimeter Highway not only provides a ground-level corridor for active transportation, but will create a gated corridor that can be used by emergency vehicles only. The corridor will not be opened to the public, and Coun. Browaty's concern the design will result in 30,000 vehicles moving through northeast Winnipeg is unfounded. It is also incorrect to infer the province is opening this corridor without municipal participation. Last fall, we heard loud and clear from the trucking industry, the active-transportation community and East St. Paul residents. Our engineers have also told us the chosen option requires a similar investment compared with building the Perimeter Highway as a level highway with a long and high bridge for active transportation. The obvious choice was to take the option that guaranteed emergency services for area residents, allowed for economic growth and was favoured by our active transportation users. If Coun. Browaty would like to better understand this project, we would be happy to give him a briefing. Ron Kostyshyn Minister, Transportation and Infrastructure

1 0

WFP: Browaty still fearful of Perimeter plans (Mar.14'15)
by Beth McKechnie 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

Browaty still fearful of Perimeter plans By: Aldo Santin http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/browaty-still-fearful-of-perimeter-p… North Kildonan Coun. Jeff Browaty said he still has concerns over a proposed at-grade corridor across the north Perimeter Highway, despite assurances by the province it won't be used as a public roadway. Infrastructure and Transportation Minister Ron Kostyshyn told the Free Press Friday there are no immediate plans to allow traffic on the new corridor that will link both sides of Raleigh Street in East St. Paul. Kostyshyn said the corridor is being designed for active-transportation uses that can accommodate emergency vehicles when the situation arises. "The corridor will not be opened to the public, and Coun. Browaty's concern that the design will result in 30,000 vehicles moving through northeast Winnipeg is unfounded," Kostyshyn said. Browaty went public with his concerns over the corridor earlier this week, saying it would result in a massive influx of traffic into north Winnipeg and the residential streets of North Kildonan. The Selinger government promised in the 2011 campaign to construct an elevated active-transportation bridge across the north Perimeter -- part of its plans for a cloverleaf at the Perimeter and Highway 59 -- linking the Pioneers Greenway pathway that runs through East and North Kildonan with a similar pathway in East St. Paul and on to Birds Hill Park. Browaty said those plans suddenly changed in the fall, to an underpass open to traffic linking Raleigh Street on both sides of the north Perimeter Highway. Kostyshyn said the corridor has been designed to accommodate an expansion for vehicular traffic, but added that would only occur "if both municipalities wish to pursue that option in the future." Browaty said the province did not consult with Winnipeg when it recently changed its plans for the corridor, adding he's not reassured the NDP government will consult the city when the time comes to allow traffic on the corridor. "Those (provincial) assurances aside, I still believe there are better ways to spend the money than what the province is planning to do," Browaty said. Browaty said traffic studies done by East St. Paul found 30,000 vehicles a day would use the new corridor by 2030 if opened to regular traffic, adding Winnipeg's residential streets in that area aren't designed to handle that kind of load. The province hasn't disclosed the cost of the proposed corridor, but a spokeswoman said it's estimated to be the same as the active-transportation bridge originally proposed for the crossing. She added it was concluded the at-grade corridor was the better option. aldo.santin(a)freepress.mb.ca Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition March 14, 2015 A14

1 0

New Video: Paradise on The Prairies (starring Portage and Main)
by Anders Swanson 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

*1.* *I made a new video. Its special. I think you'll really like it. * *[video] Paradise On the Prairies <https://vimeo.com/121991829>* Grab a coffee and enjoy. I don't think you'll be disappointed. It starts with a little handdrawn 3-D animation of Portage and Main with protected bike lanes and then takes you on a journey to see what I see. Takes a few minutes to watch the whole thing. Just might change the way you see Winnipeg. If you like it, please share it on Twitter <https://twitter.com/SwansonAnders/status/576481125473902593> with anyone who wants to see it happen (or is in a position to...). *2. Inspired? * That video is also my submission to the Winnipeg Capital Budget process. (That's why it's exactly 10 minutes.) You can have your say too. If you are in Winnipeg, consider signing up to speak in delegation on Monday (PW) or Tuesday (EPC) to share your enthusiasm for a complete bike network asap with our politicians. The clerks to talk to are Destiny Watt, dwatt(a)winnipeg.ca and Carlos Gameiro cgameiro(a)winnipeg.ca, respectively. Send them an email asap. Have a great weekend. Thanks, Anders Swanson P.S. For all those of you who chipped in to get me that camera, this one is for especially you. Thanks so much again.

1 0

AT Webinars: Bicycle Friendly Communities (Tues) & Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs (Wed)
by Beth McKechnie 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Green Action Centre and Bike Winnipeg invite you to join us for a local viewing of the following webinars (details on each follow below): *1) Bicycle Friendly Communities (Tools of Change <http://webinars.cullbridge.com/>) - Tues, Mar 17th, 11am-noon* *2) Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs (APBP <http://www.apbp.org/>) - Wed, Mar 18th, 2-3:30pm* These webinar viewings take place in the *EcoCentre <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/>* boardroom (3rd floor, 303 Portage Ave) and will be followed by group discussion of local applications. RSVPs appreciated but not necessary. Hope to see you then! cheers, Beth * * * * * 1) Bicycle Friendly Communities *Tuesday, Mar. 17th, 11am-Noon, EcoCentre <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> Boardroom* The BFC Program is a positive, upstream, results-oriented program designed to get municipal decision makers thinking about how all of their programs around cycling work complementary to one another, and how those programs can be synergistically improved. It provides recognition for the hard work done by municipal staff, the leadership displayed by municipal politicians and the partnerships developed with local cycling organizations. It gives communities that apply both a measure of where they are and a roadmap into the future, using a feedback system that has been developed and refined with input from stakeholders from all areas of transportation issues. *Presented by:* Justin Jones, Manager, Bicycle Friendly Communities, Share the Road Cycling Coalition (Canada), and Bill Nesper, Manager, Bicycle Friendly Communities, League of American Bicyclists (USA) 2) Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs *Wednesday, Mar. 18th, 2-3:30pm, EcoCentre <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> Boardroom* Key learning objectives: 1. Review state of the practice for bicycle and pedestrian data collection, with reference to NCHRP Report 797 2. Recognize the elements of effective bicycle and pedestrian counting programs 3. Understand the methodology and policy implications of Ottawa’s bicycle count program 4. Explore the Trail Modeling and Assessment Platform (T-MAP) *Description*: Consistent and standardized data collection techniques are the building blocks for establishing reliable performance measures to document usage, need, and return on investment in bicycle and pedestrian facilities. This 90-minute webinar provides practitioners with a comprehensive introduction to concepts, examples of current practice, and discussion of policy implications of data collection programs. The session agenda includes: - An overview of NCHRP Report 797: Guidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection and the state of the practice - A case study from the City of Ottawa that describes a methodology for measuring trends accurately over the long term and developing correction factors for short-term or seasonal influences - Guidelines for setting up a robust counting program, with reference to the 2013 FHWA Traffic Monitoring Guide; including techniques for estimating Annual Average Daily Bicyclists and Pedestrians (AADB / AADP) - An explanation of the Trail Modeling and Assessment Platform (T-MAP), the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy’s new tool to measure and model trail use for project prioritization and impact assessment. *Presenters*: - Tony Hull - Zlatko Krstlic, P. Eng., Transportation Planner, City of Ottawa - Tracy Hadden Loh, Ph.D., Director of Research, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy - Luis F. Miranda-Moren, Ph.D., Associate Professor, McGill University - Krista Nordback, Ph.D., P.E., Postdoctoral Research Associate, TREC, Portland State University -- *Beth McKechnie* | Workplace Commuter Options <http://greenactioncentre.ca/>Green Action Centre <http://www.greenactioncentre.ca/> <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> 3rd floor, 303 Portage Ave | (204) 925-3772 | Find us here <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> Green Action Centre is your non-profit hub for greener living. Support our work by becoming a member <http://greenactioncentre.ca/support/become-a-member/>. Donate at CanadaHelps.org <http://canadahelps.org/> <http://canadahelps.org/>

1 0

Survey identifies obstacles for 'interested but concerned' group
by Beth McKechnie 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

A new national survey in the US interviewed 9,376 adults who would like to bike more but are being held back for various reasons ("interested but concerned" group). http://www.peopleforbikes.org/blog/entry/here-are-the-first-ever-national-f… Here are 5 highlights (though it's worth checking into the details): 1. One-third of people who want to bike more are dissatisfied with existing bike infrastructure. 2. Bicycle ownership is a major barrier to riding, especially among poorer households. 3. Fear of being personally targeted is a major barrier to riders of colour. 4. The western US is much better at the bike + transit combo. 5. Every single demographic group wants protected bike lanes. Each of these sound pretty applicable to Winnipeg as well. cheers, Beth -- *Beth McKechnie* | Workplace Commuter Options <http://greenactioncentre.ca/>Green Action Centre <http://www.greenactioncentre.ca/> <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> 3rd floor, 303 Portage Ave | (204) 925-3772 | Find us here <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> Green Action Centre is your non-profit hub for greener living. Support our work by becoming a member <http://greenactioncentre.ca/support/become-a-member/>. Donate at CanadaHelps.org <http://canadahelps.org/> <http://canadahelps.org/>

1 0

Five Quick Facts: North East Pioneers Greenway Crossing of the Perimeter to Birds Hill
by Anders Swanson 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

*[In light of a recent newspaper ad <http://bikewinnipeg.ca/2015/03/11/councilor-browaty-opposes-key-tunnel/#sth…> "relabeling" a very exciting, long anticipated and much safer bicycle/pedestrian crossing of the Perimeter, I thought I'd share a couple bits of factual information with the folks on this list. IMO, the issue here is of a new road being wrapped up with a bike/pedestrian crossing unnecessarily. That, however, is part of a** separate debate about urban sprawl and car access. The **key thing to remember is that is a project was intended originally for bikes and pedestrians for a reason. It fixes a very important safety and connectivity issue - and, as a whole, this project represents a critical part of one of the coolest transportation and recreation and tourism legacies for Winnipeg. We owe it to this spectacular project to set the record straight - and to make sure the many politicians who champion it hear our support. - Anders ] * 1. *Here is a relevant video <https://vimeo.com/121954361>.* Note that there is a perfectly safe, and perfectly beautiful bike "tunnel" near the start of the video which I filmed while in Davis, California - which also happens to have the US' highest bicycle modal share. Take a moment to watch/feel what such crossings feel like. Its is near the beginning. Then stick around to see what is possible on a bike once you reach the North East Pioneers Greenway, cross the perimeter and beyond. (It is also a teaser from a longer film I am putting together for the Capital Budget process, but the timing couldn't be better.) *2. For a better "safety" perspective*, have a look at a real photo taken of the current crossing <https://www.facebook.com/771955042888044/photos/pcb.772032826213599/7720312…> . *3. Here is a map I made (again) of the bicycle/pedestrian underpasses in Oulu, Finland with help of my colleague Pekka Tahkola. <https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=z-6EAXpUkKw4.kWjIpHHg4PTQ&msa=0&ll=6…>* *Yep, that's 291 of them. *It is my opinion, and that of the current and former bicycle coordinators/engineers of this remarkable Finnish city, that it is precisely these underpasses that make Oulu one of the highest winter cycling cities in the world. Instilling "fear" about a bike underpass is simply speaking to the root of fear - ignorance. *4.* *This is about local travel by bike and on foot.* Although the stuff above is nice and certain to attract tourists and tons of summertime recreational users, any bicycle and pedestrian planner/engineer will tell you that the current options - Henderson and Lagimodiere - are much too far away to be useful to people on foot or on bikes. Destination are within sight. This explains why so many already use it <https://www.facebook.com/771955042888044/photos/pcb.772032826213599/7720312…> even though it is sketchy to do so. It also explains why the Premier, local politicians and community members banded together to champion it as a good idea. *There are thousands of people either currently traveling or wanting to travel daily on bikes and on foot between North Kildonan and East St.Paul. *Don't forget about them. For the same reason people want to build more roads, you have an equal number, if not greater, who just want to walk/ride there. It is a matter of the choices we provide. I have been to the area a few times, and each time I have seen young kids dart across the roadway. There are numerous amenities just inside the perimeter that people in East St.Paul want to get to. Including the kids on the way to soccer fields, friends, and swimming pool. The clearest one-time example of latent demand from inside Winnipeg is probably the hundreds of festival goers who ride to the Folk Fest ride every year from the Forks <https://www.facebook.com/771955042888044/photos/pcb.772032826213599/7720308…>. That ride expands every year. In order to do it, we need a police escort on the highway when the crossing itself is just a few meters away from the end of the spectacular North East Pioneers Greenway. All we need is a safe crossing. *5. It is 2015. It is probably time to focus on bike/ped facilities.* Why? There is no real traffic emergency. That "emergency" has been around for decades and it just keeps growing. There is no reason to put off building bicycle or pedestrian infrastructure. Why? The issue is systematic. If you chase potholes and temporarily build new access roads to fix "traffic congestion" and "wear and tear", you end up with a pile of bandaids and no cure. On a project level, every principle of transportation demand management out there suggests that you can simply limit some options to encourage the options. So, build the bike stuff first. See how it goes. All of this is very clearly a basic symptom of sprawl. At some point, something has to give. This crossing is a wonderful idea - and is meant for bikes, people on foot, strollers, scooters, wheelchairs, etc. Build it and they will come. Build roads, they fill with cars. Build bike paths, they fill with bikes. It's that simple.

1 0