- AT-Network - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

Bike to Work Day Winnipeg - June 22, 2012
by Beth McKechnie 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

We invite you to take to the streets and join thousands of commuters in cycling to work. *The fifth annual Bike to Work Day Winnipeg will be held on Friday, June 22nd*. Stop by a pit stop from 6:30-9:00 am on your way to work and get a boost with free snacks, bike tune-ups and refreshments. Over thirty community and corporate groups will welcome cyclists in the morning, and each stop will host its own prize giveaways and an opportunity to meet a diversity of active transportation supporters. You can wind up your week with a BBQ at The Forks beginning at 3:30 and featuring local musical talent, free dinner and your chance to win a brand new Schwinn bicycle or bike trailer from Chariot Trailers. Start today by registering online to show your support for the smart commute, and to take advantage of the day's festivities. Please visit www.biketoworkdaywinnipeg.org. -- Andraea Sartison Event Coordinator Bike to Work Day 2011 333-2666 www.biketoworkdaywinnipeg.org

1 0

The W.R.E.N.C.H. employment opportunity
by Beth McKechnie 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Want to work with kids, bikes and the cycling community? Then you've found the perfect position as Executive Director of The W.R.E.N.C.H. <http://thewrench.ca/> (Winnipeg Repair Education and Cycling Hub)! Check out the job posting here<http://thewrench.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/WRENCH-job-posting…> .

1 0

NTPP Update: A Bold Experiment in Four Communities - Handouts
by Mark Cohoe 26 Apr '12

26 Apr '12

Hi, Sorry this is a bit slow coming out. Here are the links to the handouts and evaluation for last weeks webinar. *The handouts for this webinar are available for download on the APBP website*. To download the slides and handouts in pdf format, please go to http://www.apbp.org/?page=Webinar_Downloads <http://www.apbp.org/link.asp?e=markc@biketothefuture.org&job=600878&ymlink=…>. On this page you will find handouts; the slide presentation as a pdf; the sign-in sheet to claim credit for CM and PDH; and some technical assistance documents for GoToWebinar. We hope you enjoyed the webinar, "NTPP Update: A Bold Experiment in Four Communities", and found it valuable. If you haven't already done so, please take a few minutes to complete a short online evaluation at http://www.apbp.org/surveys/?id=Evaluation_Apr-12 <http://www.apbp.org/link.asp?e=markc@biketothefuture.org&job=601203&ymlink=…> Cheers Mark Cohoe Bike to the Future

1 0

REMINDER: Registration for 2nd Conversations in motion Event - May 9th!
by Kristine Hayward 26 Apr '12

26 Apr '12

Hi! If you haven't registered for the second annual Conversations in motion series: "Health promotion gone VIRAL: Tweeting & posting for better health choices," you should do it right now! The event will be held on Wednesday, May 9th 8:15am-4:00pm at the Université de Saint-Boniface On-line registration will be open until May 4th or until all spots are filled! We are over 50% SOLD OUT!! Please see the attached Event Poster for more information on how to register or visit our webpage: http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/kinrec/research/conversations.html <http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/kinrec/research/conversations.html> *NEW: If you have registered already, be sure to check out our Pre-Event Scavenger Hunt!! Here's the link: http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/kinrec/grad_programs/safety/media/Scavenger.p… This will get you ready for the event and there are prizes to be won! For more information, please contact me at 474-7451 (phone) or Nicole_dunn(a)umanitoba.ca <mailto:Nicole_dunn@umanitoba.ca> . Thanks, Nicole Nicole J. Dunn, BA (Adv), BRS, MA Associate Director (Administration) 308A Max Bell Centre Health, Leisure & Human Performance Research Institute University of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2 T: 204-474-7451 F: 204-261-4802 E: nicole_dunn(a)umanitoba.ca http://umanitoba.ca/kinrec/research/ <http://umanitoba.ca/kinrec/research/> This email and/or any documents in this transmission is intended for the addressee(s) only and may contain legally privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, copying or dissemination is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and return the original. Ce courriel et tout document dans cette transmission est destiné à la personne ou aux personnes à qui il est adressé. Il peut contenir des informations privilégiées ou confidentielles. Toute utilisation, divulgation, distribution, copie, ou diffusion non autorisée est strictement défendue. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce message, veuillez en informer l'expéditeur immédiatement et lui remettre l'original.

1 0

Lower Speed Limits Proposed Across Toronto
by Anders Swanson 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

[speed limits are in the news...so to complete the "trifecta", here's a story out of Toronto about a recent report from Toronto's chief medical officer of health about the best and safest way to get everyone else (besides the kids lucky enough to be in a school zone) out cycling and walking...thx to Tom for the forward. - anders] http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2012/04/24/toronto-speed-limits… References: Report from Toronto Health (Road to Health: Improving Walking and Cycling in Toronto) http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2012.HL13.1 http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2012/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-46520.pdf

1 0

City of Winnipeg News Release - City of Winnipeg Annual Bike Auction
by Beth McKechnie 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

*Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:13 AM *Subject:* City of Winnipeg News Release - City of Winnipeg Annual Bike Auction [image: Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CC88E0.FA0A1B80] For Immediate Release Wednesday, April 25, 2012 *City of Winnipeg Annual Bike Auction* *Winnipeg, MB* – Residents are reminded that the City’s annual auction of unclaimed bicycles will be held on Saturday, April 28 and Sunday, April 29, 2012, at the Varsity View Sportsplex, 4230 Ridgewood Avenue. Approximately 450 bicycles will be auctioned off on Saturday, and approximately 300 on Sunday. Parking is available for $2.00 per vehicle, with all parking proceeds going to the Varsity View Community Club. This year, the City of Winnipeg has partnered with the Winnipeg Repair Education and Cycling Hub (WRENCH) to offer up to 200 bikes that have been tuned up by volunteer mechanics, and are ready-to-ride! Also on site will be information and displays about the City’s cycling network, commuter courses, proper helmet fit, and Winnipeg’s community bike shops. Public viewing will be held as follows: · Saturday, April 28 from 7:00 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. – Auction starts at 9:00 a.m. · Sunday, April 29 from 10:00 a.m. to 11:45 a.m. – Auction starts at 12:00 noon Please note that all bicycles are sold as is, where is, and no warranty is given nor implied. Cash, MasterCard, Visa, American Express and Interac payments will be accepted. Cheques will not be accepted. One-time Bicycle Registrations will be available on site at a cost of $5.60 plus GST, per bicycle. Registering your bike will ensure that, should the City recover it—you will get it back with no additional charges. For further information on Community By-law Enforcement Services – Bicycle Recovery Section, please call 311 or visit: http://winnipeg.ca/cms/license_branch/bicycle_license.stm -30- Media inquiries should be directed to the City of Winnipeg Media Inquiry Line at 204-986-6000 or via email at MediaInquiry(a)winnipeg.ca Follow us on Facebook: facebook.com/cityofwinnipeg<http://www.facebook.com/cityofwinnipeg> Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com/cityofwinnipeg<http://www.twitter.com/cityofwinnipeg>

1 0

Webinar: Safe Routes for Seniors - Thurs, May 3, Noon-1:15, EcoCentre
by Beth McKechnie 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

Please join Green Action Centre to watch the following webinar followed by discussion. Feel free to bring your lunch. RSVPs appreciated but not necessary. *Creating a Safe Routes for Seniors Program* Thursday, May 3rd, 2012 12:00pm-1:15pm (webinar duration is 45 minutes) Eco-Centre<http://greenactioncentre.ca/content/ecocentre-directions-and-travel-options/>Boardroom - 3rd Floor, 303 Portage Avenue In urban environments throughout the country, children and older adults represent a disproportionate percentage of pedestrian injuries and fatalities in motor vehicle crashes. Many of these places have long established “Safe Routes to School” programs and policies for children, but are at a loss when it comes to making streets safer for older adults. As more people age in place and the population as a whole is living longer, creating streets that are easy, enjoyable and safe for older adults is crucial in urban environments. This course uses seven chapters to outline the components of a program to improve street safety for senior citizens and promote the cardiovascular health of local older adults in urban areas. After watching this course you will understand the differences between “Safe Routes” for children and older adults and the steps you should take to get these programs off the ground, using concepts proven to work in New York City. * * *Amy Pfeiffer*, your instructor, is a transportation planner and principal of PFoundation Works. She has over 11 years experience in transportation planning working with Nelson Nygaard, Transportation Alternatives, and The New York City Department of City Planning. -- *Shoni Litinsky* | Active and Safe Routes to School Green Action Centre <http://greenactioncentre.ca/> 3rd floor, 303 Portage Avenue* | *(204) 925-3773 Green Action Centre is your non-profit hub for greener living. Support our work by becoming a member<http://greenactioncentre.ca/support/memberships/>

1 0

WFP editorial: Send right signals to pedestrians PLUS study on scramble corners
by Beth McKechnie 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

Send right signals to pedestrians http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/editorials/send-right-signals-to-p… The complaint that you need a jet pack to cross Portage Avenue on foot has been around for years. The city's traffic department, however, responds the perception likely is a lack of understanding of how the signals at intersections work. Pedestrians are given five seconds to start a crossing, and the appearance of the flashing red hand is merely a warning, not a sign to stop walking midstream. Pedestrians are given more than 10 seconds to cross -- the timing is calculated at a pace of 1.2 metres or less per second for a safe crossing. But if misperception has lingered longer than a quarter-century, if some walkers are getting caught on the median, then better communication is needed. To that end, the city is investigating the "countdown" signals used in other cities to show pedestrians how many seconds are left to get across safely. The city should also remove the buttons that must be pushed at some intersections to activate the "walk-man" signal allowing people to enter a crossing safely. The buttons were removed downtown and should be yanked in other areas, as well, to assert a pedestrian's right to cross on a green light. There are other ideas around that Winnipeg should investigate. Calgary, for example, introduced in 2008 the diagonal crosswalk at 3rd Street Southwest, in the Eau Claire area. It stops all vehicles to allow foot traffic to cross in all directions, including diagonally. Such unconventional signalling requires a learning curve, but there are intersections in Winnipeg -- River and Osborne -- where heavy foot traffic impedes vehicles turning left and right. Perhaps there, unimpeded pedestrian crossings can make sense. Motorists in Winnipeg celebrated when Mayor Sam Katz promised years ago to synchronize lights on busy streets such as Portage and Broadway. That recognized the need to inject efficiency to signalled intersections. The population is getting older and heavier. Intersection signals should help, not discourage, those who choose to walk, and walk safely, around town. * * * * * NOTE: Here's a study<http://www.toronto.ca/transportation/walking/pdf/pedestrian_scramble_crossi…>comparing the planning and implementation of "diagonal crosswalks", or scramble corners as they're sometimes called, in Toronto and Calgary. At a glance, it appears Toronto's example is the better implementation from which to learn or perhaps it's a difference in car/ped culture in the two cities. Pasted below is the concluding paragraph from the analysis, which was prepared by a representative from each of the two municipalities. cheers, Beth "It is recognized that the implementation of pedestrian scramble would increase vehicle delays. There was a significant increase in delays to mixed traffic in Toronto; from a policy implementation perspective, this tradeoff was acceptable given that there are over 50,000 pedestrians at the Toronto intersection in a typical 24 hour period compared to 36,000 vehicles. The increase in delay to transit vehicles is a concern – while a better level of service is being provided to pedestrians at the Toronto intersection, these same pedestrians are subject to additional delays when they ride on the streetcars. Similarly in Calgary the expected increase in vehicle delay was considered acceptable given the safety and operational benefits for pedestrians that scramble control provides. Implementation of scramble control in Toronto and Calgary demonstrates both cities’ commitment to creating more walkable cities. Based on the high number of pedestrians observed crossing diagonally at the three locations, it does appear that the pedestrian scramble phasing is being well used by pedestrians in Toronto and Calgary."

1 0

Long and winding road - Winnipeg needs to move toward a more car-free culture
by Beth McKechnie 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Long and winding road Winnipeg needs to move toward a more car-free culture By: Bartley Kives http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/long-and-winding-road-148422775.html If you own a 2012 Honda Civic or any other car with a 50-litre gas tank, it'll cost you an extra $1.25 to fill 'er up on May 1. This is the short-term cost of the Selinger government's 2.5-cent-a-litre provincial gas-tax hike, which is expected to rake in $48.6 million of additional revenue for the province during the forthcoming fiscal year. The cash, the province says, will be devoted to fixing roads and bridges. But as Premier Greg Selinger has been forced to concede, the province has no plans to spend an extra $48.6 million on roads and bridges this coming year. While legislation demands provincial gas-tax revenue must be spent on infrastructure, there is no similar rule against taking money out of roads-and-bridges and spending it on other priorities. To some extent, that's precisely what the province plans to do this year, as administrative officials confirmed during last week's budget lockup. The spin doctors on the political side protested loudly, claiming there are in fact increases hidden somewhere within the budget papers. But there is no doubt the province is not taking all that extra gas-tax cash and using it to top up the roads-and-bridges budget. Just as there is no question the City of Winnipeg tried to pull off a very similar trick in 2011. About 13 months ago, Mayor Sam Katz announced Winnipeg's first frontage-levy hike in about a decade, a move intended to raise an extra $14 million for the city last year. Like Selinger this year, Katz claimed in 2011 this extra revenue would be spent entirely on infrastructure. And he was correct: It went into the city's road-maintenance budget. What civic politicians were not eager to admit is even more money came out of that very same budget, to be spent on other priorities. In other words, both the city and province have tried to place the precise same spin on a form of tax hike over the past two years. Faced with budget shortfalls, Selinger and Katz tried to dress up the politically unpopular decision to raise taxes with the only form of populist window dressing voters seem to accept: We're taking your money to fix the roads. As far as spin goes, this is not very effective, as even the most easily confused reporter, blogger or opposition politician can look at two numbers and discern which one is smaller. But the fact this ploy gets used at all is a testament to how much Winnipeggers and Manitobans seem to care about their roads. Poll after poll reveals the condition of both city and provincial roads are among the top two concerns of voters in this flat patch of the planet. So politicians pander to that sentiment -- and continue to perpetuate the notion that simply "fixing the roads" will cure much of what ails this city and this province. As any historian will tell you, the presence or absence of a properly functioning transportation system may be the most crucial factor determining the success or failure of a city, both in terms of material wealth and the health and well-being of its citizens. But inherent in that assumption, across much if not most of North America, is that a properly functioning transportation system can and should be measured solely by the state of its roads. "I wish they would fix the damn roads" may be the most common complaint in Winnipeg, where the freeze-thaw cycles of our sub-Arctic climate ensure we wind up with some of the most pockmarked, potholed buggy tracks on the continent. When we travel to the U.S., many of us are left awed and envious by the sight of freeway systems with endless kilometres of elevated concrete and steel-supported overpasses. So we desire these things, much like we desire big-box stores full of IKEA furniture and glass hotel atria full of plastic waterslides, but those apparent amenities are rant fodder for another day. Based on anecdote and data, it's fairly safe to say many of us feel this way. But I would argue this is folly. Yes, a functioning highway system is important for the transfer of goods around the globe. But Winnipeg's ever-expanding road system is the key to its endless struggles, as all sane politicians come to realize over time. Winnipeg is no different from many North American cities in that the primary mode of transportation is the personal vehicle. Cars provides us all with freedom, we believe, even as we know it is more environmentally efficient, less expensive and less isolating to get around using public transit. Cars, however, are simply more convenient to use in cities designed for cars instead of people. So whenever efforts are made to improve transportation for people who don't use cars, a chicken versus egg inevitably arises. Spend money on public transit? Many of us argue against it, insisting we should simply build more roads, thus ensuring we must all spend vast sums of money to purchase, maintain and operate expensive vehicles that require large tracts of concrete for parking and, by extension, ensure our cities continue to grow outward and require more roads. Expansive parking lots for expansive stores ensure retailers pay higher property taxes and charge us more for our goods. But we demand free parking, because we have been brought up to believe it is our God-given right. Some of us even believe public transit should bloody well pay for itself, because we don't use it. The corollary argument -- that non-drivers should not have to pay for road construction -- is deemed irrelevant, if not laughable. So politicians and policy-makers put off investments in public transit, even though our leaders are well aware of the arithmetic that makes higher-density planning the most sensible and responsible financial option for any city in the long-term. The public wants more roads, the politicians shrug. They want to live in single-family homes, far away from anywhere they could possibly reach on foot, the developers claim. So the people who sculpt the shape of our lives give us what we want. And anyone foolish enough to question this logic is deemed to be a naive utopian or an urbanist geek. Of course, the price of oil and the inconvenience of congestion tend to increase both urban density and the popularity of public transit. These are the market forces that will inevitably drive even car-dependent Winnipeg toward a more car-free culture. I would argue our leaders should take us to this place far before the time comes when we have no other choice but to go there. I say this as a driver. I say this as a pedestrian and occasional transit user. I also say this as a person who looks around North America and feels envy -- not for freeways, but for the eagerness, elsewhere, for change. bartley.kives(a)freepress.mb.ca

1 0

I'll walk, thanks. I'm a liberal.
by Beth McKechnie 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

I'll walk, thanks. I'm a liberal Strange trend emerges in examination of cities' walkability By: Will Oremus http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/life/ill-walk-thanks-im-a-li… Reading Tom Vanderbilt's Slate series on the crisis in North American walking, I noticed something about the cities with the highest "walk scores." They're all liberal. New York, San Francisco, and Boston, the top three major cities on Walkscore.com, are three of the most liberal cities in the United States. In fact, the top 19 are all in states that voted for Obama in 2008. The lowest-scoring major cities, by comparison, tilt conservative: Three of the bottom four -- Jacksonville, Fla., Oklahoma City, and Fort Worth, Texas, -- went for McCain. What explains the correlation? Don't conservatives like to walk? You might think it's a simple matter of size: Big cities lean liberal and also tend to be more walkable. That's generally true, but it doesn't fully explain the phenomenon. Houston, Phoenix and Dallas are among the nation's ten largest cities, but they're also among the country's more conservative big cities, and none cracks the top 20 in walkability. All three trail smaller liberal cities such as Portland, Denver, and Long Beach. Substituting density for size gets us closer: Houston, Phoenix and Dallas are notorious for sprawl, while New York, San Francisco and Boston are tightly packed, partly because they are older cities whose downtown cores developed in the pre-car era. As they grew, their borders were constrained by those of the smaller cities and towns that surrounded them. That's not the case with many southern and western cities. Jacksonville and Oklahoma City, for instance, are vast in terms of land area, encompassing suburban and even semi-rural neighbourhoods as well as urban ones. That still leaves the question of why urban density should go hand-in-hand with liberal politics, however. I see four possible categories of explanations. 1. Liberals build denser, more walkable cities (e.g., Portlanders supporting public transit and policies that limit sprawl). 2. Liberals are drawn to cities that are already dense and walkable (think college grads migrating to Minneapolis rather than San Antonio, or young families settling down in Lowell, Mass., with a walk score of 64.1, rather than Fort Wayne, Ind., with a walk score of 39. 3. Walkable cities make people more liberal (by forcing them to get along with diverse neighbours and to rely on highly visible city services such as parks and subways). 4. The same factors that make cities dense and walkable also make them liberal. My guess is that it's mostly No. 4, with some of the other three thrown in, depending on the situation. What do dense, walkable cities have in common? Besides being older, they also tend to be on the coasts. New York (No. 1), San Francisco (No. 2), and Boston (No. 3) sprang up as port cities -- hubs of international commerce and immigration. That leads to both dense development along the coastline and to an atmosphere of diversity and tolerance. Those three cities top the list because they're both old and coastal. The others in the top 10 are mostly one or the other. Seattle (No. 6) and Miami (No. 8) are diverse coastal ports. Chicago (No. 4), Philadelphia (No. 5), and Minneapolis (No. 9) aren't coastal, but they are ports, and more importantly, they're relatively old and industrial. Look at a walkability map and you'll see that unwalkable cities are concentrated in the South. While the northern United States developed an industrial economy, the South was dominated by agriculture until the last few decades. Whereas industry breeds density, immigration and social mobility, agriculture requires vast plots of land and leads to an entrenched social order dominated by the large landowners. The historical perspective might help explain why cities such as Houston, which today is one of the nation's largest ports and a magnet for immigration, remain relatively unwalkable. As Houston becomes increasingly diverse, it is already becoming more liberal. Harris County went narrowly to Obama in '08 after going consistently Republican for decades before that. In theory, it should be getting more walkable as well. The problem is that once a city has an infrastructure built around cars, it's harder to build support for density and public transportation funding. That is, it may be easier for a city to turn liberal than for a city to turn walkable. Link to Slate story: http://slate.me/HG44LM -- Slate

1 0