Hello,
For the last version of EPIDATA ANALYSIS (24 May 2013) :
- the first veiwer screen is black (it changes after le first
commands..) : why ?
- in Help, I don't find for the tables command : /t, /c, /o, /r.. Why ?
Ok I seen "set statistics="OR CHI...", but I have a message error.
- Idem for epitables or etab command, I have a message error.
Thank you for your help.
Bernard BRANGER, Nantes, France
PS : the new link for "Course Materials in Franch" is :
http://www.reseau-naissance.fr/module-pagesetter-viewpub-tid-2-pid-28.html
Thank you
Dear users,
As I attempted to copy structure on an existing file in the dialogue box
"Copy file structure" the options check box for "copy *c*heck file" is not
accessible. What could be the problem?
Omala
Dear users,
As I attempted to copy structure on an existing file in the dialogue box
"Copy file structure" the options check box for "copy *c*heck file" is not
accessible. What could be the problem?
Omala
On 13 June 2013 20:00, <epidata-list-request(a)lists.umanitoba.ca> wrote:
> Send EpiData-list mailing list submissions to
> epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> epidata-list-request(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> epidata-list-owner(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of EpiData-list digest..."
>
>
> EpiData-list mailing list
> ___________________________________
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Bug on import in Manager (public release 1.4.1.0)
> (epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca)
> 2. How to count the number of missing values in an
> observation/record/row (epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca)
> 3. Re: How to count the number of missing values in an
> observation/record/row (epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:05:33 GMT
> From: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
> Subject: [EpiData-list] Bug on import in Manager (public release
> 1.4.1.0)
> To: <epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca>
> Message-ID: <1371110733382.14178.2158@webmail02>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> We have found a bug in the most recent public release version of EpiData
> Manager 1.4.1.0.
>
> With the bug import of epx and other files into a project with "renaming"
> of value label sets gives an error. This will be fixed and a new version
> uploaded within short time. (days)
>
> This is only relevant for the situation where you add files depending on
> naming of value label sets.
>
> If other bugs have been identified please report, such that we can fix
> these as well.
>
> regards
>
> Jens Lauritsen
> EpiData Association
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:39:48 +0700
> From: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
> Subject: [EpiData-list] How to count the number of missing values in
> an observation/record/row
> To: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAPLSYrXc_P9+LsC0wDO0Yvm1WCAfpYuLhOP+5c1O-JkfNSNtKA(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dear sirs/madams,
>
> My name is Anh. I am a student from Vietnam. I would like to calculate the
> number of missing values/entered values in a record.
>
> I had a look at Epidata manual but I could not find any relevant
> instructions. Could you please help me with this problem?
>
> Thank you so much,
>
> Anh Dang
>
> ........................................................
>
> Details of my problem:
>
> My checklist contains 5 variables. Each variable is given a score (0,1,2),
> but in some records, a few variables are left blank because they are not
> relevant. The final score is calculated by dividing the sum of score of
> each variable (don't take the missing into account) by the 'total number of
> entered variables'.
> id var1 var2 var3 var4 var5
> 1 2 1 1 0 final score =
> (2+1+1+0)/4 ( I use the command 'ignoremissing' to get the sum)
> 2 2 2 2 1 1 final score =
> (2+2+2+1+1)/5
> 3 1 1 final score=(1+1)/2
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:44:26 -0400
> From: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
> Subject: Re: [EpiData-list] How to count the number of missing values
> in an observation/record/row
> To: epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
> Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP795C0548F993B63377ADD1FD870(a)phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I assume you are doing this in Analysis. The solution is similar for a
> .chk file, but the syntax is different. It is also a bit tricky doing this
> in a .chk file because values can be changed after the calculation is done
> if you are not careful.
>
> * c is count of non-missing variables
> * s is sum of non-missing variables
> * score is final score (average of non-missing variables)
>
> gen c=0
> gen s=0
> if var1 <> . then c=c+1
> if var1 <> . then s=s+var1
> if var2 <> . then c=c+1
> if var2 <> . then s=s+var2
> if var3 <> . then c=c+1
> if var3 <> . then s=s+var3
> if var4 <> . then c=c+1
> if var4 <> . then s=s+var4
> if var5 <> . then c=c+1
> if var5 <> . then s=s+var5
> gen score = s/c
>
> if you do not have any defined missing values, you can also calculate c
> this way:
>
> c = 5-mv(var1)-mv(var2)-mv(var3)-mv(var4)-mv(var5)
>
> and you can also calculate s this way:
>
> s=iif(var1<>. , var1,0)+iif(var2<>. , var2,0)+iif(var3<>. ,
> var3,0)+iif(var4<>. , var4,0)+iif(var5<>. , var5,0)
>
> Check the help for these functions to see how they work: mv() and iif()
>
> Jamie
>
> On 2013-06-13, at 3:39 AM, epidata-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca wrote:
>
> >
> > Details of my problem:
> >
> > My checklist contains 5 variables. Each variable is given a score
> (0,1,2),
> > but in some records, a few variables are left blank because they are not
> > relevant. The final score is calculated by dividing the sum of score of
> > each variable (don't take the missing into account) by the 'total number
> of
> > entered variables'.
> > id var1 var2 var3 var4 var5
> > 1 2 1 1 0 final score =
> > (2+1+1+0)/4 ( I use the command 'ignoremissing' to get the sum)
> > 2 2 2 2 1 1 final score =
> > (2+2+2+1+1)/5
> > 3 1 1 final
> score=(1+1)/2
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
> EpiData-list(a)lists.umanitoba.ca
> http://lists.umanitoba.ca/mailman/listinfo/epidata-list
>
>
> End of EpiData-list Digest, Vol 116, Issue 3
> ********************************************
>
I am out of the office until 04/07/2013.
Please contact Tracey McCole on 071 9852900 or Carol O Donnell on 074
9125888 ext 5047 if you require further assistance, otherwise I will attend
to your email when I return
Note: This is an automated response to your message "EpiData-list Digest,
Vol 116, Issue 5" sent on 19/06/2013 18:00:46.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
***************************************************************************
"Tá an fhaisnéis sa ríomhphost seo (ceangaltáin san áireamh) faoi rún. Baineann sé leis an té ar seoladh chuige amháin agus tá sé ar intinn go bhfaighfidh siadsan amháin é agus gurb iadsan amháin a dhéanfaidh breithniú air. Más rud é nach tusa an duine ar leis é, tá cosc iomlán ar aon fhaisnéis atá ann, a úsáid, a chraobhscaoileadh, a scaipeadh, a nochtadh, a fhoilsiú, ná a chóipeáil . Seains gurb iad tuairimí pearsanta an údar atá san ríomhphost agus nach tuairimí FSS iad.
Má fuair tú an ríomhphost seo trí dhearmad, bheadh muid buíoch dá gcuirfeá in iúil don.Deasc Seirbhísí ECT ar an nguthán ag +353 71 9820555 nó ar an ríomhphost chuig ICT.Helpdesk(a)hse.ie agus ansin glan an ríomhphost seo ded' chóras."
***************************************************************************
"Information in this email (including attachments) is confidential. It is intended for receipt and consideration only by the intended recipient.If you are not an addressee or intended recipient, any use, dissemination,distribution, disclosure, publication or copying of information contained in this email is strictly prohibited..Opinions expressed in this email may be personal to the author and are not necessarily the opinions of the HSE.
If this email has been received by you in error we would be grateful if you could immediately notify the ICT Service Desk by telephone at +353 71 9820555 or by email to ICT.Helpdesk(a)hse.ie and thereafter delete this e-mail from your system"
***************************************************************************
Hi,
I plan to use Epidata for a clinical study. A problem / bug came up when I tried to do double entry of data. To prepare double entry, Epidata saves a copy of the project. But it is for me not possible to save this file. I get an error message "Error saving file! - this file filename.double.epx could not be saved" I have tried to rename the file and change destination, but still not working.
Anybody else with this problem?
I´m using
Epidata project tools v1.4.1.1 (manager and entry client)
OS X v10.8.4 on a MacBook Pro
Best regards / Venlig hilsen
Kresten Rickers
PhD Student, MD
Orthopedic Research Lab.
University Hospital of Aarhus
http://www.orf-aarhus.dk<http://www.orf-aarhus.dk/>
+45 78 46 15 11
rickers(a)ki.au.dk<mailto:rickers@ki.au.dk>
Dear sirs/madams,
My name is Anh. I am a student from Vietnam. I would like to calculate the
number of missing values/entered values in a record.
I had a look at Epidata manual but I could not find any relevant
instructions. Could you please help me with this problem?
Thank you so much,
Anh Dang
........................................................
Details of my problem:
My checklist contains 5 variables. Each variable is given a score (0,1,2),
but in some records, a few variables are left blank because they are not
relevant. The final score is calculated by dividing the sum of score of
each variable (don't take the missing into account) by the 'total number of
entered variables'.
id var1 var2 var3 var4 var5
1 2 1 1 0 final score =
(2+1+1+0)/4 ( I use the command 'ignoremissing' to get the sum)
2 2 2 2 1 1 final score =
(2+2+2+1+1)/5
3 1 1 final score=(1+1)/2
We have found a bug in the most recent public release version of EpiData Manager 1.4.1.0.
With the bug import of epx and other files into a project with "renaming" of value label sets gives an error. This will be fixed and a new version uploaded within short time. (days)
This is only relevant for the situation where you add files depending on naming of value label sets.
If other bugs have been identified please report, such that we can fix these as well.
regards
Jens Lauritsen
EpiData Association
Version 1.4.1 of Manager og EntryClient has been uploaded for generel
production usage from http://www.epidata.dk
Changes are as follows:
EntryClient: When F9 or "show value labels" is active the first value
label is selected as the default.
Manager:
Validate duplicate issues with creation of verification file and
selection of fields for comparison has been fixed.
Default name of value label sets is now valuelabel_<fieldname>
Reports and file lists now indicate cycle number (automatic version coding)
Minor other text adaptations
Export to DDI format now validates correctly against DDI-3.1 as can be
verified on:
http://snd.gu.se/sv/ddi/validator
Just paste the created XML into the field "DDI xml" and hit "validate"
All other aspects of function are the same as in the first 1.4.0 release
last week.
Regards
Jens Lauritsen and Torsten Christiansen
EpiData Association
Denmark
The public version 1.4 of EpiData Manager and EntryClient, plus the minor adaptive release of EpiData Analysis were released on May 24.
As noted in a previous mail there are some issues in relation to validate duplicate, DDI export and a few other issues.
Since the number of public releases should be kept low I have decided to wait a few more days before uploading an updated bug-fix version of Manager and EntryClient.
I am aware of some details reported in relation to Analysis and lifetable analysis. These will be taken care of soon.
If you have found any issue not mentioned on this list, then please discuss as soon as possible, such that we can fix these issues - if needed.
Meanwhile I can disclose, that the next expermental version for testing will contain a scripting facility, such that scripts can be run before and/or after entry in a given field. This will replace the current "calculate" tab in properties for fields.
Examplescripts are:
if V1 = 1 then goto V2
else
if V1 = 2 then goto V3;
V4 = V1 + V2 + V3 ;
V5 = V1*V2*V3;
regards
Jens Lauritsen
EpiData Association