August 2016 - EpiData-list - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

Jumps in Epidata Entry
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

Dear list, I have two questions regarding Jumps in EpiData Entry. 1) I want to jump to variable v10 if de score for v8 is 1 to 7. Of course this works: v8 RANGE 1 9 COMMENT LEGAL USE oplcat JUMPS 1 v10 2 v10 3 v10 4 v10 5 v10 6 v10 7 v10 END MUSTENTER END Is a shorter syntax possible and if so, how? 2) Is it possible to make a jump defination that depends on the value entered in a previous question? For example: After entering the value for variable v5 I want to jump to v8 if the answer on question v3=1. Kind Regards, Pieter van Groenestijn The Netherlands

2 3

fill fields from COMMENT LEGAL file
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

I'm studying the copydata example to learn how to extract several variables from a file identified in a COMMENT LEGAL statement. In A3.chk, the statement "TYPE COMMENT atransfer" appears. What is atransfer? I don't see where it has been defined as a variable and I don't find it as a system variable. Further, the program seems to be parsing the string in atransfer according to the position of punctuation. Where is the format of this string defined? Perhaps to be a bit more explicit: I have file with a list of CHWs: District, Village, CHW name and a survey conducted by the CHWs. As the data is entered for the survey, I'd like to present pick lists to facilitate entry. The data is quite strictly hierarchical: Villages occur within Districts, an CHWs live in villages. Thank you,

2 3

Serious bug identified (only in a special type of projects with related dataforms) - update to new EntryClient
by EpiData development and support 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

Yesterday - We have identified a bug which have created incorrect data in a certain situation . therefore - an updated EntryClient version has been uploaded (EntryClient 2.0.9.25) today. The change is due to a serious bug in RELATED dataforms. With single dataforms there is NO problem. For most projects with related dataforms the situation is: 1 New observations are added with unique key fields (say "project id"+"date of visit") 2 key values are never changed. Then you have NO problem and your data are correct. But if a project has: a. related set of dataforms (main + one or more child dataforms) b. the key contains MORE than ONE field. c. you have edited (changed) values in one of the key fields after entering records "above" a child form d. child records for more than one observation have the same value in a key field which was edited at a higher level AND you can say YES to all of a+b+c+d there is reason to check your data. If there is doubt for a given project you are welcome to contact us by mail at "info at epidata.dk" for further advice. The situation arose when we changed a flat file structure to a related structure. We split the flat file to four subfiles and imported the data into a related structure. As a first step gave one of three fields of the key the same value, whereas obviously the combination of three fields was unique. Following import this was correct, but after changing all 1000 records we realized the problem. We apologize very much for the inconvenience this might incur, but do hope that you will continue to report any strange behaviour. Only by meticulous observation can we find such unfortunate bugs. regards Jens Lauritsen EpiData Association, Denmark

1 0

AUTO: CN=Louise Cullen/O=NWHB is out of the office. (returning 29/08/2016)
by EpiData development and support 17 Aug '16

17 Aug '16

I am out of the office until 29/08/2016. Please contact Tracey McCole on 071 9852900 if you require further assistance, otherwise I will attend to your email when I return Note: This is an automated response to your message "EpiData-list Digest, Vol 152, Issue 2" sent on 17/08/2016 18:00:19. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. *************************************************************************** "Tá an fhaisnéis sa ríomhphost seo (ceangaltáin san áireamh) faoi rún. Baineann sé leis an té ar seoladh chuige amháin agus tá sé ar intinn go bhfaighfidh siadsan amháin é agus gurb iadsan amháin a dhéanfaidh breithniú air. Más rud é nach tusa an duine ar leis é, tá cosc iomlán ar aon fhaisnéis atá ann, a úsáid, a chraobhscaoileadh, a scaipeadh, a nochtadh, a fhoilsiú, ná a chóipeáil . Seains gurb iad tuairimí pearsanta an údar atá san ríomhphost agus nach tuairimí FSS iad. Má fuair tú an ríomhphost seo trí dhearmad, bheadh muid buíoch dá gcuirfeá in iúil don.Deasc Seirbhísí ECT ar an nguthán ag +353 71 9820555 nó ar an ríomhphost chuig ICT.Helpdesk(a)hse.ie agus ansin glan an ríomhphost seo ded' chóras." *************************************************************************** "Information in this email (including attachments) is confidential. It is intended for receipt and consideration only by the intended recipient.If you are not an addressee or intended recipient, any use, dissemination,distribution, disclosure, publication or copying of information contained in this email is strictly prohibited..Opinions expressed in this email may be personal to the author and are not necessarily the opinions of the HSE. If this email has been received by you in error we would be grateful if you could immediately notify the ICT Service Desk by telephone at +353 71 9820555 or by email to ICT.Helpdesk(a)hse.ie and thereafter delete this e-mail from your system" ***************************************************************************

1 0

RELATE-aware analysis
by EpiData development and support 17 Aug '16

17 Aug '16

Hello. I'm using EpiData 3.1 on windows 7 to enter data into a set of RELATEd .rec files: HNPforms.rec (these are visits to households; data about the building) Adults.rec (data about the adults living in the household) Children.rec (data about the children living in the households) Each visit to a household has a unique ID number, and that number is propagated to a field in each adult's and child's record. There can be multiple visits to each household, so an indicator of initial visit versus revisit is included in HNPforms.rec and is propagated to the records for the adults and children living in that household. Using EpiData Analysis, is there a way to "connect" the child records and the adult records to their own household records, for purposes of analysis? Merging on the unique ID number, so to speak. Thanks. --Chris

1 1

Upcoming updated software versions next week
by EpiData development and support 12 Aug '16

12 Aug '16

About a month ago users experienced unexpected problems with the most recently uploaded public version. The problems were basically very grave and would not allow various aspects of core functionality, e.g. working with value labels. Due to the documented problems we have now implemented a new test principle for EpiData Manager and EntryClient, which will be followed before public release. The tests are structured in a spreadsheet format and performed by local staff here in Denmark (public health students). Based on the tests performed we have found un-disclosed errors, which is a "proof of concept" of the idea to pre-test thoroughly before public release. In contrast to relying on unstructured testing. Early next week we will therefore release new versions for production use and also the spreadsheet, which documents what we do test before release. For coming releases I therefore suggest that users assist in the testing. You may then receive pre-release copies of the software, such that the overall testing can be thorough. Recent experience has shown that some combinations of operating system versions and types (32/64bit) etc have given problems that we have no possibility of neither catching or solving without the help of some of you. In short therefore: be prepared to download new production versions of EntryClient and Manager next week. Regards Jens Lauritsen EpiData Association

1 0