- EpiData-list - University of Manitoba Mailing Lists

Incomplete execution of PGM
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 20 Aug '07

20 Aug '07

Dear All, I am bringing to your kind attention one more and last problem. Hopefully this will be looked into before the release of ver 2 of Epidata Analysis. I have a sample database of distribution of illness according to the socio- economic status in the population. The socio- economic status is divided into 1,2 and 3 classes. The sample SES.pgm is listed below.. *SES.PGM CLS CLOSE SET ECHO=OFF READ "D:\EPIDATA\SES\SES.REC" TYPE "\LTABLE SHOWING ILLNESS IN THE SES CLASS 1" SELECT SES=1 TABLES SEX ILLNESS SELECT TYPE "\LTABLE SHOWING ILLNESS IN THE SES CLASS 2" SELECT SES=2 TABLES SEX ILLNESS SELECT TYPE "\LTABLE SHOWING ILLNESS IN THE SES CLASS 3" SELECT SES=3 TABLES SEX ILLNESS SELECT *END OF PGM When I run the PGM, following output is generated. TABLES SHOWING ILLNESS IN THE SES CLASS 1 Sex Illness F M Total N 2 1 3 Y 0 3 3 Total 2 4 6 TABLES SHOWING ILLNESS IN THE SES CLASS 2 No data! Operation aborted Since there is no data in the socio-economic class 2, the PGM aborts the operation. The rest of the PGM is not processed. I am attaching a sample SES.ZIP containing the necessary qes, chk and rec files. The latest test ver 2 (build 112b) of Epi Analysis was used. If this feature is looked into, large PGMs can be run without sny break. Is there any solution of this problem? Dr. Shavinder Singh

1 0

reuse labels in several files
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 17 Aug '07

17 Aug '07

epidata-list-request(a)lists.umanitoba.ca wrote: > Often, one uses questionnaires where the items and a value labels might > be identical for dozens or more questions. It seems that EpiData creates > a block in the .CHK file that applies to one variable only. Is there a > way to apply the same checks and labels to several variables at the same > time? > Technique 1: Common label definitions in EpiData.LBL. When you start EpiData Entry there is a default label collection. If you often use the same labels then edit the file EpiData.lbl which you will find in the same folder as the EpiData Enter system (epidata.exe) installed. Then for a given new file create the rec file and in the Enter system use "Add/revise" to add checks to the file. a Go to the first of the variables which should have a given label b. Choose from the list of your predefined labels contained in "Epidata.lbl" and read into the definition box. c. Now switch back to the field in question (F6 goes from the definition box to the field and vice versa). d. Press Ctrl+C e. Move the cursor to each of the other fields and press Ctrl+V and the definition is copied. It takes very short time. If you are thing instead of missing values etc. look in the help file: MISSINGVALUE Missing value has three syntaxes: MISSINGVALUE x [y [z]] which can be used in fieldblocks, and MISSINGVALUE ALL x [y [z]] which can be used in BEFORE FILE blocks, and MISSINGVALUE field1-field5, field6 …. x [y [z]] which can be used in BEFORE FILE blocks You see that in this case you can use syntax similar to Stata x-y . But for labels the trick above is the only possible. Technique 2: automatic revise of a larger file for subsets: The other technique to use is to create a common (large) file with all relevant questions, properly labelled. Then for a given substudy do: 1. create copies of the common large rec file and associated chk file 2. create copy of qes file 3. edit the qes file and delete sections not currently needed. 4. choose the rec file for entering data. Enter will "see" that the qes file has a more recent date and time and will suggest to adapt the structure to the qes file. Say yes to this and you will see that a number of no longer used variables will be removed including the chk for those. In terms of the analysis programme the issue is somewhat different, but I read the question as being relevant for entry. regards Jens Lauritsen EpiData Association

1 0

Epidata: apply the same value labels and validity checks to many variables
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 17 Aug '07

17 Aug '07

Hi, Often, one uses questionnaires where the items and a value labels might be identical for dozens or more questions. It seems that EpiData creates a block in the .CHK file that applies to one variable only. Is there a way to apply the same checks and labels to several variables at the same time? I appreciate that one can go into a text editor and copy the block as many times as necessary and then changing the variable names. it would be great if one could use syntax similar to SPSS or Stata where information can be applied to a variable list such as VAR001-VAR010 the same way it is applied to individual variables. Thanks! John LeBlanc __________________________________________________________ John C. LeBlanc, MD, MSc, FRCPC Associate Professor Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Community Health and Epidemiology Dalhousie University IWK Health Centre Work phone: (902) 470-8930 5850 University Avenue Work fax: (902) 470-6913 Halifax, Nova Scotia Email: John.LeBlanc(a)Dal.Ca B3K 6R8 CANADA Pager: (902) 470-8888 __________________________________________________________

1 1

Relational Files Relate Error
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 14 Aug '07

14 Aug '07

Dear All, I have a relational database comprising of 8 data entry forms. The structure is as follow; FFNO FAMIDNUM CARD Family --------------- Ecouple ----------------------- Under5 ------ Growth Monitoring form | | | | | FFNO | CSNO | | | | Agesex Form Contraception The field names in capital are unique key fields for relating the form during data entry. When I relate Growth Monitoring form Under5 form, the relating happens. When I relate Under5 Form with Ecouple the following message is displayed. Loading data D:\EpiData\Try\Gm.rec, please wait.. Excluded: 1243184 records marked for deletion File name : D:\EpiData\Try\Gm.rec Growth Monitoring Register Fields: 9 Total records: 6 Included: 6 . relate card UNDER5 Loading data D:\EpiData\Try\UNDER5.REC, please wait.. Excluded: 1243148 records marked for deletion File name : D:\EpiData\Try\UNDER5.REC . relate FAMIDNUM Ecouple Loading data D:\EpiData\Try\Ecouple.REC, please wait.. Excluded: 1243148 records marked for deletion 1 4218388 The relation happens only up to 2 forms only. What is meant by the error message 1 4218388 Is there any way out. I am doing it through EPI6 at present which does it seamlessly. Do we still have development issue regarding RELATE command in the Epidata Analysis (Ver 2 Build 112b). I am attaching this sample database in the form of CHC ZIP. Please enlighten upon this problem. Sincerely, Dr. Shavinder .

1 1

EpiData-list Digest
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 14 Aug '07

14 Aug '07

Hello, Two questions : - in the last version (build 122), how to obtain the same result with "set table label = on/ff" than anterior versions ? - in the further versions, is it possible to obtain a box-plot with two or more co-variables ? Thank you B. Branger, Nantes, France

1 0

Floating point error in analysis (describe)
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 06 Aug '07

06 Aug '07

re: "invalid floating pint" error with DESCRIBE in Analysis > I use the command line editor to issue DESCRIBE * command, and I get descriptive summaries of all variables, including the variable called AMOUNT. > > But when I issue the command DESCRIBE AMOUNT, I get an error message: Invalid floating point operation > > Please do the following: 1. Download the most recent testing version of EpiData Analysis: www.epidata.dk/testing.php 2. Retry the same analysis 3. Report to the list if the problem persisted. 4. If the problem persisted: a. pack your data file in a zip file (e.g. with epidata entry - tools menu). b. report the error to the epidata mantis system http://www.epidata.dk/php/mantis/login_page.php and upload the zip file as part of the error report. Kind regards Jens Lauritsen EpiData Association

1 2

how to sum numeric variables even if one of the variables is empty
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 06 Aug '07

06 Aug '07

Hello I would like to make an automatic sum (see: variable "daystotadm") of a series of variables (see: variable "daysadm1-2..."), but if only one of these variable is empty, the automatic calculation using the function SUM give a null result. Do anyone know a way to solve this problem without the need to enter a value for each variable. In my file I don not necessarily enter all the five lines and the number of days is already a calculated field? I attach the qes and the check files Thank you Francesco Grandesso QES FILE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of entry Date of exit Number of days -------------------------------------------- --------------- {dateentry1} <dd/mm/yyyy> {dateexit1} <dd/mm/yyyy> {daysadm1} ### {dateentry2} <dd/mm/yyyy> {dateexit2} <dd/mm/yyyy> {daysadm2} ### {dateentry3} <dd/mm/yyyy> {dateexit3} <dd/mm/yyyy> {daysadm3} ### {dateentry4} <dd/mm/yyyy> {dateexit4} <dd/mm/yyyy> {daysadm4} ### {dateentry5} <dd/mm/yyyy> {dateexit5} <dd/mm/yyyy> {daysadm5} ### -------------------------------------------- --------------- {daystotadm} Total days #### CHK FILE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- dateexit1 AFTER ENTRY daysadm1=(dateexit1-dateentry1) daystotadm=SUM(daysadm1,daysadm2,daysadm3,daysadm4,daysadm5) END END daysadm1 NOENTER END .................... and so on for each of the five dateexit* and daysadm* variables __________________________________________ Francesco Grandesso EPICENTRE 8, Rue Saint Sabin 75011 Paris, France tel +33 (0)1 4021 2847 fax +33 (0)1 4021 2803 email Francesco.GRANDESSO(a)epicentre.msf.org

1 1

Chris Sellers/FHS/ADPH is out of the office.
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 04 Aug '07

04 Aug '07

I will be out of the office starting 08/03/2007 and will not return until 08/09/2007. I will check emails periodically while I am away. If an issue needs immediate attention, please, contact Fred Grady at FredGrady(a)adph.state.al.us. Otherwise, I will respond to your email when I return.

1 0

Command Set replace logfile=on
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 04 Aug '07

04 Aug '07

Dear Epidata Team friends, I want to get the html file output form datafile by a PGM. I want to replace the previous output in the defined folder by the new output. The commands in my PGM are as follows; Set replace logfile=on Logopen The quarterly report file . 2007 /close Error message displayed is Replace Logfile not supported I change Set replace logfile=on to another command set replace datafile=on That also does not help. The help file about /close , /replace switches of Logopen command is not clear because it does not work as expected. If you close and reload Epidata Analysis, it works only once and displays error message when the PGM is run second time in the same session. What is the right command syntax? I am using trial version 2 (build 112). With regards, Shavinder Singh

1 0

Command Set replace logfile=on
by epidata-list＠lists.umanitoba.ca 03 Aug '07

03 Aug '07

Dear Epidata Team friends, I want to get the html file output form datafile by a PGM. I want to replace the previous output in the defined folder by the new output. The commands in my PGM are as follows; Set replace logfile=on Logopen The quarterly report file . 2007 /close Error message displayed is Replace Logfile not supported I change Set replace logfile=on to another command set replace datafile=on That also does not help. The help file about /close , /replace switches of Logopen command is not clear because it does not work as expected. If you close and reload Epidata Analysis, it works only once and displays error message when the PGM is run second time in the same session. What is the right command syntax? I am using trial version 2 (build 112). With regards, Shavinder Singh

1 0