- AT-Network - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

WFP: Incoming registry expected to curb bike theft, reunite owners with wheels (Apr24'24)
by Beth McKechnie 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Breaking the cycle Incoming registry expected to curb bike theft, reunite owners with wheels https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/04/23/breaking-the-cycl… KEVIN Glasier and his family were fast asleep in their Wolseley house last week when a blaring home security alarm jolted him awake at 6:26 a.m. “I just jump out of bed, in my underwear, and all you think is: Is somebody in the house? And you’re concerned with the safety of your family at that point,” the 49-year-old father of three said Tuesday. Running past his kid’s rooms and through the house, he made his way to the door to his garage and spotted a man inside dressed in black with his hood up. “He wasn’t supposed to be there,” said Glasier. “I yelled at the top of my lungs, ‘Get the f--- out of my garage’ to try to scare him off and he turned and ran.” Glasier made his way to the exterior door of the garage to make sure the man left. “I guess he was scared, so he was caught in a bit of a loop — he had that screwdriver, that nine-inch screwdriver, and he was waving that around to keep me back,” he said. “I came out of the door … and I didn’t think anything was stolen at that point, so I yelled ‘Get out of here, get out of here,’ and he was frozen, so I said ‘I’m not going to hurt you, get out of here.’ So he biked away.” Upon reviewing footage from his home surveillance cameras — video he has since posted online to try to identify the thieves, scored with wacky music — he realized another scofflaw had made off with a bicycle, which he had bought for his wife’s birthday days before. Glasier isn’t the only Winnipegger to fall victim to bike theft. Although Winnipeg Police Service statistics show an overall decrease in the number of reported stolen bicycles in recent years, 1,452 were still reported pilfered in 2023. That’s compared to 2,098 reported thefts in 2018. Mark Cohoe, executive director of advocacy group Bike Winnipeg, believes many bike thefts go unreported, but is optimistic efforts, such as increased secured park biking, have been successful in reducing thefts. “I would like to think that that’s a part of it as well, that people are getting better access to good storage and that’s holding back the number of thefts,” said Cohoe. He added that the increase in people out and about post-COVID-19 restrictions may have reduced theft opportunities. A new bicycle registry system approved by city council last year is expected to arrive online in the coming weeks. Cohoe is optimistic this will reduce thefts and help police return recovered bikes to owners. Currently, if a stolen bike is found by officers but is not registered by the owner and no proof of ownership is provided, it is held and later auctioned off by police. Council approved a move to 529 Garage, a free, cloud-based system to replace the city-run bike registry last year. The system is shared by many police agencies. Cohoe said if a registered bike is stolen in Winnipeg but recovered in another city, the system allows the owner to be tracked down. It is also accessible to the public, allowing people purchasing bikes online, for example, to run serial numbers themselves to determine if it had been reported stolen. City of Winnipeg spokesman Adam Campbell said officials would be sharing more about the new system soon. Cohoe says addressing social and health issues could help reduce theft in the long term. “I think we all recognize that a part of this, the bike theft, is driven by poverty and addictions, so certainly getting a grasp on that is a critical part to this,” he said. “There’s people taking advantage of others, to drive that theft and get the bikes sold, and that’s part of what we need to see really addressed.” He added he would like to see police dedicate a detective, like police in Vancouver, to focus on bicycle theft. Winnipeg Police Service spokesman Const. Jason Michalyshen said it would be difficult to gauge whether the drop in statistics is due to fewer thefts or fewer people reporting the thefts. “We’re always hopeful that people are securing their property at all times, making it difficult for these thefts to occur, but the reality is, they’re going to occur,” said Michalyshen. “We take them all seriously, we know the value of bikes — nothing’s cheap these days — and we want to resolve these matters as much as anyone else.” He said it is paramount for any victim of crime, including bicycle theft, to report it, so police can investigate, hold people to account and ensure data is accurate so officials can focus resources on problems. Property crimes investigators are actively probing the break-in and theft at Glasier’s home, but have not yet made any arrests, said Michalyshen. Glasier said he hopes the video helps others learn how brazen those committing break-ins and thefts can be. He added that last year, his family’s vehicle was stolen from their driveway, but they managed to locate it with a tracking device. “Part of the thing here, too, is just how as a community, and individuals, how much you have to take things into your own hands. We had to find our own car, the police were overwhelmed, there’s a thousand thefts a month, they can’t keep up… it’s rampant,” said Glasier. After posting the video, he received tips about the suspects in the break-in. He gave the information to police. erik.pindera(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:erik.pindera@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

Project update - Wolseley to Downtown Walk Bike
by Beth McKechnie 04 Apr '24

04 Apr '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Provide your input now. [City of Winnipeg | Ville de Winnipeg]<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Wolseley to Downtown Walk Bike Project – Phase 4<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Project updates Help us make Wolseley Avenue work for you [https://communications.winnipeg.ca/web_files/5642/wolsely%20walk%20bike.jpg…] The Wolseley to Downtown Walk Bike Project began in 2018. It set out to improve east-west travel through three sections of the neighbourhood: 1. Wolseley Avenue and Westminster Avenue 2. Balmoral Street 3. Granite Way Over the course of a few years, we developed, refined, and sought public feedback on a series of designs. In 2019, we presented what we thought was a final design for the neighbourhood as a whole. in 2019. We learned what we proposed for the eastern section of the area worked for the community. What we proposed for the western section didn't. As a result, we installed protected bike lanes on Balmoral Street and Granite Way. We also added them on Westminster Avenue from Sherbrook Street to Walnut Street. Now we need your help to make sure Wolseley Avenue works for people of all ages and abilities. This summer, we will turn Wolseley into an all ages and abilities active transportation route with a neighbourhood greenway. We will reduce the speed limit to 30 km/h and install speed tables, raised crosswalks, and curb bump-outs. Ahead of this, we want to know what success would look like to the community. Your feedback will help the us develop what we’re calling community criteria. We will use this list to measure how well the greenway meets community needs in addition to technical requirements such as lower speeds and traffic volumes. Attend a pop-up. Join us in person to speak with the project team and provide your feedback. Format: Drop in (come and go) Date: April 18, 2024 Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. Location: Clifton School, 511 Clifton St.<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Date: April 19, 2024 Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Location: Bonnie Day, 898 Westminster Ave.<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Date: April 20, 2024 Time: 11 a.m. - 1 p.m. Location: Robert A. Steen Community Centre (Outside the Spring Craft Sale), 980 Palmerston Ave.<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Learn more<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Review the project boards. Take the survey<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Take five minutes to tell us what you think. Learn more about this project winnipeg.ca/wolseleytodowntown<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Contact us Email: <mailto:City-Engage@winnipeg.ca> wolseleytodowntown(a)winnipeg.ca<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Phone: 204-924-4144 Connect with us: [Twitter]<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…>[Facebook]<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…>[YouTube]<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…>[LinkedIn]<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…>[Instagram]<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> Share on X<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…> | Share on Facebook<https://communications.winnipeg.ca/ext/click/go/71ebfa129fce40624b3653ffef6…>

1 0

WFP: Public service says Osborne proposal would slow traffic, transit (Apr4'4)
by Beth McKechnie 04 Apr '24

04 Apr '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Public service says Osborne proposal would slow traffic, transit Report leaves city hall scrambling for answers https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/04/03/councillors-scram… A CITY councillor is disappointed after a report shot down a proposal to improve pedestrian flow at one of Osborne Village’s busiest intersections. The public works committee asked the public service to investigate the possibility of introducing a scramble crossing at Osborne Street and River Avenue last year, allowing pedestrians to cross in all directions amid widened sidewalks, narrowed road lanes and slower vehicles. The final report recommends no alterations to the intersection due to concerns about traffic flow and transit interruptions. “There are problems of logic that need to be explained in the report. I think it’s a very light report, so I don’t think enough time and care was taken,” Coun. Sherri Rollins (Fort Rouge-East Fort Garry) said of the 14-page document, which is to be reviewed by the public works committee at its April 9 meeting. “In particular, the troublesome part is that the resolve of the original motion was to report back on a pedestrian-prioritized pilot and I see none of that in this report.” Rollins championed the original request to investigate a scramble crossing, which would be the first intersection of its kind in Winnipeg. She and other community stakeholders believe it would improve safety and walkability for pedestrians. The public service acknowledged the crossing would improve safety, but said it would require a longer traffic signal cycle length. “A pedestrian scramble is not recommended at the intersection because it would likely increase both vehicle and pedestrian delays and also be cost-prohibitive,” the report said, noting motorists would have to stop at the intersection for an additional 20 seconds and the delay would likely impact nearby intersections. The service also assessed the possibility of removing the slip lane on Osborne Street, which allows southbound motorists to turn right onto River Avenue without stopping at the lights. Eliminating the slip lane would require the removal of a concrete island that houses a transit stop at the intersection. “The removal was ultimately not recommended due to negative impacts to Winnipeg Transit service and bus stop amenities at the intersection,” the report said. “Relocating the bus stop is an undesirable change to Transit operations and passenger comfort.” Rollins called the explanation a “red herring.” “Transit stops move all the time,” she said. “You could argue the passengers of the bus might have even more room to line up if they didn’t have to exist on a small island.” Coun. Janice Lukes, who chairs the public works committee, said she, too, has questions about the public service’s report. “They’re saying not to proceed. I like the idea of a (pedestrian) scramble. We don’t have many of them in Canada. I think there may be some hesitancy with the department on that,” she said Wednesday. The report lacks a detailed accounting of how many pedestrians cross the intersection daily, said Lukes, who would “like to have a little bit more information.” The Osborne Village BIZ was a major proponent of overhauling the intersection and floated the idea of a scramble in its “Blueprint for a Vibrant and Healthy Neighbourhood” document, released last year. “Everybody who lives in the neighbourhood understands how important it is to make sure it’s safe for pedestrians,” said Zohreh Gervais, Osborne BIZ executive director.”This is one step we can take to help that process move along, so I really hope that the city will reconsider.” Rollins intends to reject the report and recommend the public service return in 90 days with a more comprehensive document, she said. — with files from Joyanne Pursaga tyler.searle(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:tyler.searle@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

WFP: Traffic-calming Wolseley Avenue (Apr4'24)
by Beth McKechnie 04 Apr '24

04 Apr '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Traffic-calming Wolseley Avenue City says dropping speed limit would increase neighbourhood livability https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/04/03/wolseley-avenue-o… WOLSELEY Avenue, a hotbed of activity with bicycles and pedestrians dodging drivers trying to escape the hustle of Portage Avenue, could become the city’s latest greenway, with vehicle speeds limited to 30 km/h under a new proposal. A city report recommends the scenic street along the Assiniboine River become the next year-round speed-reduced route, which would see its speed drop to 30 km/h from 50 km/h between Maryland Street and Raglan Road, if approved by council. Coun. Janice Lukes, head of the public works committee, supports the change. “It increases the neighbourhood livability… As our city densifies, we’re going to be doing more and more of this. We don’t need cars racing through neighbourhoods… They can drive (at a higher) speed on collectors and on the major arterials,” said Lukes (Waverley West). The trend to add more speed-reduced neighbourhood greenways is well underway. The City of Winnipeg defines the greenways as on-street routes meant to safely move pedestrians, cyclists and motor vehicles, which typically include traffic-calming treatments and a 30 km/h speed limit. The avenue would join 19 other such routes that council previously approved. Wolseley Avenue stands out because it tends to have more traffic than the standard neighbourhood greenway, with about 1,000 to 3,200 vehicles per day, while target traffic volumes for a greenway should fall below 1,000 to 1,500, said city spokeswoman Julie Horbal Dooley, in an emailed statement. “What we need to explore further is whether the speed limit and some minor traffic-calming measures do enough to create ‘all ages and abilities’ (active transportation) conditions on Wolseley,” she wrote. She noted speed tables, curb bumpouts and raised crosswalks are slated to be added this summer. After staff assess how that works, further proposed changes could be brought forward for community consultation, Horbal Dooley said. Lukes said the higher traffic volume doesn’t dampen her support for the proposed change. “Wolseley is one of the most commuter… bicycling-oriented neighbourhoods in the city… It’s got a very high percentage of people who bike and walk. I know the majority, a lot of Wolseley residents, want this,” she said. A frequent bike commuter and advocate for reduced residential street speed limits applauded the proposal. “I wouldn’t want to ride on Portage Avenue with my kids. So having Wolseley to the south of Portage is a great way to be able to head out to the Polo Park area… It’s a missing link,” said Ian Walker, chairman of Safe Speeds Winnipeg. Walker said the lower speed is much safer for roads shared by vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists, since pedestrians and cyclists are much more likely to survive a collision when the vehicle is travelling at 30 km/h or less, as per the World Health Organization. “We’d like to see all residential streets be 30 km/h. In the meantime, we’re happy to see that the city is creating routes that people can use to commute,” he said. By contrast, others fear the change would slow down drivers. “These are routes that people need to drive on. I’m not against having areas for (cyclists) but it needs to be done with some thought… I’m concerned that it’s going to be a cash grab for the city and they’re going to set up their mobile (photo radar police units to ticket people) as a way to increase their revenues,” said Winnipeg resident Derek Rolstone. Rolstone said he expects the change would result in traffic congestion, perhaps inconveniencing more Winnipeggers than it supports. “When you put a 30 km/h zone in place, there’s people who are going to go 20 (km/h) and that’s not good,” he said. “We have a lot of bike routes for a winter city. I don’t think we need more.” Lukes said she expects some drivers to oppose the change but believes the benefits outweigh the concerns about driver delay. She said photo radar can offer an “incredibly effective tool for traffic calming and for improving neighbourhood livability.” In recent years, Wolseley has been an enhanced summer bike route, which means it is already slated for a seasonal speed-limit reduction that begins in May. Those bike routes were meant to slow down vehicle traffic and create more room for cyclists. joyanne.pursaga(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:joyanne.pursaga@freepress.mb.ca> X: @joyanne_pursaga

1 0

WFP opinion: It ain’t over till it’s over — is it over? (Portage & Main) Apr4'24
by Beth McKechnie 04 Apr '24

04 Apr '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. It ain’t over till it’s over — is it over? https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2024/04/04/it-aint-over-… JUDY WAYTIUK THE other day, I dropped into the Portage and Main circus. The elderly Asian man at the little convenience store there told me, in halting English, “I hope property owners keep open.” He has nowhere to go. He’ll have to figure it out. City council’s decision is not a reprieve while debate over closing the concourse continues, and the decision perhaps gets reversed. It will close. Council prettied up the mayor’s abrupt, unilateral decision with the gentlest possible knuckle- rap (though the vote on the amendment was 14-1) for his colossal pratfall in announcing the closure without a shred of the information needed to do so sensibly. Not actual costs, economic impacts, effects on businesses clinging to survival. Not the damage dried-up foot traffic will do to Winnipeg Square shops, to hotels, restaurants, or to the property values on which taxes from all those shops and businesses and parkades and hotels are based. Without pondering the thrill of crossing Portage and Main in January at -30 C with 40-kilometre winds in a wheelchair. Because when you close the circus, surface pedestrian crossing is your only option. Remember: the sole reason the mayor chose to open the surface was so he could close the circus. Council cobbled together a face-saving repair to his blunder and threw a sympathetic bone to the Bruce Head Wall, which is in the centre of the circus. The Winnipeg Arts Council — from whom the mayor just pulled an annual $500,000 that had enabled them to fulfil an essential purpose, commissioning public art, will try to figure out the problem. But they really should just find competent art historians to document the Wall in torturous detail for history, since the public will never see it in situ again. Locating a site for a 415-foot massive circular piece of three-foot-thick, 12-foot-high sculptured concrete slab? Figuring out what to do with its backside, even if you find a spot? Assuming you could cleanly cut it up into roughly 50 four-tonne blocks and haul them out of the doomed circus? Scotiabank’s escalators won’t carry them up. I’m exhausted after weeks of battling alone, until the Building Owners and Managers Association of Manitoba and the Downtown BIZ blazed up at the last minute, firing desperate salvos across the civic ship of state’s inexorably advancing bow. I’m tired of constantly observing the mayor’s $73-million number is patently wrong, and seeing that simple truth ignored in favour of the shiny-bauble news story: “Widow battles to save husband’s art.” But the media ran with that number, unquestioning, from the get-go, and cemented $73 million into their files — and the public mind. Then the shiny-bauble news story became “Historic intersection to reopen to people.” Nobody has checked the glaringly visible arithmetic. Concourse repairs plus new accesses — $35 million — not $73 million. Sewer/water main repairs, $13 million. Rip up/ replace the intersection plus traffic management, $25 million. Total: $38 million. Traffic disruption and $73 million were the mayor’s reasons to shutter the concourse. They have been blindly parroted by journalists since March 1. The sole questioning analysis came in brief coverage quoting the building owners association protest letter, and in op-eds penned by vested interests (this being one). The mayor also wished to lift the decision-making burden for civic authorities decades into the future. He very much deserves credit for at least making a decision frantically ducked by Brian Bowman — the mayor who held that 2018 plebiscite, simultaneously ignoring the leaking concourse membrane which was, even then, degrading under his watch. But the $38 million worth of sewer and water work still needs doing. Stantec’s report documents the needed work for over two pages. It will mean shredding and replacing the intersection and East Portage Avenue as well, and five years of disrupted traffic; there are even pretty, multi-coloured diagrams. Does the mayor consider $38 million and five years of awful traffic also unacceptable? On June 8, 2016, an enormous sinkhole in downtown Ottawa swallowed three lanes of Rideau Street. Cause: a broken water main. A year later, another hole gaped open. Hasty repairs hadn’t gone quite right. On Feb. 7 of this year, a sewer line broke in south Winnipeg. Roughly 230 million litres of raw, putrid sewage belched into the Red River before it was fixed 16 days later — temporarily. Traffic on Abinojii Mikanah was terrible. On March 13, a sewer pipe collapse forced closure of a south Winnipeg community centre/daycare for more than two weeks. If your sewer and water department tells you something needs doing, you do it. But that means more costs. When crosswalks go in (possibly $10 million), they’ll have to be ripped up, along with the intersection, to do the sewer and water work. The mayor wants those crosswalks by July 1, 2025, the same deadline the public service got to produce all the information the mayor apparently didn’t need to make his decision in the first place. So, another $20 million, maybe? Nobody wanted the concourse closed. Not the consultants, not Stantec, not the public service, not the shelved 2018 Dillon report. This is what happens when you don’t think something through, and you grab the wrong decision because you skipped your homework. It could blow up in your face. Or implode. Literally. Winnipeg, and what’s simply known across Canada as The Wall, will pay the cost. One way or the other. Bruce Head’s widow, Judy Waytiuk, may be exhausted, but she isn’t quite ready to quit.

1 0

WFP: Fuel for a rethink of driving habits (Mar22'24)
by Beth McKechnie 22 Mar '24

22 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Fuel for a rethink of driving habits OPINION https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/2024/03/21/an-opportunity-to-think-… THE abrupt shutdown of an Imperial Oil pipeline that carries fuel to Winnipeg is surely an inconvenience. Economically, it’s bad news because it could have a negative effect on trade and retail sales. The trucking industry has already been impacted. However, it’s also an opportunity: a chance for Winnipeggers, including businesses, to explore ways to burn less carbon-emitting fuel. Some fuel stations around Winnipeg have been limiting, or are sold out of, gasoline after the pipeline was shut down for repairs. Imperial Oil says the pipeline — which runs from Gretna, near the U.S. border to Winnipeg — will be out of commission for three months. While industry officials and politicians have assured Manitobans there is no immediate threat of a fuel shortage (since gas is being delivered by truck and rail instead), there are visible signs of a supply disruption. Hastily scrawled “Out of gas” signs are popping up at some pump locations. Those will surely become more common, as will capping the amount of fuel motorists can buy. The wrong and dangerous response to this inconvenience (which is all it is right now, it’s not a crisis) would be to hoard fuel in jerry cans in your garage or backyard. For starters, there’s no need to do so. Fuel is available for sale and, by all accounts, will continue to be so for some time. It may just take people a little longer to get it. Second, hoarding will only exacerbate the situation by increasing demand unnecessarily. Third, and most important, it’s dangerous. Storing fuel in jerry cans — or worse, containers not designed to hold fuel — increases the risk of combustion and fire. A more appropriate and healthier response would be to use this situation to re-evaluate how much carbon-emitting fuel we use in our lives. Granted, some of that consumption is not discretionary. For those who need their vehicles for work, or have no other way of commuting to places they must be, there’s not much wiggle room. For many, though, there are alternatives to driving, especially for able-bodied, single-occupant motorists. Transit is the most obvious alternative. It’s not an option for everyone, especially in Winnipeg, which has a substandard public transportation system (the government should take this opportunity to re-evaluate how poorly it funds transit in Winnipeg). But it is available to many and, while perhaps inconvenient and less comfortable than getting into a remote-started vehicle, it is often a viable alternative to driving. Walking is also not an option for everyone, but it goes without saying most people could walk a lot more to reach their destinations, myself included. Many of us are lazy. We like convenience and it’s far easier to get into a vehicle to commute a kilometre or two (sometimes less) than it is to walk. Cycling. Again, not everyone has that choice, but with warmer weather just around the corner, biking to work, school, the store… wherever, is a viable alternative for many. Fortunately, the city has made progress expanding its network of dedicated cycling routes. It is far easier to get around on a bike today in Winnipeg than it was 25 years ago. The city has a long way to go before it can claim to be cyclist-friendly, but it’s headed in the right direction. Perhaps the fuel-supply disruption could help accelerate that process. Some people can work from home more often, carpool if possible (or more often) or even stay home instead of making a discretionary commute. Dog owners don’t have to drive to unleashed parks every day. They can substitute some of those trips with walks in their own neighbourhoods. The fuel-supply disruption could even be an opportunity to re-evaluate how people drive, including reducing or eliminating quick accelerations, speeding up to red lights and exceeding the speed limit, all of which is fuel-inefficient. In other words, use this fuel-disruption situation to rethink how much fuel you burn. Is all of it necessary? Can some be reduced? Is it time to start thinking about buying an electric vehicle or a hybrid? Those who have one must feel pretty good about their decision right now. Given the climate-change crisis faced by humanity, we should be having these discussions on an ongoing basis. It should not take a minor fuel- supply disruption to get us out of our single-occupant vehicles. Since the opportunity has presented itself, why not exploit it? tom.brodbeck(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:tom.brodbeck@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

WFP: City hall votes to open Portage and Main, close concourse (Mar22'24)
by Beth McKechnie 22 Mar '24

22 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. City hall votes to open Portage and Main, close concourse Tear down barricades: council https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/03/21/council-votes-to-… IN the end, the final vote in a debate that has raged since 1979 wasn’t even close. Next year, after 46 years, pedestrians will once again cross Portage and Main at street level: city council Thursday voted 11-3 to open the intersection and close the underground concourse. ‘ The landmark intersection, which has been called the windiest in Canada, has been the place to where Bombers fans race to celebrate a Grey Cup win, where protests are routinely held and where the military was celebrated for helping out during the 1997 “flood of the century.” The vote came after city officials estimated it would cost $73 million and disrupt traffic for up to five years to replace the leaking membrane that protects the underground concourse and keep it open. Mayor Scott Gillingham has repeatedly argued that assessment makes a clear case to close the underground instead. “I believe the practical alternative (is) to open the intersection to pedestrian traffic at street level, avoid up to five years of traffic delays and decommission the concourse,” said Gillingham. The mayor joined Couns. Matt Allard, Jeff Browaty, Shawn Dobson, Evan Duncan, Cindy Gilroy, Janice Lukes, Brian Mayes, Sherri Rollins, Vivian Santos and Devi Sharma to support the proposal, while Couns. Ross Eadie, Jason Schreyer and Russ Wyatt voted against it. Couns. Markus Chambers and John Orlikow were absent. Not everyone at Thursday’s council meeting agreed: the trucking industry questioned the effect on traffic, while one councillor argued for another plebiscite to let citizens have their say and another councillor said he backs opening pedestrian access but opposes closing the indoor walkway. An early estimate suggests it would cost about $20 million to $50 million to close the concourse, though council voted to complete a more thorough assessment of that cost, and the steps required, before the 2025 budget process. City officials are expected to prepare for the street-level reopening by July 1, 2025. The city expects to devote $13 million to the “initial opening design and construction” and defer some road projects to pay for it. Some delegates at Thursday’s council meeting questioned why council would make such a quick decision to close the concourse, before the full impact is studied. “We’ll all have to wait until after you vote to close it to find out what it would actually cost… We know nothing that we need to know about the ramifications of closing it,” said Judy Waytiuk. Waytiuk noted she has a vested interest in opposing the concourse closure, since her late partner, Bruce Head, created the 127-metre-long concrete artwork that covers the inner wall of the circular walkway, which would be difficult to save on its own. She stressed maintaining public infrastructure is a primary role of city council, including the concourse. A member of the trucking industry said he fears large trucks could lose some access to the intersection, which is a key part of many different routes. “We’re not specifically against opening the barricades… Our concern is keeping Portage and Main open in all directions to trucks because conceptual designs do not make that clear,” said Aaron Dolyniuk, executive director of the Manitoba Trucking Association. Debate over pedestrian access at the intersection has raged on for many years. In a 2018 plebiscite, 65 per cent of Winnipeggers voted “no” to reopening the intersection to pedestrians, which was cut off in 1979 after the underground concourse opened. Wyatt said the city shouldn’t pursue a reopening unless a second plebiscite with the same question finds the majority of Winnipeggers now support the change. “I’m not going to vote to open Portage and Main, absolutely not, without there being another plebiscite (to) let the citizens of Winnipeg decide,” said Wyatt (Transcona). He also expressed safety concerns, suggesting pedestrian access will result in an increase in crashes, causing injuries and even deaths. While the mayor said he was opposed to reopening the intersection during the last election campaign, Gillingham said the latest information, especially the cost to fix the concourse, led him to change his mind. Eadie (Mynarski) supported pedestrian access but opposed the concourse closure. “I’m definitely not for closing the concourse. It’s existing infrastructure, just like the Arlington Bridge (that should be maintained),” he said. Meanwhile, Browaty said an amending clause, which requires the cost and traffic impacts of closing the concourse to be studied, helped lead him to support the slightly altered motion. That comes despite his long-standing opposition to opening the intersection to pedestrians. “Even though I’m still against 24-7 (pedestrian) crossings and I don’t think spending $13 million to rush the opening for next year is the best plan, I do think… getting that amendment is important enough (to vote for this),” he said. The North Kildonan councillor said pedestrian crossings should be assessed over the first 12 to 18 months after the reopening. “If it doesn’t work out… perhaps (in the) longer term, we look at putting weekday rush-hour bans on pedestrian crossing,” said Browaty. The mayor said he’s committed to consulting with the trucking industry, property owners at the intersection and businesses in the underground concourse about the changes, noting any spending to actually close the concourse would still require city council approval. “Council has to make hard decisions from time to time. There are times… when we have to make a decision about whether we’re going to continue to invest in an asset or whether or not we’re going to say it’s time to decommission an asset,” said Gillingham. Council’s decision also directs city staff to consult with the Winnipeg Arts Council about the public art in the concourse. joyanne.pursaga(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:joyanne.pursaga@freepress.mb.ca> X : @joyanne_pursaga

1 0

WFP: Poll shows U-turn on Portage and Main (Mar21'24)
by Beth McKechnie 21 Mar '24

21 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Poll shows U-turn on Portage and Main Most Winnipeggers now support reopening intersection https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/03/20/u-turn-on-portage… A MAJORITY of Winnipeggers is in favour of reopening Portage and Main to pedestrians six years after an overwhelming “no,” a new poll suggested ahead of a council vote Thursday. More than a quarter of those polled in the Free Press- Probe Research survey said they voted against the proposal in a 2018 plebiscite, but have since changed their mind. “When you look at this new information, I think a lot of people, like me, are making a different decision than they did six years ago,” Mayor Scott Gillingham said Wednesday. The “new information” is the estimated $73 million cost and up to five years of traffic disruption associated with proposed repairs to the pedestrian concourse beneath the iconic downtown intersection. “When people, like I did, get this new information, it moves us toward the practical alternative, which is to reopen the intersection at-grade,” said Gillingham. The online survey of 600 Winnipeg adults was conducted between March 5-18. A total of 61 per cent said they strongly or somewhat support restoring pedestrian access, while 39 per cent are strongly or somewhat against it. Women, younger adults, university graduates and supporters of the provincial NDP and Liberals were among those more likely to be in favour. Portage and Main has been closed to pedestrians since 1979. In 2018’s non-binding plebiscite, 65 per cent of voters were against removing concrete barriers and reopening the junction to foot traffic, while 35 per cent were in favour. The Free Press- Probe Research poll suggests 28 per cent of those who voted “no” are now strongly or somewhat in support. “We have seen a pretty significant chunk of suburban Winnipeggers think this is the right thing to do, given the cost and the support (on council),” said Probe Research principal Curtis Brown. “There hasn’t been as much vocal opposition compared to six years ago.” Support outpaced opposition in four of five areas of the city. The strongest support is in the city’s core (72 per cent in favour), followed by the southwest (61 per cent), northwest (60 per cent) and southeast (58 per cent). Northeast Winnipeg had the highest proportion of opposition (53 per cent). Potential traffic impacts and negative attitudes toward downtown were probable factors, said North Kildonan Coun. Jeff Browaty. The finance committee chair said he is open to allowing pedestrians only at off-peak times. He said a full reopening should be trialled for 12-18 months — to assess traffic pattern changes and economic impacts — before a final decision is made. A 2017 study by a consulting firm suggested a few minutes would be added to most commutes. Since then, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed work and commuting patterns for some Winnipeggers, the mayor has said. Browaty said council shouldn’t consider closing the underground concourse until it sees a complete study. He fears property and rental values could decline if the concourse is closed. At a March 12 executive policy committee meeting, Browaty was the lone member to vote against a motion to reopen Portage and Main to pedestrians by July 1, 2025, and proceed with an eventual concourse closure in consultation with affected businesses and property owners. Council is scheduled to vote today. “It seems like the mayor has the votes for it,” said Brown. “No matter what happens, there definitely will be people who are not happy.” Gillingham believes the motion has enough support, but he is not expecting a unanimous vote. If approved, an external engineering study will help to determine the design and cost of a pedestrian- friendly intersection. The vote is taking place less than three weeks after Gillingham announced he is now in favour of reopening Portage and Main to pedestrians. The U-turn was prompted by a report from the city’s acting urban planning manager, who said it could cost $73 million and disrupt traffic for up to five years to replace a leaking membrane under the concrete that protects the concourse. “I could see why that could sway people’s decision,” said Coun. Vivian Santos, who supports pedestrian access to the intersection, which is in her Point Douglas ward. Decommissioning the concourse, meanwhile, could cost between $20 million and $50 million, subject to further study. Gillingham has said it costs the city about $1 million annually to operate and maintain the concourse. The Building Owners and Managers Association of Manitoba has spoken out against the proposed closure, describing it as “short-sighted” and “based on incomplete information.” The city said about 72,000 vehicles pass through Portage and Main on a weekday, which is 10 per cent less than in 2016. It is Winnipeg’s sixth busiest intersection. Last year, a study counted more than 2,100 pedestrians in the underground circus during a two hour period at midday on a weekday. More than 1,500 people walked by the intersection on adjacent sidewalks during counts in mid-January. Probe Research said its survey comprised a random and representative sampling of Winnipeggers. Live operators, an automated phone system and an online panel were used to recruit respondents. The polling firm said the survey has a margin of error of four percentage points, 95 per cent of the time. Margins of error are higher within sub-groups, such as gender, age and education. chris.kitching(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:chris.kitching@freepress.mb.ca>

2 1

The Economist on American love of big vehicles
by Charles Feaver 14 Mar '24

14 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Why American cars are so big A regulatory loophole that incentivised sales of big vehicles is about to be tightened [Trump supporters drive through Mooresville in trucks while participating in a Donald J. Trump parade in Mooresville, Indiana, USA.]image: jeremy hogan/polaris/eyevine Mar 11th 2024 SaveShare Give Americans love to super-size-and not just their fast food. They favour huge sport-utility vehicles (suvs) and pickup trucks over small cars. Some 8.7m hit the road in 2023, accounting for more than half of all sales of new vehicles, according to jato Dynamics, a research firm. Although European cars are also getting bigger<https://www.economist.com/europe/2023/06/21/a-farewell-to-small-cars-the-in…>, American ones still have a comfortable lead: in 2022 the average car sold in America weighed 1,857kg, almost 20% more than the average in Europe. Wide roads and big parking spaces accommodate this preference for hefty rides-and so does the law. But a loophole that for nearly 50 years has incentivised sales of big vehicles will soon be tightened. Will that lead Americans to buy smaller cars? In 1973 oil-producing Arab countries cut shipments to America to punish it for supporting Israel in the Yom Kippur war: sharp increases in fuel prices, long queues at petrol stations and a deep recession followed. In 1975, in response to the crisis, the federal government imposed fuel-economy standards on carmakers. By 1985 all new models would have to reach 27.5 miles per (American) gallon (11.7km/litre), up from an average of 13mpg. Today the law mandates 40mpg. To increase efficiency, manufacturers had to use more complex engines, which made their cars costlier. To ease the burden on small businesses that relied on big vehicles, the government exempted "light trucks", any vehicle that could be used off road and weighed less than 8,500lb (3855kg). That meant suvs-typically among the biggest and least-efficient cars-were swept into the category and avoided the new fuel standards. [cid:image002.png@01DA7652.C1A60610]image: the economist Because making light trucks held to lower environmental standards was more profitable than building small clean cars, automakers marketed big models, including suvs, enthusiastically. They portrayed them as quintessentially American, embodying freedom<https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2023/11/09/in-praise-of-ame…>, strength and adventurousness. By 2002 light trucks made up a bigger share of light-duty vehicle sales than cars. After the price shock of the 1970s, by the 1990s petrol had become cheaper in America than in other rich countries-so the cost of running a big car did not deter buyers. Such models are convenient for suburban living, and consumers see them as safe. Even when buying cars that are not exempt from efficiency standards, Americans favour chunky sedans over small city cars, which made up just 8% of vehicle sales in 2023, compared with 36% in Europe. And although suvs have a similar market share-a little over half of new vehicles-in both America and Europe, American models are bigger and less efficient. That has been bad for the climate. Transport is the largest source of greenhouse gases in America, and almost 60% of those emissions come from cars and other light-duty vehicles. It has been bad for the safety of other road users too. Heavier cars are more likely to kill people if they hit them. According to a study conducted at the University of Hawaii, pedestrians are almost 70% more likely to be killed if they are hit by a light truck as opposed to a car. The rule favouring big petrol-guzzlers is about to change. The Environmental Protection Agency (epa), which sets limits on cars' emissions, announced in April 2023 that it planned to tighten standards across the board and narrow the definition of a light truck. The agency is due to publish final rules this year. The CO2-emission limit for cars is currently 161 grams per kilometre, compared with 276 grams for light trucks, a 71% difference; the epa is expected to cut that gap to 22% by 2032, forcing manufacturers to use more efficient engines in their big models, which will raise the price of big cars relative to smaller ones. The agency believes that its new rules are so strict that they will speed up the move towards electric vehicles<https://www.economist.com/business/2023/11/27/is-americas-ev-revolution-sta…> (evs), so that by 2032 two-thirds of new sales will be electric. Yet this may make little difference to the size of cars. Many popular vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, would still count as light trucks and continue to benefit from lower efficiency standards, and hence lower costs and prices. And evs are developing the same weight problem<https://www.economist.com/business/2023/08/10/how-green-is-your-electric-ve…> as conventional cars. The epa does not regulate evs' indirect emissions, even though heavier models require more electricity to charge, and need bigger batteries, which contain more of the scarce metals used to make those batteries. In 2022 60% of electric-vehicle sales in America were suvs, according to the International Energy Agency. Regulation alone may not be enough to change the country's taste for super-sized cars. ■

1 0

WFP: A step closer to pedestrians on Portage and Main (Mar13'24)
by Beth McKechnie 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. EPC votes for plan; Downtown BIZ concerned A step closer to pedestrians on Portage and Main https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/03/12/epc-votes-in-favo… THE proposal to reopen pedestrian access at the Portage and Main intersection and decommission its underground concourse passed a key hurdle Tuesday. City council’s executive policy committee cast a 5-1 vote in favour of the move, despite hearing concerns the below-grade closure will hurt businesses linked to the structure. After applauding the pedestrian reopening as a way to spark street-level activity, Downtown Winnipeg BIZ chief executive officer Kate Fenske told EPC she is similarly worried about the below- ground changes. “We’re hoping this doesn’t have to be an either/or position… Decommissioning the underground would have a huge impact on their livelihoods and could also impact the success of other businesses connected to the city-owned Portage and Main underground,” said Fenske. The sheltered walkways also offer a key option for employees of many downtown businesses to travel between buildings, especially during the winter, she added. “Opening the intersection at Portage and Main to pedestrians is absolutely a priority, but Winnipeg’s underground is so much more than just an intersection,” she said, suggesting the city collaborate with the BIZ to address any negative impacts. Mayor Scott Gillingham later told reporters the feedback “doesn’t change anything for me.” “I’ve committed to having discussions with the property owners and the business owners, as well. We know that businesses, obviously, within the circus… would be affected by its closure but also businesses that are located under the properties. Part of our commitment is to be in discussion with the property owners and the businesses to try to find a way to assist them,” he said. The mayor stressed decommissioning of the site would not happen immediately, though the City of Winnipeg hasn’t provided a timeline. Gillingham said it’s “too soon to tell” whether the city could compensate the six tenants who now rent spaces within the city’s portion of the concourse. “The decommissioning wouldn’t happen immediately. It would take a while to all play out, so there’s time for dialogue.” The mayor has stressed there is a clear financial basis for the changes, noting replacing a leaking membrane to protect the concourse would cost an estimated $73 million and require up to five years of traffic-delaying construction. The mayor’s office said Winnipeg received about $111,000 in rent from concourse businesses in 2023, but paid $1.011 million to operate and maintain the site the same year. An early estimate suggests it would cost about $20 million to $50 million to close the concourse. After decades of heated debate over the site’s future, Gillingham said the relatively muted response to his current call to reopen it to pedestrians is likely related to Winnipeg’s need to address more urgent concerns. “I’m not saying the opening of Portage and Main is not important, but there are just more things that are pressing in our community right now — whether it’s housing, safety, the need to continue to address homelessness in our community. I think the public is wanting us to focus on those things.” At EPC, the mayor joined Couns. Sherri Rollins, Evan Duncan, Janice Lukes and Brian Mayes to vote in favour of the Portage and Main plan; Coun. Jeff Browaty voted against it. Browaty stressed the underground walkway is an important piece of public infrastructure. “Many groups are concerned with this out-of-the-blue closure scenario, accessibility advocates, business owners, people working downtown… At this point, no real work has been done to study the shuttering of the underground circus.” While the matter still awaits a final council vote, Gillingham said he believes there is sufficient support among elected officials to get the plan approved. joyanne.pursaga(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:joyanne.pursaga@freepress.mb.ca> X: @joyanne_pursaga

1 0

WFP Analysis: Imagining what the ‘Windy Corner’ could one day be (Mar11'24)
by Beth McKechnie 11 Mar '24

11 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Imagining what the ‘Windy Corner’ could one day be https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2024/03/11/imagining-wha… OPEN Portage and Main. Four simple words. Elections have been fought over them. Friends have become temporary enemies because of them. Family dinners have been ruined by them. A Winnipeg debate that has stirred local emotions and bewildered outsiders for more than half a century. During the 2018 plebiscite, a common refrain in opposition to opening the intersection to pedestrians was that the money required to remove the barricades could be used for more important things. A new Public Works report flips this economic argument on its head, revealing a staggering cost for required repairs to the underground. This construction work would also cause up to five years of traffic delays through the intersection. With this new information, Mayor Scott Gillingham and several city councillors have pulled the pin on that old political hand grenade and announced their support for the less costly and disruptive approach, proposing to close the underground and allow people to cross the street at the sidewalk level. In 2018, the easiest solution was the status quo, so we voted against change. Today the easiest solution is change. The debate will continue as the mayor’s proposal moves through committees and council votes. We know the issue has been a political quagmire and this time will likely be no different. As politicians argue, however, the rest of us might try a new approach for once. Instead of being sucked back into endless circular debates about traffic and safety, informed by gut feeling and speculation, what if we let the traffic engineers solve the traffic engineering? Let the experts be experts, while the rest of turn our thoughts to a vision of what Portage and Main might become. We may be forced into this decision for pragmatic reasons, but that doesn’t mean our response can’t inspire our collective imagination. The mayor has said, “it’s just an intersection.” He’s right, it is. It’s not the mythical beast that has its own climate or was once a battlefield of pedestrian carnage that has lived in Winnipeg lore for generations. But it was once a special place in our city, in our country. What if it was again? What if instead of being a place to drive through, it was a place where we lingered, learned, and loved? As you enter the ‘Cities of the Twentieth Century’ exhibit at the Canadian Museum of History in Gatineau, you are greeted by a giant mural of Portage and Main from a century ago. It once represented the very best of what a city could be — bustling sidewalks filled with optimism at the social and economic heart of a city. Could it ever become that again? Portage and Main began as an Indigenous meeting place, the intersection of two ancient trading routes, its unusual width a legacy of Red River Carts travelling, side by side, as Métis entrepreneurs crisscrossed the open Prairie. When Henry McKenney built his general store at the connection of the two paths in 1862, he planted the seed that a modern city would grow from. Portage and Main would later be the site of Winnipeg’s first city council meeting, and was once the head of Banker’s Row, a stunning line of financial buildings on land as valuable as Wall Street in Manhattan. Western Canada’s first office building once stood there, and in 1969, the west’s tallest building rose from the corner. It would be where the city’s first streetcar ran, and its last. The intersection witnessed the 1919 General Strike, the signing of Bobby Hull and Dale Hawerchuk, and the return of the Jets. A place where we celebrate together, mourn together, and protest together. Imagine a place where this spirit and history was woven together and expressed through art, lighting, landscape, and interpretive design. A vibrant place that is a celebration of our city, one that welcomes visitors to learn about us and a place for us to learn about ourselves. Today, every side of the intersection is seeing renewal and growth — new plazas, new restaurants, new office space, a gym, a soaring new skyscraper filled with hundreds of people who call the nearby intersection home. The familiar old bank that resembles a Greek temple on the southeast corner will see the intersection’s highest impact transformation as it becomes the Red River Métis National Heritage Centre, poetically reclaiming the origins of the place as a celebration of Métis culture and modern spirit. It will stand as a downtown focal point and destination that will draw people to Portage and Main. Imagine if, instead of being hidden behind concrete barricades, this new landmark was surrounded by a grand urban landscape that spills from one corner to the next, drawing all this new activity out from inside the buildings onto the sidewalks and into the public spaces. A celebration of who we are, where we have come from and where we want to go. Most Winnipeggers recognize the lasting impacts of the pandemic have hit downtown hard, and Portage Avenue is no longer the proud street it once was. New ideas are needed to restore its prominent place in our city. Re-imagining Portage and Main as a welcoming place for people won’t solve all of downtown’s issues, but it will make an important statement about who we are as a city and who we aspire to be. The mayor and supporting councilors should be given credit. It will take political courage to move forward, even backed by financial justification. As we do, let’s take some time to dream about the possibilities and shift towards an uplifting dialogue about vision and opportunity, reflecting on what Winnipeg’s famous ‘Windy Corner’ might one day be. Brent Bellamy is creative director at Number Ten Architectural Group.

1 0

WFP: ’Over the moon’: longtime proponents of opening Portage and Main plan ‘crossing the street’ party (Mar3'24)
by Beth McKechnie 03 Mar '24

03 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. ’Over the moon’: longtime proponents of opening Portage and Main plan ‘crossing the street’ party https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/03/02/over-the-moon-lon… If the concrete barricades are torn down and Portage and Main reopens to pedestrians, you can expect Adam Dooley to be one of the first Winnipeggers to cross the storied intersection. Dooley, who co-chaired the Vote Open campaign during a 2018 plebiscite that denied the reopening, joked about having a “crossing the street” party to celebrate the occasion. “We will definitely be there on day 1, and I know there will be a lot of happy people,” he said. “Once the dust settles, people will applaud this. Even people who were four-square against it.” Dooley and fellow supporters were pleased when Mayor Scott Gillingham announced Friday Portage and Main could reopen to pedestrians by summer 2025, following decades of debate. “I was over the moon. It feels like something that has been a really long time coming,” said Alyson Shane, a digital marketing agency owner who was the official spokesperson of the Vote Open campaign. “It’s nice to see the city making changes that move us in a positive direction.” The downtown intersection closed to foot traffic in 1979, after the city struck a 40-year deal — now expired — with a property developer who built an office tower and an underground mall. In 2018’s non-binding plebiscite, 65 per cent of voters were against restoring pedestrian access. Dooley and Shane said there was a lot of missing information or myths at that time, especially around the potential impacts on travel and safety. When he ran for mayor in 2022, Gillingham was opposed to removing the barricades, saying it would “disrespectful” to ignore the results of the public vote. He’s now in favour, after a new city staff report said it would cost $73 million to repair the leaking membrane under the concrete that protects a pedestrian concourse beneath the intersection. Repairs would involve digging up parts of Portage and Main, which would cause traffic “chaos” for four to five years, the mayor said Friday. Additional costly repairs would be necessary in 30 to 40 years. “We have information today we did not have in 2018, and I did not have during the election in 2022,” said Gillingham. If the report’s findings were available in 2018, the plebiscite’s result likely would have been closer, said Dooley, a public relations executive based in the Exchange District. “When I read about the rationale (Friday), I thought this is a good, common sense policy decision,” he said. In 2018, the Vote Open campaign heard two main concerns: that reopening Portage and Main would be a waste of money, and it would impede vehicular traffic. The report states concourse repairs and maintenance would be costlier, said Dooley. As for traffic impacts, people in the “vote yes” camp pointed to a consulting firm’s 2017 study which suggested only a few minutes would be added to most commutes. The difference would have been negligible, said Shane. Since then, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed work and commuting patterns, and the city has been taking steps, including bus route changes, to improve traffic flow, said Dooley. In 2017, the cost to reopen the intersection was estimated to be $11.6 million, about half of which was for the purchase of new buses. City council could soon vote on a motion which calls for pedestrian access at Portage and Main — the city’s sixth-busiest downtown intersection — by 2025 to coincide with a new Winnipeg Transit route network. Further study would find out how much it could cost to reopen the intersection. Public works chair Coun. Janice Lukes (Waverley West) said the city budget’s road safety plan would provide funding and research to ensure the intersection is safe for pedestrians. Busier downtown intersections are open to pedestrians, she noted. The plan calls for the concourse to be permanently closed to the public. It could cost $20 million to $50 million, and take up to five years to decommission the city’s portion of the concourse, said Gillingham. Dooley said some questions are still to be answered. “We don’t know what the final intersection will look like,” he said. Supporters such as Shane believe a pedestrian-friendly junction will help to improve public safety and vibrancy downtown. “It’s a really exciting and positive step for our city,” she said. chris.kitching(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:chris.kitching@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

WFP Analysis: Six years later, ‘Yes’ side gets the last laugh (Mar2'24)
by Beth McKechnie 02 Mar '24

02 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Six years later, ‘Yes’ side gets the last laugh OPINION https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/2024/03/01/is-the-truth-in-the-end-… BACK in 2018, with Winnipeggers embroiled in a contentious plebiscite about whether to reopen Portage and Main to pedestrian traffic, one of the property owners connected to the concourse beneath the storied intersection suggested city council delay the vote. The roof membrane of the concourse was leaking and would have to be replaced. However, as the plebiscite campaign raged on, the property owners and city had done only very preliminary engineering work to estimate the size and cost of a fix. “It would seem to me to be very premature to vote on the intersection until we get all the engineering information on what expenditures need to be made to the concourse,” said Roseanne Hill Blaisdell, president and CEO of Harvard Developments, owner of 201 Portage Ave. History will show the plebiscite was not delayed and that — without all of the necessary information about the consequences of the concourse repairs — Winnipeggers voted convincingly to keep the intersection closed. Fast-forward five years. The missing information in the debate over Portage and Main was finally unearthed Friday when Winnipeg Mayor Scott Gillingham released an engineering report confirming it would cost $73 million to remove the existing pedestrian barricades and repair the roof of the underground concourse beneath the intersection. Gillingham said once he had the report in hand, he began to see just how pointless it was to repair the concourse. The $73-million investment would only buy the concourse — the city-owned circular walkway that connects the sub-grade retail and commercial levels of four properties at Portage and Main — another 40 years or so, when the entire process would have to be repeated. And because the membrane has to be accessed from street level, significant portions of the intersection would be closed for up to five years. The decommissioning of the concourse will be costly, as well, Gillingham said, with estimates running from $20 million to $50 million. However, that work will not have to be repeated in 40 years and will not require the intersection to be closed at street level, he added. Despite voting against reopening in 2018 and avoiding the issue completely in the 2022 election, Gillingham said he realizes the only sensible option is to close the concourse permanently, which almost automatically means reopening the intersection to pedestrians at street level. “I think it’s the practical decision,” Gillingham said in an interview on the Niigaan and the Lone Ranger podcast. “I think that if the average voter in Winnipeg had this information (back in 2018), that we’d looking at $73 million for this work, that we’d have to do it again in 30 to 40 years and five years of traffic chaos, I think more voters would have said, ‘Open it to pedestrian traffic.’” Rather than get involved in another plebiscite, Gillingham will join Coun. Sherri Rollins in tabling a motion on the floor of city council to close the concourse permanently and reopen the intersection to pedestrians by 2025. In other words, no followup plebiscite. Gillingham should be applauded for putting practical considerations ahead of philosophical ones. But it will still rankle many of the most strident supporters of reopening the intersection who predicted this exact scenario back in 2018. You may remember that former mayor Brian Bowman was actually elected in 2014 on a pledge to reopen the intersection. However, in the leadup to the 2018 civic election, North Kildonan city councillor Jeff Browaty and allies on council challenged the mayor to hold a plebiscite on the issue on the theory that voters in suburban neighbourhoods — where there is typically higher turnout during civic elections — would defeat the idea. Sensing the political mismatch that was developing, the ‘Yes’ campaign immediately went to work educating voters on the truth of the Portage and Main debate, which was afflicted by both a shortage of critical information (engineering estimates) and deliberate misinformation. Browaty, architect of the plebiscite and unofficial leader of the ‘No’ campaign, continued to argue that reopening the intersection would put vehicles and pedestrians at risk and cripple traffic flow. He made the arguments even though there were much busier and larger intersections in downtown that allowed pedestrians to cross at street level safely and efficiently. And Browaty dismissed concerns about the concourse repairs, suggesting that if existing barriers had to be removed as part of repairing the membrane, then it was an opportunity to build something “more aesthetically pleasing” in their place. When Browaty was reminded during the campaign that a full cost estimate had not been completed, he shrugged and started repeating talking points about pedestrian safety. What a lot of people suspected, and what we know now to be true, is that the 2018 plebiscite was a sham. It was a misinformed debate that took place with only partial information about cost implications, all designed to hoodwink voters. For a ‘Yes’ campaign that relied heavily on fact but ultimately fell prey to the forces of fiction, there may be some hard feelings about having to wait five years for the truth to come out. On the other hand, the ‘Yes’ folks do get to have the last say on the matter. They told you so. dan.lett(a)winnipegfreepress.com<mailto:dan.lett@winnipegfreepress.com>

1 0

WFP: Portage & Main - Concourse businesses worried; disability groups cheering
by Beth McKechnie 02 Mar '24

02 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Concourse businesses worried; disability groups cheering Winds of change bring mixed reaction https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/03/01/winds-of-change-b… DOWNTOWN senior Marilyn Brazeau is a frequent visitor to the underground concourse at Portage and Main. Brazeau, who lives a few blocks away, is a regular customer of some Winnipeg Square businesses and, after hearing Friday’s traffic-stopping news, expressed concerns about the owners and people who work below the famous intersection. Mayor Scott Gillingham announced earlier in the day that replacing the leaking membrane under the intersection — protecting the concourse below — would cost the city $73 million and take up to five years, creating major construction-related traffic disruptions. The city will instead close the concourse and remove the controversial concrete barriers at street level that have prevented pedestrians from crossing since 1979. Gillingham’s announcement comes more than five years after 65 per cent of voters in a civic plebiscite turned thumbs-down to reopening the intersection to pedestrians. The mayor said he’s working with Coun. Sherri Rollins to draft a motion that recommends the city remove the pedestrian barricades by summer 2025 to coincide with the launch of the new transit network. Brazeau acknowledged that safety is a concern for people who access the concourse via stairwells from the street. “It is kind of scary (in the concourse), to be honest with you but, I mean, it’s scary up here too, right?” she said, adding she’d like to hear more input from downtown residents and business owners and possibly another plebiscite, before the city takes action. “I think it’s really controversial,” she said. “I think that people should have a say, people should vote on it, because it’s going to cost money, it doesn’t matter which way we go.” John Young was 17 years old in 1979. At the time, he found the decision to close the intersection to people shocking. Now the executive director of the Independent Living Resource Centre, which supports people with disabilities in Winnipeg, he is well-versed in the difficulties downtown residents have navigating the corridor. “Just imagine this — you went from Portage Place, you want to get to here,” he said Friday morning, gesturing at the concourse entry adjacent to the Richardson Building. “But then you get to Scotiabank, and the elevator doesn’t work. You can’t keep going. You’ve got to go back home.” He said the city had reached out to the ILRC for input on the possible change. While he’d like to see the concourse stay open, taking down the barriers will make a big difference for many. “One hundred per cent, this would solve it for people with disabilities, it would solve it for older people, it would solve it for a lot of people who live downtown who just want to cross the street,” he said. If the city saves money by closing the concourse, Winnipeg Square eatery Caribbean Vibes owner Melani Bastians said the city should take the difference and invest it into social supports in the downtown core. “If there’s any extra money that’s being saved from this (change), in the downtown core, we should find a warehouse, build a massive kitchen and… we can make massive amounts of food for the hungry,” she said. Lasha Yaeger has managed the Winnipeg Square dessert shop Cookies By George for nearly 25 years and has followed the never-ending debate about the intersection nearly that long. She was thinking about the future of her business Friday. While some customers order ahead over the phone, most of her business comes from people walking up and buying treats on the go — many using the underground concourse to get to her — and she’s not sure business in the winter will keep up if people have to get to her by trudging through the snow. “As a business, it will affect me,” Yaeger said Friday. “I’m not going to get as many people walking up, especially in the wintertime. So I’m a little concerned.” Yaeger wonders how her business and others in the downtown core, still licking their wounds in the aftermath of COVID-19, will adapt again. “I have very mixed feelings on it,” she said. The underground concourse was quiet Friday morning, and many of the businesses inside were empty. Business owners in the area were skeptical about hopes from city council members that the change could help the revitalization of downtown. Mike Publicover, who owns the nearby Stonework’s Bistro, has been working downtown for more than 30 years. “Every mayor, every council, every time somebody has an idea to improve downtown, it hasn’t happened,” he said. malak.abas(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:malak.abas@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

WFP: Portage & Main - Most councillors behind mayor (Mar2'24)
by Beth McKechnie 02 Mar '24

02 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Most councillors behind mayor WINNIPEG Mayor Scott Gillingham said he thinks a motion to reopen Portage and Main to pedestrians by the summer of 2025 has the support of most of his fellow councillors. He was joined at his city hall press conference by councillors Cindy Gilroy (Daniel McIntyre), Janice Lukes (Waverley West), Sherri Rollins (Fort Rouge - East Fort Garry) and Vivian Santos (Point Douglas) who spoke in favour of it. “Once we start opening things up, we’re going to see a flurry of businesses,” said Gilroy. “When people are around, there is more safety. It builds a downtown where people want to come and live,” she said. Rollins said she and her colleagues have reached out to business organizations about the impact on retailers in the concourse. “We want to keep businesses in the downtown,” she said. “We care a lot about the empty spaces that we want to see filled above ground, too.” Santos said businesses and residents have been asking to open up the intersection and improve access to businesses and services at street level. Others also expressed support. “These types of decisions require leadership and I am glad to see the mayor has taken that approach,” said Evan Duncan (Charleswood-Tuxedo-Westwood). “Open the intersection to pedestrian traffic, close the lower level and let’s get on with life,” Duncan said in an email. Markus Chambers (St. Norbert-Seine River) said he, too, is in favour. So is St. James’ Shawn Dobson. “Opening Portage and Main might be the best financial decision we can make,” Dobson said. The cost of repairs to the concourse membrane, a reduction in pedestrian volume since the pandemic and a need to reinvigorate downtown are three reasons he cited for supporting reopening the intersection. Ross Eadie (Mynarski) said he will vote “yes” but has “concerns and conditions” he wants addressed. Eadie said $73 million would be better spent on replacing the Arlington Bridge. Matt Allard (St. Boniface) and Devi Sharma (Old Kildonan) both said they weren’t prepared to comment Friday. Some other expressed opposition for different reasons. Jeff Browaty (North Kildonan) said repairing the underground concourse is worth it and questions the cost involved in closing it for good. “The reality is we don’t know what the actual costs are to do the mothballing, to close the concourse entirely,” he told reporters after the mayor’s press conference. “We don’t know how long that’s going to take, what the level of construction is to fill it in, so to speak.” He said the $20 million to $50 million cost suggested by the mayor “is really from the back of a cocktail napkin.” The mayor was “putting too much emphasis” on the traffic interruptions if the $73-million repair goes ahead, said Browaty who supports spending to keep the underground concourse open. “I think there’s a lot of advantage to our downtown for people who work in that core for people to use the retail amenities in the underground concourses.” Holding another plebiscite on the matter is unwarranted, he said. “Winnipeggers have spoken. They don’t want it open.” Russ Wyatt (Transcona) said a plebiscite is necessary and Winnipeggers should decide on reopening Portage and Main. “Their voice is being completely ignored by city hall today and being undermined.” He said the city should be getting a second opinion. Brian Mayes (St. Vital) said he’s neither for nor against the reopening — it’s the timeline for making a decision that he called “very troubling.” “I am disturbed by the rush to get this decided,” he said Friday. “This is a pretty big issue.” Councillors Jason Schreyer and John Orlikow did not respond to a request for comment.

1 0

WFP: The great debate returns - Mayor crosses street in decades-old controversy (Mar2'24)
by Beth McKechnie 02 Mar '24

02 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. The great debate returns… with a $73-million price tag Mayor crosses street in decades-old controversy after report reveals repairs to membrane protecting concourse will cost $73M, disrupt traffic up to five years https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/03/01/mayor-calls-to-re… PORTAGE and Main could reopen to pedestrians by summer 2025 after decades of debate and political wrangling over the fate of the iconic downtown intersection. On Friday, Winnipeg Mayor Scott Gillingham announced he’s now in favour of removing the concrete barricades at each corner preventing pedestrian crossing after a new report said it would cost $73 million to repair the leaking membrane under the concrete that protects the concourse below it. The repairs would involve major construction-caused traffic disruptions for up to five years at what is now Winnipeg’s sixth-busiest downtown intersection, the report said. A motion is being drafted to call for the pedestrian intersection to reopen by summer 2025 to coincide with the launch of the new Winnipeg Transit route network. The engineering report goes to the city’s property and development committee on Thursday. “The goal is to get this approved by the end of the month,” said Gillingham, who previously was opposed to reopening the intersection. He said learning the costs and inconvenience of keeping the concourse open changed his mind. “I think it’s time we put this question to bed once and for all and move onto more important issues like addressing homelessness, safety, housing and improving commuting options for people throughout our entire city.” The so-called “coldest and windiest corner in Canada” has been closed to pedestrian traffic since 1979 under an agreement the city signed with a developer who agreed to build two office towers, a hotel, a bank and an underground mall. The city agreed to force people who wanted to cross the street to do it underground, benefiting businesses in the mall. Permanently closing the city’s portion of the underground concourse could take up to five years and cost $20 to $50 million, Gillingham said. “It’s too soon to tell at this point, but there wouldn’t be access through the concourse once it’s decommissioned,” he said. Public works chairwoman Coun. Janice Lukes said Portage and Main has lower volumes of traffic than other downtown intersections and is the only one closed to pedestrians. Funding and research to ensure the intersection is safe for pedestrians would come through the city budget’s road safety plan, said Lukes (Waverley West). Former mayor Brian Bowman promised to reopen the intersection while in office, but after 65 per cent of voters registered their opposition in a non-binding 2018 plebiscite, he dropped it. Instead of a plebiscite, Gillingham and property and development chairwoman Coun. Sherri Rollins will draft a motion calling for Portage and Main to reopen to pedestrians and the mayor expects the majority on council will support it. “There’s a lot that has changed in the past six years,” said Gillingham, who maintained his opposition to taking down the pedestrian barriers during his 2022 mayoral campaign, pointing to the 2018 plebiscite and saying it would be “disrespectful” to the public to ignore the results. However, Winnipeggers were in the dark concerning how much it would cost and how long it would take to replace the membrane, he said Friday. Since the non-binding vote, a global pandemic has changed commuting and work patterns and a transit network design is helping to improve traffic flow, he said. “We have information today we did not have in 2018 and I did not have during the election in 2022,” the mayor said. Coun. Jeff Browaty, who was one of the loudest voices in opposition to opening the intersection in 2019, said civic officials still don’t have enough information and he doesn’t think there’s been adequate consultation with affected property owners. James Richardson & Sons issued a brief statement Friday saying that it is “in favour of improving and revitalizing Winnipeg’s downtown, including taking the step of opening the Portage and Main intersection to pedestrian traffic.” “We understand that the City (of Winnipeg) is considering closing the underground pathway as part of the re-opening of the intersection to aboveground pedestrian traffic, but without time to consider the details of such a plan, it is too early for us to comment further,” the statement said. A prominent tenant at Portage and Main applauded the push to remove the concrete barricades. “Not only do we care in terms of the downtown at large, but… as tenants that are going to be accessing that intersection every day,” said Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Loren Remillard. Four or five years of anticipated traffic disruptions would add to the challenges already facing downtown, Remillard said. “This isn’t just the responsible decision,” he said. “It is the only logical decision.” Federal Northern Affairs Minister Dan Vandal, a former city councillor, said he supports “100 per cent” closing the underground concourse and removing the barriers. “I wish we would have done it 15 years ago,” the St. Boniface MP said at an unrelated news conference in the city Friday. “COVID really did a number on the underground pedestrian walkway and infrastructure is expensive, and I think it’s the right move,” Vandal said. “I’ve long advocated for opening up Portage and Main when I was a (city) councillor… I think this is an example of a good idea will always rise to the top. And it’s quite clear that there were challenges with closing pedestrian traffic and maintaining the underground vitality.” Premier Wab Kinew, who opposed the reopening in the 2018 plebiscite, didn’t offer provincial help to repair the membrane to keep the concourse open. “Mayor Gillingham and I share a commitment to downtown redevelopment and, if he believes this is a cost-effective path forward, then our government won’t stand in the way,” he said in a prepared statement. — with files from Maggie Macintosh, Malak Abas and Katie May carol.sanders(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:carol.sanders@freepress.mb.ca> Closed intersection timeline December 1976: City council awards a contract to build an underground parking garage and pedestrian corridor at Portage and Main, and agrees to prohibit pedestrians from crossing the iconic intersection for 40 years. February 1979: A city committee votes to immediately ban pedestrian traffic at the intersection, although crossing from the south corner was permitted to continue until a connection was completed between the concourse and street. March 1979: A caravan of protesters — many using wheelchairs — make three circuits of the intersection to protest the closure. A Winnipeg police sergeant told them, “I must warn you that you are in violation of a traffic-control device.” Officers wrote down the names of about a dozen protesters and gave them to the Crown attorney’s office. August 2014: Mayoral candidate Brian Bowman holds a campaign news conference to announce he would open the intersection to pedestrians, with the goal of getting it done by 2019. “We’ll all be here when the Winnipeg Jets win the Stanley Cup,” he said. October 2018: Voters re-elect Bowman to a second term. Winnipeggers also vote overwhelmingly (65 per cent “no”) against reopening the intersection in a non-binding plebiscite. October 2022: Scott Gillingham is elected mayor. He said during the campaign that he was opposed to reopening the intersection. The second-place candidate, former mayor Glen Murray, previously supported reopening Portage and Main but said that month that “the people have spoken about it once already.” April 2023: The city releases a discussion paper outlining the issues surrounding the intersection, including a massive project to repair the membrane protecting the Winnipeg Square concourse and options to improve pedestrian access.

1 0

CBC: 'A lot has changed,' Gillingham says as he pushes to reopen Portage and Main by summer 2025
by Beth McKechnie 01 Mar '24

01 Mar '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Mayor says fixing intersection to save walkway below would cause 'traffic chaos' and cost $73M https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/portage-main-reopening-gillingham-1… Winnipeg Mayor Scott Gillingham made it official Friday morning and announced his desire to reopen Portage and Main to pedestrians by summer 2025. A new report from the city's acting urban planning manager says fixing the leaky membrane at Portage Avenue and Main Street in order to protect the city-owned underground pedestrian crossing would create traffic delays for four or five years and cost at least $73 million. Gillingham said Friday at a news conference he cannot support years of traffic disruptions and will not support the plans, outlined in the new report, to fix the leaky membrane at the city's sixth-busiest intersection. "Repairing the membrane would require completely tearing up Portage and Main in sections and create traffic chaos downtown for four to five years," Gillingham said. "We need to pursue a more practical alternative. It's time to reopen Portage and Main to pedestrian traffic." Gillingham's plan, which must be supported by council, would permanently close the circular underground walkway. Reopening the intersection in summer 2025 would coincide with the implementation of Winnipeg Transit's new route network, which will include a transit hub at Portage and Main. Portage and Main has been closed to pedestrians since 1979. An agreement with neighbouring property owners to keep it closed expired in 2019. James Richardson & Sons, which owns the Richardson office tower at the northeast corner of the intersection, said it supports pedestrian crossings at the intersection. "James Richardson & Sons Ltd. is in favour of improving and revitalizing Winnipeg's downtown, including taking the step of opening the Portage and Main intersection to pedestrian traffic," spokesperson Barb Perreaux said in an emailed statement. "We understand that the city is considering closing the underground pathway as part of the reopening of the intersection to above-ground pedestrian traffic, but without time to consider the details of such a plan, it is too early for us to comment further." The Manitoba Métis Federation, which owns the former Bank of Montreal building on the southeast corner of Portage and Main, supports reopening the intersection. President David Chartrand said above-grade crossings will increase the vibrancy of downtown Winnipeg and enable foot traffic to the Métis heritage centre under construction at the Bank of Montreal. That centre is slated to open in 2026, he said. CBC News has reached out to Harvard and Artis, the owners of the office towers at the northwest and southwest corners of Portage and Main. Former mayor Glen Murray sought to reopen the intersection and held a contest to redesign it. That plan was shelved by his successor, Sam Katz, who said he wished to honour a 40-year deal with adjacent property owners to keep the intersection closed. * Refresh coming to Fairmont Winnipeg after hotel acquired by James Richardson & Sons<https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/fairmont-winnipeg-hotel-purchase-ri…> * 'Would have been a step backwards': Winnipeggers vote to keep Portage and Main closed<https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/winnipeggers-vote-portage-main-1.48…> Brian Bowman, Katz's successor, initially promised to reopen the intersection to pedestrians but shied away after a majority of Winnipeggers who voted in a non-binding plebiscite in 2018 indicated they opposed the idea. Gillingham did not support reopening in 2018. "There's a lot that has changed in the past six years. We have information today we didn't have then," Gillingham said. "We didn't know then that replacing the membrane would disrupt traffic for four to five years. We didn't know that it would cost $73 million. We didn't know that we were going to have a global pandemic that would permanently change commuting and work patterns. "We didn't have the transit network design, which will actually help to improve traffic flow at the intersection, and I think if voters did have that information in 2018, I think they probably would have made a different choice. I know I would have. Gillingham said he is not asking the province for money to help with decommissioning the underground concourse. City councillors Sherri Rollins (Fort Rouge-East Fort Garry), Janice Lukes (Waverley West), Cindy Gilroy (Daniel McIntyre) and Vivian Santos (Point Douglas) stood alongside Gillingham at the news conference. Rollins, Gilroy and Santos represent every Winnipeg ward adjacent to downtown, while Rollins also chairs council's property committee and Lukes chairs council's public works committee. Gillingham said he expects some city councillors to oppose his decision. Transcona Coun. Russ Wyatt is one of them. He questioned why a city planner wrote the report and not a city engineer. "It raises alarms and concerns that we would rush to judgment that we would overturn a plebiscite decision made by the citizens of Winnipeg not to open that intersection," Wyatt said in an interview. e later jumped up to the podium where Gillingham spoke at the news conference and addressed people who were there. City hall staff responsible for audiovisual equipment turned his microphone off. Kate Fenske, executive director of the Downtown Winnipeg Business Improvement Zone, said reopening Portage and Main to pedestrians will improve the vibrancy and safety of downtown. Adam Dooley, who was the co-chair of the "vote open" campaign during the 2018 plebiscite, said the city was aware keeping the underground concourse would come with significant costs. The decision should never have been put to a vote, said Dooley, the public relations manager at communications firm UpHouse.

1 0

WFP: City seeks public input on addressing icy sidewalks (Feb29'24)
by Beth McKechnie 29 Feb '24

29 Feb '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. City seeks public input on addressing icy sidewalks https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/02/28/city-seeks-public… WHILE city crews are proactively seeking out slippery sidewalks to sand, they’re also asking Winnipeggers to point out trouble spots, after a recent freeze-thaw cycle created treacherous conditions. A City of Winnipeg post on X (formerly Twitter) asks residents to report the streets, sidewalks and paths that need sanding the most. “We’ve got thousands of kilometres of sidewalk and pathway. We do have city staff actively out trying to address public areas by putting out sand … but the more we can work together as a community to help, the better we will be,” said Coun. Janice Lukes, chairwoman of public works. “So, we’re encouraging residents to help, to call in these trouble spots.” For sidewalks, Lukes (Waverley West) said public reports help target sanding where it’s needed most. “When (the temperature is) back and forth like this, for sure we get more calls, because every day the conditions are different. And it is frustrating because people have strollers, they want to walk, it’s slippery. This last spell (of winter weather) was a real bad one … but if we’re notified of the troubled areas, we’ll get out there,” said Lukes. The councillor noted repeated freeze-thaw cycles have made some routes more treacherous this winter, but stressed the city has invested more to keep sidewalks and active transportation paths clear. That included spending $3 million to buy 15 sidewalk snow-clearing machines, which arrived in time for this winter. The recent weather patterns made sidewalks especially tough to navigate on Monday, when Rachel Unger fell on a slick patch of ice covered by a layer of snow. “I think it was an issue of weather just because it melted so much and just got really, really cold. It was snow-covered ice, so I didn’t even see that it was there. … It all happened very fast,” said Unger, who uses they/ them pronouns. The fall caused a torn knee ligament, so they may require surgery. Unger suspects sanding might have prevented the injury altogether and hopes the city will take additional proactive measures to sand sidewalks, such as by adding set timelines to complete the treatment. “This winter has just been so wild and very unpredictable from anyone’s standpoint. This is not typical … (but) it would be nice to have a more standardized approach, knowing that it’s not going to prevent all injuries. If we could prevent some (injuries) that would be amazing,” they said. Lukes said requiring all sidewalks to be sanded within a set amount of time would prove challenging and may not be the most effective use of tax dollars, since sidewalk conditions can vary on a block-by-block basis. “You can literally go down two blocks and see (both) frozen ice and dry sidewalk … I really don’t think sanding every sidewalk in the city (would) be a very efficient use of our resources,” she said. The timing of sidewalk sanding is currently based on visual inspections and weather conditions, spokeswoman Julie Horbal Dooley said in an email. “Sanding/ice control isn’t a matter of one-and-done completeness; often, when conditions are suitable, we will sand the entire Priority 1 (major route) and Priority 2 (collector street) sidewalks after a full network plow. Outside of plowing operations, we will sand if and where conditions require it — not on a city-wide or priority-(based) basis,” wrote Horbal Dooley. Coun. Matt Allard, who has repeatedly called for enhancements to sidewalk snow clearing, said he’s not sure more sanding is the answer. Allard (St. Boniface) said his call to have all sidewalks cleared at the same priority level as major route roads, which was recently rejected by city council, would be more effective in keeping sidewalks passable. “(It would) mean comparable conditions for someone who’s driving a car on a (major route) and someone who’s walking on a sidewalk. It would, in my opinion, involve a situation where a slippery sidewalk is the exception and not the rule when you’re looking at the freeze-thaw conditions,” he said. City policy dictates that roads on Priority 1 major routes be cleared to bare pavement, with plowing completed within 36 hours after a snow event ends. Crews are expected to plow downtown sidewalks to a paved surface when “conditions allow,” while sidewalks along major routes and collector streets are cleared to a compacted snow surface, both within 36 hours after a storm ends. Residential sidewalks are to be maintained to a compacted snow surface, with plowing completed within five working days after work starts. Allard said more frequent sanding may be less effective than changing snow-plowing timelines and standards, since sand can be frozen over during freeze-thaw cycles. joyanne.pursaga(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:joyanne.pursaga@freepress.mb.ca> X: @joyanne_pursaga

1 0

WFP: Calls to curb cars on Cambridge (Feb29'24)
by Beth McKechnie 29 Feb '24

29 Feb '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Calls to curb cars on Cambridge Residents complain about traffic volume https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/02/28/calls-to-curb-car… A RIVER Heights neighbourhood where residents are fed up with rush-hour drivers treating their streets as shortcuts could get relief in the form of traffic-calming measures. At its March 5 meeting, city hall’s public works committee is set to ask staff to explore interim measures for Cambridge Street north of Corydon Avenue, and the possibility of a longterm traffic management plan with a wider look at the community. “The objective is to try to make the streets calmer and safer for everybody,” said Coun. John Orlikow (River Heights-Fort Garry). He said cut-through traffic has been an issue and Cambridge Street is among the residential streets where it is excessive. If his motion is approved, city staff will be given four months to report back on possible measures. The motion says cut-through traffic is increasing as the south end of Winnipeg densifies and grows. A short-term plan would seek input from River Heights residents and consider possible ramifications for streets adjacent to Cambridge, said Orlikow. He said the city would look at how recent construction work on corridors such as Stafford and Harrow streets has affected nearby residential streets. Last year, Cambridge residents told the Free Press drivers were using the street as a shortcut during the construction projects. About 3,900 vehicles per day use Cambridge between Corydon and Grosvenor avenues, the city said. Lower totals were recorded between Grosvenor and Kingsway (3,400) and Kingsway and Academy Road (2,400). Daily totals are as high as 6,500 between Corydon and Grant avenues, where Cambridge is wider and designed to accommodate more traffic. Tim Fennell, a founding member of a residents group, Calm Cambridge, that has lobbied city hall for traffic calming measures, welcomed the potential for interim solutions. “I believe there is some political will to make this happen,” he said. “We need support from all the different members of council.” The group proposed five interim calming measures in its pitch to city hall. It suggested extending the red light interval for north-south traffic at Cambridge and Corydon, installing temporary speed bumps between Corydon and Academy and temporarily reducing the speed limit to 30 km/h on that stretch. The group has asked the city to consider extending left-turn restrictions, from Grant and Corydon to northbound Cambridge, to include the afternoon rush hour. It also suggested blocking existing slip lanes at Grosvenor and Cambridge, and using the intersection as a normal four-way stop. Fennell said there is some risk of traffic being redirected onto adjacent streets by any new measures on Cambridge, but he believes drivers would choose corridor streets rather than other residential streets. He began lobbying for calming measures out of concern for the safety of Cambridge residents and road users, given the volume of traffic and high speeds of some vehicles. He said Cambridge is narrower between Corydon and Academy, and not designed to handle as much traffic as it does. Some sections do not have sidewalks. Fennell said he obtained Manitoba Public Insurance data that showed 179 reports of collisions on Cambridge and 80 on neighbouring Oxford Street from 2014 to 2022. The highest annual total for Cambridge was 31 in 2019. Wayne Manishen, a Winnipeg doctor, wants the city to consider traffic control measures at Cambridge and Taylor Avenue, an intersection he uses regularly. “I call it the ‘Cambridge carnage and chaos corner,’” said Manishen, who provided photos of a collision that happened last summer and a congested intersection during the afternoon rush. In 2018, council rejected a request for a temporary traffic light during construction of the nearby Waverley Street underpass. Manishen believes another option could be turning restrictions for some directions of travel during certain hours. “You don’t necessarily need lights, but you need something,” he said. “The status quo is still a dangerous option.” A long-term community study would take many months to complete. Last year, public works chair Coun. Janice Lukes told the Free Press a community plan would be more effective than individual changes. A community study in Lord Roberts began in 2018 and closed in 2023, with ongoing monitoring. It proposed about two dozen solutions, including reduced speed limits on some streets, new sidewalks, parking restrictions and cyclist crossing improvements. Meanwhile, the public works committee will also consider a recommendation to include traffic-calming measures, where feasible, in road renewal projects in locations that have higher volumes of “vulnerable” road users, starting next year. A staff report cites school and playground zones, and neighbourhood greenways as examples. chris.kitching(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:chris.kitching@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

WFP: Council ponders price hike for residential parking pass (Feb28'24)
by Beth McKechnie 28 Feb '24

28 Feb '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Council ponders price hike for residential parking pass https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/02/27/council-pondering… WINNIPEGGERS who require permits to park on their home street may soon pay much more to do so. Annual residential parking permits are required to park in time-limited areas. They cost $25 each, with each household able to apply for up to three. A new tiered approach would raise that fee to $50 for a first permit per household, $75 for a second and $200 for a third. Pending approval in the city’s 20242027 budget, the new fees would take effect in 2024, and would increase with inflation each year after. Coun. Jeff Browaty, the head of council’s finance committee, said the substantial hikes are meant to deter street parking and encourage greater use of driveways, garages and other alternatives. “This wasn’t really done as a big revenue generator. What we’re really trying to do is discourage long-term on-street parking, wherever possible,” said Browaty. When asked why the fees will increase so much at once, the North Kildonan councillor said he thinks the cost remains relatively low. “Car ownership, like it or not, is not an inexpensive proposition. … Even on a very small car, $50 is basically the cost of a simple tank of gas,” said Browaty, who added the permit fee has also been frozen since 2006. Other councillors agreed the change is warranted. “It opens up the street. It allows other people to park and have turnover. … These are public streets, they’re not public parking lots,” said Coun. Janice Lukes, chairwoman of public works. However, one councillor fears many inner-city residents, who more often lack garages and other parking alternatives, would face an unfair burden if the new rates are approved. “Now, not only are you charging for the parking pass, you’re going to have to have a massive increase for them. It’s just very unfair for residents who are living in the inner city,” said Coun. Cindy Gilroy. The Daniel McIntyre councillor said she already receives complaints about the $25 annual passes and hopes to convince fellow council members to reject the increases. “I don’t think this is a popular move. I think they should look at other ways to generate revenue,” said Gilroy. There are currently about 3,200 active residential parking permits for Winnipeg vehicles, including 86 permits issued for a third vehicle in one household, according to the Winnipeg Parking Authority. If council approves the changes, the higher fees will likely be imposed sometime this summer, said Lisa Patterson, the manager of parking and facilities for the WPA. “We’re really trying to encourage people to not use the city street as car storage. … Try to use the spaces on your property first,” said Patterson. She said such fees are already higher in other Canadian cities and more revenue is needed to cover the program’s cost. While annual operating costs for the permitting program were not provided, Patterson said fee revenues fall short of paying for staff, software and other expenses, though that figure includes an unspecified dividend to be transferred to general city revenues. Overall, the parking authority is expected to transfer about $7.8 million to general city coffers this year. Patterson suggested the higher fees could also entice more Winnipeggers to consider alternate forms of transportation to personal vehicles. “There’s a cost to car ownership and if there’s a way to encourage people to utilize a different method of transportation, that’s something we’re trying to do,” she said. Coun. Sherri Rollins supports the changes as a move away from “subsidizing” vehicle use. “Generally speaking, when you own things like vehicles or bicycles, you have a place where you are going to keep them. When that place is (in) the public realm … then the public sphere acts like a subsidy,” said Rollins (Fort Rouge-East Fort Garry). “I will get arguments, as soon as you publish this, that $50 is too low (for the first car per home), that we should not at all be subsidizing vehicles.” Rollins said she believes the proposed fees — which would affect residents of multiple streets in her ward — are fair. “I’m concerned about affordability on a lot of fronts, including housing. … I’m not concerned about it here, not at these price points. Not at the first car. I still think the third car (permit price) is still too low,” she said. City council will cast a final budget vote on March 20. joyanne.pursaga(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:joyanne.pursaga@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

WFP: Vehicle hits three people in crosswalk (Feb23'24)
by Beth McKechnie 23 Feb '24

23 Feb '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Child and two adults taken to hospital, driver flees scene Vehicle hits three people in crosswalk https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/02/22/two-adults-child-… A CHILD and two adults were hit by a vehicle Thursday morning in a River Heights pedestrian crosswalk close to an elementary school and two daycare centres. The student at J.B Mitchell School, a crossing guard and another adult were taken to hospital, police said. The collision happened at about 8:50 a.m. in the warning light-equipped crosswalk at the intersection of Grant Avenue and Lanark Street. “Winnipeg Fire and Paramedic Service members were on scene when police arrived and the pedestrians were transported to hospital in stable condition for precautionary measures,” Winnipeg Police Service spokesperson Const. Dani McKinnon said. “The driver, who was not on scene when police arrived, has been identified and is co-operating with police.” McKinnon said the investigation into the incident is ongoing, but no charges have been laid. Police told the Free Press at one point Thursday the incident was a hit-and-run but later said that has yet to be determined. No evidence of the incident remained near the scene by late morning. When school let out around 3:30 p.m., two crossing guards were stationed at the intersection wearing fluorescent safety vests and activating the crosswalk lights — which were fully operational — before ushering children and adults across the street. When the roadway was clear, a steady stream of motorists cruised past. A Winnipeg School Division spokesperson referred to the crossing location as “very busy.” Multiple parents who were parked near the school waiting to pick up their children said school officials had notified them about the incident via email earlier in the day. “I have a daughter who is in the same class as that little (child who was struck),” said one mother, who did not provide her name. “The school brought in some extra people for the kids to talk to.” One neighbour who lives near the crosswalk but did not witness the collision said it is frequently used by parents who park on Lanark south of Grant before walking their kids to the school located at the corner of Lanark and John Brebeuf Place. As far as the man is aware, the lights have always functioned normally and vehicles typically stop as expected, he said. “It doesn’t seem like a trouble spot, but if I had kids, I’d just be careful; you’ve got to be careful at every corner,” he said. While Lanark is designated as a school zone to the north and south of the intersection, motorists travelling eastbound or westbound on Grant are not required to slow their speeds below the 50 kilometre per hour limit. At least one home on Lanark has a yard sign that urges drivers to “please slow down.” Collisions between drivers and pedestrians are not uncommon on city streets. City council approved the Road Safety Strategic Action Plan in 2022, a year in which drivers killed 11 pedestrians in Winnipeg. The document outlined several infrastructure improvements and safety recommendations, including the creation of a road safety committee, a road safety branch within the public works department and three new full-time safety-focused staff positions. One of those positions was filled early this year, a city spokesperson said Thursday. The 2023 city budget allocated $282,000 in funding for the project. In just over a year, Winnipeg police have issued news releases about 10 incidents in which pedestrians were seriously injured or killed by motorists. Of those, four occurred in the last two months. Most recently, a 23-year-old woman died after being struck by a 58-year-old driver on the 1400 block of Pembina Highway the night of Jan. 26. Investigators learned the woman had run in front of the vehicle, which was travelling southbound on Pembina near Clarence and Boston avenues. The driver stopped and remained on scene. On the morning of Jan. 13, an 18-year-old man was struck and killed near Notre Dame Avenue and Cecil Street. Investigators again determined the victim had run in front of the involved vehicle, which was heading southbound on Notre Dame. Police said the driver stopped his vehicle, called police and provided emergency medical care to the victim until an ambulance arrived. The week prior, a 48-year-old man was killed after being run over by a motorist attempting to pull into a car wash. The man had been lying near the entrance, police said. Finally, a woman died after a driver struck her near Kildonan Place mall on Jan. 5. Police said the victim had been involved in an earlier collision with another vehicle, got out of her car to exchange information with the other motorist and was hit by a passing truck. The driver remained on scene. Thursday’s collision is not the first time a child accompanied by an adult was hit by a vehicle at a city crosswalk. Rezene Habtegergish, 4, and her mother were hit by a vehicle at a crosswalk on Isabel Street at Alexander Avenue the morning of March 18, 2019. Rezene later died. Surafiel Musse Tesfamariam, 8, was struck and killed at a crosswalk on St. Anne’s Road, between Bank and Varennes avenues, the morning of Feb. 13, 2018. He was crossing the road with his mother. Signs were later put up on Varennes with the honorary name Surafiel Way. tyler.searle(a)freepress.mb.ca<mailto:tyler.searle@freepress.mb.ca>

1 0

WFP Analysis: Commuters, meet Marchetti (Feb20'24)
by Beth McKechnie 20 Feb '24

20 Feb '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Commuters, meet Marchetti https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/2024/02/20/commuters-mee… IF you’re ever hosting a dinner party and you get the feeling that urban planning theory might be just the right topic to spark some lively conversation, casually bring up Marchetti’s Constant. It might make you the hit of the party. It’s a simple but powerful idea that has defined the shape and size of cities for thousands of years and is a key determinant of the sprawling metropolises we live in today. In 1994, Italian physicist Cesare Marchetti published a research paper titled Anthropological Invariants in Travel Behaviour. The study looked at how people of all cultures have moved around their cities from ancient times to the present day and recognized a consistent human behaviour, now known as Marchetti’s Constant. His research identified that when taking the average across a population, the maximum time people will comfortably dedicate to urban commuting is one hour per day — half an hour in each direction. Marchetti found that the half-hour commute has remained consistent throughout time, and the size of the cities we live in has been defined by how far we can commute in that time, using the transportation technologies of the day. He looked at Ancient Rome and found that even as it became the largest city on Earth with more than a million people, it never grew past four kilometres in diameter. With an average human walking speed of four kilometers per hour, a person could do a pedestrian commute from the periphery to the city centre in half an hour. Despite incredibly high densities and no natural boundaries to stop outward expansion, the size of the city remained defined only by how far people could comfortably walk. Cities across the world, from China, to Mesoamerica, to Europe, roughly maintained this size well into the Industrial Revolution. With the invention of bicycles and the development of streetcars in the late 1800s, the speed of urban mobility increased, and the size of cities followed, but the half-hour commute time remained constant. Commuters on bikes or riding streetcars could travel about six kilometres in half an hour, and the streetcar cities that developed across North America during this time followed by growing to this dimension. The pre-automobile city of Winnipeg with 400 streetcars serving 100 million riders per year, was about five kilometres from downtown to the periphery, about a half-hour commute. Today, the size of cities is defined largely by vehicles and the road networks they travel on, but Marchetti’s Constant remains. Comparing major Canadian cities, average commute times are remarkably consistent despite vast population differences, with the three largest cities averaging about 30 minutes and smaller cities ranging between 23 and 27 minutes. This consistency can be attributed to larger transportation networks in more populous cities. Calgary as an example, covers twice the area of Winnipeg, yet its commute times are only about a minute longer because it has a much larger road network. Intuitively, this would seem to indicate that cities should be striving to build larger roads to reduce travel times, but this is where the lessons of Marchetti’s Constant become important. Cities don’t build their transportation networks to create 30-minute commutes, they naturally expand to the 30-minute limit that their transportation systems will accommodate. We often expect that expanding a road network works like replacing a small pipe with a larger one, creating more room for water to flow smoothly through. When it comes to roads, however, it’s more like installing a larger pipe that naturally draws more water into itself until it’s filled again. When a road is made larger, people can drive faster, and commute times are reduced. Because of Marchetti’s Constant, people will naturally begin to live farther away, until that magic half hour commute time limit is once again reached. This brings more cars travelling longer distances to the enlarged road, resulting in traffic congestion that increases commute times beyond half an hour. Residents will again lobby for larger roads in response, and the cycle will begin again. The result is that cities are not only saddled with the prohibitive cost of constructing larger roads, but they must also pay to service and maintain more infrastructure in an ever-expanding urban area. Continually stretched civic budgets, with reduced services and crumbling infrastructure, are the result of cities being caught in this unsustainable growth cycle. All of Winnipeg’s long-term strategic plans and guidelines encourage higher density and inward growth to make our city more livable, affordable, economically viable, and environmentally sustainable. Experience demonstrates that when we build bigger roads, we are not only making it impossible to achieve these strategic goals, but we are also not solving the problem of traffic congestion. Bigger roads invariably lead to physically larger cities and more vehicle traffic. An alternative strategy to increasing road capacity is to address congestion by incentivizing ways for people to live closer to where they are commuting to. These inward growth patterns can reduce driving distances and in turn, the number of cars on the road. With higher densities and shorter commuting distances, alternative mobility options like walking, biking and public transit become more viable. Targeted investments to make these different transportation modes more attractive can reduce vehicle use and further alleviate traffic congestion. From ancient Rome to North American streetcar suburbs, and the sprawling cities of today, Marchetti’s Constant has demonstrated for thousands of years that transportation systems are fundamental in shaping cities, and they can either be used to expand urban sprawl, or they can naturally push growth and development inward in a more sustainable way. Brent Bellamy is creative director at Number Ten Architectural Group.

1 0

Re: Plans for twining Mcgilvary west bound from tracks to perimeter...what do you think?
by Mark Cohoe 19 Feb '24

19 Feb '24

Caution! This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba. Thanks Terry, I hadn't seen this, and we never got an invite to participate as a stakeholder on this (we usually do). It does seem to completely ignore the city's cycling strategy as well as OurWinnipeg 2045. I'm very glad that you contacted us and sent this my way. Cheers, Mark On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 5:22 PM Terry Zdan <tjzdan50(a)gmail.com<mailto:tjzdan50@gmail.com>> wrote: I think a grade separated pedestrian/cycle crossing such as gateway @ chief peguis would be most appropriate. Anything less not so much. Have to also address access to Bison Crossing. Apparently you can comment at this site https://engagemb.ca/pth3 ? -- Mark Cohoe Executive Director Bike Winnipeg t: 204-894-6540 e: mark(a)bikewinnipeg.ca<mailto:mark@bikewinnipeg.ca>

1 0

WFP: Eyebrows raised over what’s not in City of Winnipeg's budget (Feb9'24)
by Beth McKechnie 09 Feb '24

09 Feb '24

Crucial infrastructure projects aren’t financed Eyebrows raised over what’s not in budget https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/02/08/eyebrows-raised-o… THREE major infrastructure projects are notably absent from the City of Winnipeg’s proposed multi-year budget; no funding was earmarked for the now closed Arlington Bridge, Kenaston Boulevard (Route 90) widening or Chief Peguis Trail extension. That’s despite some councillors and advocates pushing the city to prioritize replacement of the 112-year-old Arlington Bridge, a major connection between the North End and West End over the Canadian Pacific Railway yards. Funding demands grew louder in November when the city suddenly closed the bridge — even for pedestrians — due to structural concerns. “We should (have started) funding a replacement (bridge) quite some time ago because we knew it was going to fail,” said Coun. Ross Eadie (Mynarski), whose ward includes the structure. Eadie said he would have liked to see the city devote part of the revenue raised from frontage fees, which the previous 2023 budget raised by $1.50 per foot, to start saving for a replacement. A 2018 report suggested a new bridge would cost about $330 million. Eadie said the bridge is a “critical” link between communities, with emergency response times to some homes likely running longer since its closure. Mark Cohoe, executive director of Bike Winnipeg, said the loss of the bridge also cut off a key active transportation route. “Realistically, we need to be seeing money to replace the Arlington Bridge to include (new) protected bike lanes … or to see money going into rail relocation (so the bridge is no longer required),” said Cohoe. While the Chief Peguis, Kenaston and Arlington Bridge projects aren’t financed in the draft 2024 to 2027 budget, it notes Mayor Scott Gillingham promised revenue from the 2023 frontage fee hike could be used for the road projects. That revenue was allocated to general road repairs but would be diverted to Chief Peguis and Kenaston “trade corridor” projects, if federal and/or provincial funding is confirmed. “Once we’re ready to proceed with Kenaston (that can raise money) to pay for the city’s portion of it,” said Coun. Jeff Browaty (North Kildonan). Browaty, who leads council’s finance committee, said unallocated roads funding in the six-year capital plan could also be used. The proposed municipal budget assumes the province’s strategic infrastructure funding to the City of Winnipeg will remain frozen at $89.8 million each year until 2027, with all the money already allocated to various capital projects. Ian Bushie, Manitoba’s municipal relations minister, was tight-lipped about a possible increase to the city’s infrastructure funding being included in the NDP’s first budget in the spring. It will be up to the city to bring forward a proposal that prioritizes the Arlington Bridge and other major capital projects before the provincial government makes any decisions about financial support, said Bushie. “We’ve had continued… discussions to see how we can best accommodate the City of Winnipeg with their significant challenges,” Bushie said, He said a seven-year freeze on the city’s provincial operating grant under the former Tory government is forcing it to catch up in a lot of areas. “When they bring their priorities to the table, we’re open to having those discussions.” As for the widening of Kenaston Boulevard and the western extension of the Chief Peguis Trail, Bushie said discussions continue across levels of government. “I can assure you that we are more than willing to be an advocate and open to those discussions to see how we can best support,” Bushie said. The mayor plans to wait on the results of business case studies on the feasibility of the Kenaston and Chief Peguis projects before taking further city action. Browaty noted the city will wait for an ongoing engineering study on Arlington to be finished before deciding its fate. All three studies are expected this year. If approved, the Chief Peguis Trail extension would stretch from Main Street to Brookside Boulevard and Kenaston Boulevard would be widened to include three lanes in each direction between Ness and Taylor avenues for a combined cost of about $1 billion. — With files from Danielle Da Silva joyanne.pursaga(a)freepress.mb.ca X: @joyanne_pursaga

1 0

WFP: Treacherous walkways (Feb9'24)
by Beth McKechnie 09 Feb '24

09 Feb '24

Treacherous walkways Wacky winter weather is making sidewalks a risky, slippery mess https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2024/02/08/mild-weather-has-… WENDY Scharf watched from the steps of her home in the Central St. Boniface neighbourhood Wednesday afternoon as passing pedestrians shuffled, slid and sidestepped over slick sections of ice and pools of water covering the northbound sidewalk. It’s a common sight, she said, and part of living in a residential area typically considered lower priority by city street-clearing crews. “It’s like this all the time. I mean, all the time,” Scharf said, pointing toward the brown, slush-covered sidewalk. “It is very dangerous this time of year to be out here. I think it adds a level of difficulty, especially for the elderly and people who have strollers.” Winnipeg is experiencing an uncommon pattern of weather conditions that have contributed to the issue this winter, with mild temperatures causing a freeze-thaw cycle that generates ice on roads and sidewalks and in gutters and drains. Reports of slippery conditions have spiked as a result, with the city receiving 562 requests for service related to icy sidewalks and active transportation pathways since Oct. 1. During the same period the previous year, it received just 121 such complaints, city data shows. Last year, when there was more snow, the city received 1,622 requests for service related to blocked sidewalks and active transportation pathways. The same period this year generated just 402 complaints, the data show. Overall, the requests for sidewalk maintenance are down by 44 per cent so far this season, the city said. Coun. Janice Lukes, who leads the public works committee, and Coun. Matt Allard, who has been a vocal proponent of improved snow clearing, traded barbs on the subject during a committee meeting last week. Allard (St. Boniface) demanded better service on sidewalks, saying they should be plowed to the pavement, while Lukes (Waverley West) argued the city is doing everything it can to stay ahead of challenging conditions on major thoroughfares. Up to four centimetres of snowfall and sub-zero temperatures were forecast for Winnipeg beginning Thursday afternoon. The city organizes its snow-clearing schedule in order of priority, with major thoroughfares and adjacent sidewalks classified as Priority 1, non-regional bus routes and collector streets designated as Priority 2 and followed by Priority 3 residential streets. P1 areas are typically plowed to bare pavement within 36-hours of snowfall and then salted. Sidewalks along P1 and P2 streets are plowed after a five-centimetre snowfall and maintained to “a compacted snow surface,” except for downtown sidewalks, which are supposed to be cleared to bare pavement. Sidewalks in residential areas are considered the lowest priority and are plowed to a compacted snow surface only after all the other sidewalks have been plowed. Recently, a number of groups advocating for persons with disabilities launched the S(NO)w Plow campaign to lobby for better clearing of sidewalks. The groups say for persons with disabilties, sidewalks can be impassable when not properly cleared of snow. Michael Cantor, manager of streets and maintenance, said the current sidewalk-clearing equipment operated by the city is incapable of stripping pathways to bare pavement, owing to their uneven surfaces. Clearing sidewalks in such a way could damage equipment or infrastructure — whichever breaks first, he said. City workers would need to use salt and chemicals to reach bare pavement, but current bylaws restrict the use of such materials to P1 streets in an effort to reduce their associated negative environmental impacts, he said. Cantor said he’s looking forward to colder temperatures that will temporarily halt the thaw and allow workers to spread sand to improve traction. In the current conditions, sand mixes with melting ice and has a negligible effect. Allard noted the city has unsuccessfully attempted to pass various motions approving a plow-to-pavement pilot project for P3 zones at least three times in recent years. He believes investments in improved sidewalk-clearing equipment could improve maintenance quality without draining the city’s coffers, saying the snow-clearing budget reserved for roadways is often overspent, while the sidewalk clearing budget is underspent. Lukes pushed back on the idea, saying even if equipment was able to clear pathways to the pavement, the resulting ice and snow would need to be hauled to one of the city’s snow storage locations at an exorbitant cost. She pointed out that Winnipeg’s approach to sidewalk clearing is unique, given that some other municipalities — including Calgary, Edmonton, Regina, Saskatoon, Toronto and Vancouver — require homeowners to clear walks in front of their homes. The topic has been raised in recent years, but as snow-clearing bylaws are currently written, the City of Winnipeg can fine residents who take it upon themselves to clear snow and ice from city property. Allard said he is opposed to the idea of residents being asked to clear walkways, given such maintenance is an expected return on taxpayer funds. However, he believes the current bylaw should be amended to protect residents from fines, should they choose to do so. Martin Pollock, a Winnipeg lawyer specializing in personal-injury cases, said it is difficult, but not impossible to prevail in a slip-and-fall lawsuit against the city on its property. Municipalities are exempt from certain sections of the Occupiers Liability Act, meaning they cannot be held liable under the legislation for injuries occurring on their property. “Now, that doesn’t mean you can’t sue them for negligence,” Pollock said. “The question becomes, how often did they inspect that piece of the sidewalk? Did they know about it? Did somebody call them five times? “It all depends on the circumstances.” The Winnipeg Regional Health Authority said it does not reliably track slip-and-fall injuries, but noted “hundreds of Manitobans are injured from slipping on snow and ice, most commonly in and around parking lots and on sidewalks and especially when temperatures fluctuate around freezing temperature.” tyler.searle(a)freepress.mb.ca

1 0