EpiData-list August 2011

epidata-list@lists.umanitoba.ca

1 participants
15 discussions

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

Greetings. Is there a way to do a conditional value label look up in either the current or in the new test version of EpiData? For instance, if field disease equals A then field subtype has values 1,2,3 for selection, if field disease equals B then field subtype has values 4,5,6, etc. Thank-you, and well done to the development team for excellent progress. _______________________________________ Stephen Drew Health Data Analyst Region of Waterloo Public Health Waterloo, ON

12 years

IF... THEN LEGAL

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

Hi all, I'm trying to combine IF... THEN with LEGAL but somehow I'm having problems with it. Basically, what I want to do is to determine valid values for one variable based on the answer given to another variable. In the example below, the two vars are stateid and countyid: If stateid = 1 then countyid could be 01 or 04; if stateid = 2 then countyid could be 02, 03 or 05. Example: countyid IF stateid = 1 THEN LEGAL 01 04 END ENDIF IF stateid = 2 THEN LEGAL 02 03 05 END ENDIF MUSTENTER END -- Thomaz A.

12 years

I can't normally export value labels to Stata 11

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

Dear friends, I can't normally export value labels to Stata 11 data file even using the newest sample.epx. Why? RegardsRichard Zhou > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:00:29 -0500 > From: epidata-list-request(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Subject: EpiData-list Digest, Vol 94, Issue 13 > To: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > Send EpiData-list mailing list submissions to > epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > epidata-list-request(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > You can reach the person managing the list at > epidata-list-owner(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of EpiData-list digest..." > > > EpiData-list mailing list > ___________________________________ > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: New test versions (manager, entryclient, template cmd > tool) (epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:25:02 +0200 > From: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Subject: Re: [EpiData-list] New test versions (manager, entryclient, > template cmd tool) > To: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Message-ID: <4E57828E.2030904(a)epidata.dk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Dear All. > > As promised in our previous mail, we have released a new test version of > EpiData Analysis on our website today. > > This test release have been modified to support the new XML structure > used by the most recent versions of EpiData Manager and EpiData EntryClient. > > Along with this change, EpiData Analysis is now also capable of reading > the zipped versions of the project files. That is, it is now possible to > read the .epz files. > > With kind regards, > Torsten Bonde Christiansen. > EpiData Association. > > > On 2011-08-24 16:38, epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca wrote: > > > > Dear All > > > > As previously announced the programs released today have had a > > significant change to the underlying structure of the project file > > (the .epx/.epz XML structure). > > > > The reason for this is that the previous structure could not be > > described by a XML Schema file. A schema file is a standardised way of > > describing the structure and internal logic of an XML file. Some of > > the logical properties of the structure were inconsistent and > > therefore changed. This has as a positive "side effect" that the > > overall loading and saving time for a project file has improved quite > > a bit. > > > > The changes will - as warned two times on this list - break > > compatibility with > > previously created files. An updated version of the sample.epx file is > > provided with the downloads and additionally the EpiData Commandline > > Tool has been updated (and release for all platforms) to support the > > new XML structure. > > > > Please read previous mails on the list to see further explanation and > > how you can avoid problems in relation to the changed XML structure. > > > > The currently available test version of EpiData Analysis does NOT > > support the new XML structure. An updated version will be released in > > a few days. > > > > Common fixes/changes: > > * Updated XML structure > > * Import from STATA 12 now supported. > > * New saving algorithm, for improved speed. > > > > Manager: > > * Fixed a bug where removing a control marked for copy would cause > > breakdown if copy/paste was later invoked. > > * Fixed shortcuts for MAC. > > * Added boolean field to "other fields" > > * Fixed bug with "delete all" > > * Speed improvements for copy/paste and placing new controls (mainly > > visible with very many controls). > > > > EntryClient: > > * Fixed shortcut overlap in MAC > > * Speed improvements with loading project files. > > * Speed improvements when browsing records. > > > > EpiC: > > * Updated to support new XML structure. > > > > Regards > > > > Torsten Christiansen and Jens Lauritsen > > EpiData Association > > _______________________________________________ > > EpiData-list mailing list > > EpiData-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list > > > > ------------------------------ > > ________________________________________ > EpiData-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list > > > End of EpiData-list Digest, Vol 94, Issue 13 > ********************************************

12 years, 1 month

New test versions (manager, entryclient, template cmd tool)

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

Dear All As previously announced the programs released today have had a significant change to the underlying structure of the project file (the .epx/.epz XML structure). The reason for this is that the previous structure could not be described by a XML Schema file. A schema file is a standardised way of describing the structure and internal logic of an XML file. Some of the logical properties of the structure were inconsistent and therefore changed. This has as a positive "side effect" that the overall loading and saving time for a project file has improved quite a bit. The changes will - as warned two times on this list - break compatibility with previously created files. An updated version of the sample.epx file is provided with the downloads and additionally the EpiData Commandline Tool has been updated (and release for all platforms) to support the new XML structure. Please read previous mails on the list to see further explanation and how you can avoid problems in relation to the changed XML structure. The currently available test version of EpiData Analysis does NOT support the new XML structure. An updated version will be released in a few days. Common fixes/changes: * Updated XML structure * Import from STATA 12 now supported. * New saving algorithm, for improved speed. Manager: * Fixed a bug where removing a control marked for copy would cause breakdown if copy/paste was later invoked. * Fixed shortcuts for MAC. * Added boolean field to "other fields" * Fixed bug with "delete all" * Speed improvements for copy/paste and placing new controls (mainly visible with very many controls). EntryClient: * Fixed shortcut overlap in MAC * Speed improvements with loading project files. * Speed improvements when browsing records. EpiC: * Updated to support new XML structure. Regards Torsten Christiansen and Jens Lauritsen EpiData Association

12 years, 1 month

Warning: Changes in XML structur in the next test release of Manager and EntryClient

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

Dear all As I already informed on August 17th the next test release for Manager and EntryClient will require ALL current EPX and EPZ files to be recreated. The next test release will be available within the next few days. Obviously this can be annoying, but as previously announced we do need to have the flexibility of changes all the way to release of version 1. If you are preparing projects for future use I recommend that you either: a. - Export your data with current test version into stata format - import again with the new test version (when this is ready) - add jumps, calculations etc after the import. (Labels will be imported correctly) or b look at the template principles explained in http://www.epidata.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/documentation:templateformat and then use the template command tool to create the epx files. A revised template tool will be released at the same time as the next test release. In other words: Do not spend too much time on fine tuning epx files at this point. Datastructures are fine, but details must be expected to change, e.g. specifications of jumps, range, notes etc. The XML structure used in v1.0 will be supported for all future releases after that. regards Jens Lauritsen EpiData Association

12 years, 1 month

key unique code not working fully

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

I have a database with 2 unique keys: stickno and randid. The CHK file contains the following code for these fields: stickno KEY UNIQUE 1 RANGE 1 500 MUSTENTER END randid KEY UNIQUE 2 RANGE 100 1699 MUSTENTER AFTER ENTRY IF (randid>899) and (randid<1300) THEN HELP "randid must be 100-899 or 1300-1699" TYPE=WARNING ENDIF END END Despite the KEY UNIQUE commands, I found 2 records with stickno=290 and randid==227. I believe KEY UNIQUE was present in the CHK file prior to beginning data entry, but even if not, when attempting to open the REC file I should receive a warning alerting me to the duplicates. This doesn't happen when I keep the EIX file in the same directory as the database. After deleting the EIX file from the directory, when attempting to open the REC file I do get a warning alerting me to the duplicates. What information does the EIX file store? I've attached it in case you're able to determine where the error lies. I haven't attached the database because it contains data on real patients and I can't edit it without changing the EIX file. Any insights would be much appreciated. Cheers, Suzanna Vidmar Senior Research Officer Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Royal Children's Hospital Flemington Road Parkville Victoria 3052 Australia telephone: +61 3 9345 6372 facsimile: +61 3 9345 6000 email: suzanna.vidmar(a)mcri.edu.au www.mcri.edu.au <http://www.mcri.edu.au/> ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________

12 years, 1 month

Revision of XML structure and changes in next test release of Manager and EntryClient

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

Dear all Since last test release of July 15th summer vacation is now over and the following has been fixed or worked on: a. copy-paste bugs b. other minor issues c. develop a scripting tool to validate function (simulate user performance) d. WIKI documentation updated - e.g. see: http://www.epidata.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/documentation:program_keys e. Critical external review of the XML structure The next test release will follow when these aspects are all covered. More comments below. Comments: Yesterday a critical review of the current XML structure for the data files was performed with the Danish Data Archive. It turns out that a few issues requires some changes to the XML structure (tag-attribute), to ensure consistence and possibility of developing a schema file for the XML. Schema files are content describing files, which will enable other software to read the epx files and validate contents against the formal specification. While this is rather technical - and of no interest - to most users, it means that with the next test release the XML structure will change (again). If you are preparing projects for future use I recommend that you either: a. - plan to export your data with current test version into stata format - import again with the new test version (when this is ready) or b look at the template principles explained in http://www.epidata.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/documentation:templateformat and then use the template command tool to create the epx files. A revised template tool will be released at the same time as the next test release. In other words: Do not spend too much time on fine tuning epx files at this point. Datastructures are fine, but details must be expected to change, e.g. specifications of jumps, range, notes etc. The XML structure used in v1.0 will be supported for all future releases after that. regards Jens Lauritsen EpiData Association

12 years, 1 month

Excel data upload into EpiData

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

Jens & Jamie, Thank you for suggestions time to time on Epidata programming that I am working on. We are replacing existing disease database (specific disease) that is in Access plateform with Epidata. The access database was not stable over the years, so lost a chunk of data few times. Hope Epidata is the solution. I completed most programming including several calculated fields, some are very complex assiging risk factors. The data is in MS Excel. It has ~ 2000 data with ~ 100 variables. All the data fields in both (Epiadta QES and Excel) systems are identical except IDNUM is extra in Epidata. I am looking the best way to migrate excel data into the blank epidata. May be I should convert excel to .REC file first, then import, or may be .TXT is better. I have tested with small dataset by cerating .REC file first then import. It did work. Any suggestion would be appriciated. Thanks Bijay On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:01 AM, <epidata-list-request(a)lists.umanitoba.ca>wrote: > Send EpiData-list mailing list submissions to > epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > epidata-list-request(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > You can reach the person managing the list at > epidata-list-owner(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of EpiData-list digest..." > > > EpiData-list mailing list > ___________________________________ > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Export EpiData to Excel - is there a solution/an > alternative? (epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca) > 2. relational files on epodata analysis > (epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca) > 3. Re: relational files on epodata analysis > (epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:03:19 +0200 > From: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Subject: Re: [EpiData-list] Export EpiData to Excel - is there a > solution/an alternative? > To: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Message-ID: > <23065_1313082200_ZZh0y4eF~ > 8kfp.00_4E440B57.4040905(a)uni-bielefeld.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hey everybody, > > thank your so much for your efforts and the enormous help! I need some > time to consider your proposals and the next steps now :-) > > My boss has done a lot of work with Excel and she is just worried 1. > that we have to adapt to a new system and 2. that we can't combine the > data from the Open Office sheets with already existing Excel sheets. > > Thanks again and greetings, > Nina > > > > Am 11.08.2011 17:45, schrieb epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca: > > I suppose the starting point really is to answer the question, "What do I > want to do with the data in Excel?" > > > > ? look at it in a spreadsheet view? - EpiData Analysis can do this > (Browse) > > ? do some simple calculations on some fields? - EpiData Analysis can do > this > > ? do some really complicated calculations on some fields? - just export > some key identifying fields and the fields you need into Excel and merge the > results back into your EpiData file > > ? do some special analysis that is only available in Excel? - same idea, > but I can't think of any that would use very many fields > > ? create a database that will support mail-merge ? - you won't need many > fields for this > > > > If your boss has a fixation on an old version of Excel, then you are > limited to exporting 256 fields (columns). Excel 2010 or newer can handle > over 16,000 columns > > > > Jamie > > > >> thank you very much! I tried to suggest that to my boss but she is not > convinced yet. Are there any other possibilities available? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EpiData-list mailing list > > EpiData-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > > http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list > > > -- > Nina-Claire Himpe > Wiss. Mit. von Prof. Dr. Ulrike Davy > Lehrstuhl für öffentliches Recht, deutsches und > internationales Sozialrecht, Rechtsvergleichung > Fakultät für Rechtswissenschaft > Universität Bielefeld > Postfach 10 01 33 > 33 501 Bielefeld > > UHG T7-109 > Tel.: 0521 - 106 2508 > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:59:24 -0500 > From: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Subject: [EpiData-list] relational files on epodata analysis > To: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Message-ID: > <6c3a19b721250cea381f09c055a1d1f1.squirrel(a)webmail.uady.mx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > I woul like to request a simple exaple to relate 2 files and create a new > one using epidata analysis. > Thank you in advance > > Jose Farfan > > > ----------------------------------------- > "Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán" > http://www.uady.mx/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:50:49 -0400 > From: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Subject: Re: [EpiData-list] relational files on epodata analysis > To: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca > Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP24D73CD429C739981CD0C1FD220(a)phx.gbl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > This is quite simple. Please read the help for the MERGE command in > Analysis. > Here is a simple example in a zip file. >

12 years, 1 month

relational files on epodata analysis

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

I woul like to request a simple exaple to relate 2 files and create a new one using epidata analysis. Thank you in advance Jose Farfan ----------------------------------------- "Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán" http://www.uady.mx/

12 years, 1 month

Export EpiData to Excel - is there a solution/an alternative?

by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca

Dear member of the team, dear all, I am having the following problem and would be very grateful if there was a solution (or alternative) to it: The data I want to export to Excel consists of approximately 960 lines in Epidata formats (= 960 colums in .xls). As I understand EpiData (and as the test with the used data showed) it is impossible to export more than 256 lines to Excel (version 2003) because of the Excel 2003 column limit . Is there any way to export the 960 lines to Excel? Or is there another alternative I should consider? Thank you very much in advance! Greetings, Nina-Claire Himpe

12 years, 1 month

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

EpiData-list August 2011