- AT-Network - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

WFP Analysis: More city than we can pay for (May16'22)
by Beth McKechnie 16 May '22

16 May '22

More city than we can pay for https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/more-city-than-we-can-pa… AS people in Winnipeg emerged from a long, frigid and snowy winter, they found a city with roads bearing a striking resemblance to the surface of the moon. This, despite the City of Winnipeg having had its highest road renewal budget in history for each of the last three years. With drought followed by flood, freezing followed by thaw, Manitoba gumbo has been having its way with our city’s roads. We can’t change the weather, or the soil, and significantly raising taxes wouldn’t be popular, so how will we ever manage our worsening pothole problem? There is one straightforward answer — build fewer roads and get more people to live on the ones we already have. The solution to managing potholes is simple math that reads like a Grade 9 pop quiz. If 10 taxpayers live on a street that is one kilometre long, each one pays to maintain 100 metres of road. If 10 taxpayers live on a street that is one and a half kilometres long, each one pays to maintain 150 meters of road. Every tax dollar being stretched more thinly by lower density means reduced maintenance and more potholes. It’s a simplistic example, but this is precisely what has happened in Winnipeg, and in most sprawling North American cities, over the last 50 years. Since the 1970s, Winnipeg’s low-density, suburban growth patterns have resulted in the population increasing by 37 per cent while the built area of the city has almost doubled. Each taxpayer today is responsible for about 40 per cent more land area and its corresponding infrastructure. Looking at infrastructure such as water pipes, according to the city, each Winnipegger today is responsible for nearly 2.5 times more length of pipe than they were in the 1940s, 70 per cent more than in the 1970s. The math is simple. We have built more city than we can pay for, and our moonscape roads are the result. Looking deeper, the math doesn’t get better. An excellent source of information regarding the cost of Winnipeg’s growth can be found at the Dear Winnipeg Blog (dearwinnipeg.com), written by Michel Durand-Wood. He found that the replacement cost for all of Winnipeg’s roads is about $17 billion, and if we maintain our current road renewal budgets, again, the largest in the city’s history, the replacement cycle will be more than 100 years. The only solution to our infrastructure deficit is to rethink what growth looks like in Winnipeg and begin embracing higher density and more diverse residential and commercial development in our existing neighbourhoods. Locating more development around infrastructure that is already in place, and less development on the periphery of the city that requires new infrastructure to be built, is the only way we will ever inch towards greater economic sustainability. The infrastructure in most need of replacement, for now, exists in older neighbourhoods. The combined sewer system is an important example. Replacing the system is non-negotiable and it will cost billions of dollars to do. To be most cost-effective, our goal must be to have as many people as possible using and paying for that new infrastructure, instead of spending money to replace it while also building new elsewhere. This example translates to all infrastructure and city services, including roads, pipes, sewers, fire halls, community centres, libraries, transit, snow clearing and everything the city pays for. The more taxpayers sharing it, the less costly and the better maintained it will be. By growing our existing neighbourhoods, we will also be investing in our most productive tax base. Despite being filled with high-value homes, new suburbs typically generate far less tax revenue than less-affluent inner-city neighbourhoods because of their lower overall density. Central neighbourhoods like Wolseley, West Broadway, Spence and Earl Grey generate between 50 and 80 per cent more taxes per hectare than new suburbs built on the edge of the city. Osborne Village generates more than twice as much tax revenue per hectare than Bridgwater, Whyte Ridge or Island Lakes. This is also true for commercial development. The single block of Corydon Avenue between Daly and Cockburn streets is lined with old, nondescript, two- and three-storey buildings and shops, but its collective assessed tax value is equal to a Costco in south Winnipeg that uses five times more land area, contributing significantly to the city’s overall footprint, infrastructure and maintenance costs. Not only does the compact nature of mature neighbourhoods produce more revenue, but it also significantly reduces the city’s cost to service them. A study by the Halifax Regional Municipality found that when all infrastructure and public services are calculated, an average home in a central neighbourhood costs $1,416 per year to support, compared to $3,462 in a distant suburb. By embracing density and infill growth, welcoming change in our neighbourhoods and creating policies that support a more compact urban form, we can grow our most productive tax base and spend less to service it. We can complain about soils, weather and construction techniques, but in the end the severity of our pothole problem comes down to simple math. The only solution is to change the equation. *Brent Bellamy is senior design architect for Number Ten Architectural Group.*

1 0

St. Boniface Bike Route Survey (closes June 14th)
by Beth McKechnie 14 May '22

14 May '22

ST. BONIFACE BIKE ROUTE UNDER CONSIDERATION THE City of Winnipeg wants the public’s help to select a new active transportation route between St. Boniface and downtown. The path would create a link for pedestrians and cyclists to travel between the Esplanade Riel footbridge/ Provencher Bridge and the multi-use path on Archibald Street south of Nairn Avenue. After the first round of public consultations, the city will seek feedback on three possible route options west of the Seine River and one that runs east of the river, including: • West option A: Provencher Boulevard (as a standalone route through the area). • West option B: A combination route that serves neighbourhoods both north and south of Provencher Boulevard with parallel routes on de la Cathedrale Avenue (south of Provencher Boulevard) and Notre Dame Street (north of Provencher Boulevard). • West option C: A combination route that serves neighbourhoods both north and south of Provencher with parallel routes on de la Cathedrale (south of Provencher) and Dumoulin Street (north of Provencher). • East recommended design: Nadeau Street / Notre Dame Street / La Fleche Street / La Verendrye Street to connect to Archibald Street. Winnipeggers can share their thoughts on the proposed routes through a city survey or at a public event between now and June 14. For information on the options to provide feedback, visit winnipeg.ca/stbtodowntown.

1 0

New Date, More Tickets! Transportation for a Strong Town
by Mel Marginet 05 May '22

05 May '22

On Wednesday, May 25th Green Action Centre will welcome Strong Towns’ Charles Marohn to Winnipeg. Charles released *Confessions of a Recovering Engineer: Transportation for a Strong Town* in 2021. This book is a follow-up to *Confessions of a Recovering Engineer: A Bottom-Up Revolution to Rebuild American Prosperity*. In this book tour presentation, Marohn demonstrates how the values of engineers and other transportation professionals are applied in the design process, and how those priorities differ from the values of the general public. By showing how transportation investments are a means to an end and not an end unto themselves, Marohn reveals how the standard approach to issues like fighting congestion, addressing speeding, and designing intersections only makes transportation problems worse, at great cost in terms of both safety and resources. By contrast, the Strong Towns approach to transportation focuses on bottom-up techniques for spending less and getting higher returns, all while improving quality of life for residents of a community. Green Action Centre is thrilled to be working with Peg City Car Co-op Philip Mikulec, Erik Dickson of the City of Winnipeg’s Transportation Division and Michel Durand-Wood to plan an exciting and impactful event for the Manitoba audience. *More tickets are now available for* *The Confessions Tour: Transportation for a Strong Town <https://greenactioncentre.ca/healthy-travel/the-confessions-tour-transporta…>, which was previously SOLD OUT when we had to reschedule due to the April blizzard*. GET TICKETS <https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/the-confessions-tour-transportation-for-a-stron…>Like many cities in Canada, Winnipeg has gone through a period of record growth, and yet our financial position has never been worse. Our approach to transportation results in a dozen deaths on average every year and hundreds of residents with serious or life-altering injuries. What did we get wrong, and what can we do now, and into the future, to ensure we have a successful transportation system that contributes to the quality of life of all residents? The lessons Charles shares will apply to those in Winnipeg as well as municipalities across the province. Whether you are a planner, developer, transportation engineer, municipal leader or community advocate, you will want to attend this important event. Following Charles’ keynote, attendees will be divided into groups to participate in a series of breakout sessions to bring the high-level concepts to the local reality around us. Be part of the transportation transformation in your town! *ABOUT CHARLES MAROHN* Charles Marohn, known as “Chuck” to friends and colleagues, is the founder and president of Strong Towns. He is a professional engineer and a land use planner with decades of experience. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering and a Master of Urban and Regional Planning, both from the University of Minnesota. Marohn is the author of *Strong Towns: A Bottom-Up Revolution to Rebuild American Prosperity* (Wiley, 2019), and of *Confessions of a Recovering Engineer: Transportation for a Strong Town* (Wiley, 2021). He hosts the Strong Towns Podcast <https://www.strongtowns.org/podcast> and is a primary writer for Strong Towns’ web content <https://www.strongtowns.org/>. He has presented Strong Towns concepts in hundreds of cities and towns across North America. Planetizen named him one of the 10 Most Influential Urbanists of all time. Thank you to our sponsors for making The Confessions Tour: Transportation for a Strong Town possible! [image: Logos (2).jpg] *Mel Marginet* | Workplace Commuter Options <http://greenactioncentre.ca/>Green Action Centre <http://www.greenactioncentre.ca/> <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> 3rd floor, 303 Portage Ave | (204) 925-3777 x112 | Find us here <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> **Note: I work two days a week at Green Action Centre and it may take a few * *days to respond to you. * *We are located on Treaty 1 Territory and the homeland of the Métis Nation. The water we drink comes from Shoal Lake First Nation. * Green Action Centre is your green living hub Support our work by becoming a member <http://greenactioncentre.ca/support/become-a-member/>. Donate at CanadaHelps.org <http://canadahelps.org/> <http://www.gomanitoba.ca>

1 0

Manitoba government investing in two Winnipeg trails
by Beth McKechnie 01 May '22

01 May '22

CTV News: https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/manitoba-government-investing-in-two-winnipeg-t… Provincial news release: https://news.gov.mb.ca/news/index.html?item=54344&posted=2022-04-30 WFP: TWO NEW TRAILS GET $600K IN FUNDING THE provincial government is spending $600,000 on two new cyclist and pedestrian trails in Winnipeg. On Saturday, the province announced two projects have been approved under the Trails Grant fund. There is $450,000 going toward a 2.4-kilometre multi-use path west of McPhillips Street between Leila and Church Avenues. It’s called the Northwest Hydro Corridor Construction Project and is expected to include lighting, benches and new pedestrian and cyclist traffic signals. As well, the province is putting $150,000 toward connecting The Forks and Chief Peguis Trail via the North Winnipeg Parkway Active Transportation Project. The Trails Grant for Winnipeg is part of a $10-million endowment fund from the provincial government, in partnership with Trails Manitoba and The Winnipeg Foundation, the province stated in a news release.

1 0

Sunday bike routes start in May
by Beth McKechnie 30 Apr '22

30 Apr '22

WFP: SUNDAY BIKE ROUTES START NEXT MONTH Motorists will soon be slowing down on 15 city streets starting next month for the summer and fall. The city announced Friday that during the first three weeks of May it will be putting signage up reminding motorists to slow down to 30 km/h 24 hours per day, seven days a week, on the streets until Oct. 31. The streets include Wellington Crescent, from the Maryland Bridge to Academy Road, Lyndale Drive from Cromwell to Gauvin streets, and Scotia Street from Armstrong to Anderson avenues. CBC: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/winnipeg-open-streets-bike-route-1.… CoW press release: https://winnipeg.ca/cao/media/news/nr_2022/nr_20220429.stm#4

1 0

WFP Analysis: EVs not a ‘silver bullet’ solution (Apr25'22)
by Beth McKechnie 25 Apr '22

25 Apr '22

EVs not a ‘silver bullet’ solution https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/evs-not-a-silver-bullet-… AS governments across the world struggle to meet quickly approaching climate change targets, electric vehicles have begun to find their way into the spotlight. The “Build Back Better” plan in the U.S. and Canada’s 2022 federal budget both focus efforts to decarbonize the transportation sector on incentivizing “zero emission vehicles” (ZEVs). Transportation is Canada’s second largest source of GHG emissions, responsible for 25 per cent of the country’s total. In cities such as Winnipeg, vehicle tailpipes are the source of half of all emissions. It is also clear, however, that electric vehicles are not an “easy button” solution to climate change. A 2,000-kilogram machine transporting an 80-kilogram human cargo for almost every trip made outside of the home is not a sustainable solution, regardless of the machine’s power plant. There are many studies that try to quantify ZEVs’ emissions, and the consistent conclusion is that no car is truly a zero-emission vehicle. For a more complete picture, the current focus on tailpipe emissions must be broadened to include the carbon footprint of all facets of a vehicle’s life cycle. When factoring in the manufacturing emissions created during raw-materials extraction, production and shipping, as well as emissions from the electrical grid during its use, it has been found that an electric vehicle has about half the overall carbon footprint of a gasoline vehicle. This is an important reduction that will only improve over time, but threatening to counteract these gains is the fact that every 20 years there are 50 per cent more vehicles on Canadian roads. They are also getting larger, which increases manufacturing emissions, battery sizes and energy use. Over the last two decades, the share of trucks and SUVs has grown from 30 per cent to 80 per cent. In our ever-shortening climate-crisis timeline, market absorption also creates a challenge for ZEVs. A new study done at Polytechnique Montréal found that to meet that city’s 2030 emissions reduction targets, more than 60 per cent of vehicles on the road will need to be ZEVs. Many projections show that even with federal incentives, by 2030 only 11 per cent of vehicles will be electric, with 60 per cent likely not being reached until 2050. Extensive vehicle electrification is important, but it will only get us part way to our transportation emissions targets. A complete solution will require serious investment in strategies that fundamentally reduce the amount we drive. Key to this will be investing heavily in alternate forms of transportation, including public transit, to provide convenient mobility alternatives. The focus has been on electrification, but for that to be an effective climate policy, priority should be given to investments that increase ridership. Electrification of public transit creates headlines, but the environmental benefits of public transit are actually realized when more people get out of their cars and onto a bus. If we made public transit sufficiently attractive to reduce emissions from private vehicles by only two per cent, it would have the same environmental impact as electrifying every transit vehicle in Canada. More effective policy would fast-track rapid transit construction, significantly increase service frequency and reliability, and provide strong connectivity to make transit effective for everyday use. Most Canadian cities developed around a pervasive streetcar system that was its primary mode of motorized transportation. We can take inspiration from our past and re-establish a public transit system that is no longer an afterthought, but instead is a well-integrated and desirable mobility option for everyone. Creating an effective system of alternative mobility, including public transit, walking or biking, is more complex than simply buying more buses or building bike lanes. Land-use policies must carefully dovetail with transportation planning to realize success. We can again learn from our past, when streetcar neighbourhoods were built with higher densities and grid pattern streets that provided walkable access to shops and public transit. When new neighbourhoods were built, the street grids and transit routes were simply extended, instead of the disconnected subdivisions and commercial power centres we build today that make cars the only viable transportation option. On average, Canadians drive 25 per cent farther each day than they did 20 years ago. By limiting suburban sprawl on the periphery of the city and implementing policies that promote infill development, such as higher allowable densities and reduced parking requirements, more compact and walkable neighbourhoods will result. This will allow more people to live closer to their daily services and amenities, making walking, busing and biking more viable options. Zoning and land-use policies can also emphasize the development of “complete streets” that reallocate vehicle space to alternate transportation such as bike lanes, priority transit lanes and wider sidewalks. These streets can be higher density with walkable access to employment, commerce and recreation. Electric vehicles are an important part of our climate change policy, but they are not a silver bullet. They must dovetail with effective government policies and budgets that promote greater use of public transportation and alternative modes of travel. Our challenge is great, and the time is now to make impactful changes for our future. *Brent Bellamy is senior design architect for Number Ten Architectural Group.*

2 1

CBC: Pedal-powered plastic shredder helps Winnipeg's ArtsJunktion get creative for Earth Week
by Beth McKechnie 22 Apr '22

22 Apr '22

Great story: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/pedal-powered-plastic-recycling-win…

1 0

WFP Editorial: More work needed to make city bike-friendly (Apr18'22)
by Beth McKechnie 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

Winnipeg’s active transportation network needs all the help it can get. As such, a proposal to continue the city’s "open streets" program through this summer, and beyond, is a welcome development. The plan — renamed the "enhanced summer bike route program" after the city realized encouraging pedestrians to mingle with vehicles on roadways was in contravention of the Highway Traffic Act — has been tweaked for 2022 and is awaiting council approval. Changes include dropping weekday speed limits to 30 km/h and limiting wholesale street closures to weekends and holidays on many routes. Residents along Wellington Avenue who opposed the street’s closure last year will be pleased to see the thoroughfare has been excluded from the program for the upcoming season. City planners concurred that a protected bike lane through the neighbourhood would be more useful. The seasonal transportation mode shift along residential roads has been celebrated (and enjoyed) by many, and the program is a rare example of the city prioritizing cyclists over drivers. At least some of the time. Safe cycling routes are the first step to encouraging more people to hop on a bike — and Winnipeg needs a lot more people to hop on bikes if it wants to meet the objectives outlined in the city’s OurWinnipeg 2045 planning document. The aspirational plan pushes for a sustainable transportation system that relies less on personal vehicles and more on low-carbon public and active transportation. Within the document, cycling is promoted as a cost-effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve community health. Unfortunately, it’s a choice that, at the moment, presents more barriers than benefits locally. The summer bike routes are great for recreational users, since they allow cyclists to enjoy scenic areas of the city without having to duck and dodge vehicle traffic. However, many of the 14 routes proposed are mere islands of safety. Few connect directly with established bike paths and, unless you live in the neighbourhood, most require traversing busy main roads to gain access. Churchill Drive, for example, offers pleasant views of the Red River, but visiting cyclists have to deal with bridges, train tracks, under- and over-passes before they can catch a glimpse. Cycling advocates have long called on officials to create a connected network of bike lanes that allows people to move through all areas of the city safely and with ease. Yet for many Winnipeggers, cycling still isn’t a viable way to get to work, go grocery shopping or pick the kids up from school. The system is too fractured, and most commutes, depending on where you live, require riders to mix with cars or pedestrians for at least part of the journey. Progress has been made in recent years, with protected paths cropping up throughout the city, but Winnipeg has a long way to go before it can claim to be bicycle-friendly — or even bicycle-tolerant. Recreational biking can be a gateway to commuter cycling. The enhanced summer bike route program was born out of the pandemic, but has proven it has permanent appeal. Based on uptake (many routes saw hundreds of cyclists daily), it also has the potential to get more people thinking about their bikes as an everyday mode of transportation. It’s clear Winnipeggers want to cycle. It’s up to the city to create a clear path forward.

1 0

Why ‘Vision Zero’ Hit a Wall
by Beth McKechnie 14 Apr '22

14 Apr '22

An excellent read if you haven't come across it yet: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-04-11/-vision-zero-at-a-crossr… cheers, Beth -- Beth McKechnie (she/her) *| *Green Action Centre <http://www.greenactioncentre.ca/> 3rd floor, 303 Portage Ave | (204) 925-3777 x102 | Find us here <http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/> *Green Action Centre is located on the ancestral lands of the Anishinaabeg, Ininew, Anishininiwag, Dakota, and Dene Peoples, and the homeland of* *the Métis Nation. We acknowledge that our water is sourced from Shoal Lake 40 First Nation and that our hydro is sourced from numerous First Nations here in Manitoba**. * Green Action Centre is your green living hub Support our work by becoming a member <http://greenactioncentre.ca/support/become-a-member/>. Donate at CanadaHelps.org <http://canadahelps.org/> <http://www.gomanitoba.ca>

1 0

WFP Analysis: Time to get people back on the bus (Apr1'1'22)
by Beth McKechnie 11 Apr '22

11 Apr '22

Time to get people back on the bus https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/time-to-get-people-back-… AS reported in the Free Press (“Advertising campaign aims to attract riders back to Transit,” March 22), Winnipeg Transit has started advertising to bring riders back. Renewing interest in public transit is an important first step, both locally and nationally. However, much more must be done to truly resurrect transit across Canada. As part of a study funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and Infrastructure Canada, we investigated impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on public transit and active transportation in Canadian municipalities. Prior to COVID-19, as seen in the 2011 and 2016 census results, Winnipeg had been doing rather well in terms of transit ridership. But then the pandemic arrived in March 2020, causing a near-total collapse in monthly transit ridership and fare revenues both locally and across Canada. The number of transit passenger trips fell from 161 million in February 2020 to 26 million in April, after the onset of the pandemic. Monthly ridership has since been inching upward, but only to about half of pre-pandemic levels. We identified several reasons for the collapse. First, there were the shifts to remote work or telecommuting, and to online education, especially in post-secondary education. These shifts account for a fair amount of the decline in demand. Second, social-distancing requirements had the effect of reducing transit capacity, i.e. number of seats available. Third, and perhaps most problematic, people were afraid to enter enclosed spaces, including buses and train cars. Countering the fear will require measures to increase safety, as well as promotional campaigns to rebuild public confidence. Public transit has important implications for Canada, in terms of improving environmental performance and social equity. Thus, there is an urgent need to rethink and redirect public policies related to public transit, particularly at the federal level. The government of Canada has invested heavily in shifting transit to zero-emission buses (ZEB), to the tune of $2.75 billion over five years. The purpose behind this large investment is achieving substantial reductions in emissions. While Canada could reach its 5,000 ZEB target by 2025, for the money to be well spent, people need to be riding these buses. The federal government has also announced some funding to help municipalities cover transit losses. However, these funds are more limited ($750 million in total), and have more strings attached. Modal shift remains the main mechanism for emission reductions by transit — in other words, getting folks out of cars and onto buses. Compared to a similar number of people operating private vehicles, a conventional diesel bus can reduce emissions by approximately 50 per cent. A ZEB can reduce emissions 100 per cent, but is more than twice as expensive to purchase. Thus, for a given capital budget, a transit agency can achieve the same reductions by buying either one ZEB or two conventional buses. The conventional option also better addresses social equity, since lower-income people depend more on the availability of public transit. Further, on a fuel cost per passenger/kilometre basis, diesel buses are about half as sensitive to fuel price increases as private vehicles. We recommend that public transit be exempted from the federal carbon tax. While municipalities have received some collected fuel taxes back from the government of Canada, all still must pay carbon tax. Winnipeg Transit is now paying close to $2.5 million annually. Transit agencies can either absorb the added cost or pass it on to riders. Carbon tax on transit makes little sense if the goal is to increase ridership. Turning to active transportation, cycling has seen a surge of interest and activity, primarily driven by recreational pursuits, rather than commuting to work or school. But overall, active transportation has been slowly but steadily declining in Canada, led by less walking. One emerging trend is multi-modal trips combining transit and cycling. This is something Winnipeg Transit has embraced, with bike racks on buses and lockers at transit stations. This combination addresses the distance limitation associated with cycling, and active transportation in general. Of course, it also depends on the availability of effective transit infrastructure and service. The pandemic hit public transit hard. It has also had negative ripple effects on lower-income communities and active transportation. Restoring public transit ridership should be a clear policy priority. Practical policy changes at all levels are needed to make it happen. *Paul D. Larson is a professor of supply chain management and Robert Parsons is a sessional instructor at the I.H. Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba. Larson was applicant and principal investigator and Parsons was co-applicant for the recent Knowledge Synthesis Grant investigation entitled “Public Transit and Active Transportation: Activity, Structural and Energy Efficiency Effects on Mobility and the Environment.”*

1 0