- AT-Network - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

WFP Analysis: Reimagining Wellington Crescent (Jun21'21)
by Beth McKechnie 22 Jun '21

22 Jun '21

Reimagining Wellington Crescent https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/reimagining-wellington-c… “WE heard birds” exclaimed Anne Hidalgo, the mayor of Paris, France, in an interview with Time magazine last summer. She was describing her city, all cities, during the first COVID-19 lockdowns, when, with fewer people driving, we were provided a glimpse into what the future of cities could be. She vowed that Paris would not return to a pre-pandemic world, pledging to learn from the devastating challenges of the last year and emerge as a more socially equitable, environmentally sustainable, cleaner, healthier and happier city. The changes that have swept across Paris since have been far-reaching and impactful, driven by a policy framework called the “la ville du quart d’heure,” or the “15-minute city.” The strategy focuses on building more diverse, integrated, and mixed-use neighbourhoods that provide residents access to all of life’s core services and amenities, within a 15-minute walk, bike or transit ride. Designing communities with integrated supports such as shops, restaurants, gyms, groceries, offices, schools and parks is in direct contrast to most modern neighbourhoods, where housing is separated by a vehicle trip from employment, shopping, entertainment and industry. The pandemic has forced many people to work from home and spend more time in their own neighbourhoods. The 15-minute city concept builds on this evolving social and employment landscape, offering an opportunity to improve local economies and deliver lasting health, equity and environmental benefits. In Paris, incentives are being provided to support development of small businesses and community facilities in targeted areas, emphasizing equal access to services, amenities and green space that strengthen neighbourhoods and actively reduce social divides and inequalities. A new policy has been developed to create pockets of “urban forest” and community gardens for local urban agriculture, in school yards, parks, plazas and other public spaces like city-owned surface parking lots. To facilitate more outdoor dining during the pandemic, restaurants and cafés across Paris were allowed to set up temporary outdoor patios in parking spaces on the street. It was recently announced that these patios will be made a permanent fixture in the city. As the pandemic lifts, other neighbourhood businesses such as florists or bookstores will also be invited to apply for summer terraces, turning over large parts of streets to more pedestrian uses. At the centre of the 15-minute city idea is a complete transformation of how people will move around the city. During the pandemic, more than 50 kilometres of new bike lanes, called coronapistes, were built on major streets across Paris, to provide direct access to key destinations that allows the bicycle to become a viable mode of daily transportation. These lanes are now being made permanent, and the government has committed to building another 650 kilometres of new cycleways, with public space and sidewalks that will transform 70 per cent of the city’s on-street car parking into places for people. To provide more public space during the pandemic, the city’s iconic east-west artery, Rue de Rivoli, became an open street to allow socially distanced outdoor activity. This major artery has now been made permanently open, complementing the riverside freeway that once served 40,000 vehicles per day that has now been transformed into a pedestrian promenade. More than one billion euros per year has been pledged for the maintenance and beautification of streets, squares and gardens, including the famous Champs-Élysées, which will see half of its eight vehicle lanes removed with new bike lanes, pocket parks, and public space, being created along its length. As one of the few positive legacies of the pandemic, Winnipeg’s Open Streets are, on a very small scale, reminiscent of what is happening in Paris. We have taken a tiny fraction of Winnipeg’s 7,000 kilometres of street lanes dedicated to vehicles and turned them into large linear parks. You can hear the birds again on Wellington Crescent. As popular as they are, Open Streets face opposition, but closing them doesn’t necessarily mean a return to the past. Paris offers us an important alternative to consider. The goal of its mobility strategies in the 15-minute city has been to connect pedestrians and cyclists safely and conveniently with their day-to-day destinations, by pedestrianizing major streets and building protected bike lanes on direct, heavy traffic, central routes. Wellington Crescent doesn’t have to be an Open Street, but its future can be something more than the high-speed vehicle freeway it once was. It could be reimagined with parking space removed to build bike lanes and sidewalks. Stop signs and raised crosswalks could be added at every intersection to reduce and slow traffic. It could become a vital active transportation connector between Polo Park and Osborne Village, and a slow, safe, park-like street to drive on. Similarly, instead of opening Scotia Street, adding wider sidewalks and protected bike lanes on a major route like Salter Street would provide equitable access to education, employment and recreation for North End residents. Every neighbourhood has main streets with similar opportunities to connect people with the places they want to go, using more diverse, affordable and sustainable modes of transportation. Paris has shown through its 15-minute-city strategy that by focusing on building stronger, more connected neighbourhoods that allow biking, walking and transit to be used as everyday transportation, great change can be realized. It is OK if Open Streets are not Winnipeg’s priority, if new, more impactful ideas replace them. It is impossible to compare any Canadian city to a global capital like Paris, but its desire to use the lessons of the last year to emerge from the pandemic with a new vision of what the future can be, is something that should inspire all cities. *Brent Bellamy is senior design architect for Number Ten Architectural Group.*

1 0

Webinar: Authentic Community Engagement - Best Practices for Equitable Work
by Beth McKechnie 17 Jun '21

17 Jun '21

How to wield your walkable, people-first community advocacy work as a true tool for empowerment Support Walkable Communities <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> Authentic Community Engagement - Best Practices for Equitable Work Wednesday, July 14th at 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM EDT Register Here <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> Join us for presentations and a robust Q & A dialogue with active transportation professionals, nonprofit leaders, and equitable engagement experts around what it means to practice and build authentic community engagement with diverse coalitions as the foundation for driving those vital relationships. Panelists will share their best practices for equitable work in striving for inclusive, accessible, connected, and walkable communities - through the lens of their invaluable learned, professionally practiced and lived experiences. Among the details covered, presenters will lean into the importance of acknowledging past harms and learning how to demonstrate an awareness and distinction of active transportation and walkability work as a true tool for empowerment vs. a weapon of racialized oppression. The presentations/discussion will address the following critical questions: - What are the most universal best practices in achieving equity in our work? - How can advocates, practitioners and leaders center the needs and desires of BIPOC and low-income residents? - How can we achieve buy-in and funding streams from government leaders? - How can we habitually challenge normativity in how we define safe walking, biking, mobility, and access? - Why is it imperative to get out of your demographic bubble? - How can we get overlooked community members involved in government-decision discourse? - What are examples of removing barriers for individuals to experience safe destination-based movement while lowering car dependency? - How can we build trust, empowerment and agency with communities that have been perpetually ignored, harmed, and disinvested in? - What kind of data points, projects, or outreach can provide the most insight for determining connected, safe active transportation routes and services in the given community? Learn More and Register Here <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> Help Us Spread the Word About this Webinar [image: Facebook] ‌ <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> [image: Twitter] ‌ <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> Learn More About Our Presenters John Yi is the Executive Director of Los Angeles Walks. Prior to joining LA Walks in 2019, John was the Advocacy Director for the American Lung Association in California, where he worked on strong tobacco control and air quality policies. At the Lung Association, John also served as a lead organizer by training tobacco control coalitions throughout the state. He helped bring smoke-free ordinances to over a dozen different cities, fighting back against secondhand smoke and Big Tobacco's efforts to target low-income and communities of color. John also served as the interim National Director for Parent Revolution, an education and social justice non-profit. In this role he led parent organizing campaigns in Texas, Oklahoma, Indiana, and Ohio. He received his master's degree at Georgetown University and his bachelor's degree at the University of Michigan. He is a brother of Pi Alpha Phi, speaks Korean and Russian, and loves to cook. Waffiyyah Murray is the Better Bike Share Partnership Program Manager and a Philadelphia native with a love for walking and biking. She has a bachelor’s degree in Psychology from Temple University, and over fourteen years of experience working with different Philadelphia-based non-profit and community organizations. As Education Program Manager for the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia, she worked with the City to support its Safe Route to School program, a national initiative promoting safety and physical activity in school age children through walking and biking. Waffiyyah first arrived at oTIS as the Indego Community Coordinator, where she worked to connect communities to Indego programming and resources to ensure equitable access to Indego, the City of Philadelphia’s bike share system. In her current role as the Better Bike Share Partnership Program Manager, Waffiyyah works to address barriers to the use of bikeshare in low income communities and communities of color, and increase equitable access in bikeshare systems nationally. Jeremy Maxand is the Executive Director of the Living Independence Network Corporation, a center for independent living serving 16 counties in southwest Idaho. Jeremy grew up in a small island community in Southeast Alaska and has used a manual wheelchair since 1989. He moved to Idaho in the early nineties to attend Boise State University, where he earned undergraduate degrees in Criminal Justice Administration and Sociology, and a graduate degree is Applied Historical Research. Jeremy holds a certificate from the University of Washington’s Evans School of Public Policy & Governance Nonprofit Executive Leadership Institute, and from the University of Missouri’s College of Human & Environmental Sciences, School of Architectural Studies, ADA Coordinator Training Certification Program. Jeremy has twenty years of nonprofit management experience, and 10 years in executive leadership. Most recently, he was an emergency preparedness program specialist with the Idaho State Independent Living Council, working with local, state, and federal emergency management and public health partners to improve disaster response and recovery for people with disabilities. In Alaska, Jeremy served as an assembly member and mayor of the third geographically largest city by area in the country. Jeremy currently serves on the Valley Regional Transit Regional Advisory Council, the Ada County Highway District ADA Advisory Committee, the Idaho State Independent Living Council, the Idaho State Building Code Board, the Idaho Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster Board, and is a founding board member of the Idaho Access Project. José Leal (moderator) At MIG, his projects have encompassed everything from complete streets, parks, schools, and recreation facilities. As Director of the Tribal Nation Building Studio, José is responsible for guiding an interdisciplinary studio of designers, planners, engineers, and scientists to provide engagement, planning, and design services to Tribal Nations to support and strengthen tribal community cohesiveness and resilience, self-determination, and sovereignty. His work focuses on the power of inclusive planning and design and cultural relativism to connect people to the spirit of place through storytelling. STAY CONNECTED <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> Donate Today <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> [image: Facebook] ‌ <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> [image: Twitter] ‌ <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> [image: LinkedIn] ‌ <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> [image: Instagram] ‌ <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014CmJIQ6i_1yELurQdLLA9bjguVufZzlkTtu4a4qb02S…> America Walks | PO Box 371, Annandale, VA 22003

1 0

WFP: Open-street project promotes accessibility, users say (Jun16'21)
by Beth McKechnie 16 Jun '21

16 Jun '21

Open-street project promotes accessibility, users say https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/open-street-project-promotes-access… AT the height of evening rush hour, winding Wellington Crescent is abuzz with all kinds of traffic — even with automobiles limited to one block of travel. Cyclists, joggers, rollerbladers, children on skateboards and scooters, families out for an evening walk with the dog all crowd to the tree-canopied route, taking advantage of the barricaded streets and wide pedestrian boulevard in the warm, sunny afternoon. While most car traffic stuck to the open block, a handful still trekked further, one earning a flash of police lights and a conversation with an officer. Since May, the Winnipeg street has been closed to most vehicle traffic between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m.; cyclists are permitted to use the roads, pedestrians are asked to use walkways, and drivers allowed only to travel a block to and from their homes. Though the policy has drawn ire from Wellington and River Heights residents who feel the “open street” brings more problems than opportunities, others say the program provides more accessible ways to get outside and get active — provided everyone shares the road. In a recent package of submissions to the City of Winnipeg public works committee, some disgruntled residents took issue with the increases in traffic on the alternate route, Academy Road. Some residents noted difficulty turning onto the alternate route during rush hour, “bumper-to-bumper” traffic, or tacking extra minutes onto their commute. Others described frustrating encounters with pedestrians and cyclists aggravated by cars on the road — even while driving just one block to their residences. For Sarah Manteuffel, who lives in the Fort Rouge/River Heights area and uses Wellington Crescent when it’s closed to vehicle traffic, the wide-open road provides a safer place for her to ride. On her day off Monday, Manteuffel went for a leisure ride down Wellington and posted a photo of herself — smiling wide next to road barriers outlining the open street rules — in response to criticism of an initiative she feels “makes Winnipeg great.” “I have dwarfism, so I ride a smaller bike and on the streets don’t usually feel very safe,” Manteuffel said in an interview Tuesday. “Even in a designated bike lane, am I going to be trusted to be seen by large vehicles? I go pretty slow, so even other passing cyclists can sometimes be a hazard.” Brian Szklarczuk, an adaptive cycling advocate who co-owns Wolseley’s upcoming bike shop Prairie Velo, said more inclusive forms of movement (three-wheeled bikes, handcycles) often take up a little more space, but those who use them also want to feel safe and comfortable on the road. “We know we need a little more space in the adaptive world, but we really want to be able to not be on the margins all the time,” he said. “(We want) to be able to use the other areas and just feel normal, just feel like we’re another person riding — and that’s what the open streets have allowed folks to do.” As some area residents argued the streets were inaccessible to those who are not as mobile and unable to travel the street except by car, Manteuffel said she found that perspective “challenging” to hear. “I understand that people may want to participate in driving down the crescent to utilize it but, there are other methods and opening the street allows for a different variety of body types to take advantage of that space,” Manteuffel countered. Szklarczuk agrees, and hopes to see all Winnipeggers mindful of each other’s needs when out on the roads. “If we can have the conversations about true inclusiveness, we can have everyone feel safe on whatever mode of transportation they’re using: cyclists, walkers, folks using mobility devices, power chairs, manual chairs — everything you can think of can co-exist really well. We can also co-exist with vehicles really well if there is a shared responsibility that we are all using the road,” he said. Coun. Matt Allard, public works chairman, said a recent motion to knock Wellington Crescent off the holiday closure list came about in an effort to both satisfy the community’s needs and keep the street program running. After Wellington’s ward councillor, John Orlikow, tabled a motion asking for more flexibility on open street rules, by putting power in the hands of the public works director, Allard feared staff could have the power to nix the program. After talking off-the-record with legal advisors, public works instead motioned to take Wellington Crescent off the list and let the area councillor and the public works team decide how best to proceed. Allard said the intent was not to see Wellington permanently dropped from the list, but rather to empower the local councillor and public works director to add routes in a way that works best for constituents. Internal conversations about Wellington Crescent — and its future use as a Sunday/holiday closure street — are still underway at city hall. “The road belongs to everyone, at the end of the day,” Allard said. “All of our taxes pay for the roads, and they are a public space and meant to be shared.” julia-simone.rutgers(a)freepress.mb.ca Twitter: @jsrutgers

1 0

WFP Editorial: Street strife on Wellington Crescent (Jun16'21)
by Beth McKechnie 16 Jun '21

16 Jun '21

Street strife on Wellington Crescent https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/editorials/street-strife-on-welli… THE city should pay close attention to the serious concerns raised by some Wellington Crescent residents about the consequences of favouring cyclists and restricting motorists. What the city must ignore, however, is the suggestion by several residents that their high-end addresses entitle them to special treatment. To bestow municipal favours on the basis of property value is a type of classism that has no place in Winnipeg. It would be a logistical nightmare, for example, if city staff had to prioritize posh areas for services such as fire, police and snow-clearing. It would also violate the egalitarian foundation of democracy, where citizens, regardless of address, get equal access to government consideration. That said, it’s equally important not to stoop to negative stereotypes. Many critics in public forums are denouncing the recent feedback on bike routes as the laments of well-to-do Winnipeggers who don’t want their tony street to be sullied by visitors. It’s a pilot project, after all, and feedback is warranted. These Wellington Crescent residents took the opportunity to offer their feedback, plenty of feedback, a prerogative that could be equally exercised by homeowners along any of the other 17 city areas involved in this summer’s Enhanced Summer Bike Routes program, formerly known as Open Streets. Their views were outlined in about three dozen letters, citing problems with the traffic-calming program that restricts motorists to one block of travel between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. seven days a week. Homeowners wrote about increased trash on the ground, and dog deposits on lawns. Many were also miffed that their alternative driving route, along Academy Road, is now so crowded that traffic is slowed. Alarmingly, several letter writers described conflict. One wrote: “I was threatened, yelled at, and physically blocked by cyclists and pedestrians, on a daily basis, while driving the one block allowed to access my residence.” Another wrote: “When you close the roads, the people that live on the street are treated like trespassers onto their own properties.” While councillors should thoughtfully weigh such concerns, they should ignore an attempt by several letter writers to wield their property taxes as a lobbying weapon. One writer noted: “I pay almost 12K a year in property taxes.” Another wrote: “I hope that with our hefty property tax bill our voices will be heard.” The letters were submitted to the city’s public works committee, which then recommended Wellington Crescent be removed from the open streets list. The recommendation now goes to council’s executive policy committee. Councillors should be wary about granting Wellington Crescent an exemption that could set a precedent and undermine the entire open roads program. Council could be required to grant similar exemption to any street where a few homeowners took the initiative to door-knock neighbours and obtain a petition and letters seeking, like Wellington Crescent, an exemption from open roads. Councillors, and Wellington Crescent residents, should live with the current open-road restrictions until this year’s pilot program ends on Nov. 5. It will then be decided which routes will be included in next season’s open-road program. Wellington Crescent is a beautiful area with well-tended properties, grand homes, lush gardens and flowering trees. It’s to be hoped homeowners fortunate enough to live there can bear with the added cyclists and pedestrians for now, perhaps even considering it a community service that their haven offers visitors a geographical tonic from the stressful grimness of the pandemic.

1 0

Webinar Recording - Improving Traffic Signals for Bicycling and Walking
by Mark Cohoe 15 Jun '21

15 Jun '21

Hi, I had the chance to watch this webinar last week, and found it very interesting and useful. https://www.pedbikeinfo.org/webinars/webinar_details.cfm?id=109 One key part was the need to look at average pedestrian delay when setting phasing for traffic signals. When left out of reports that calculate average delay and levels of service for vehicles, average pedestrian waiting times often end up exceeding 40-50 seconds, or Level of Service F, even though it might actually be pretty easy to greatly reduce the average pedestrian wait times without causing much added delay to vehicles. To prevent this from happening, some cities's have adopted policies that require average pedestrian wait times to be measured in any report that includes intersection level of service for vehicles. Pedestrian Level of Service is then reported based on values in the 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual. Cheers, Mark Cohoe Executive Director Bike Winnipeg t: 204-894-6540 e: mark(a)bikewinnipeg.ca

1 0

Advancing Equity in Transportation Planning webinar
by Beth McKechnie 15 Jun '21

15 Jun '21

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Winters, Philip <winters(a)cutr.usf.edu> Date: Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:25 PM The next webinar in the 2021 Florida Public Transit Assn, FDOT and CUTR Professional Development Workshop series is “*The Journey Forward: Advancing Equity in Transportation Planning*.” It will be held on Wednesday, June 16, 2021 (10:00-11:30am ET). The webinar is free but pre-registration is required. The webinar will be recorded. *Registration:* https://cutr.adobeconnect.com/pdw-21-advancing-equity/event/registration.ht… *The Journey Forward: Advancing Equity in Transportation Planning* *Moderator:* Stephanie Lewis, CUTR *Presenters:* Tia Boyd, CUTR and Joshua Barber, Hillsborough MPO This session will describe innovative processes, strategies, and tools to integrate equity into transportation planning. We will begin by introducing the Transportation Equity Toolkit – a resource to advance equity in local and regional transportation planning. This toolkit provides agency staff and community members with tools, guidance, and resources to address the transportation needs of traditionally underserved communities and move equity to the forefront of transportation planning practice. The session will then explore how to apply tools such as the Transportation Equity Audit Tool and the Transportation Equity Scorecard Tool to identify the needs of underserved communities and prioritize projects for funding that advance equity. To provide an example of real-world applications of equity-driven practices, Hillsborough MPO staff will discuss their processes and findings from the Title VI and Nondiscrimination Plan update. To meet Title VI and Nondiscrimination Plan requirements, Hillsborough MPO staff have been developing a wide-ranging update that includes a framework for equity for the agency, documenting the history of racism in planning in Hillsborough County, a comprehensive public involvement process with the most underserved communities, and policy and process recommendations for the agency. We will discuss some of the findings from the historical analysis and the feedback from community outreach efforts. The discussion of community feedback will include challenges community members face accessing transportation, housing, planning meetings, and other community elements. Overall, the session will explore: 1. The impetus to investigate historical inequalities and the cumulative impacts of inequitable planning practices, 2. Strategies for more meaningful involvement from diverse communities, including outreach and survey design, and 3. Available tools and resources to identify and address the unique needs of traditionally underserved communities. Registration: https://cutr.adobeconnect.com/pdw-21-advancing-equity/event/registration.ht… A list of all sessions can be found at https://www.cutr.usf.edu/fpta/register.html *PHILIP L. WINTERS, TDM-CP *Director, TDM Program Center for Urban Transportation Research <https://www.cutr.usf.edu/> University of South Florida Tampa Campus 813.974.9811 winters(a)usf.edu [image: logo of Best Workplaces for Commuters] www.bestworkplaces.org Follow us on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/CUTRUSF/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/CUTRUSF> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/27012080/> | Newsletter <https://usf.us15.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=c3b2561719f02cfb61009c74f&id=5…> *Due to Florida’s broad open records law, email to or from university employees is public record, available to the public and the media upon request.*

1 0

Study: An economic analysis of the health-related benefits associated with bicycle infrastructure investment in three Canadian cities
by Beth McKechnie 15 Jun '21

15 Jun '21

Decision-makers are increasingly requesting economic analyses on transportation-related interventions, but health is often excluded as a determinant of value. We assess the health-related economic impact of bicycle infrastructure investments in three Canadian cities (Victoria, Kelowna and Halifax), comparing a baseline reference year (2016) with the future infrastructure build-out (2020). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246419

1 0

WFP: City hall lobbied to lift restriction on Wellington Crescent (Jun12'21)
by Beth McKechnie 12 Jun '21

12 Jun '21

City hall lobbied to lift restriction on Wellington Crescent ‘Open street’ drive residents crazy https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/open-streets-drive-wellington-cresc… CLOSING Wellington Crescent to vehicles has driven some residents of the city’s toniest street to distraction and forced the city to reconsider the designation. In a package of letters submitted to the public works committee, residents argued their mental health, safety, and human rights are being violated because motorists are restricted to one block of travel between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. seven days a week. A 68-page package — compiled by resident Brenlee Carrington-Trepel and comprising more than three dozen letters from disgruntled residents — outlines their concerns. One letter, penned by Asper Foundation president Gail Asper decried the closure of the “historic” street to vehicles, arguing the “100-year-old trees, lilacs and cherry blossoms in full bloom, spectacular gardens of the homeowners and the stunning homes themselves” are an essential “mental health break.” Asper, like many residents, suggested the open street model also amounts to discrimination against the city’s older population who may not be able to access the street by bicycle. “I strongly believe in bike paths, but I do not believe in closing important and historic streets like Wellington Crescent in order to make space for bike paths seven days a week. This is discriminating against thousands of Winnipeggers and I submit there is simply no need for this, when cars, bikes and pedestrians have co-existed for decades,” she wrote. Another letter from one-time mayoral candidate and former councillor Paula Havixbeck argues the policy has caused an increase in property crime. Havixbeck wrote about the observations in the River Heights Community Watch Facebook group — where she is one of the administrators — suggesting open streets resulted in an increase of “crime that quite literally walks across the bridge at both ends” of Wellington Crescent. “The fact that Wellington Crescent is closed, however, poses an issue because fewer people are on site to see these individuals coming in with their empty shopping carts and to be there to be more of a deterrent. Individuals are coming over the bridge day and night. They target yards they can access quickly,” Havixbeck wrote. “I have asked that there be some support in terms of cadets monitoring those entry points.” The open streets summer program bans vehicles from travelling more than one block on select streets in an effort to encourage cycling. Wellington Crescent is also popular with pedestrians and dog-walkers. After an in-camera discussion, the public works committee agreed to request Wellington Crescent be removed from the open streets list and that the public works director be given the power to amend open street rules. The executive policy committee will consider the motion. Area councillor John Orlikow, who originally submitted a motion to public works requesting the director have the ability to alter open street rules, said his intention was never to see the open street shut down. He wanted flexibility to adjust the program based on health restrictions, street usage, traffic capacity on nearby Academy Road and community feedback. “A lot of people are very supportive of (open streets),” said Orlikow. “I feel comfortable that the goodness of the neighbourhood understands why it’s needed and the vast majority of people support that.” Orlikow, who said he is a member of the neighbourhood watch, noted he has not seen data that substantiates claims crime has increased as a result of open streets. “I have seen data that people are not feeling as safe as they used to, and that is very concerning. Are open streets the reason for that? I really can’t say it is,” he said. Another writer, Ian Restall, wrote the closure amounted to “inequity” with a “human rights element.” He argued residents are “disadvantaged and some might say discriminated against by these closures” should they be unable to bike or walk down the road. “I don’t think driving is a human right,” Orlikow countered. “If they do have a concern about human rights, I would suggest they take it to a human rights tribunal.” Several residents — including letter writer Naomi Devine — noted they pay “significant taxes” for the “luxury” of living on Wellington Crescent, arguing they expect to be able to drive more than one block on the road in return. “I don’t agree with that claim. Everybody pays taxes and everybody has the same rights as everybody else,” Orlikow said. While community feedback from those who live on the street is critical, he noted, “I don’t care how much taxes you pay… no one owns the streets, they are public assets.” Before the pandemic, Orlikow said, conversations were held about pedestrians, cyclists and motorists sharing the road. “At the end of the day, it will be my intent to keep open streets on Wellington Crescent. People really do enjoy it. And just try to find some way to get flexibility so we can adjust it based on variables out there,” he said. (To read the letters, visit wfp.to/7nL) julia-simone.rutgers(a)freepress.mb.ca Twitter: @jsrutgers

1 0

Globe and Mail: Speed kills: Slowing cars is great for cities
by Charles F 12 Jun '21

12 Jun '21

Speed kills: Slowing cars is great for citiesThe Globe and Mail (Alberta Edition)Acentury ago, during the Roaring Twenties, the automobile established its dominance in our cities. As car proliferated, pedestrian death surged. To cut the carnage, walkers were shunted to sidewalks and could only cross streets at specific intervals. Los Angeles in 1923 was among the first to outlaw jaywalking – in the lingo of the day, a “jay” was a half-witted rube. “Don’t jay walk” blared one poster of the era, depicting a hapless walker hit by an angry driver, a nearby cop shouting at the pedestrian. According to the 2020 book Slow Cities, automakers helped launch “a massive shaming campaign [that] prompted a radical shift in public attitudes to the use of streets.”Everyone knows how the story turned out. Streets came to be understood as things whose purpose was to speed traffic. Streets belonged to cars; people were just interlopers, like hairs clogging a drain.The first cracks in the car’s dominance emerged a half-century ago when public opposition prevented proposed freeways from ripping through downtown Vancouver and the heart of Toronto. In the late 1990s, Sweden formulated a bolder idea: Vision Zero. Its goal was to design cities so that zero pedestrians would ever be killed by a car. It asserted that when cars killed pedestrians, it wasn’t because pedestrians were “jays.”Vision Zero has been spreading, including to unlikely places such as Calgary and Edmonton – cities with traditional, car-centric layouts.In Calgary, as of May 31, the speed limit on most neighbourhood streets was reduced to 40 kilometres an hour from 50 km/h. Edmonton is making the same change in August; big downtown streets such as Jasper Avenue are included.The rationale is simple: Speed kills. If a car moving at 50 km/h hits a pedestrian, the likely result is death. But if the car is going 30 km/h, the pedestrian probably survives. Research cited by the City of Calgary suggests a 1-per-cent reduction in average driving speed reduces fatal collisions by 4 per cent.The move to 40 km/h is only a half-step. The goal of Vision Zero in neighbourhoods is a limit of 30. And on arterial roads, where speeds are higher, and more deaths occur, a limit of 50 km/h is advised as much safer than the usual 60 or 70.In Canada, Toronto may have made the most progress so far. City council in 2019 approved a plan to cut civic speed limits. Known as “Vision Zero 2.0,” it’s a second go at a first attempt that came up short. The city, in take two, cut speeds on numerous arterial streets but still chose a cautious streetby-street approach, rather making citywide changes. Toronto has since kept making reliable progress. Among the next moves is a plan to cut neighbourhood speed limits in much of Scarborough to 30 km/h from 40.Pedestrian and cyclist deaths in Canada are stubbornly high. From 2000 through 2004, according to Transport Canada, cars killed an average of 364 pedestrians a year and 53 cyclists. From 2014 through 2018 – the most recent national numbers – cars killed 318 pedestrians annually, and 45 cyclists.The data from Toronto show encouraging trends – and gathering data is a signal of the importance of achieving a goal, rather than just tallying fatalities long after the fact, or treating pedestrians and cyclist deaths as just a fact of life. In 2020, road deaths in Toronto plunged – in part because of the pandemic and lighter traffic. This year’s figures are even lower. As of mid-May, there have been just five pedestrian traffic fatalities and zero cyclists. Serious injuries are also down sharply.Slowing cars – and saving lives – takes more than lower speed limits. The design of streets is important, such as narrower driving lanes, wider sidewalks, pop-out curbs at corners for pedestrians and cycling lanes. Other strategies include automated speed cameras, investment in transit and limiting cars in some areas, such as school zones in the morning and afternoon.This is not utopian fantasy. Vision Zero became reality in two Scandinavian capital cities in 2019, with Oslo and Helsinki recording zero pedestrian deaths. Back in the 1990s, Helsinki was suffering about 25 pedestrians deaths a year.A century ago, road safety was about making sure people knew their place, and stayed out of the way of cars – the real owners of the road. That paradigm is finally being reworked. The pace of change is measured in the dwindling number of lives lost.

1 0

Fwd: Please join us June 24 at 7:30pm for the virtual launch of WriteToMove, a WITH ART anthology
by Anders Swanson 11 Jun '21

11 Jun '21

Welcome to join! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <tamara.rae(a)winnipegarts.ca> Date: Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 1:33 PM Subject: Please join us June 24 at 7:30pm for the virtual launch of WriteToMove, a WITH ART anthology To: leigh anne parry <leighanneparry(a)gmail.com>, Anders Swanson < andersswanson(a)gmail.com> Please join us online on Thursday, June 24 at 7:30pm for the free virtual launch of *WriteToMove* <http://winnipegarts.ca/wac/artwork/write-to-move>. The anthology, edited by Sharon Chisvin, explores the broad topic of mobility rights and was created with the Winnipeg Trails Association through the Winnipeg Arts Council’s WITH ART community public art program. *“I am grateful to all of the anthology contributors who entrusted me with their writing. I have never climbed a mountain or cycled across Europe. Nor have I ever been followed by store security because of the way I look, or had to flee my homeland and seek refuge elsewhere because of who I am. But I have had the honour of learning about those experiences, imagining those experiences, and being moved and inspired by those experiences in the process of editing WriteToMove*.” – Sharon Chisvin, Editor *“What resulted from the WriteToMove call for submissions is an array of stories that transcend any single interpretation of movement. Movement—geographical, physical, emotional, mental—is a necessary and beautiful part of our everyday lives. Everyone's an expert in their own movement. Everyone has an opinion about transportation. But not everyone experiences the built environment through the same lens.” *– Anders Swanson, Winnipeg Trails The event is free to all and features readings by contributing writers Alex Merrill, Moneca Sinclaire, Yvonne Kyle, Byron Rempel-Burkholder, Brendan McKay, Bob Armstrong, Jim Ross, Binh Pham, Berhe Gebrihet and more. Please register to attend here: *https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/writetomove-a-with-art-anthology-virtual-launch-tickets-158175008709* <https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/writetomove-a-with-art-anthology-virtual-launch…> tamara rae biebrich Senior Project Manager, Public Art *Winnipeg Arts Council <http://winnipegarts.ca/>* 103 - 110 Princess Street Winnipeg MB R3B 1K7 Treaty 1 Territory tamara.rae(a)winnipegarts.ca 204.943.7668 winnipegarts.ca <info(a)winnipegarts.ca> <https://www.instagram.com/wac_public_art/> <http://winnipegarts.ca/wac/pubart-gal/>

1 0