- AT-Network - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

WFP: City hall feels heat, will bury snow plan (Jan17'25)
by Beth McKechnie 17 Jan '25

17 Jan '25

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Proposal would have delayed clearing efforts City hall feels heat, will bury snow plan https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2025/01/16/city-to-cancel-co… A PILOT project to increase the amount of snow needed to trigger residential street clearing appears set to be dumped from the city’s budget, after public backlash piled up. City council will be asked to delete the project from the 2025 financial blueprint, which was proposed to raise the threshold to plow residential streets from 10 cm to 15 cm, starting in October. That change would have affected snow clearing throughout next winter. Council’s public works committee voted unanimously in favour of a motion to scrap the pilot project on Thursday. Mayor Scott Gillingham said he will support the motion, noting residents expressed concerns the threshold increase would compromise road safety and accessibility. “We had more feedback concerned (with) the snow-clearing pilot idea than we did about the (proposed 5.95 per cent) property tax increase … We have a very high standard of snow clearing and the public has said very clearly that they want that maintained,” said Gillingham. The mayor said some residents complained it currently takes too long to clear residential streets and the change would extend that wait, while others suggested it would make travel more difficult for people with mobility devices. “Even though I tried to express there’s not a service cut, we’re just doing a pilot project, people, I think, really did see it as a service cut,” said Gillingham. The city’s snow-clearing budget is slated to increase by $5.3 million to $45.7 million this year. Actual spending is tied to the work required to follow snow-clearing policies and varies widely depending on weather. The mayor stressed the city must seek out other ways to keep snow-clearing costs under control as inflation boosts the price of snow removal contracts. Coun. Janice Lukes, chairwoman of council’s public works committee, said mobility concerns led her to raise the motion to cancel the project. “The feedback that really resonated with me was … the concern of the public (about) mobility issues on streets where there’s no sidewalks or pathways, because people have to use streets (for all modes of traffic). We will never be able to afford a sidewalk or a pathway on every street in the City of Winnipeg,” said Lukes (Waverley West). The councillor said she supports the idea of “floating” cost-saving measures to gauging public feedback, though she did have concerns about this particular proposal from the start. “We could try this pilot project. But, honestly, I really wanted to cancel it right off the bat,” said Lukes, noting Winnipeggers are passionate about snow clearing. The city hoped the pilot project could avoid one citywide residential snow-clearing operation each year, which typically costs from $2.75 million to $5 million. Potential savings weren’t factored into the 2025 budget, Lukes said. She expects the project will be scrapped when council votes on it. “I don’t think there’ll be a problem with the councillors supporting this motion,” said Lukes. The call to strike the project triggered relief from some residents, including those who represent people with disabilities. “As much as they were calling it a pilot, it felt very much like a budget cut disguised as a pilot … I am glad they are hearing people,” said Melissa Graham, executive director of the Manitoba League of Persons with Disabilities. If the pilot project were to go ahead, Graham feared recent changes to improve sidewalk snow clearing would become less effective. “If you can’t cross the street to (reach) the next sidewalk, you effectively can’t use (the sidewalk) anyway. A lot of people in this community stay home, sometimes all winter, because they can’t get around on sidewalks,” she said. “I see this (call to cancel the project) as very good news. I’m glad that they’re getting the message that sidewalk clearing and road clearing isn’t just a perk, it’s something that’s really important to people,” Graham said. David Kron, executive director of the Cerebral Palsy Association of Manitoba, said he was concerned even a temporary policy change would have forced more people to stay home more often. “It doesn’t take a lot of snow buildup to make a street or a sidewalk inaccessible for folks that use a manual or power chair or, like myself … a cane. It doesn’t take much of a barrier to make somebody have to stay at home during the winter,” said Kron. “If folks can’t get out of their homes, they can’t be part of the community.” A cycling advocate also welcomed the proposed cancellation, since he feared the change would have allowed more snow and ruts to build up. “The ruts at 15 cm are just really hard to navigate and it is a safety hazard,” said Mark Cohoe, executive director of Bike Winnipeg. “(If) you’re in that rut and … try to get out of it, there’s a potential of (falling) down.” Cohoe said the change threatened to hinder the city’s effort to get more people to walk and bike. “We’re a winter city. Having that … ability to get out and to feel like we’re going to have that option of moving around, walking, busing and driving through the city, is really critical to life in Winnipeg. We can’t just shut down for four months (or more) of the year,” he said. City council is expected to cast a final vote on the overall budget on Jan. 29. joyanne.pursaga(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:joyanne.pursaga@freepress.mb.ca> X: @joyanne_pursaga

1 0

WFP: Arrest made in pedestrian Death (Jan15'25)
by Beth McKechnie 15 Jan '25

15 Jan '25

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. ARREST MADE IN PEDESTRIAN DEATH A driver has been arrested after an 87-year=old man was hit at a marked pedestrian crossing and later died. The collision happened at the intersection of McPhillips Street and Leila Avenue at about 7:30 a.m. on Dec. 23. Emergency services were already on scene when a pickup truck traveling east on Leila Avenue hit a pedestrian who was crossing McPhillips. The pedestrian was taken to hospital in unstable condition, where he later died from his injuries. The driver, a 44-year-old man, remained on scene and spoke with police. He was arrested Sunday and faces a charge of driving carelessly causing death. He was released on a notice to appear in court.

1 0

WFP: Getting riders back in the saddle (Jan13'25)
by Beth McKechnie 13 Jan '25

13 Jan '25

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Volunteer-run shop repairs bikes — and teaches cyclists how to — for free Getting riders back in the saddle https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2025/01/13/getting-riders-ba… ON a Sunday afternoon in mid-December, when most Winnipeggers aren’t thinking about cycling, Jacques Gross is at the Bike Dump, replacing the rear axle on a black and purple mountain bike. As he discards a broken part, the 24-year-old amuses himself by singing to it a song by English musician James Blunt. “Goodbye my lover, goodbye my friend,” he croons. Gross got involved at the volunteer- run, community bicycle shop shortly after moving to Winnipeg last May. Before stepping into the space, which is located at the corner of Main Street and Logan Avenue at the back of the Red Road Lodge, he didn’t know what a community bicycle shop was. He expected that becoming a volunteer would require “a bunch of red tape,” but that was not the case. “I just showed up and kept showing up,” he says. “Since (May), I’ve been confident enough to expand my knowledge … I feel there aren’t many things on a bike I can’t fix now.” Being a welcoming space that is accessible to everyone is what the Bike Dump is all about. Founded in 2005, the shop offers access to tools and a space where people can fix their bikes, free of charge. It is staffed by a non-hierarchical group of volunteers who help visitors with their repairs. The Bike Dump also offers repair workshops and sells refurbished bicycles on a sliding scale. “Volunteers come in with all different skill levels, including zero,” says Edward Cloud, 52, who has been involved for more than 10 years. Volunteers who are new to bike repair might spend their first shifts watching and listening; others might spend 90 minutes on their own exploring some small repair on one of the many bikes waiting to be refurbished. “We have a lot of good education happening in this space,” Cloud says. Across from Gross, Sarah Furgale is working on a blue 10-speed. As a result of an injured hip, the 52-year-old can’t cycle as much as she’d like. Fixing bikes is the next best thing. “I still want to be involved in bike culture, so I thought that this would be a good way for me to do that,” says Furgale, who has volunteered at the Bike Dump since April. “I like helping people fix their bikes,” she says. “Sometimes we get some people who are at risk or who really rely on their bikes. And so to be able to help them with something small, it’s been really rewarding.” The shop is looking for additional volunteer mechanics. People of all abilities are encouraged to get involved. Additionally, women and queer-identifying people are invited to consider volunteering so the Bike Dump can restart its Monday-night shift where women, queer and trans people who may feel uncomfortable during the shop’s regular hours can stop by and repair their bikes. The shop is also looking to add a day-time shift where volunteers would strip parts off of unrepairable bikes and possibly build bikes for sale. A senior mechanic would be there to assist and teach. To get involved, visit bike-dump.ca/ volunteering or email winnipegbikedump@ gmail.com. There’s a lot of history at the Bike Dump, says volunteer Chris Chypyha, 60, with a lot of great people and amazing tools. “Maybe it seems like a little bit of anarchy,” he says, “but the shop is actually well run.” If you know a special volunteer, email aaron.epp(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:aaron.epp@freepress.mb.ca>.

1 0

WFP Editorial: Setting lower limits for e-bikes just makes sense (Jan9'25)
by Beth McKechnie 09 Jan '25

09 Jan '25

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Setting lower limits for e-bikes just makes sense https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/editorials/2025/01/09/setting-low… THERE are some public-policy proposals that are so grounded in common sense that one wonders why they’re even up for discussion. The current conversation regarding speed limits for motorized bicycles and scooters on Winnipeg’s active transportation network is one such circumstance. For the safety of all who walk, jog, run or ride on these protected pathways, it’s an initiative that should be rolled out with all due haste. A City of Winnipeg spokesperson stated last week the public service is currently researching how other jurisdictions have dealt with the issue of motorized conveyances on active transportation routes, and how Winnipeg might effectively enforce whatever speed limits are eventually imposed. Such investigation is a necessary element of creating and implementing a policy to ensure active transportation routes remain safe. But it shouldn’t require a deep dive into research or a lengthy debate to reach the conclusion that danger is created by the introduction of power-assisted machines onto pathways whose sole reason for being is to safely separate cyclists and pedestrians from interactions with motor vehicles travelling at much higher speeds. The growing popularity of e-bikes and electric scooters has created a new subclass of transportation that is, to invoke an ancient metaphor, neither fish nor fowl. Not engineered, in terms of size or structure, to compete for space among cars and trucks on roadways, these power-assisted conveyances are still capable of travelling at top speeds ranging from 30 to 50 km/h — a rate at which collision with anything, including a pedestrian or conventional cyclist, could have catastrophic results. Think of it this way: the low end of the e-bike/ scooter maximum-speed scale (30 km/h) equates to the reduced-speed limit imposed on motor vehicles traveling along school-zone streets which students or other pedestrians might have occasion to cross. It’s more than reasonable for those who utilize the city’s slowly growing active-transportation network to argue they don’t want anything travelling at that speed, or faster, whizzing past them from any direction. Manitoba law already caps the maximum speed, in general terms, of e-bikes and scooters at 32 km/h, but common sense dictates that their rate of travel on pedestrian/bike paths must be considerably slower in order to promote their safe co-existence with walkers and pedal-powered riders. Calgary has imposed a speed limit of 20 km/h for all conveyances, power-assisted or not, on its active-transportation routes, while Quebec has created a provincial regulation that makes it illegal for power-assisted vehicles that are not licensed and do not bear a federal safety certification mark to travel on public roadways, including bike lanes. Arriving at an acceptable standard for Winnipeg’s active transportation network — quickly, one hopes — is only the first step. The second — and decidedly more challenging — element will be enforcing whatever limit is put in place. Simply put, it’s difficult to imagine how this cash strapped city will find the resources and personnel required to patrol the pathways and enforce the limits. Safety in the active-transportation realm might depend largely on the willingness of reasonable power-assisted riders to abide by posted speed limits. This much is certain, however: the growing popularity of e-bikes and other power-assisted conveyances will inevitably steer more of them onto Winnipeg’s active-transportation network; as this city seeks to catch up with others that have been more aggressive in encouraging their citizens to embrace active transportation, it’s incumbent on city hall to create the best possible opportunity for all who travel its protected pathways to safely and peacefully coexist.

1 0

WFP: City studying scooter speed limits (Jan4'25)
by Beth McKechnie 04 Jan '25

04 Jan '25

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. City studying scooter speed limits https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2025/01/04/city-studying-sco… The City of Winnipeg says they are looking to other jurisdictions to study speed limits for motorized bicycles and scooters on active transportation paths. Spokesperson David Driedger said Friday the public service is researching how other Canadian jurisdictions are handling speed limits and how they can be enforced within Winnipeg. Tom Milne, an electric bicycle user, says he would support a speed limit on the multi-use paths. [SUBMITTED E-bike user Tom Milne said he would support a speed limit on active transportation routes.]<https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/290736…> SUBMITTED E-bike user Tom Milne said he would support a speed limit on active transportation routes. “People who use two wheeled vehicles, we expect a certain level of courtesy and consideration from those folks operating for real vehicles,” he said. “I also think that people who use e-bikes need to extend that same courtesy consideration to people on regular bicycles, and particularly pedestrians on those shared trails and active transportation routes.” Milne, 62, bought an e-bike two summers ago to stay active using a lower-impact bicycle. He clocks about 1,000 kilometers on his motorized bike every season and frequently uses active transportation paths. The Old St. Vital resident said he would support a speed limit, but worries how well it would be enforced. “I know it would be very costly for the city to put cadets or police officers or set up cameras, but I also thought about if they were to go with a limit of, say, 25 km/h and they posted those speed limits signs, that would make a difference,” he said. Mark Cohoe, executive director of Bike Winnipeg, sits on the city’s active transportation committee which meets to discuss committee-related issues including speed limits. Cohoe says the committee has discussed what provinces like Quebec have done to regulate speeds on active transportation paths and the public service will be researching what that province’s laws are. According to the Quebec provincial website, to be able to travel on public pathways, an e-bike can’t travel any faster than 32 km/h. For motorized personal mobility devices, which includes electric scooters and unicycles, the devices can travel a maximum speed of 25 km/h. Cohoe applauded the city for being proactive in its approach to regulating speeds on pathways, but said it needs to be a multi-level approach. “We know it’s going to be a challenge to regulate. There’s no question about that. I think part of this is the province and feds dealing with what comes in and what’s sold,” he said. “But then, you know, how do we enforce it will be an issue too.” Most e-bikes can reach speeds of between 32 and 48 km/h depending on their make and model. The active transportation advocate says the study will need to focus on regulating what can and can’t be on pathways, speed limits, the design of pathways and their widths to see what would be allowed on active transportation routes. “Electric bikes are becoming more prevalent, and they vary a lot. They can be basically something where we’re powering a bike to something that’s approaching to what could count as a moped, “I think we recognize that with electric bikes coming in that it’s an issue that does pop up. But I think we want to make sure we’re not over-regulating at some level and that we are maintaining safety out there as well,” Cohoe said. Driedger couldn’t provide a timeline on when the forthcoming report, to be presented to the city’s Public Works department, will be available. Milne believes the vast majority of e-bike and scooter users are responsible and share the road, but if they are over-regulated or forced off the paths and on to the roads, he would give his up. “Exploring the city on those trails has really opened up my of view of Winnipeg, you don’t only have to travel on the road and it feels safer,” he said. “If I’m forced off the path I would no longer have a use for it.” nicole.buffie(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:nicole.buffie@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

WFP Analysis: Speed limits are supposed to be political (Jan4'25)
by Beth McKechnie 04 Jan '25

04 Jan '25

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Speed limits are supposed to be political MICHEL DURAND-WOOD https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2025/01/04/speed-limits-… I WAS compelled to respond to a recent piece by Curtis Pankratz ( The politics of traffic safety in Winnipeg, Dec. 30). In it, he laments the politicization of speed limits in Winnipeg, while advocating for a science-based approach to traffic safety. I both agree and disagree. Pankratz argues that a significant turning point in this politicization was the dissolution of the Manitoba Highway Traffic Board in 2019. While I do enjoy the sweet irony contained in the argument that a politically appointed board is somehow apolitical, it completely dodges the point: setting speed limits is inherently a political act. Always. That’s because there is no universal “safe speed limit.” What constitutes a safe speed limit is entirely dependent on the context surrounding it. Safe traffic speeds on a four-lane divided highway aren’t the same as what is safe on a residential street, or in a busy downtown, or in a daycare’s parking lot. That much is obvious on its face. But who chooses what that context will be? Who chooses whether homes or businesses will be allowed on a street, whether there will be a bus stop here or there, whether there will be a school or a park, whether pedestrians will be allowed to cross here, whether a given space will be a place you come to or one simply to travel through? All of those decisions are made based on our goals as a city, our values as a community, which we establish through the democratic process. That’s a political act. In fact, that’s the very definition of politics. And it’s why speed limits are set by provincial law (and by city bylaw) by politicians, instead of by an automated process devised by technocrats in some anonymously bland administration office. Setting the speed limit in an area is the political expression of our objectives, our hopes and dreams, for that area. You can’t separate that from politics. That said, setting speed limits is the first step, and yes, it’s a political one, but it’s not the last. Because once we’ve decided, as a community, what we want for a certain area, whether there will be businesses, schools, homes, parks, whether there will be people walking, biking, waiting for transit, whether we want to prioritize low-carbon travel modes, economic activity, lower noise levels in an area, or any other number of factors we might collectively consider, only then do we turn to science to see what traffic speeds will allow us to meet those goals. And on this, the science is crystal clear. Study after study after study has shown that the maximum safe speed for traffic in most urban contexts is 30 km/h, from Tingwall & Haworth (1999), to Hannawald & Kauer (2004), to Rosen & Sander (2009), to Tefft (2011), to Richards (2010), and even the OECD in 2006. It’s why the World Health Organization officially recommends maximum traffic speeds of 30 km/h wherever “motorized traffic mixes with pedestrians and cyclists.” Whether our ultimate aim is climate action, or economic activity, or livability, or anything else that has us putting homes, businesses, bus stops, pedestrians, bikes or trees in an area, then scientific evidence dictates that traffic speeds must not exceed 30 km/h in that area. Likewise, if we want high traffic speeds in an area, as is our (political) prerogative as a community, then we can’t have homes, businesses, pedestrians, traffic lights or bus stops there. We can argue the politics of which place is for what, but not the science once we’ve decided. Which brings me to my final point, one of agreement with Mr. Pankratz: if posted speed limits are aspirational, then physical design is what matters. Science has shown that most drivers will drive at a speed that is consistent with the roadway’s design. Once we’ve debated the politics of our community’s goals, once we’ve followed the science to choose the appropriate speed limit to achieve those goals, then the real work begins to design and build our infrastructure so that every street’s design speed matches its posted speed limit. Yes, that’s a huge undertaking. But we didn’t get here overnight. Our streets as they are today are the result of decades of political choices dictating the design of our streets. But a city is a complex ecosystem, a human habitat, ever evolving with changing needs, changing technologies, changing demographics and changing scientific knowledge. Our streets must evolve because our goals for our city have evolved. The City of Winnipeg’s 2025 budget has allocated $169.3 million for road repairs. Nothing says we have to rebuild them as they are. In fact, we shouldn’t rebuild them as they are. We should instead be rebuilding each and every one of them to meet our currently identified community goals. And in a lot of places in Winnipeg, those goals point towards 30 km/h. Michel Durand-Wood lives in Elmwood and has been writing about municipal issues at DearWinnipeg.com since 2018.

1 0

WFP Analysis: Time to take losses of life seriously (Dec31'24)
by Beth McKechnie 31 Dec '24

31 Dec '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Time to take losses of life seriously LINDA VAN DE LAAR https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2024/12/31/time-to-take-… WINTER is here and that means drivers slipping and sliding through intersections. While pedestrians clamber over windrows, users of mobility aids are forced to use the road, and space dedicated to active transportation becomes even less accessible. On Dec. 12, I appeared in front of city council hoping for an early Christmas miracle to keep those vulnerable road users safe from the increasing road violence perpetrated by inattentive and rushed drivers. I am a year-round bicycle commuter, cycling about five km each way to my job at St. Boniface Hospital. I also reluctantly choose to run most errands by foot. That Thursday, a motion in front of city council to implement an immediate speed limit reduction to 30 km/h from River Avenue, where the protected bike lane starts, to Academy Road, where the multi-use path starts, no longer included an actual speed limit reduction. It had been a long road for this weakened motion to reach the city council. During the preceding Executive Policy Committee meeting, more than 50 individuals relived the traumas related to the dangers and close calls they had experienced on this particular stretch of Winnipeg’s bicycle network. It did nothing to sway those in charge. Another traffic flow study was the only thing city council promised. I voiced opinions prevalent among those who pursue an active, vehicle-free lifestyle in a city dominated by cars — disappointment and outrage at the slow pace this city moves towards safe roads for all. It took until 2022 to fund a road safety unit. Up to November 2024, 14 pedestrians and two cyclists were killed by drivers on our roads. We can now add an 84-year-old man killed in Westwood to the tally. We are in a road safety crisis. The tragic death of Rob Jenner has left our community in mourning, highlighting the city’s neglect in promptly addressing road violence. It took six months for the city council to consider a weakened speed limit motion after Rob was killed by a reckless 19-year-old driving three times the limit. Winnipeg needs safe speeds, enforcement, and adequate infrastructure to protect all road users. We need a city that takes each life lost seriously. I asked city council to reconsider the original motion and reduce the speed limit on Wellington Crescent to 30 km/h for the full length. But I really wish city council would reduce speeds on all residential streets to 30 km/h and consider a speed limit reduction on major arteries such as Portage Avenue, St. Mary’s Road and St. Anne’s Road. All available evidence points towards 30 km/h being the only safe speed when pedestrians and cyclists are made to share roads with drivers in 5,000-pound vehicles. The City of Winnipeg is stalling on international guidelines from the World Health Organization and the United Nations while continuing to look for Winnipeg-made solutions. When a pedestrian or cyclist is hit at 30 km/h, their survival rate is 90 per cent. At 40, it plummets to 60 per cent. That’s not an abstract number, those are people. Those are lives. It is also no secret that reduced speeds lead to lower collision rates, reductions in noise and air pollution and an increase in walkability and livability. As an added bonus, it is the fiscally responsible thing to do as lower speeds reduce wear and tear on our already overburdened road network. We do not need more studies. The data is already available on the city’s own website! We don’t need another report to tell everyone what we already know. The city has set itself goals in the Transportation Masterplan 2050 and Our Winnipeg 2045 and it is crawling to those goals at a snail’s pace. The city put up green bike route signs in 1999, 25 years ago, and has done little to improve cycling on those routes since. The city knows 30 km/h is the only safe speed for residential streets, that is why 30 km/h school zones exist, but we leave children unprotected on our roads outside of school hours. On my walks and rides, I often feel that driver convenience and status quo is more important to the City of Winnipeg than protecting lives. I want streets where children can walk and bike to school without fear. I want connected, safe bike routes. I want neighbourhoods where drivers don’t terrorize and endanger us. So here we are in 2024, anxiously awaiting the Reduced-Speed Neighbourhood Pilot to tell us what we already know. We need to move beyond collecting data and start implementing change. The city cannot rely on yard signs; it must take decisive action. As we approach 2025, my New Year’s wish for Winnipeg is for safer streets across the city — an environment where every user can feel secure. Linda van de Laar is a registered nurse in Winnipeg.

1 0

WFP analysis: The politics of traffic safety in Winnipeg (Dec30'24)
by Beth McKechnie 30 Dec '24

30 Dec '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. The politics of traffic safety in Winnipeg CURT PANKRATZ CITIES are complex networks of human interaction and whether by walking, cycling, taking the bus, or driving, thousands of people move around Winnipeg every day. The role of science in ensuring safety is crucial. But in Winnipeg, science has been displaced over the years by political wrangling and lobby group pressure. A significant turning point was the dissolving of the Manitoba Highway Traffic Board on March 1, 2019. The board had jurisdiction over traffic safety and was designed to prevent its politicization. In order to change speed limits, for example, municipalities were required to apply to the board and public hearings would ensue. The board had the power to deny requests that, based on scientific evidence, compromised public safety. Since the board’s elimination, there have been more than 40 arbitrary speed limit reductions scattered throughout Winnipeg, many of which had earlier been denied by the board. The political pressure has come from all sides, including lobby groups and organizations like Norwood Grove BIZ, which succeeded in getting a previously denied reduction in hopes of putting restaurant patios on Marion. There is also fiscal pressure and the additional enforcement revenue that came from this change has been enormous. Speed limits have been the focus of politicization because they seem so simple. But scientifically, reducing speed limits does not necessarily lead to greater safety. In fact, it can make things worse. When a speed limit is too divergent from a road’s design speed, vehicle speeds vary greatly. Some people drive reasonably based on their surroundings and others follow the posted limit. This makes it more difficult for other road users to judge the speed of oncoming traffic and thereby affects cyclists and vehicles attempting to turn onto the street. Speed variation also leads to lane changing and following too closely, each of which lead to far more injury crashes than speeding does. Most importantly, when a speed limit is too low, drivers must focus attention on their speedometer. In traffic safety, we want driving indications to be things outside the car and speedometers should never be the main cue in urban settings. Now, add a false sense of security by pedestrians and cyclists and things get dangerous. Slower impact speeds are less deadly, but that does not mean that lowering a posted speed limit will attain that, as Winnipeg city engineers acknowledged in a 2013 study when they recommended that Winnipeg not reduce residential speed limits. The recent example of the proposed speed limit reduction on Wellington illustrates how intense this has become. At the EPC meeting on Dec. 4, 53 lobbyists spoke in favour of the speed limit reduction. It was a parade of science-free emotional appeals, the politicization of Rob Jenner’s tragic death and a few insults. There were a few incompatible comparisons to other places with no scientific foundation (most notably, Winnipeg does not have freeways to remove commuters from local roads as they do in Amsterdam as well as other Canadian cities). The most frequently cited evidence was “near misses” — something way too subjective and unverifiable to base public safety decisions on. It is a common recourse for those lacking real evidence. EPC voted against the speed limit reduction, and instead approved a motion to prioritize the building of protected cycling infrastructure on the street (which, incidentally, would be the science- based recommendation for Wellington). On Dec. 12, City Council met to consider that recommendation. Only four public speakers are allowed for each motion — two in favour and two opposed. One lobby group took all four of the spots so that there could be no presentations that might conflict with their narrative. All four speakers ridiculed city councillors for not reducing the speed limit, even accusing them of not caring about children’s safety and lacking integrity. This seemed to be more about achieving complete and total victory than finding an evidence-based solution. Such usurpation would not have been possible at Traffic Board hearings. Also problematic were the ways in which certain councillors approached the issue. At EPC, one councillor tried to bargain, saying that if 30 km/h wouldn’t be passed, maybe they can compromise on 40 km/h. That is not how traffic safety works. You don’t just pick a number because it is halfway between what you want and what is currently in effect. Another councillor was concerned about their track record as one who gets motions passed. These things have no place in safety policymaking. Another councillor raised a critical point — it is also unfair when a more privileged ward gets priority over other wards that may have a greater need for safety improvements. Wards should not be battling each other for changes that should be determined by science. If we do not build science back into the process, Winnipeg will continue to develop into a patchwork of politically motivated traffic zones rather than a complete, evidence-based urban system. That’s not going to do much to improve safety and it’s certainly not going to make things more civil. Curtis Pankratz, is an associate professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Winnipeg.

1 0

WFP: Chill on wheels (Dec21'24)
by Beth McKechnie 21 Dec '24

21 Dec '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. CHILL ON WHEELS For hardy cyclists, boosts to mind and body override plights of Old Man Winter, poor bike routes https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/2024/12/20/chill-on-wheels MOST Friday and Saturday evenings in the dark months of winter, the distinctive whir of tire treads can be heard crossing the pavement and ice outside the Centennial Concert Hall, home of the Winnipeg Symphony Orchestra. As the downtown Exchange District buzzes with concertgoers shuffling on icy sidewalks and shielding themselves against the bracing Manitoba cold, Daniel Perry, a double bassist, arrives on his custom-built Osto fat bike. He wears only thin merino-wool base layers, snow pants and a light shell. Ice crystals form on the fabric buff he wears over his face to protect his skin. Perry moved to Winnipeg from Indianapolis, Ind., in 2014. “I had a really shitty Canadian Tire bike I got off Kijiji when I first moved here,” Perry recalls. “I didn’t get very far before I gave up, and I didn’t ride again for a few months.” Cycling in Winnipeg can be challenging. Winnipeg is traditionally a car city — not to mention the fact it is frequently dubbed the coldest city in Canada and is known for its icy winds. In Winnipeg, about 0.5 per cent of the population commutes by bike. This is on par with cities like Toronto and Ottawa but behind Montreal, where 1.2 per cent of the population cycles. Winter cyclists face a myriad of challenges beyond cold toes: unplowed bike lanes make for treacherous riding, road salt corrodes bike chains and snow compacted by car tires makes for an especially slippery commute. Despite these challenges, cyclists in Winnipeg persist, though their numbers dwindle substantially in the winter months. Chris Baker, the active-transportation co-ordinator for the City of Winnipeg, says the city’s bike network is still in its “teenage years.” It’s come a long way since its infancy, but there’s still a lot of work to do. “Winnipeg has only had a bike policy or a plan since 2015,” he adds. That same year, Perry decided to invest in a decent pair of wheels. For him, cycling in the winter was the antidote to seasonal blues and the anxiety of driving, as well as a way to keep in shape — both mentally and physically. ●●● In 2014, Perry had been excited to land a spot in the Winnipeg Symphony Orchestra. It was a prestigious gig: there are only 41 bass spots available across the seven orchestras in Canada that pay above $40,000 per year, and openings are rare. But when he arrived alone on Winnipeg’s distant doorstep, so far from family and friends, Perry felt displaced, anxious and adrift. I know how Daniel felt. I, too, moved from the U.S. to join the WSO. When I arrived 15 years ago, I too struggled to adjust to Winnipeg being my new home. Being part of the city’s professional symphony orchestra, as Perry puts it, felt like being in a “bubble that’s disconnected from the community.” With erratic work schedules and intense daily practice, newcomers to the symphony often settle into an insular, indoor existence, entrenched in the social circle and culture of the orchestra. In Perry’s small friend group, that culture involved many evenings each week of socializing and heavy drinking, not uncommon among symphony musicians. After a year stuck indoors, suffering from asthma and allergies caused by dust and pet dander in friends’ homes, Perry committed to changing his habits. He vowed to stop drinking for a few months, start getting outdoors and begin exercising. Perry traded in his used Canadian Tire bicycle for a new road bike, better suited to longer rides and city streets. He began pulling up the Google Maps bike feature and exploring Winnipeg. Suddenly, he found himself seeing things he’d never noticed while driving. Before long, he was hooked on biking. Within a couple of years, he’d given up his car altogether and relied on his bike as his primary mode of transportation, including riding to work. As a fellow orchestra member, I always felt I could be forgiven for driving to work. My cello — my most precious possession — is, like all stringed instruments, susceptible to extreme cold and heat. It’s also next to impossible to transport by bicycle. Perry faces an even bigger barrier to commuting by cycle in a wintry, windy city — he plays the double bass, one of the largest instruments in the orchestra, alongside the harp and piano. Basses are cumbersome and heavy, nearly two metres tall and extremely delicate. Like all string instruments, they are pricey and can cost as much as buying a car. Perry’s solution: use his second bass to practise at home and avoid transporting his primary bass to and from the concert hall. ●●● Perry’s relationship with Winnipeg has evolved in tandem with its biking infrastructure. There are now more than 400 kilometres of bike lanes, greenways and multi-use paths. “(I discovered) how (routes) are connected to the riverside paths, they go through neighbourhoods and next to green spaces, and (I) actually got to see that side of the city,” Perry says, speaking both scenically and geographically. “I was like, ‘Oh — this is a beautiful place!’” These days, Perry is a local fixture along Winnipeg’s bike lanes. He has also become deeply entrenched in the city’s cycling community. As local cyclist Leslie Parisien puts it, “You can’t throw a rock around here without finding someone that knows Daniel.” He volunteers with organizations like The Wrench, which uses reclaimed parts to refurbish bikes and offers classes, workshops and community programming with the stated aims of “educating youth, empowering volunteers and providing people with affordable, sustainable active-transportation options.” Perry’s infectious enthusiasm for biking has rubbed off on his colleagues at the WSO. “I do try to celebrate that since I started, we’ll have winter days where there are between five and 10 people riding to work in the middle of winter,” Perry says. “For me, that’s where I have power … even if that’s in the smallest of ways, it’s a change, and that’s what I can do.” The municipal government also appears to be taking notice of the growing cycling community: Baker notes the City of Winnipeg has committed to increasing its active-transportation budget. (The 2025 city capital budget for the pedestrian and cycling program is $2.2 million, and is forecast to rise to $5.4 million in 2026). Still, some cyclists feel current efforts aren’t enough. According to Manitoba Public Insurance, every year an average of four cyclists in Winnipeg are killed in collisions with cars, with an additional 78 injured. Edmonton, by comparison, has an annual budget of $33.3 million for cycling infrastructure and plans to expand its bike network through 2026. On average, there was only one cyclist fatality per year there from 2012-22. Few studies have been done on the impact of infrastructure design on cyclists’ safety. Those that have been done have indicated that when dedicated, bike-only infrastructure exists, the risk of crashes and injuries is significantly reduced, in addition to providing sustainable transportation options and benefits to public health. Perry and others believe well-maintained, dedicated bike lanes are essential to prevent fatalities like one in June when longtime cyclist Rob Jenner was killed on Wellington Crescent while riding to work. Patty Wiens is one of those working to ensure city officials make cycling safe. “We have to hold them to task,” Wiens, known as the “Bike Mayor of Winnipeg,” says. (Bike Mayor is a title bestowed on 141 people in dozens of countries by the Bicycle Citizen Network, an Amsterdam-based organization providing support to community-led cycling initiatives and Bike Mayors across the globe). When Weins meets with Mayor Scott Gillingham — she calls him the “Car Mayor” — she pushes for three changes to make roads safer for cyclists: reduce residential speed limits to 30 km/h, eliminate right turns for cars at red lights and remove all slip lanes. Weins, who rides an e-bike, finds her sense of community enriched by cycling activism: “We’re too isolated. I think that is why the bike community has become so crucial. We find these people who feel the way we do. We bond together, and then we’re outside together. I’ve added probably 200 new friends to my life that I can honestly say are friends.” ●●● While Winnipeg’s punishing winters and fragmented bike routes scare off many cyclists, Perry remains undeterred. And his relationship to the WSO has changed for the better as well. With a deeper connection to the community, he says, “now for me, this is more of a job than an identity.” Finding a healthier work-life balance has allowed Perry to explore the world of competitive winter marathon bike races. As he gradually increased his distance, he started to eye the 268-kilometre Toscobia Winter Ultra in Wisconsin. “It sounded kind of ridiculous, but also attainable enough that I wanted to go for it.” He thought, “If this is an actual event, and people do this all the time, why can’t I be one of those people?” Now, Perry is not only one of those people, but he is incredibly successful. He finished first in the 2023 Tuscobia Ultra, in which he also won a spot to compete in Alaska’s fabled Iditarod Trail Invitational — a behemoth fatbike ultra-marathon that takes place every February, covering more than 560 km. Perry, one of only a few rookies on the trail this year, rode to a fourth-place finish. Though Perry and I have sat in close quarters on the orchestra stage for 10 years, I visited his home for only the second time about a month after that race. I found him sitting cross-legged on his sleek grey sofa, sipping a cup of black coffee. Bella, a small, elderly rescue he was dog-sitting, was curled up like a croissant at the opposite end of the couch. Sporting a mullet and trimmed beard, he was “still processing” the Iditarod experience and seemed philosophical. “I’m not just obsessed with bikes,” he says. “I use it as a tool or an avenue for other things.” Perry spends a lot of time on his bike in reflection, he says, doing what he calls his “inner work.” And without his bike, Perry knows his connection to his community in Winnipeg wouldn’t be as rich. Beyond the physical benefits of cycling year-round, biking has also propelled Perry’s personal development and community activism. Cycling is no longer simply a mode of transportation. ●●● There are many sub-zero evenings when Perry arrives at the concert hall, rosy-cheeked and refreshed from his commute. He’s already started mentally and physically preparing for his performance on his ride to work. “I like to take time to think about my breathing and my posture and my muscle engagement while I’m riding… this helps me warm up and think about using my entire body to play bass,” he says. He wheels his bike backstage, past colleagues already in their evening dress. Perry and the other bassists he inspired to ride to work leave their bikes in a large instrument-storage room. Fat bikes parked between instrument cases and storage lockers spark conversations about recent rides, road conditions and weather. Layers of sweaty clothing are peeled off and hung on handlebars to dry, as orchestra members change into tuxedos, dresses and other formal wear. As the ice melts and drips from his bike tires, Perry sits on stage, just one cog in the wheel of the orchestra, anticipating his ride home after the concert amid the snow falling gently outside. Perry is thankful for the relationship he has cultivated with cycling. “I needed something that I did on my own terms, that I could have as a passion away from music,” he says. “My world is so much bigger now.” Emma Quackenbush is a writer and cellist who has performed with the Winnipeg Symphony Orchestra for 15 years.

1 0

WFP Analysis: Slower speeds for safety on residential streets (Dec20'24)
by Beth McKechnie 20 Dec '24

20 Dec '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Slower speeds for safety on residential streets HILLARY ROSENTRETER https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2024/12/20/slower-speeds… JUST days ago, I heard another one of those familiar sounds — crunch. It’s the sound two-ton hunks of metal and plastic make when they collide. I looked over from a snow-packed multi-use path lined with footprints and bike tire tracks to see people clamouring out of their vehicles to inspect the damage. Although this sound is not unique to the winter months, unfavourable weather conditions do highlight just how dangerous our roads and sidewalks can be. On Dec. 12, I spoke before city council on this very topic. After passing through multiple committees at City Hall, seeing record turnout for such an issue with over 50 delegations in an executive policy committee meeting in support, and shapeshifting to the wills of various councillors multiple times in the process, a motion addressing the hidden dangers of the beautiful Wellington Crescent was on the agenda. Much to the dismay of many, the motion titled “Item No. 4 of the Report of the Standing Policy Committee on Public Works dated Nov. 29 — Speed Limit Reduction on Wellington Crescent,” did not contain any provisions for a speed limit reduction. To help you understand why I stood at City Hall’s podium that day — aside from standing on the shoulders of those who came before me — I need to take you back in time, six months ago, to June 6, the day Rob Jenner was killed on Wellington Crescent. Already before lunch that day, our online Winnipeg Cycling Community’s main message thread was ablaze over news about a cyclist being hit by a driver along Wellington Crescent earlier in the morning, and taken to hospital in critical condition. We were anxious and devastated. To be honest, we were also angry. We were desperate for more information. Our group has many residents of the wards of Coun. John Orlikow (River Heights), Coun. Sherri Rollins (Fort Rouge-East Fort Garry) and Coun. Cindy Gilroy’s (Daniel McIntyre). They use Wellington Crescent for their daily commutes because it’s their only choice, being right at their doorstep. They know better than anyone that this beautiful right-of-way hides darks secrets among the cracks in its narrow sidewalks, with unmarked pedestrian crosswalks the width of four lanes and the frequent speeders along the Crescent. They would be the first to tell you that Jenner’s death was an inevitability. Even though Jenner was among the most cautious cyclists, he is not with us today. Jenner’s death was entirely preventable. And to be clear, I did not speak to city council because of a reckless driver. I can promise you nearly every single person who walks or rolls along Wellington Crescent has a harrowing story about a few near death experiences. I am here because one death is one too many, and change needs to happen. Since moving back to Winnipeg in 2021, I have avoided Wellington Crescent after having a white-knuckle experience on my very first time using the route, almost exactly where Rob was hit. And yes, the driver in Jenner’s case was reckless. (In case you were not aware, the vehicle that hit Jenner was travelling at nearly 160 kilometres per hour down Wellington Crescent.) Wellington Crescent encourages high speeds. It is incredibly wide and winding, and hints at drivers that they can travel at highways speeds along what is, first and foremost, as residential as a street can be. Wellington’s design is built to kill and we need to make sure Jenner’s death is the last on the street. And in an ideal world the last death at the hands of a driver, but we have already had more deaths since then. Much of June 6 was agony, to be honest. We could all see ourselves and our loved ones in Jenner. When the photos of the crime scene were added to media articles, my stomach sank. The lead shot was Jenner’s bike on the boulevard. I know my way around a bicycle, so I immediately noticed that not only was the rear wheel severely mangled but the rim had been completely obliterated. I need to emphasize here that it takes an incredible amount of force to do that. It was so clear to me that the cyclist had been hit from behind. It tore me up. I had a terrible feeling about their chances of survival. Being hit by a driver from behind is basically a worst-case scenario. I know because I speak from experience. I was heading home along Waterfront Drive near Higgins below the Disraeli Bridge. I was so fortunate that the driver and I were slowing down as we approached a red light. Being hit from behind is scary because you have no way of anticipating it, especially on roads without dedicated, separated and well-maintained infrastructure. One moment you’re rolling along, the next your body and the pavement become one. Had the driver and I not been going at similar speeds I would probably be dead today. My partner and mom got a message saying: “I’ve been hit. But I’m OK.” It took me a few minutes to type up the message through tears and although bike riding is the most joyful experience on the planet for me, I will always carry a twinge of anxiety about whether my life will be cut short too. Not a single person in our group knew Jenner personally. But we were all grieving. There had been a life involuntarily taken too soon by entirely preventable causes. Like Nardia Bedward, Tammy Bateman, Doris Porter, and too many others. My ask to city council was to amend the motion to include provisions for a 30km/h speed limit along the Crescent. Coun. Brian Mayes (St. Vital) rattled on about all the calls he receives from people in his ward about lowering their street’s speed limit to 30km/h and, like some other councillors, used this as an excuse to “not treat Wellington Crescent like a special case.” The irony of this type of argument is not lost on me. I am completely in favour of consistency in our 30km/h speed limits, believing they should be year round and apply to all residential streets in the city. Consistency is safer and more practical for everyone. Unfortunately, city council did not amend the motion to include reducing the limit to 30km/h, but we heard from multiple councillors to hold tight until the city’s report on their 30km/h pilot streets would be released some time in 2025. Maybe with a study completed on a pilot, city council will finally take action on life and death matters. Hillary Rosentreter is an advocate for safe streets.

1 0